CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:1045 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1045.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:1047 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1047.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
On 06/21/2012 12:13 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
AFAIK you cannot use Swift storage as a Nova volume backend. Also in order
to make Swift scale you need at least a couple of nodes.
Is this true? I haven't had a chance to dig into this, but I asked my
OpenStack guy about this on IRC the
Hi Folks,
Can you guide me about how to convert the CentOS file system from EXT3/EXT4
to XFS without loosing data? I have tried search in google about this but I
couldn't get the relevant idea.
**
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
afaik, there's no way to do this 'in place'.
you'd need to boot into rescue mode, create the new XFS partition, copy the
data across , then make the new partition live.
- Original Message -
From: Karthick K karthick@gmail.com
To: centos-virt@centos.org
Sent: Thursday, 28 June,
Buenas tardes amigos, una ayuda con el siguiente problema:
Desde hace un mes, más o menos, estoy teniendo el siguiente problema con
el envió y recepción de correos por medio de Postfix (version 2.2.8), el
mensaje es el siguiente:
He cambiando los nombres de direcciones y de dominios, asi es
He cambiando los nombres de direcciones y de dominios, asi es que no se
preocupen por estos datos.
bueno fuera tener los encabezados completos para llevarse una idea de
quién puede generar este mensaje.
2012/6/26 James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com:
Is anybody using http://freeipa.org on a CentOS 6 server? Is it working
well?
Yes and yes I suggest checking out the FreeIPA mailing list and
IRC channel if you have any trouble as you'll find quite a few people
there.
As a heads up
Named segfaulted here and there, and when the master instance failed,
takeover didn't work for whatever reason.
I have four IPAs replicating together across two DCs with full DNS and CA
integration plus using it for sudo management as well fully stable.
Have never seen the behaviour you
Is there a HOWTO for this somewhere? Sounds like a very useful setup
All the docs needed to set up that bit can be found on docs.redhat.com ...
the identity management guide in the rhel6 section.
I've written some more advanced guides on the freeipa wiki (look at how tos
under documentation)
Hi,
we do have some subnetworks for private computers, which are allowed to
use there public smtp servers like msn, web.de or whatever with the
users private accounts.
All our own computers have to send mail trough our mailserver with user
authentication.
From time to time we are faced with the
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Götz Reinicke
goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de wrote:
Hi,
we do have some subnetworks for private computers, which are allowed to
use there public smtp servers like msn, web.de or whatever with the
users private accounts.
All our own computers have to send
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:39 AM, James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.comwrote:
Named segfaulted here and there, and when the master instance failed,
takeover didn't work for whatever reason.
I have four IPAs replicating together across two DCs with full DNS and CA
integration plus using it
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:39 AM, James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.comwrote:
Named segfaulted here and there, and when the master instance failed,
takeover didn't work for whatever reason.
I have four IPAs replicating together across two DCs with full DNS and CA
integration plus using it
Am 27.06.12 10:29, schrieb Fajar Priyanto:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Götz Reinicke
goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de wrote:
Hi,
we do have some subnetworks for private computers, which are allowed to
use there public smtp servers like msn, web.de or whatever with the
users private
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:39 AM, James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com
wrote:
Named segfaulted here and there, and when the master instance failed,
takeover didn't work for whatever reason.
I have four IPAs
datacenters?
Bingo
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Götz Reinicke
goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de wrote:
Am 27.06.12 10:29, schrieb Fajar Priyanto:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Götz Reinicke
goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de wrote:
Hi,
we do have some subnetworks for private computers, which are allowed to
Dear All
To install gimp from the install media on my centos 6.2 , I found the
install media from the output of #df command and modified the baseurl
inside the /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Media.repo to point to the correct
media then issued :
#yum --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=c6-media install gimp
On 06/27/2012 12:26 PM, hadi motamedi wrote:
But it is unsuccessful.
Please be a little more specific.
What error message do you get?
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk
http://www.lemo.dk
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 6/27/12, Mogens Kjaer m...@lemo.dk wrote:
On 06/27/2012 12:26 PM, hadi motamedi wrote:
But it is unsuccessful.
Please be a little more specific.
What error message do you get?
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk
http://www.lemo.dk
___
Yes, it works well, no problems then.
Best regards,
Rafal,
2012/6/26 Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com:
On 06/26/2012 08:51 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Are you absolutely sure that the switch port connected to eth0 is
configured to deliver tagged packets for VLAN 20 (and that the ping
source is
On 06/27/2012 05:04 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hello listmates,
Has anybody attempted to run an XFS in a file mounted via -o loop? The file
size is about 20 TB and it resides in a larger XFS filesystem residing on a
disk. That filesystem's size is about 25 TB. What sort of degradation
should
I have the line:
request tftp-server-name;
in my centos 6.2 dhclient-eth0.conf file
If the tftp-server-name is given by the DHCP server everything is fine.
however, if it is NOT given the client seems to error out and does not
get an address and is not on the network.
I then take the line out
On 6/27/12, Mogens Kjaer m...@lemo.dk wrote:
On 06/27/2012 12:26 PM, hadi motamedi wrote:
But it is unsuccessful.
Please be a little more specific.
What error message do you get?
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk
http://www.lemo.dk
___
Am 27.06.2012 11:15, schrieb Götz Reinicke:
Am 27.06.12 10:29, schrieb Fajar Priyanto:
1. Many malware have their own smtp and can send spam directly.
To overcome this, block port tcp 25 on your gateway, and only allow
your mailserver.
Hi, thanks for your suggestion. But for the mentioned
Am 27.06.12 16:08, schrieb Tilman Schmidt:
Am 27.06.2012 11:15, schrieb Götz Reinicke:
Am 27.06.12 10:29, schrieb Fajar Priyanto:
1. Many malware have their own smtp and can send spam directly.
To overcome this, block port tcp 25 on your gateway, and only allow
your mailserver.
Hi,
Am 27.06.12 16:08, schrieb Tilman Schmidt:
Am 27.06.2012 11:15, schrieb Götz Reinicke:
Am 27.06.12 10:29, schrieb Fajar Priyanto:
1. Many malware have their own smtp and can send spam directly.
To overcome this, block port tcp 25 on your gateway, and only allow
your mailserver.
Hi,
Götz Reinicke wrote:
Am 27.06.12 16:08, schrieb Tilman Schmidt:
Am 27.06.2012 11:15, schrieb Götz Reinicke:
Am 27.06.12 10:29, schrieb Fajar Priyanto:
1. Many malware have their own smtp and can send spam directly.
To overcome this, block port tcp 25 on your gateway, and only allow
your
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
Trying to get a later version of the unixODBC RPM that is in Centos 5, I
read in some posting that unixODBC.x86_64 2.2.12-1.el5s2 was in the testing
repo but I was unable to locate it, currently it appears that we are
runningunixODBC-2.2.11-7.1. I have looked in the Centos 5 Testing
repo but do
Jeff Sheltren has been providing timely and clear updates about the
status of the 6.3 release:
http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/
They're much appreciated! Thank you very, very much.
--
Paul Heinlein
heinl...@madboa.com
45°38' N, 122°6' W___
CentOS
On 06/27/2012 01:09 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
Jeff Sheltren has been providing timely and clear updates about the
status of the 6.3 release:
http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/
They're much appreciated! Thank you very, very much.
Those updates are even correct ... good job Jeff :)
We are making
-snip-
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/RHWAS/SRPMS/
The latest version available is:
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/RHWAS/SRPMS/unixODBC-2.2.12-8.el5s2.src.rpm
I am not sure I would use the packages from that repo however ... for
example,
on 6/27/2012 7:26 AM Götz Reinicke spake the following:
Am 27.06.12 16:08, schrieb Tilman Schmidt:
Am 27.06.2012 11:15, schrieb Götz Reinicke:
Am 27.06.12 10:29, schrieb Fajar Priyanto:
1. Many malware have their own smtp and can send spam directly.
To overcome this, block port tcp 25 on
On 6/27/12, Götz Reinicke goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de wrote:
Long story short: I advised the use of port 587 two hours ago.
FYI since than I had 169 outgoing connections to port 20 and 1 to 587. :)
Seriously, just force them. I got so tired of one particular app/mail
server that keep
36 matches
Mail list logo
