CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0738
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0738.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0737
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0737.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:0739
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0739.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:0739
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0739.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0740
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0740.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:0739
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0739.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
Buenas Tardes Lista,
Hablar alguna manera de bloquear sitios con el dansguardian pero para el https
lo he googleado pero no he encontrado.
Espero que me puedan ayudar.
Slds
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
On 06/14/2012 04:01 PM, Getzan Avila wrote:
Buenas Tardes Lista,
Hablar alguna manera de bloquear sitios con el dansguardian pero
para el https lo he googleado pero no he encontrado.
a ver, el dansguardian recibe las peticiones del squid. El squid recibe
las peticiones de dos formas:
1-
Dansguardian no filtra el puerto https tampoco squid, lo que yo hago el
bloquear la ip por iptables.
Recuerda que el puerto 443 viaja encriptado.
Saludos
Pablo
-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En
nombre de Getzan Avila
Enviado
Si configuras OpenDNS, se puede establecer que ademas filtre por
categoría de los sitios, todas las peticiones.
En mi empresa (bah, donde trabajo) fue implementado y ayudo bastante
--
Diego - Yo no soy paranoico! (pero que me siguen, me siguen)
___
On 6/14/12, Smithies, Russell russell.smith...@agresearch.co.nz wrote:
How about using one of the backup tools to image the server?
We use Symantec System Recovery and image all the disks. We then have the
option of restoring to different hardware (physical or virtual) which works
very well.
A client is insisting to install CentOS 6.2 32 bit version [1] on a
system with 4GB RAM.
Lately, I have done 64 bit installations only; not sure if the 32 bit
kernel supports pae for = 4GB RAM.
If anyone knows the answer please let me know (will save me time on an
installation in my setup).
[1]
Am 14.06.2012 09:46, schrieb Arun Khan:
A client is insisting to install CentOS 6.2 32 bit version [1] on a
system with 4GB RAM.
Lately, I have done 64 bit installations only; not sure if the 32 bit
kernel supports pae for = 4GB RAM.
If anyone knows the answer please let me know (will
On 06/14/12 12:46 AM, Arun Khan wrote:
[1] The Client's ERP vendor has validated the application on the 32
bit platform only thus the reason for 32 bit version.
the client should find a ERP vendor who's not stuck back in the 90s.
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
Hello everybody,
I installed Centos 6.2 on a computer with an older version of it in
order to dual boot both of them. I managed to install the new OS on a
physically seperated hard drive, and configured grub to make the newly
installed OS the default one. Now the older OS won't boot and this
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote:
https://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/6.0_Release_Notes/kernel.html
see 12.6.1. Physical Address Extension (PAE)
Not said there, but support is up to 64GB of RAM.
Thanks very much for
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:46 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 06/14/12 12:46 AM, Arun Khan wrote:
[1] The Client's ERP vendor has validated the application on the 32
bit platform only thus the reason for 32 bit version.
the client should find a ERP vendor who's not stuck back
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin
centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/14/12, Smithies, Russell russell.smith...@agresearch.co.nz wrote:
How about using one of the backup tools to image the server?
We use Symantec System Recovery and image all the disks. We then have the
option
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
Dear Community Friends,
i badly require CentOS 4x, because one of our application only work with
that version, and current server has failed. The image which is
available in CentOS following sites. CD is not boot able, cannot install.
http://vault.centos.org/4.9/
http://vault.centos.org/
can
We have a situation here that is a real mystery.
Our MRTG on our outgoing router and a firewall server that protects our
web servers is showing a spike every six hours. I can't find the server
behind the firewall that is generating such an extreme amount of
packets, even though I've looked
How about tcpdump?
Mike
On 06/14/2012 01:07 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
We have a situation here that is a real mystery.
Our MRTG on our outgoing router and a firewall server that protects our
web servers is showing a spike every six hours. I can't find the server
behind the firewall that is
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:11 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Boris Epstein wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 2:50 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:59:13AM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote:
snip
To be specific, I use UNFSD to export a MooseFS file system.
On 06/14/2012 12:05 PM, Shiv. Nath wrote:
Dear Community Friends,
i badly require CentOS 4x, because one of our application only work with
that version, and current server has failed. The image which is
available in CentOS following sites. CD is not boot able, cannot install.
On 06/14/2012 12:05 PM, Shiv. Nath wrote:
Dear Community Friends,
i badly require CentOS 4x, because one of our application only work with
that version, and current server has failed. The image which is
available in CentOS following sites. CD is not boot able, cannot
install.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.com wrote:
We have a situation here that is a real mystery.
Our MRTG on our outgoing router and a firewall server that protects our
web servers is showing a spike every six hours. I can't find the server
behind the firewall
Hi all,
Just like to know which secure FTP servers are popular in use on Linux, the
FTP server should provides HTTPS, FTPS and SFTP methods.
Current we are with Serv-U FTP server, but it has been crashed all the time
for unknown reasons -- can not find any causes in its log file at all.
On Jun 13, 2012, at 2:52 AM, Sanjay Arora sanjay.k.ar...@gmail.com wrote:
My machine is on LAN 192.168.1.0/24, has an IP of 192.168.1.3. This
Network has GW 192.168.1.1 which is an adsl router in the office. No
firewall on the router. Other LAN machines have IPs in the
192.168.1.0/24 network
On Jun 14, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.com wrote:
We have a situation here that is a real mystery.
Our MRTG on our outgoing router and a firewall server that protects our
web servers is showing a spike every six hours. I can't find the server
behind the firewall
On Jun 14, 2012, at 6:44 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 14, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.com wrote:
We have a situation here that is a real mystery.
Our MRTG on our outgoing router and a firewall server that protects our
web servers is showing a
On 06/14/12 3:39 PM, Gelen James wrote:
Just like to know which secure FTP servers are popular in use on Linux, the
FTP server should provides HTTPS, FTPS and SFTP methods.
sftp is part of SSH, not FTP. https is HTTP not FTP.
ftps (FTP over SSL) is a non-standard mess and should be banned.
Hi John,
I had the same idea with you just a few years back that the ftp only servers
FTP protocol. But nowadays a FTP server provides same contents over a lot of
protocols at the same time: FTP/FTPS/SFTP/HTTP/HTTPS.
Please check the wiki
page
On 06/14/12 4:08 PM, Gelen James wrote:
I had the same idea with you just a few years back that the ftp only servers
FTP protocol. But nowadays a FTP server provides same contents over a lot of
protocols at the same time: FTP/FTPS/SFTP/HTTP/HTTPS
thats just silly. I suppose we should call
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:18 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
thats just silly. I suppose we should call NFS FTP too, because it
serves files?
What do you call something like Alfresco that emulates all kinds of
file/web services while imposing additional logic compared to what the
On 06/14/12 4:08 PM, Gelen James wrote:
Please check the wiki
pagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_FTP_server_software. There are so
many choices
psst? most of those are for MS Windows, which doesn't come with a
decent FTP server built in. many of them are commercial. there's
On 6/14/2012 7:23 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 06/14/12 4:08 PM, Gelen James wrote:
Please check the wiki
pagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_FTP_server_software. There are so
many choices
psst? most of those are for MS Windows, which doesn't come with a
decent FTP server built in.
Dear CentOS Community
Is totally clear there's no support sendmail platform today, but I need to
stop SMTP brute-force attack on sendmail. My server is attacked today, my
maillog look like :
4...@myserver.com, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=myserver.com [127.0.0.1]
Jun 14 19:07:01 at6412
On 06/14/12 4:22 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
What do you call something like Alfresco that emulates all kinds of
file/web services while imposing additional logic compared to what the
OS would do?
useless
hey, you asked what *I* would call it. I have no use for that sort of
silliness. Maybe
On 06/14/12 4:33 PM, Gustavo Lacoste wrote:
I need help for STOP this spamers right now.
Thanks in advance to anyone who can guide me
2 of the three relay IPs listed in your log fragment are listed on
spamhaus' Zen combined list, http://www.spamhaus.org/zen/
this is free for use by low
On 06/15/2012 01:28 AM, John Hinton wrote:
On 6/14/2012 7:23 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 06/14/12 4:08 PM, Gelen James wrote:
Please check the wiki
pagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_FTP_server_software. There are so
many choices
psst? most of those are for MS Windows, which
You can use, also, fail2ban
http://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/index.php/Sendmail
http://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/index.php/HOWTOs
Work over the filter.
You can set that if 'x' connection from same IP in 'y' seconds, block
in firewall
--
Diego - Yo no soy paranoico! (pero que me siguen, me siguen)
The problem with my server is: I use it to offer webhosting services. Some
customers using Outlook are blocked because they use black listed ips (ips
simply are dynamic).
With Kind Regards,
Gustavo A. Lacoste Z.
Curacautín - Chile
Skype: knxroot
Msn Gtalk: knx.root [at]
If you have disabled open relaying then I would look at grey listing and
throttling to reduce the number of spam per hour that comes in.
Since your routing others emails there is no point in spam analysis cause your
customers are probably doing it already. Just need to dissuade spammers from
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Gustavo Lacoste gust...@lacosox.org wrote:
The problem with my server is: I use it to offer webhosting services. Some
customers using Outlook are blocked because they use black listed ips (ips
simply are dynamic).
Give them logins/passwords and only rely if
On 06/14/12 5:58 PM, Gustavo Lacoste wrote:
The problem with my server is: I use it to offer webhosting services. Some
customers using Outlook are blocked because they use black listed ips (ips
simply are dynamic).
They should be using smtp auth over SASL, or they should be using their
ISP's
On Jun 15, 2012 12:39 AM, Gelen James hahaha_...@yahoo.com wrote:
Just like to know which secure FTP servers are popular in use on Linux,
the FTP server should provides HTTPS, FTPS and SFTP methods.
Proftpd, hands down for the (s)ftp(s) but for http you have to look
somewhere else.
Mikael
Proftpd, hands down for the (s)ftp(s) but for http you have to look
somewhere else.
k
+1 for ProFTPD. I have not used it for sftp, but I have for ftps. Make
sure on ftps to use ccc - clear command channel which allows the command
channel to be picked up by firewalls that need to know about
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Sanjay Arora sanjay.k.ar...@gmail.com
wrote:
OK, I don't quite understand what 'reserved for LAN' use means. I'll
assume it means someone else controls it and they won't cooperate
48 matches
Mail list logo
