On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Nicolas Ross
wrote:
> I have some general questions about VM.
>
> If I set vcpu let's say to 2-3 for a single vm, does this mean that
> those CPU are dedicated to that vm or many vm can share the same
> physicial cpus ?
No, all the CPU will be virtualized and share
Hi !
I'm about to deploy a new server that will host several virtual host for
mainly website hosting purposes. My server will be a Xeon 3440 or 3450
with 32 gigs of ram (the max of that board). So I will have 8 logical
cores. At the moment, I don't know how many vms I will have, in the
order o
On 06/26/2012 12:50 AM, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2012-06-25, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 06/25/12 1:10 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
they really should be better integrated, like the way LVM and JFS are
> integrated on AIX.
>
> # chfs -a size=+2G /var
>
> adds 2GB to /va
On 2012-06-25, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 06/25/12 1:10 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>>> they really should be better integrated, like the way LVM and JFS are
>>> >integrated on AIX.
>>> >
>>> > # chfs -a size=+2G /var
>>> >
>>> >adds 2GB to /var, online, automatically. grows the logical volum
On 06/25/2012 06:25 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> Subject says it all.
>
> Is there a preferred location to post Centos systems administration gigs?
>
> -Jason
It'd probably be most useful to find tech groups in your local areas. A
good place to start would be to see if there is a local hackerspace.
Subject says it all.
Is there a preferred location to post Centos systems administration gigs?
-Jason
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdi
On 6/25/2012 2:10 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> but what is the
> difference of that command above to this one on CentOS 6?
>
># lvresize -L+2G -r VG_sys/LV_var
That doesn't resize the filesystem sitting on the LV_var logical volume.
There's a level of non-integration above this, too: whe
On 06/25/12 1:10 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> they really should be better integrated, like the way LVM and JFS are
>> >integrated on AIX.
>> >
>> > # chfs -a size=+2G /var
>> >
>> >adds 2GB to /var, online, automatically. grows the logical volume and
>> >resizes the file system, all at onc
Am 25.06.2012 21:51, schrieb John R Pierce:
> On 06/25/12 12:14 PM, Luke S. Crawford wrote:
>> Also, nobody uses it. If you hit a problem, you are completely on your
>> own. I thought it would be more simple to have only one abstraction
>> layer; Nope. Use md and lvm on top of the md.
>
>
On 06/25/12 12:14 PM, Luke S. Crawford wrote:
> Also, nobody uses it. If you hit a problem, you are completely on your
> own. I thought it would be more simple to have only one abstraction
> layer; Nope. Use md and lvm on top of the md.
they really should be better integrated, like the way
On 06/25/2012 05:22 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
> Do you see an error in my configuration? Why is 10.20.0.108 not available?
Not immediately, but check the output of the 'ip' tools. ifconfig and
route are deprecated:
ip route show
ip addr show
Finally, see if there's any incoming traffic on the t
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 03:10:30AM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> On 6/25/12, Warren Young wrote:
> > Then there's the LVM option, but I can't immediately come up with a
> > one-liner that tells you whether a given LVM disk set is equivalent to
> > software RAID.
>
> LVM has a mirroring optio
On 6/25/12, Warren Young wrote:
> Then there's the LVM option, but I can't immediately come up with a
> one-liner that tells you whether a given LVM disk set is equivalent to
> software RAID.
LVM has a mirroring option but from, possibly outdated, reading a
couple of years back, it is not as smar
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 06/24/12 5:48 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> IMO the 64 bit scene is just as broken as it was 3
>> years ago when I had a 64 bit version intended for AMD (Phenom quad core
>> here) installed for about 2 hours.
>
> WHAT is broken about 'the 64 bit scene' ?!?I have 64 bit
On 06/24/12 5:48 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> IMO the 64 bit scene is just as broken as it was 3
> years ago when I had a 64 bit version intended for AMD (Phenom quad core
> here) installed for about 2 hours.
WHAT is broken about 'the 64 bit scene' ?!?I have 64 bit Opteron
systems happily runn
On 06/25/2012 05:10 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> On 25/6/2012 3:48 πμ, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
>> IMO the 64 bit scene is just as broken as it was 3
>> years ago when I had a 64 bit version intended for AMD (Phenom quad core
>> here) installed for about 2 hours.
>
> We are using always 64-bit only i
Warren Young wrote:
> On 6/23/2012 12:15 AM, Digimer wrote:
>>
>> Software RAID? If you have two or more disks, yes.
>
> There's no requirement that if you have two disks, they have to be
> RAIDed together. I frequently build systems with /dev/sda being a lone
> SATA disk for the OS and apps, with
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 6/23/2012 12:15 AM, Digimer wrote:
>
> Software RAID? If you have two or more disks, yes.
There's no requirement that if you have two disks, they have to be
RAIDed together. I frequently build systems with /dev/sda being a lone
SATA disk for the OS and apps, with /dev/sdb being a hardware RA
On 25/6/2012 3:48 πμ, Gene Heskett wrote:
> IMO the 64 bit scene is just as broken as it was 3
> years ago when I had a 64 bit version intended for AMD (Phenom quad core
> here) installed for about 2 hours.
We are using always 64-bit only installations of CentOS 5 and 6
(including all packages)
On Fri, June 22, 2012 16:38, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Not true. It will issue an AVC every time something tries to happen.
> Big things to know:
>a) ll -Z shows you the selinux context
>b) chcon [-R] -[urt]
>c) getsebool and setsebool
>
> mark
If you are working with SELinu
Rafał Radecki wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have currently an OpenVZ server:
>
> uname -a
> Linux vader8.superhost.pl 2.6.32-042stab055.16 #1 SMP Fri Jun 8
> 19:22:28 MSD 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> cat /etc/redhat-release
> CentOS release 6.2 (Final)
I don't even remember that kernel for 6.2
Hi all.
I have currently an OpenVZ server:
uname -a
Linux vader8.superhost.pl 2.6.32-042stab055.16 #1 SMP Fri Jun 8
19:22:28 MSD 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 6.2 (Final)
lspci | grep -i eth
01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd
On 24.6.2012 20:58, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 06/24/2012 12:24 PM, ken wrote:
>> # df -H
>> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
>> /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-lvroot
>> 31G12G18G 39% /
>> /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-lvtmp
>> 195
24 matches
Mail list logo
