In http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd
there is a recommendation to NOT use the version that comes with Centos
6.3, but to get the more current version from RPMForge.
Is this the 'correct' thing to do on a Centos-based mail server?
___
CentOS
I just noticed an interesting behaviour of rup on CentOS5/6: run without any
host args, it never prints results for CentOS6 machines. However, if a CentOS6
machine is queried directly, there is a result. It doesnt't matter whether the
querying host runs CentOS5 or CentOS6.
# rup |grep centos6host
On 04/01/13 15:59, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
In http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd
there is a recommendation to NOT use the version that comes with Centos
6.3, but to get the more current version from RPMForge.
Is this the 'correct' thing to do on a Centos-based mail server?
There is no
I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a brand new
CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days, I successfully used the attached
iptables script (as /etc/rc.local) on Red Hat 5.x systems, but this
doesn't seem to be quite working on the new system.
Specifically, while it seems
Why not try reconfiguring using /usr/bin/system-config-firewall-tui
instead of a manually created configuration.
Mike
On 01/04/2013 12:01 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a brand
new CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days, I successfully used
I'm trying to set up a small cluster using the High Availability and
High Availability Management groups. I'd like to run this on 3 different
machines, one being a management machine and the other two being the
actual cluster. It doesn't seem to want to cooperate. I can set the
cluster nodes
On 01/04/2013 11:53 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 04/01/13 15:59, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
In http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd
there is a recommendation to NOT use the version that comes with Centos
6.3, but to get the more current version from RPMForge.
Is this the 'correct' thing to do on
On 01/04/2013 12:01 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a brand
new CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days, I successfully used the
attached iptables script (as /etc/rc.local) on Red Hat 5.x systems,
but this doesn't seem to be quite working on
On 01/04/2013 12:01 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a brand new
CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days, I successfully used the attached
iptables script (as /etc/rc.local) on Red Hat 5.x systems, but this
doesn't seem to be quite working on the
On 1/4/2013 12:21 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
On 01/04/2013 12:01 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a brand new
CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days, I successfully used the attached
iptables script (as /etc/rc.local) on Red Hat 5.x systems, but this
- Original Message -
|
| On 1/4/2013 12:21 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
| On 01/04/2013 12:01 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
| I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a
| brand new
| CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days, I successfully used the
| attached
| iptables script (as
On 01/04/2013 12:13 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
I'm trying to set up a small cluster using the High Availability and
High Availability Management groups. I'd like to run this on 3 different
machines, one being a management machine and the other two being the
actual cluster. It doesn't seem to
On 04.01.2013 17:12, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have been looking at the same issue WRT Postfix. There the
differences are probably greater between what is available in source
and
what is in 6.3. But I need to resist going with source building, as
then I have to spend more time than I have
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
what is in 6.3. But I need to resist going with source building, as
then I have to spend more time than I have staying up with fixes. I
want an RPM repo to fit into the YUM process.
BTW, I have started this effort following:
Sorry, Digimer, I sent the reply to you and not the list.
At any rate, I've found part of my problem. Seems I added the IP as a
resource, and then tried to add that resource to the service groups. For
some reason, that didn't work, but just adding the IP to the service
group does fine.
Now to
Tim Evans wrote:
On 01/04/2013 12:01 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a brand new
CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days, I successfully used the attached
iptables script (as /etc/rc.local) on Red Hat 5.x systems, but this
doesn't seem to be
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Tim Evans tkev...@tkevans.com wrote:
I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a brand new
CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days, I successfully used the attached
iptables script (as /etc/rc.local) on Red Hat 5.x systems, but this doesn't
seem
On 01/04/2013 03:03 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Tim Evans tkev...@tkevans.com wrote:
I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a brand new
CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days, I successfully used the attached
iptables script (as /etc/rc.local)
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Tim Evans tkev...@tkevans.com wrote:
On 01/04/2013 03:03 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Tim Evans tkev...@tkevans.com wrote:
I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a brand new
CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days,
On 01/04/2013 04:11 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Tim Evans tkev...@tkevans.com wrote:
On 01/04/2013 03:03 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Tim Evans tkev...@tkevans.com wrote:
I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a
I've discovered recently that something on my Centos 5.8 box (up to date)
is hogging a ton of RAM.
so a little while ago I sat and watched top for a while. it showed
(sorry, I didn't take screen shots or write this down, so the numbers
are a bit rough) that out of 8 gigs of swap, around 2 1/2 was
Couldn't get this to work so had to disable it.
On 26 December 2012 19:47, Gavin Henry gavin.he...@gmail.com wrote:
First things first... Can you confirm that those are still the values in
place?
cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/arp_filter
cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/arp_ignore
cat
22 matches
Mail list logo