There's a mistake in HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey , so I'd like to ask that
someone fix it, or that I be given editing rights.
The mistake is that in the section on CentOS 6, step 8, the correct
command is syslinux /dev/sdb1 (only).
Also, although this isn't a mistake, I'd like to suggest
On 29 April 2012 19:30, Yves Bellefeuille y...@storm.ca wrote:
There's a mistake in HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey , so I'd like to ask that
someone fix it, or that I be given editing rights.
The mistake is that in the section on CentOS 6, step 8, the correct
command is syslinux /dev/sdb1 (only).
Hi,
So I updated my guest from 5.1 to 5.8 via a complete yum update, many many
packages BTW.
I shutdown the guest, change its Disk bus from IDE to Virtio and then upon
boot, I get kernel panics as no disk can be found. I do get the splash screen
at first however.
My guest has /dev/hda,
On Apr 29, 2012, at 7:18 PM, Nux! wrote:
On 29.04.2012 23:49, aurfalien wrote:
Hi,
So I updated my guest from 5.1 to 5.8 via a complete yum update, many
many packages BTW.
I shutdown the guest, change its Disk bus from IDE to Virtio and
then upon boot, I get kernel panics as no disk
Hola!!
He cometido un grave error jugando con los enlaces simbólicos y ahora mi
sistema no arranca. El problema es que en /dir hice unlink libc.so.6 e
inmediatamente todo dejó de funcionar nisiquiera podía hacer un ls.
Arranque desde USB con una distro linux de rescate (systemrescue) y
montando
Reboot.. y nada, empiezan a cantar errores de kernelsyslog, sendmail,
todos diciendo que se revise systemctl. Parece que ha sido suficiente con
restaurar el enlace, algo ha quedado inestable. ¿Hay que hacer alguna otra
operación? Porque no realmente el enlace está exactamente como estaba
Es la primera vez que oigo algo así, pero por lo descrito me parece que
puedes estar cometiendo un error al recrear el enlace simbólico, en lugar
de enlazar a la librería de tu disco puedes estar haciendo el enlace a una
librería de tu USB, así usaste algo cómo: ln -s /usr/lib/... /usr/lib/...
On 04/29/2012 12:00 AM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
On Saturday 28 April 2012, Phil Savoie psavoie1...@rogers.com wrote:
default=1
Remember that Grub starts counting with 0, not with 1. The default is
the second stanza, not the first.
kernel
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 13:55, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
I thought I spammed here as well last night when I sent to the SL
list, but appears not. Sorry for the noise.
Anyway, for those of you interested to run the RPMs from the
libreoffice.org tarball instead of the stock packages, I put
On 29.04.2012 21:07, Vnpenguin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 13:55, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
I thought I spammed here as well last night when I sent to the SL
list, but appears not. Sorry for the noise.
Anyway, for those of you interested to run the RPMs from the
libreoffice.org tarball
On 04/27/2012 01:55 PM, Nux! wrote:
I thought I spammed here as well last night when I sent to the SL
list, but appears not. Sorry for the noise.
Anyway, for those of you interested to run the RPMs from the
libreoffice.org tarball instead of the stock packages, I put them all in
a repo.
On 29.04.2012 23:36, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 04/27/2012 01:55 PM, Nux! wrote:
I thought I spammed here as well last night when I sent to the SL
list, but appears not. Sorry for the noise.
Anyway, for those of you interested to run the RPMs from the
libreoffice.org tarball instead of
Shaun cen...@stinkfish.org wrote:
I just need to be really careful about the remove command in future.
I've found that breaking things is always the fastest path to a great
education.
--
Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd
(04) 460-2531 : (021) 295-1923
Getting module_request errors from SELinux. Errors being thrown by
metacity
sendmail.postfix
cleanup
trivial-rewarite
local
postdrop
pickup
All errors are essentially the same
System was working well until I began to apply some basic security
hardening configuration.
Postfix
14 matches
Mail list logo
