CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0668 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0668.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0664
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0664.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0668 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0668.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0669 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0669.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
Hi guys,
my goal is to create a reliable virtualization environment using CentOS
6.4 and KVM, I've three nodes and a clustered GFS2.
The enviroment is up and working, but I'm worry for the reliability, if
I turn the network interface down on one node to simulate a crash (for
example on the
On 03/21/2013 01:11 PM, Maurizio Giungato wrote:
Hi guys,
my goal is to create a reliable virtualization environment using CentOS
6.4 and KVM, I've three nodes and a clustered GFS2.
The enviroment is up and working, but I'm worry for the reliability, if
I turn the network interface down on
Il 21/03/2013 18:48, Maurizio Giungato ha scritto:
Il 21/03/2013 18:14, Digimer ha scritto:
On 03/21/2013 01:11 PM, Maurizio Giungato wrote:
Hi guys,
my goal is to create a reliable virtualization environment using CentOS
6.4 and KVM, I've three nodes and a clustered GFS2.
The enviroment is
On 03/21/2013 02:09 PM, Maurizio Giungato wrote:
Il 21/03/2013 18:48, Maurizio Giungato ha scritto:
Il 21/03/2013 18:14, Digimer ha scritto:
On 03/21/2013 01:11 PM, Maurizio Giungato wrote:
Hi guys,
my goal is to create a reliable virtualization environment using CentOS
6.4 and KVM, I've
It's not related to your problem. Just a note: when you use the noatime
mounting option in fstab then you do not need to use nodiratime because
noatime takes care of both.
Zoltan
On 3/21/2013 6:48 PM, Maurizio Giungato wrote:
Il 21/03/2013 18:14, Digimer ha scritto:
On 03/21/2013 01:11 PM,
El 20/03/13, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin rodrigo.pichin...@gmail.com escribió:
Hola a todos,
Resulta que instala CentOS en su versión *minimal Desktop*, una vez
terminada la instalación pude ver que no tenia red, en un principio *
NetworkManager* intentaba configurar mi red, pero aun así no tenia
Antes de instalar Centos tenia fedora 18 en mi laptop y me reconocía amabas
redes cableada e inalambrica (p1p2 wlan0), pero con centos no me reconoce
ni una, la red cableada tuve que meterle mano yo.
Si ocupo ifconfig -a
solo me muestra la local
lo
después de configurar la red cableada y al
Yo creo que no tienes los módulos necesarios en memoria para gestionar los
periféricos de red, por eso es que no te funciona. Primero que todo, lspci
-vv para buscar qué módulos ocupan tus periféricos; lsmod para saber qué
módulos tienes efectivamente cargados, y si no están los que necesitas,
Gracias Hector, haré lo que me sugieres ...creo que por hay va la cosa.
Saludos
El 21 de marzo de 2013 09:11, Héctor Herrera hherre...@gmail.com escribió:
Yo creo que no tienes los módulos necesarios en memoria para gestionar los
periféricos de red, por eso es que no te funciona. Primero
Buenos días a todos de la lista:
Primero que nada les cuento la experiencia que estoy pasando con mi servidor
de correos (postfix,dovecot+sasl), hace un mes aproximadamente he notado que
el servidor a las 5:00PM es atacado/escaneado o algo asi tratando de
conectarse al dovecot
Buenas Noches.
Lo que indican los logs son fallos de autenticación que provienen de una
dirección remota.
rhost=66.142.38.137
Para resolver esto puede instalar un paquete como fail2ban y configurarlo para
que chequee los logs de dovecot y cualquier otro servicio que quieras proteger.
I rmeember you can just exist the shell and log on again to apply the
changes. Not really a reboot.
You can check it with ulimit -a for the list items of the changes.
Yes logout and login again helps - but only your shell environment.
Every process/daemon/database has its own (unchanged)
Dear All
I had successfully installed posfixadmin. I was able to login to postfix
admin and create email ids etc.
In something broken (not sure which one caused the issue), I am
experiencing below problem with postfix admin.
1. I am able to access domain/mailadmin page.
2. I can create admin
Under CentOS6, is it possible to get an interface to RUNNING state
without assigning a (dummy) IP address?
# ifconfig em2
em2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 78:2B:CB:67:3E:5C
UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
Maybe you will like ethtool from now.
Banyan He
Blog: http://www.rootong.com
Email: ban...@rootong.com
On 3/21/2013 5:21 PM, isdtor wrote:
Under CentOS6, is it possible to get an interface to RUNNING state
without assigning a (dummy) IP address?
# ifconfig em2
em2 Link
Hi,
I'm currently at CentOS 5.8. After some penetration testing, found some
high severity OpenSSH issues which would require its upgrade. But till
CentOS 5.9 the latest rpm available is openssh-4.3p2-82.el5 (which I'm
currently using).
Is it fine to upgrade to CentOS 6 rpms while I'm on CentOS
Without going to 5.9 you will have unpatched vulnerabilities. With all the
applicable patches for EL5 you should not have any vulnerabilities due to
in-channel software from CentOS. That does not mean the vulnerability scanner
won't find false positives, the key is to get the CVE number of the
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 05:23:50PM +0530, Anumeha Prasad wrote:
I'm currently at CentOS 5.8. After some penetration testing, found some
high severity OpenSSH issues which would require its upgrade. But till
CentOS 5.9 the latest rpm available is openssh-4.3p2-82.el5 (which I'm
currently
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Anumeha Prasad anumeha.pra...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm currently at CentOS 5.8. After some penetration testing, found some
high severity OpenSSH issues which would require its upgrade. But till
CentOS 5.9 the latest rpm available is openssh-4.3p2-82.el5 (which
2013/3/21 Anumeha Prasad anumeha.pra...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I'm currently at CentOS 5.8. After some penetration testing, found some
high severity OpenSSH issues which would require its upgrade. But till
CentOS 5.9 the latest rpm available is openssh-4.3p2-82.el5 (which I'm
currently using).
2013/3/21 Ron Colvin r...@colvin-deweese.com:
Without going to 5.9 you will have unpatched vulnerabilities. With all the
applicable patches for EL5 you should not have any vulnerabilities due to
in-channel software from CentOS. That does not mean the vulnerability scanner
won't find false
On 21/3/2013 11:06 πμ, Austin Einter wrote:
My question is why it is redirecting wrongly to domain/login.php.
I would suggest you visit postfixadmin project forum and/or subscribe to
their mailing list.
Nick
___
CentOS mailing list
It sounds like a php coding problem. You can check the php page first.
Check at what condition is you will be redirected back to the login
page. It would be easy. You can send in the php file or give us the
address where to find the file.
Make sure you have all the conditions match, you will
OK, some more information:
I rebooted to a non-xen kernel (2.6.18-348.1.1.el5), and the problem
remains, so it is not xen or a xen kernel issue. The machine has an AMD
64-bit processor (AMD Sempron(tm) Processor LE-1300), if that makes any
difference. I have a LD450 keyboard (DEC VT220 flavored
Dear Banyan
Thanks for input. I checked the log. I found always ssl_error_log is being
written when I am trying to login to postfixadmin and it looks relevant
also. But I do not know how to fix it.
The error log is as below.
[Thu Mar 21 07:08:09 2013] [error] [client 122.178.239.178] PHP
I just looked at link
http://sourceforge.net/p/postfixadmin/discussion/676076/thread/9eb8a948 ,
it looks a similar issue and it is related session cookie. I checked in my
php.ini and cooki is enabled. Not sure if memcache will create any
problem..,
Hope somebody would have faced this issue
Am 21.03.2013 um 13:12 schrieb John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 05:23:50PM +0530, Anumeha Prasad wrote:
I'm currently at CentOS 5.8. After some penetration testing, found some
high severity OpenSSH issues which would require its upgrade. But till
CentOS 5.9 the
On 03/21/2013 06:53 AM, Anumeha Prasad wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently at CentOS 5.8. After some penetration testing, found some
high severity OpenSSH issues which would require its upgrade. But till
CentOS 5.9 the latest rpm available is openssh-4.3p2-82.el5 (which I'm
currently using).
Is it
On 2013-03-21, Austin Einter austin.ein...@gmail.com wrote:
In something broken (not sure which one caused the issue), I am
experiencing below problem with postfix admin.
As another poster already commented, unless postfixadmin is part of an
official CentOS repo (and I strongly suspect it is
Austin Einter wrote:
Dear Banyan
Thanks for input. I checked the log. I found always ssl_error_log is being
written when I am trying to login to postfixadmin and it looks relevant
also. But I do not know how to fix it.
The error log is as below.
[Thu Mar 21 07:08:09 2013] [error] [client
Hi guys,
my goal is to create a reliable virtualization environment using CentOS
6.4 and KVM, I've three nodes and a clustered GFS2.
The enviroment is up and working, but I'm worry for the reliability, if
I turn the network interface down on one node to simulate a crash (for
example on the
A few weeks ago, suddenly, reading news at lunch, I could not get to
nytimes.com. I could ping it, and nslookup it, and if I put the IP address
in place of the name, it was fine.
After *much* back and forth over a ticket I put in, over the last week or
so, our group figured it out: It *seemed* to
On 3/21/2013 5:12 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
Most penetration testing is done via lackadaisical auditors using
automated tools that are pretty much completely worthless in the real
world using Enterprise Linux as said tools are unaware of backporting
policies.
indeed, they are automated
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
A few weeks ago, suddenly, reading news at lunch, I could not get to
nytimes.com. I could ping it, and nslookup it, and if I put the IP address
in place of the name, it was fine.
After *much* back and forth over a ticket I put in, over the last week or
so, our group
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
A few weeks ago, suddenly, reading news at lunch, I could not get to
nytimes.com. I could ping it, and nslookup it, and if I put the IP
address in place of the name, it was fine.
After *much* back and forth over a ticket I put in, over the last
This morning a handful of workstations got upgraded from 6.3 to 6.4 and
things seemed to be functional, until we tried to log in to one of our
instrument accounts that for various reasons uses olvwm/openwin as the
desktop (and no, I don't have the option of changing that at this time).
The
Miranda Hawarden-Ogata wrote:
This morning a handful of workstations got upgraded from 6.3 to 6.4 and
things seemed to be functional, until we tried to log in to one of our
instrument accounts that for various reasons uses olvwm/openwin as the
desktop (and no, I don't have the option of
On 2013/03/21 11:18, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Miranda Hawarden-Ogata wrote:
This morning a handful of workstations got upgraded from 6.3 to 6.4 and
things seemed to be functional, until we tried to log in to one of our
instrument accounts that for various reasons uses olvwm/openwin as the
On 03/21/2013 04:06 PM, Miranda Hawarden-Ogata wrote:
This morning a handful of workstations got upgraded from 6.3 to 6.4 and
things seemed to be functional, until we tried to log in to one of our
instrument accounts that for various reasons uses olvwm/openwin as the
desktop (and no, I
Hi All,
Not sure I understand the error message:
yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: less.cogeco.net
* elrepo: elrepo.org
* extras: centos.mirror.rafal.ca
* rpmforge: mirror.cpsc.ucalgary.ca
*
I am trying to install a CentOS 6.4 x86_64 VM using a CentOS 5.9 x86_64
host, but its install has froze *twice*. What I am doing is to create a
10gig LVM volume, which I put a MS-DOS partition table on (using fdisk).
I then format the only partition to ext3, install grub and install the
pxeboot
On 3/21/2013 3:34 PM, Phil Savoie wrote:
Error: Package: gnome-vfs2-ntfs-1.13.1-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (@rpmforge)
Requires: ntfsprogs = 1.13.1-1.el6.rf
Removing: ntfsprogs-1.13.1-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (@rpmforge)
ntfsprogs = 1.13.1-1.el6.rf
On 3/21/2013 3:42 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
Is it because some package from the second disk is needed? Do I have to
create a merged version of the DVDs? Or is something else wrong?
I put a mirror of this, http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6/os/x86_64/
on a local http server
then I use the
Hi
Please help me understand to choose between the two versions CentOS 6.3 and
CentOS 6.4. I am not sure to choose 6.4 since it is being released
recently(
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2013-March/019276.html)
and it may be risky to push it in Live environment.
Regards,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Kaushal Shriyan
kaushalshri...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I have installed CentOS 6.4 on Dell Server R320 64bit with UEFI BIOS. Do i
need both /boot and /boot/efi partitions. Please help me understand the
difference between these.
Regards,
Kaushal
Hi,
On 2013-03-22, Kaushal Shriyan kaushalshri...@gmail.com wrote:
Please help me understand to choose between the two versions CentOS 6.3 and
CentOS 6.4. I am not sure to choose 6.4 since it is being released
recently(
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2013-March/019276.html)
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 5:04 PM, SilverTip257 silvertip...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Dave Johansen
davejohan...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:14 AM, SilverTip257 silvertip...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Gerry Reno
The graphics chip is probably relevant. FWIW I can't Ctrl-Alt-Fn to
any Virtual Console (I just get a black screen, no login prompt). I
have a nVidia graphics chip. There are many reports on the Internet of
trouble with VC and nVidia and some other graphics chips.
Cheers,
Cliff
On Fri, Mar 22,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Keith Keller
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:
On 2013-03-22, Kaushal Shriyan kaushalshri...@gmail.com wrote:
Please help me understand to choose between the two versions CentOS 6.3 and
CentOS 6.4. I am not sure to choose 6.4 since it is being released
53 matches
Mail list logo
