On 02/16/2013 09:07 PM, Mark Smulders wrote:
Dear admins,
My centos wiki username: MarkSmulders
Proposed subject: Nested virtualization on CentOS 6
Proposed location: under Howto Virtualization
setup here: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/NestedVirt let me know if you
run into any issues
Hola,
Le 21/02/2013 19:42, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin a écrit :
Que tal:
Instale OpenVpn en Centos...todo bien
Pero existe 2 modos de conexión mediante llave estática y mediante
certificados TLS SSL
La pregunta es cual es mas conveniente
Llave estática es un password. Para
El problema que te muestra es la falta de integración de SAMBA y LDAP, debes
hacer backup de SAMBA y LDAP de tu servidor con ubuntu, luego instalar SAMBA y
LDAP en tu servidor Centos y montar el backup de SAMBA y LDAP en tu Centos en
alcancelibre.org hay unos tutoriales los cuales te pueden
El 21/02/13, Héctor Herrera hherre...@gmail.com escribió:
Holas lista!!
Hola
Tengo un problema, y lo publico aquí por si me pueden ayudar. Estoy
configurando un servidor DHCP (una cosa simple, nada del otro mundo) para
una red interna. Estoy siguiendo el ejemplo de AlcanceLibre.org [1]
Gracias por tu respuesta. Obviamente instalé desde repositorio con yum.
También desactivé el firewall de Windows, pero nada funcionó. Y de hecho,
en /var/log/messages no mostró en ningún momento que estuviera recibiendo
peticiones de IP... Alguien tiene alguna idea? Yo me quedé seco de ideas a
El 22/02/13, Héctor Herrera hherre...@gmail.com escribió:
Gracias por tu respuesta. Obviamente instalé desde repositorio con yum.
También desactivé el firewall de Windows, pero nada funcionó. Y de hecho,
en /var/log/messages no mostró en ningún momento que estuviera recibiendo
peticiones de
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Eero Volotinen
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 8:39 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Dell Precision M6700 with centos 5?
any experiences with centos 5/rhel 5 install?
any experiences with centos 5/rhel 5 install? machine is rhel 6.1
certified laptop?
Why not install CentOS 6.3 instead? CentOS and RHEL are binary compatible.
Yes, but Centos 5 is needed on this project.
--
Eero
___
CentOS mailing list
On 2/22/2013 12:12 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
any experiences with centos 5/rhel 5 install? machine is rhel 6.1
certified laptop?
Why not install CentOS 6.3 instead? CentOS and RHEL are binary compatible.
Yes, but Centos 5 is needed on this project.
your project uses a laptop as the target ?
your project uses a laptop as the target ?
yes, its best solution for mobility.
why would any new project require an OS thats approaching end of service
life ?
project is new, but software is old, so it only supports rhel 5/centos
5 without code modifications.
--
Eero
2013/2/22 Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi:
your project uses a laptop as the target ?
yes, its best solution for mobility.
why would any new project require an OS thats approaching end of service
life ?
project is new, but software is old, so it only supports rhel 5/centos
5 without
On 21 February 2013 22:31, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
I have pretty much gotten use to Gnome 3 on my F17 notebooks. With the
right extensions it actually kind of works.
That can be said for Windows as well. Why use something that's broken
to start with?
--
Hakan (m1fcj) -
Hi all,
This morning, my centos NFS server returns these error messages:
RPC: fragment too large: 0x00800103
RPC: multiple fragments per record not supported
RPC: fragment too large: 0x00800103
RPC: multiple fragments per record not supported
RPC: fragment too large: 0x00800103
RPC: multiple
On 22/02/13 08:26, John R Pierce wrote:
On 2/22/2013 12:12 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
any experiences with centos 5/rhel 5 install? machine is rhel 6.1
certified laptop?
Why not install CentOS 6.3 instead? CentOS and RHEL are binary compatible.
Yes, but Centos 5 is needed on this project.
Am 22.02.2013 um 13:01 schrieb Ned Slider n...@unixmail.co.uk:
On 22/02/13 08:26, John R Pierce wrote:
On 2/22/2013 12:12 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
Yes, but Centos 5 is needed on this project.
your project uses a laptop as the target ?
why would any new project require an OS thats
On 02/22/2013 04:23 AM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
On 21 February 2013 22:31, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
I have pretty much gotten use to Gnome 3 on my F17 notebooks. With the
right extensions it actually kind of works.
That can be said for Windows as well. Why use something
On 22/02/13 12:51, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 22.02.2013 um 13:01 schrieb Ned Slider n...@unixmail.co.uk:
On 22/02/13 08:26, John R Pierce wrote:
On 2/22/2013 12:12 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
Yes, but Centos 5 is needed on this project.
your project uses a laptop as the target ?
why would any
On 02/21/2013 09:45 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 02/21/2013 03:30 PM, Digimer wrote:
On 02/21/2013 03:27 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have read that v 6.3 is about Fedora 12. Now that v 6.4 has shipped
(no I won't be dumb enough to ask when C6.4 we ship), what version of
Fedora does it
On 17.02.2013 г. 17:59 ч., Florian La Roche wrote:
I could have written a script to remove IPV6 link local address but
there should be a basic option for that.
You can set: echo options ipv6 disable=1 /etc/modprobe.d/noipv6.conf
But more and more apps then log problems or get confused if
On 02/21/2013 06:55 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 2/21/2013 3:20 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
:Hardware name: HP Compaq dc7800 Small Form Factor
...
Should I worry?
yes.
You should update bios .
hmmm, thats a 2007 vintage economy business desktop ?
looks to be a December 2011 rev 1.32A
On 2/22/2013 12:32 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
other solution might be installing centos 6 and virtualizing centos 5 on it.
thats what I likely would do, assuming this app really doesn't work on
C6 with a bit of tweaking (installing the -compat libraries etc).
that and start looking immediately
On 2/21/2013 12:43 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
:[Firmware Warn]: Your BIOS is broken; DMAR reported at address fed9
returns all ones!
I googled Your BIOS is broken; DMAR reported at address fed9
returns all ones! and got some related results.
this bug report (on FC12) says... yes,
On 02/22/2013 01:38 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 2/21/2013 12:43 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
:[Firmware Warn]: Your BIOS is broken; DMAR reported at address fed9
returns all ones!
I googled Your BIOS is broken; DMAR reported at address fed9
returns all ones! and got some related
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 02/22/2013 01:38 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 2/21/2013 12:43 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
:[Firmware Warn]: Your BIOS is broken; DMAR reported at address
fed9
returns all ones!
I googled Your BIOS is broken; DMAR reported at address fed9
returns all ones!
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
This issue is not CentOS specific ... here is another discussion:
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1235797
The issue seems to be that someone with local access elevates their
privileges in some manner, and
But don't forget that what the kernel people call 'local' access
really means any bug in any network application that lets you execute
an arbitrary command even if it is non-root - and those have
historically been pretty common.
sounds like local install of famous php scripting language...
On 02/22/2013 02:32 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 22.02.2013 20:28, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
on a similar/identical bug with Fedora FC17, someone suggested booting
with iommu=off to work around this.
Where do I add this?
like every other kernel param in /boot/grub/grub.conf at
the end of
On 02/22/2013 03:04 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 22.02.2013 20:58, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
Kernel param. I really should have caught that.
So I was all ready to edit grub.conf and then slapped my hand.
You TEST it out first, adding the command at boot time. ARGH!
one option
Once
On 02/22/2013 01:50 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
This issue is not CentOS specific ... here is another discussion:
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1235797
The issue seems to be that someone with local access
Am 22.02.2013 um 21:11 schrieb Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org:
On 02/22/2013 01:50 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
This issue is not CentOS specific ... here is another discussion:
Trying to install Centos6 on my system (it's been running C5 for years).
I've got a pair of drives, so I'm trying to use RAID-1.
Previously I used a procedure where each partition was part of a separate
RAID device, but this time I'm trying the HOWTO from the Centos WIKI on
making a partitionable
On 02/22/2013 09:35 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:
i use following script to scan top level
directories for files that are not packaged:
If you trust your rpm-db, then something like my syscleanup script might
also come in handy :
https://www.gitorious.org/syscleanup/syscleanup/trees/master
I
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Fred fred.fre...@gmail.com wrote:
Previously I used a procedure where each partition was part of a separate
RAID device, but this time I'm trying the HOWTO from the Centos WIKI on
making a partitionable RAID pair.
Although the instructions work, there are
33 matches
Mail list logo
