¡amigos!
me acabo de dar de alta en la lista porque tambien instale centos 6,2
reemplzando windows 7 home premium en un dell inspiron 15R portatil de 4 gb
de ram expandible a 8 gb,320 gb dd,procesador intel p6200 con tarjeta
grafica integrada,
tengo una inquietud y es la sgte:
como se instalar
Buenas noches Juan.
bajese para su version los codec gstreamer revise esta doc. al final de la
pagina
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=8134
saludo
Richard Riveros Pineda
De: JUAN QUINTERO MARTINEZ loborojo19...@gmail.com
Para:
On 06/24/2012 02:47 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greets;
This centos6.2 system seems to have python-2.6.6, but that is turning into
a huge problem because I now have a backlog of about 40 packages that will
not upgrade because they all need python 2.4.
That, and importing gpg keys doesn't seem
On Sunday 24 June 2012 03:03:53 ken did opine:
On 06/23/2012 05:36 PM Keith Roberts wrote:
IIRC that happened a some years ago with Ubuntu.
Ever since that happened I've been wary of the various
different custom options available from different Linux
distros. I just use the
On Sunday 24 June 2012 03:06:14 Chris Geldenhuis did opine:
On 06/24/2012 02:47 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greets;
This centos6.2 system seems to have python-2.6.6, but that is turning
into a huge problem because I now have a backlog of about 40 packages
that will not upgrade because they
On 24.6.2012 10:12, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 June 2012 03:06:14 Chris Geldenhuis did opine:
On 06/24/2012 02:47 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greets;
This centos6.2 system seems to have python-2.6.6, but that is turning
into a huge problem because I now have a backlog of about 40 packages
On Sunday 24 June 2012 07:25:21 Veli-Pekka Kestilä did opine:
On 24.6.2012 10:12, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 June 2012 03:06:14 Chris Geldenhuis did opine:
On 06/24/2012 02:47 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greets;
This centos6.2 system seems to have python-2.6.6, but that is
turning
Hello Gene,
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 08:40 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
yum is still showing me 21 packages to update, all from an el5 repo.\
You can figure out what repo that is by rpm -qiing one of the packages
that is causing you trouble. Remove all offending packages, then remove
the repo rpm
On 06/24/2012 12:05 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
And what do you do when this LVM goes corrupt in about a month? I've
had it self destruct on me twice. I hate it when that happens.
I would look for some other issue like bad hardware. Over the last
several years I've routinely used LVM for pretty
On 06/24/2012 03:41 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 06/24/2012 12:05 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
And what do you do when this LVM goes corrupt in about a month? I've
had it self destruct on me twice. I hate it when that happens.
I would look for some other issue like bad hardware. Over the last
On 06/24/2012 09:41 AM Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 06/24/2012 12:05 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
And what do you do when this LVM goes corrupt in about a month? I've
had it self destruct on me twice. I hate it when that happens.
I would look for some other issue like bad hardware. Over the last
On 06/24/2012 11:21 AM, ken wrote:
On 06/24/2012 09:41 AM Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 06/24/2012 12:05 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
And what do you do when this LVM goes corrupt in about a month? I've
had it self destruct on me twice. I hate it when that happens.
I would look for some other issue
On 06/24/2012 12:04 PM Steve Clark wrote:
On 06/24/2012 11:21 AM, ken wrote:
On 06/24/2012 09:41 AM Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 06/24/2012 12:05 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
And what do you do when this LVM goes corrupt in about a month? I've
had it self destruct on me twice. I hate it when that
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012, ken wrote:
It helps during their creation, rather than just accepting the defaults,
to give the LVs meaningful names. But even if you don't:
# df -H
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-lvroot
31G
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012, ken wrote:
*snip*
Yeah, the problem is more than likely in your hardware. I've used it on
hundreds of machines and since 1999 and never had a problem traceable to
LVM. On the other hand, I've seen a lot of disks go bad.
And what happens then in that situation - do you
On Sunday 24 June 2012 12:43:23 Leonard den Ottolander did opine:
Hello Gene,
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 08:40 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
yum is still showing me 21 packages to update, all from an el5 repo.\
You can figure out what repo that is by rpm -qiing one of the packages
that is
Hello Gene,
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 12:55 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
There are no surviving el5 packages on the system, including in the .repo
files of yum.repos.d
But if I fire up yumex, well over half the files presented say they are el5
coming from rpmfusion,
Those two statements seem
On 6/24/2012 12:55 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 June 2012 12:43:23 Leonard den Ottolander did opine:
Hello Gene,
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 08:40 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
yum is still showing me 21 packages to update, all from an el5 repo.\
You can figure out what repo that is by rpm
On 24/6/2012 7:47 μμ, Keith Roberts wrote:
And what happens then in that situation - do you loose any
more data than you would loose with 'standard' primary and
extended logical partitions, or does using LVM help in
recovering more data from a bad disk?
Read:
On 06/24/2012 12:24 PM, ken wrote:
On 06/24/2012 12:04 PM Steve Clark wrote:
On 06/24/2012 11:21 AM, ken wrote:
On 06/24/2012 09:41 AM Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 06/24/2012 12:05 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
And what do you do when this LVM goes corrupt in about a month? I've
had it self destruct
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr
Subject: Re: [CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to
6.2]
On 24/6/2012 7:47 μμ, Keith Roberts wrote:
And what happens then in that situation -
On Sunday 24 June 2012 16:48:31 Leonard den Ottolander did opine:
Hello Gene,
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 12:55 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
There are no surviving el5 packages on the system, including in the
.repo files of yum.repos.d
But if I fire up yumex, well over half the files
On 06/24/2012 12:42 PM Keith Roberts wrote:
OK. But what about a drive that is already partitioned with
live data on it. Is it easy to make that work with LVM, or
does it mean I have to do a fresh installation to use LVM?
Keith,
AFAIK, you'd need to have spare disk space (which might
On Sunday 24 June 2012 17:27:09 Tony Schreiner did opine:
On 6/24/2012 12:55 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 24 June 2012 12:43:23 Leonard den Ottolander did opine:
Hello Gene,
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 08:40 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
yum is still showing me 21 packages to update, all
On Sunday 24 June 2012 17:31:40 Les Mikesell did opine:
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
There are no surviving el5 packages on the system, including in the
.repo files of yum.repos.d
Did you use yum to remove the packages?
Yes, except for the
On 06/24/2012 12:47 PM Keith Roberts wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012, ken wrote:
*snip*
Yeah, the problem is more than likely in your hardware. I've used it on
hundreds of machines and since 1999 and never had a problem traceable to
LVM. On the other hand, I've seen a lot of disks go bad.
Hello Gene,
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 17:21 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
These are the packages it is
showing me that I _could_ install, and nearly every blessed one of them has
a dependency on python-2.4. Why yumex is even showing me el5 files is a
puzzle I'm apparently not equipt to sort,
Hello Gene,
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 12:55 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
There are no surviving el5 packages on the system, including in the .repo
files of yum.repos.d
No _surviving_ el5 packages. So you *did* have el5 repos enabled earlier
on? Perhaps yumex is caching that old configuration. Just
On Sunday 24 June 2012 20:43:15 Leonard den Ottolander did opine:
Hello Gene,
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 17:21 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
These are the packages it is
showing me that I _could_ install, and nearly every blessed one of
them has a dependency on python-2.4. Why yumex is even
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
I see what someone meant when they said centos was a stripped mostly
server distro.
I'd say it is sort of gnome-oriented, but there is plenty of desktop stuff now.
With the
same config files installed here on
30 matches
Mail list logo
