CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0703
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0703.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
El 30/05/12, Daniel danielog2...@gmail.com escribió:
Entonces el orden de las líneas si afecta? Es como Iptables? Muchas gracias,
Saludos
Hola, para squid el archivo te indica dónde poner la reglas, por
ejemplo yo siempre pongo mis ACLS al final de todas las acls (que ya
estan) y los
hola bunos dias a todos tengo un problema mas bien dos el primero soy
muy novato en linux el segundo es que tengo un servidor Centos 5.4 y al
tratar de actualizarlo con yum -y updata me menda este error:
oaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
*
On 05/30/2012 11:21 PM, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
Hi,
I am running Nagios on CentOS release 5.5 (Final). Any clue about the below
warning? Please let me know if any one needs any additional information.
/usr/sbin/nagios -v /etc/nagios/nagios.cfg
Nagios 2.12
Copyright (c) 1999-2007 Ethan
On 05/30/2012 04:00 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
On 5/30/2012 3:35 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
On 05/30/2012 08:26 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
Greetings,
Are there any summary CentOS numbers available?
yes
The number of subscribers to this email list, and the number of server
installs?
There are
On 30 May 2012 21:14, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote:
Jerry,
I believe that by default the network is down and the BOOTPROTO=dhcp is
not in the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethx. I encountered a
similar issue on a KVM guest with minimal install
Earl
Was there
Hello,
I'm considering buying a Lenovo Thinkpad X220 *Tablet*.
Does anybody run CentOS 6 on it?
Is the multitouch working?
Thanks in advance for any hint,
Mathieu
PS: I have checked thinkwiki.org already
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 13:49 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
restorecon -R -v /var/run
I think the directory is mislabeled.
Hello,
It looks like it is mislabelled by default. If I set the context of
'/var/run/net-snmp' to 'snmpd_var_run_t' then the use of pass_persist
works fine.
I'll submit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 07:59 AM, John Horne wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 13:49 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
restorecon -R -v /var/run
I think the directory is mislabeled.
Hello,
It looks like it is mislabelled by default. If I set the context of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 07:59 AM, John Horne wrote:
Ok in Fedora we have /var/run/net-snmpd, is /var/run/net-snmp a standard
directory for this?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 08:43 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Ok in Fedora we have /var/run/net-snmpd, is /var/run/net-snmp a standard
directory for this?
Hello,
What I have is:
Fedora 15:
=
ls -ldZ /var/run/net-snmp
drwxr-xr-x. root root
Not technically a centos question, but a lot of you guys seem to manage
some large systems
and I could use some clarification on a postfix setting.*
*reject_unknown_client_hostname
(in postfix 2.3 reject_unknown_client)
When I first used this there were issues with users trying to send mail
Not technically a centos question, but a lot of you guys seem to manage
some large systems
and I could use some clarification on a postfix setting.*
*reject_unknown_client_hostname
(in postfix 2.3 reject_unknown_client)
When I first used this there were issues with users trying to send
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 08:51 AM, John Horne wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 08:43 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Ok in Fedora we have /var/run/net-snmpd, is /var/run/net-snmp a standard
directory for this?
Hello,
What I have is:
Fedora 15:
On 30.5.2012 22:48, Bob Hoffman wrote:
On 5/30/2012 3:35 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
On 05/30/2012 08:26 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
Greetings,
Are there any summary CentOS numbers available?
yes
The number of subscribers to this email list, and the number of server
installs?
There are
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 09:29 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
It looks like /var/run/net-snmp is correct, I will fix our policy and get it
into RHEL6.4
Hello,
I received a reply via Miroslav Grepl that this is already fixed. The
bug report is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822480
On 31/05/12 14:09, Bob Hoffman wrote:
Not technically a centos question, but a lot of you guys seem to manage
some large systems
and I could use some clarification on a postfix setting.*
*reject_unknown_client_hostname
(in postfix 2.3 reject_unknown_client)
When I first used this there
Hello all.
We recently purchased HP Proliant DL380 G7 server and also a HP Lefthand
P4500 G2 24TB iSCSI box.
The server itself has Quad Ethernet based on the BCM5709 Chipset from
Broadcom (NetXtreme II).
My main question is about iSCSI offload mechanism, as iSCSI itself is
pretty new to me
On 5/31/2012 9:59 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 31/05/12 14:09, Bob Hoffman wrote:
Not technically a centos question, but a lot of you guys seem to manage
some large systems
and I could use some clarification on a postfix setting.*
*reject_unknown_client_hostname
(in postfix 2.3
Bob Hoffman wrote:
Not technically a centos question, but a lot of you guys seem to manage
some large systems and I could use some clarification on a postfix
setting.*
*reject_unknown_client_hostname
(in postfix 2.3 reject_unknown_client)
When I first used this there were issues with users
Bob Hoffman wrote:
On 5/31/2012 9:59 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 31/05/12 14:09, Bob Hoffman wrote:
Not technically a centos question, but a lot of you guys seem to manage
some large systems
and I could use some clarification on a postfix setting.*
nsip
on a side note, I tested apews.org as a
On 5/31/2012 10:20 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I guarantee that those folks with too-smart-for-their-own-good phones
will send directly from them. Having never looked at a header from an
email sent via iPhone, I don't know - don't they have a legit mailserver
as their gateway?
yea, that is
On 05/29/2012 01:41 PM, Gene Poole wrote:
OK, I did the deal and I am in the process of upgrading/migrating from
CentOS 5.8 x86_64 to CentOS 6.2 x86_64. But, I'm stuck with a gnome GUI
that only sees 1024x768. Under CentOS 5.8 it saw 1920x1080 (without much
work from me). The command I
I have installed Centos 6.2 on:
1) Tyan S2892 with ATI on board Rage XL graphics ( Centos x86_64
version), 8GB memory, 3ware Raid array
2) Supermicro Dual Xeon Single core, old machine, with ATI onboard Rage
XL graphics (Centos i386 version), 12GB memory, 3ware Raid array
Both machines exhibit
On 31/05/12 15:16, Bob Hoffman wrote:
On 5/31/2012 9:59 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 31/05/12 14:09, Bob Hoffman wrote:
Not technically a centos question, but a lot of you guys seem to manage
some large systems
and I could use some clarification on a postfix setting.*
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
Hello,
I have a strong suspicion that something is not working right on my el6 laptop.
I have a usb 3g dongle that works fine on windows and ubuntu. It's one of those
ZTE dual-personality devices (usb id 19d2:2000). When it's plugged in, it
appears as usb storge device, then needs to be
On May 31, 2012, at 6:09 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
Not technically a centos question, but a lot of you guys seem to manage
some large systems
and I could use some clarification on a postfix setting.*
*reject_unknown_client_hostname
(in postfix 2.3 reject_unknown_client)
When I first
I hadn't paid attention when one or two folks recently posted this, but
it's hit us, also:
$ sealert -l d1655210-f43c-4737-98dc-86b6aac82bb6
Entity: line 53: parser error : Input is not proper UTF-8, indicate
encoding !
Bytes: 0x99 0x3C 0x2F 0x74
tpath`/tpath
^
failed
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I hadn't paid attention when one or two folks recently posted this, but
it's hit us, also:
$ sealert -l d1655210-f43c-4737-98dc-86b6aac82bb6
Entity: line 53: parser error : Input is not proper UTF-8, indicate
encoding !
Bytes: 0x99 0x3C 0x2F 0x74
Hi,
Has anyone ever actually implemented a replicating iSCSI SAN using CentOS? I
saw directions here:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Ha-Drbd
It looks doable, but I am not the strongest linux person and would like to hear
if anyone has tried and if there any caveats. Also, I noticed that
Postfix on CentOS-6.2 evidently does not use upstart style
configurations. The author evidently has no plans on altering
Postfix's structure to accommodate upstart any time soon, if ever
(http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/274670).
Thus Postfix starts and stops using a
On 05/31/12 11:46 AM, Beth Albertson wrote:
Has anyone ever actually implemented a replicating iSCSI SAN using CentOS? I
saw directions here:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Ha-Drbd
It looks doable, but I am not the strongest linux person and would like to
hear if anyone has tried and if
On Wed May 30 17:57:49 EDT 2012, Nataraj wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 17:00, James B. Byrne wrote:
I am trying, without success, to create an upstart config file to
automatically start and restart an ssh proxy. The command sting that
I use in the script has been checked and verified from the
On 05/31/2012 10:35 AM, Craig White wrote:
On May 31, 2012, at 6:09 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
Not technically a centos question, but a lot of you guys seem to manage
some large systems
and I could use some clarification on a postfix setting.*
*reject_unknown_client_hostname
(in postfix 2.3
On Wednesday, May 30, 2012 02:56:24 PM Max Pyziur wrote:
My hope is to upgrade; that way I don't have to change/specify partition
topology, and hopefully only minimally adjust the existing configurations.
I have tried this type of upgrade before; I have not had it go well for the
most part.
I have an issue with CentOS 6.2's autofs/automount. When I issue service
autofs start (or restart) the automount daemon starts as expected, however, I
am not able to access any of the exports nfs directories; but if I shutdown the
automount daemon and start it by just issuing
Hello all,
I have a server on my private network that is configured as an NIS server
and mapped to a public IP address on a firewall. All other TCP ports
(SSH, iperf, you name it) are visible from the outside - but the
portmapper-managed ports (port 111 itself and the YPSERV/YPXFRD ports,
etc.)
Boris Epstein wrote:
Hello all,
I have a server on my private network that is configured as an NIS server
and mapped to a public IP address on a firewall. All other TCP ports
(SSH, iperf, you name it) are visible from the outside - but the
portmapper-managed ports (port 111 itself and the
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Boris Epstein wrote:
Hello all,
I have a server on my private network that is configured as an NIS server
and mapped to a public IP address on a firewall. All other TCP ports
(SSH, iperf, you name it) are visible from the outside
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
i will not buy the argument with the hardware because
i had in the last years 4 notebooks, 3 workstations
and two different notebooks of my co-developer which
all done many dist-upgrades well if you know how
to
Well, this is getting more and more unpleasant. Turned out my manager and
the other admin were also working on this. One of the times they restarted
*something*, or maybe my reinstall, took care of the first problem.
Now, however, we're seeing a ton of exceptions... and what's struck me is
that
On Thu, 31 May 2012, Boris Epstein wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Boris Epstein wrote:
Hello all,
I have a server on my private network that is configured as an NIS
server and mapped to a public IP address on a firewall. All
other TCP ports (SSH, iperf,
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2012, Boris Epstein wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Boris Epstein wrote:
Hello all,
I have a server on my private network that is configured as an NIS
server and
On 05/31/2012 04:28 PM, OVERBEY, DUDLEY wrote:
I have an issue with CentOS 6.2's autofs/automount. When I issue service
autofs start (or restart) the automount daemon starts as expected, however,
I am not able to access any of the exports nfs directories; but if I shutdown
the automount
45 matches
Mail list logo
