CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0687 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0687.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
Saludos a todos.
Tengo un servidor con CentOS 6.4. He buscado en internet como instalar y
configurar postfix (ya viene instalado por defecto), dovecot y squirrelmail.
El problema esta en squirrelmail que cuando escribo en el navegador
http://192.168.10.6/webmail da error, pues dice que no
y únicamente ingresando http://192.168.10.6
¿Qué te sale?
Saludos.-
2013/3/27 Alberto Contreras alconma...@yahoo.es
Saludos a todos.
Tengo un servidor con CentOS 6.4. He buscado en internet como instalar y
configurar postfix (ya viene instalado por defecto), dovecot y
squirrelmail.
El
El 27 de marzo de 2013 11:54, James Dean bond...@gmail.com escribió:
y únicamente ingresando http://192.168.10.6
¿Qué te sale?
Saludos.-
2013/3/27 Alberto Contreras alconma...@yahoo.es
Saludos a todos.
Tengo un servidor con CentOS 6.4. He buscado en internet como instalar y
Has probado poniendo https y no http? Squirremail en su conf dentro de apache
establece http seguro como método
Enviado desde mi iPhone
El 27/03/2013, a las 21:15, Carlos Restrepo restrcar...@gmail.com escribió:
El 27 de marzo de 2013 11:54, James Dean bond...@gmail.com escribió:
y
On 26 Mar 2013, at 23:34, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
What, I *shouldn't* tell him what he's doing wrong? Just try to do his job
for him, and let him come back, again and again, without ever actually
learning something?
This is a list not personal email. Just ignore it if it upsets you and let
On 3/26/2013 5:29 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/26/2013 03:25 PM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
On 3/26/2013 3:14 PM, Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
On 26 March 2013 18:58, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Had you, for example, searched to find out a) how to look at a file, b)
looked at the files I suggested
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
See this FAQ entry:
http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS6#head-b67e85d98f0e9f1b599358105c551632c6ff7c90
Had read this FAQ many times and clicked Configure Networking and
selected system eth0 and connect automatically.
On 3/27/2013 8:39 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
See this FAQ entry:
http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS6#head-b67e85d98f0e9f1b599358105c551632c6ff7c90
Had read this FAQ many times and clicked Configure Networking and
Hello,
how do people cope with constant SELinux errors like this from Fusion
Passenger:
36886. 03/27/2013 14:20:05 ps unconfined_u:system_r:passenger_t:s0 2
file open system_u:system_r:udev_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 denied 1922
36887. 03/27/2013 14:20:05 ps unconfined_u:system_r:passenger_t:s0 4 dir
Hello,
I've just tried to use CentOS-6.4-x86_64-minimal.iso, but it does not work
unmodified.
The grub commands used by the ISO for installation/rescue are:
kernel /images/pxeboot/vmlinuz ...
initrd /images/pxeboot/initrd.img
These paths do not exist on disk.
If I manually correct these
On Tue, March 26, 2013 16:08, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I dunno - I don't think I was telling him to learn latin; rather,
that he should increase his vocabulary beyond, oh, I read, years
back, that the *average* American's *average* vocabulary was about
500 words... and that Koko the gorilla
Hi,
after a long general power failure, I had to power off/on my
soon to be 6.4 firewall (updated to 6.4, but not rebooted yet).
After the off/on, everything seemed to be fine.
But I realized there were some specific/weird heavy slow downs.
In one case, the windows clients *uploads* would stall
On 27 March 2013 13:09, ign...@vault13.lt ign...@vault13.lt wrote:
Hello,
how do people cope with constant SELinux errors like this from Fusion
Passenger:
36886. 03/27/2013 14:20:05 ps unconfined_u:system_r:passenger_t:s0 2
file open system_u:system_r:udev_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 denied 1922
did you actually capture the traffic counting the process time spending
on a single packet IN and OUT of the system? Maybe you can try to
install a factory driver of the network card to see if it's helpful.
First of all, better figuring out where the problem is. Kernel itself or
driver. To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/27/2013 10:01 AM, Paul Norton wrote:
On 27 March 2013 13:09, ign...@vault13.lt ign...@vault13.lt wrote:
Hello,
how do people cope with constant SELinux errors like this from Fusion
Passenger:
36886. 03/27/2013 14:20:05 ps
Y'know, I was just reading an article about a Spanish Linux group filing a
complaint with the EU regulators about UEFI, and I was struck by a
thought: why is it that the OEM does not provide the UEFI key with the
hardware FOR THAT BOARD AND UEFI, rather than have it provided by M$?
Any clues (or
It depends on the hardware vendor. Which hardware vendor they faced the
issue?
On Wednesday, March 27, 2013, wrote:
Y'know, I was just reading an article about a Spanish Linux group filing a
complaint with the EU regulators about UEFI, and I was struck by a
thought: why is it that the OEM
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
If you can log in and use an editor in character mode you can fix it.
The change needed in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 will
be obvious once you get that far. But, it might be easier to
reinstall if you
On 3/27/2013 1:04 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
If you can log in and use an editor in character mode you can fix it.
The change needed in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 will
be obvious once you get that far.
Robert Benjamin wrote:
On 3/27/2013 1:04 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net
wrote:
If you can log in and use an editor in character mode you can fix it.
The change needed in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 will
snip
won't
Waleed Harbi wrote:
On Wednesday, March 27, 2013, wrote:
Y'know, I was just reading an article about a Spanish Linux group filing
a complaint with the EU regulators about UEFI, and I was struck by a
thought: why is it that the OEM does not provide the UEFI key with the
hardware FOR THAT
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
The reason I think this is the problem is the post where you said you
could log in after a very long delay. About the only thing that can
cause a very long delay is the system waiting for DNS responses on
what it thinks
On 3/27/2013 1:52 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
The reason I think this is the problem is the post where you said you
could log in after a very long delay. About the only thing that can
cause a very long delay is the system
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
The reason I think this is the problem is the post where you said you
could log in after a very long delay. About the only thing that can
cause a very long delay is the system waiting for DNS responses on
what it thinks
On 03/27/2013 09:25 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
why is it that the OEM does not provide the UEFI key with the
hardware FOR THAT BOARD AND UEFI, rather than have it provided by M$?
Because then you'd have to install a version of Windows (or any other
OS) signed FOR THAT BOARD AND UEFI.
Secure
Robert Benjamin wrote:
On 3/27/2013 1:52 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net
wrote:
The reason I think this is the problem is the post where you said you
could log in after a very long delay. About the only thing that can
cause a very
On 3/27/2013 3:30 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Robert Benjamin wrote:
On 3/27/2013 1:52 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net
wrote:
The reason I think this is the problem is the post where you said you
could log in after a very long delay.
On 3/27/2013 3:57 PM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
On 3/27/2013 3:30 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Robert Benjamin wrote:
On 3/27/2013 1:52 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net
wrote:
The reason I think this is the problem is the post where you
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
Did you mean ping nytimes.com ?
tcpdump -A port 50 output is tcpdump: verbose output suppressed,
use -v or -w for all protocol decode listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB
(Ethernet), capturing size 65535 bytes, and a
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Robert Benjamin benj...@cox.net wrote:
Did you mean ping nytimes.com ?
tcpdump -A port 50 output is tcpdump: verbose output suppressed,
use -v or -w for all protocol decode listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB
(Ethernet), capturing size
On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 06:14 -0400, Max Pyziur wrote:
Greetings,
The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration
files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible?
yes, they are ghost files, not really included in the package
Louis
I'm bumping this thread in hopes some Googe/Chromium devs will realize
that GCC 4.7.2 is available for RHEL6. Please continue supporting
google-chrome for rhel/centos 6. Now that version 26 is stable we get
a warning message every time chrome is launched. Google Chrome has
stopped updating ...
34 matches
Mail list logo
