On 03/10/2013 07:47 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
Well, this is interesting. I have three systems, all of which now have the
same problem.
I was running yum update on these machines via a vnc connection (running a
vnc desktop on one of them, and logging into the others with a a
gnome-terminal on my
On 03/06/2013 07:19 PM, b.j. mcclure wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 13:06 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
I'm having a wireless connection issue with an HP laptop and a Zotac
media server after the 6.4 package updates from CR repository. Nothing
changed with wireless config as far as I can tell.
On 10/03/13 01:24, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
Depend on how new your card is. :)
HD 4800 series, RV770
More details are in this ELRepo bug report:
http://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=355
So I guess I should try enabling the testing repository. Thanks.
Yves
Dear All
I have a CentOS 6.3 machine. I am trying to setup DNS BIND setup in that
machine. It is having a static global IP. I have done lot of reading ,
google search and tried all possible option, but still not able to resolve
the issue.
My named.conf looks as below.
*
*
*
// named.conf
//
//
On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 17:27 +0530, Austin Einter wrote:
Dear All
I have a CentOS 6.3 machine. I am trying to setup DNS BIND setup in that
machine. It is having a static global IP. I have done lot of reading ,
google search and tried all possible option, but still not able to resolve
the
For whatever it's worth - I yum update'd two VMs without any trouble
whatsoever (from 6.3 to 6.4) and am in the process of updating a laptop...
Not that it should matter but they are both guests running on a CentOS 5.9
Xen host.
I'm in the process of updating a laptop - I'm hoping it works
On 03/09/2013 09:36 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
During today's big Centos 6 update I lost my connection to a machine during
the
yum update and when I logged back in and ran yum update again it told me to
run yum-complete-transaction. When I ran yum-complete-transaction I got
screen after screen of
Dear All
My resolv.conf looks as below
search netcloudjobs.com
nameserver 10.0.0.1
nameserver 8.8.8.8
nameserver 127.0.0.1
I do not have any error logs.
I just did one modification in named.conf.
*allow-query { localhost; 10.0.0.1/24; 10.0.0.254/24; };
*
*Line I modified to
*
Dear Daniel,
BTW This will be fixed in the RHEL6.4 version of policy.
is new policy already available in rhel6.4?
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/12/2013 07:35 AM, Ilyas -- wrote:
Hello,
I'm
Am 10.03.2013 03:01, schrieb Les Mikesell:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Tilman Schmidt
t.schm...@phoenixsoftware.de wrote:
Mar 3 04:44:48 gimli sshd[12870]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo
for hn.ly.kd.adsl failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT!
Mar 3 04:44:49 gimli sshd[12871]:
On 03/10/2013 07:57 AM, Austin Einter wrote:
Dear All
I have a CentOS 6.3 machine. I am trying to setup DNS BIND setup in that
machine. It is having a static global IP. I have done lot of reading ,
google search and tried all possible option, but still not able to resolve
the issue.
My
On 03/09/2013 01:54 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 09:41:12AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/08/2013 04:49 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/08/2013 11:30 AM, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
I just checked the mirrors this morning and nothing has shown up for 6.4.
Did something
My registrar is Godad.com, looks they have registered nameservers
ns1.netcloudjobs.com and ns2.netcloudjobs.com
Now I am able to resolve to ns1.netcloudjobs.com
I have only 1 IP address that x.x.x.43 , so I can not use x.x.x.44
From my dedicated server, if I ping to www.netcloudjobs.com , it says
Hi Austin,
since your A record is fine and can be resolved, the issue is obviously not
BIND related but lies somewhere in your network/firewall configuration.
The last address that is visible in the tracereoute output from here is
15 ip-208-109-113-174.ip.secureserver.net (208.109.113.174)
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 08:20:43AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/09/2013 01:54 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 09:41:12AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/08/2013 11:30 AM, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
I just checked the mirrors this morning and nothing has shown up
Put this in a zone file:
netcloudjob.com. IN A 173.201.189.43
Just after a MX line
10 mar 2013 14:51, Austin Einter austin.ein...@gmail.com napisał(a):
My registrar is Godad.com, looks they have registered nameservers
ns1.netcloudjobs.com and ns2.netcloudjobs.com
Now I am able to resolve to
lets reply to myself then ;-)
%pre
#!/bin/bash
if [ -b /dev/vda ] ; then
echo bootloader --location=mbr --timeout=0 --driveorder=vda
--append=crashkernel=auto rhgb quiet /tmp/diskinfo
echo clearpart --linux --drives=vda /tmp/diskinfo
echo part /boot --fstype=ext4 --size=500
On 10.03.2013, at 16:14, Arek Czereszewski arekc...@gmail.com wrote:
Put this in a zone file:
netcloudjob.com. IN A 173.201.189.43
Just after a MX line
Austin already did that, and it doesn't help.
The name can already be resolved, and the address cannot be pinged either. I
checked
On 03/10/2013 10:19 AM, Peter Eckel wrote:
Hi Austin,
since your A record is fine and can be resolved, the issue is obviously not
BIND related but lies somewhere in your network/firewall configuration.
The last address that is visible in the tracereoute output from here is
15
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:14:14 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
use screen if you update over WAN connections
yes, i know it is too late but thats the way to go
I was doing it through VNC, thinking that would be more-or-less equivalent to
screen, which it apparently isn't. Somehow my vnc session
On 03/10/2013 12:12 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:14:14 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
use screen if you update over WAN connections
yes, i know it is too late but thats the way to go
I was doing it through VNC, thinking that would be more-or-less equivalent to
screen, which it
On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 10:24 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
We don't release redhat-release in CentOS at all ... we have
centos-release instead.
I figured that, but I now have an /etc/redhat-release saying 6.4, as
does
/etc/centos-release.
/etc/redhat-release is a link to
I've been designing the infrastructure for a new team using CentOS 6 and
Puppet. I'm still learning Puppet, but thought I had things pretty well under
control. After this week, I'm beginning to wonder… :-)
In the last week I've had versions of three packages disappear from the yum
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:26:51 -0400
Gerry Reno wrote:
The yum update that was running in your lost VNC session was in all
likelihood still running.
If yum was indeed still running, it wasn't using any significant CPU. I did
run top in my login terminal to see if anything significant was going
On 03/10/2013 01:04 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:26:51 -0400
Gerry Reno wrote:
The yum update that was running in your lost VNC session was in all
likelihood still running.
If yum was indeed still running, it wasn't using any significant CPU. I did
run top in my login
Is there a way (software) to turn a Centos server into an AP?
The server will have DHCP and RADVD, so no ARP proxying needed. This is
for a small lab setup.
yumex is not helping me search for an answer.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 03/10/2013 03:01 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Is there a way (software) to turn a Centos server into an AP?
The server will have DHCP and RADVD, so no ARP proxying needed. This is
for a small lab setup.
yumex is not helping me search for an answer.
I just found hostapd for Fedora, but it
On 03/10/2013 03:15 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.03.2013 20:06, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
On 03/10/2013 03:01 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Is there a way (software) to turn a Centos server into an AP?
The server will have DHCP and RADVD, so no ARP proxying needed. This is
for a small lab
On 3/10/2013 1:22 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I just found hostapd for Fedora, but it is not showing up in my Centos
repos.
http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/2/simple/2
http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/15160581/dir/redhat_el_6/com/hostapd-0.5.8-13.el6.x86_64.rpm.html
Thanks
anybody know of a frozen-bubble package for el6 x86_64? I've been reduced
to trying to build from source, and it ain't going very well. :(
Thanks!
--
Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
I can do all things through Christ
2013/3/10 Fred Smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us:
anybody know of a frozen-bubble package for el6 x86_64? I've been reduced
to trying to build from source, and it ain't going very well. :(
what is the error message?
--
Eero
___
CentOS mailing list
On 03/10/2013 04:35 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 3/10/2013 1:22 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I just found hostapd for Fedora, but it is not showing up in my Centos
repos.
http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/2/simple/2
Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
This point has already been answered on this mailing list (and
elsewhere). A bit of search in the archives and elsewhere would
quickly bring you this:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Skype
I'm very familiar with that document. :-) And many users, including
myself,
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Fred Smith
fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote:
anybody know of a frozen-bubble package for el6 x86_64? I've been reduced
to trying to build from source, and it ain't going very well. :(
Nux! has it:
http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/dextop/el6/x86_64/
Akemi
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 10:52:25PM +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2013/3/10 Fred Smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us:
anybody know of a frozen-bubble package for el6 x86_64? I've been reduced
to trying to build from source, and it ain't going very well. :(
what is the error message?
well,
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 02:16:25PM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Fred Smith
fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote:
anybody know of a frozen-bubble package for el6 x86_64? I've been reduced
to trying to build from source, and it ain't going very well. :(
Nux!
2013/3/10 Fred Smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us:
anybody know of a frozen-bubble package for el6 x86_64? I've been reduced
to trying to build from source, and it ain't going very well. :(
Thanks!
--
it's available from nux desktop repos:
http://li.nux.ro/repos.html
--
Eero
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:04:37 -0600
Frank Cox wrote:
It may be easier to restore from backup and then attempt to do the update
again.
Perhaps, but since everything seems to still be in place on those hard drives,
and since my last yum update completed without any errors being reported, I
Am 10.03.2013 12:57, schrieb Austin Einter:
I have a CentOS 6.3 machine. I am trying to setup DNS BIND setup in that
machine. It is having a static global IP. I have done lot of reading ,
google search and tried all possible option, but still not able to resolve
the issue.
After reading the
Am 10.03.2013 14:50, schrieb Austin Einter:
From my dedicated server, if I ping to www.netcloudjobs.com , it says
*[root@ip-173-201-189-43 named]# ping www.netcloudjobs.com
PING www.netcloudjobs.com (173.201.189.43) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- www.netcloudjobs.com ping statistics ---
3
On 03/10/2013 07:00 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:04:37 -0600
Frank Cox wrote:
It may be easier to restore from backup and then attempt to do the update
again.
Perhaps, but since everything seems to still be in place on those hard
drives,
and since my last yum update
Am 10.03.2013 16:34, schrieb Peter Eckel:
On 10.03.2013, at 16:14, Arek Czereszewski arekc...@gmail.com wrote:
Put this in a zone file:
netcloudjob.com. IN A 173.201.189.43
Just after a MX line
Austin already did that, and it doesn't help.
Yes it does. The name can now be resolved.
On 03/10/2013 07:29 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
On 03/10/2013 07:00 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:04:37 -0600
Frank Cox wrote:
It may be easier to restore from backup and then attempt to do the update
again.
Perhaps, but since everything seems to still be in place on those hard
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:29:56 -0400
Gerry Reno wrote:
Did you try booting a rescue disk and reinstalling the bootloader?
I booted the Centos 6.4 minimal iso, told it to upgrade an existing
installation, and to install the bootloader. About all that it appeared to do
was install the bootloader.
On 03/10/2013 08:14 AM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
lets reply to myself then ;-)
I missed your first message. I've put a copy of my centos 6 kickstart
here in case there are any ideas you think are good ones:
http://pastebin.com/rJEnsdvw
___
CentOS mailing
Am 10.03.2013 09:28, schrieb Bruce Whealton:
So, it works, except for the php part. I made the files executable.
You shouldn't. PHP pages work just fine without execute permission.
What I mean by the php part doesn't work is that it is just being thrown
out. There is no attempt to process
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 17:40:39 -0600
Frank Cox wrote:
The bootloader seems to be fine -- grub itself boots up. I get a kernel panic
after that,
I just had a thought: Is it possible to just reformat and reinstall the /boot
partition? I wonder if that would solve the problem
--
MELVILLE
I didn't think I needed to make the files executable. Anyway, the simple
index.php has a title, an H1 tag and a couple php statements, one of which
is phpinfo();
My page, that I get has just the title and the content inside the h1 tag.
When I view the source, there is nothing that was inside a
On 03/10/2013 07:40 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:29:56 -0400
Gerry Reno wrote:
Did you try booting a rescue disk and reinstalling the bootloader?
I booted the Centos 6.4 minimal iso, told it to upgrade an existing
installation, and to install the bootloader. About all that it
I am being hit on a number of my systems with yum update reporting 270+
rpms to update, and MOST are coming from the base repo. I checked a few
out, and yes, they are of a higher release.
I don't recall ever seeing the base repo change; it is almost like it is
picking up the the 6.4 base repo
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 09:30:40PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't recall ever seeing the base repo change; it is almost like it is
picking up the the 6.4 base repo instead.
That's exactly what it's doing. The /6 base and update repository
always point to the latest version. 6.4 was
Dear All
Thanks for great support.
Now the issue is completely resolved.
I had to add netcloudjob.com http://netcloudjob.com. IN A
173.201.189.43 line in forward zone file. (As suggested by Arzek)perly.
Now from remote locations we are able to ping to www.netcloudjobs.com and
netcloudjobs.com
Dear All
I am planning to setup mail server for my domain.
Which one is preferred postfix or sendmail.
I came across a link *
http://ostechnix.wordpress.com/2013/02/08/setup-mail-server-using-postfixdovecotsquirrelmail-in-centosrhelscientific-linux-6-3-step-by-step/
* for postfix mail setup.
On 03/10/2013 09:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 11.03.2013 02:30, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
I am being hit on a number of my systems with yum update reporting 270+
rpms to update, and MOST are coming from the base repo. I checked a few
out, and yes, they are of a higher release.
I don't
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:24:55 -0400
Gerry Reno wrote:
It seems like maybe it cannot find the root filesystem.
Kernel panics just like this when it cannot find it.
Interesting. How can I check that? I have another almost-identical system
that's still working and I compared grub.conf between
On 2013-03-11, Austin Einter austin.ein...@gmail.com wrote:
Which one is preferred postfix or sendmail.
I suspect this is mostly personal preference. I prefer postfix because
the configuration files are easier to read and write.
It says I need to disable firewall. Is it really required.
On 03/10/2013 11:09 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:24:55 -0400
Gerry Reno wrote:
It seems like maybe it cannot find the root filesystem.
Kernel panics just like this when it cannot find it.
Interesting. How can I check that? I have another almost-identical system
that's
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:16:10 -0400
Gerry Reno wrote:
Boot to rescue mode and see if you can mount the device containing the root
filesystem readonly and see all the files on it.
Then check that the kernel root option is looking at the same device.
I can indeed see all of the files on that
On 03/10/2013 11:23 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:16:10 -0400
Gerry Reno wrote:
Boot to rescue mode and see if you can mount the device containing the root
filesystem readonly and see all the files on it.
Then check that the kernel root option is looking at the same device.
I
On Sunday 10 March 2013, Frank Cox thea...@melvilletheatre.com wrote:
Interesting. How can I check that? I have another almost-identical
system that's still working and I compared grub.conf between the two
of them and didn't notice any significant differences. Nothing that
immediately
On 03/10/2013 10:54 PM, Austin Einter wrote:
Dear All
I am planning to setup mail server for my domain.
Which one is preferred postfix or sendmail.
I switched to postfix 3 years ago, and never looked back.
I came across a link *
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:27:25 -0400
Gerry Reno wrote:
Do you know if this grub file was rewritten?
Can you check it against a backup copy?
I don't have a backup copy of the grub.conf file since it's always been
automatically managed and updated by grub and friends and I've never really had
to
On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 20:19 -0400, Bruce Whealton wrote:
I didn't think I needed to make the files executable. Anyway, the simple
index.php has a title, an H1 tag and a couple php statements, one of which
is phpinfo();
My page, that I get has just the title and the content inside the h1 tag.
On 03/10/2013 11:12 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2013-03-11, Austin Einter austin.ein...@gmail.com wrote:
Which one is preferred postfix or sendmail.
I suspect this is mostly personal preference. I prefer postfix because
the configuration files are easier to read and write.
It says I need to
Hi all
I get a Cisco 1841 router, connecting the office through a CHAP PPPoE link:
[...]
interface Dialer1
ip address negotiated
ip mtu 1492
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
encapsulation ppp
ip tcp adjust-mss 1452
dialer pool 1
dialer-group 1
no cdp enable
ppp
On 03/11/2013 01:05 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Hi all
I get a Cisco 1841 router, connecting the office through a CHAP PPPoE link:
[...]
interface Dialer1
ip address negotiated
ip mtu 1492
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
encapsulation ppp
ip tcp adjust-mss
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:36:55 -0400
Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
Also check that /etc/fstab is correct.
I've finally figured out how to get an error message, but I have no idea of
how to fix it.
By removing rhgb and quiet from the grub commandline, I see a whole bunch
of write-up going by, then
67 matches
Mail list logo