CentOS Errata and Bug Fix Advisory 2013:X006 (Xen4CentOS)
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
-
X86_64
-
e1000e-2.4.14-3.4.54.1.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.rpm:
On 07/23/2013 07:01 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
On 22/07/13 21:26, Johnny Hughes wrote:
There are two unset Xen ballon options ... they are:
# CONFIG_XEN_SELFBALLOONING is not set
# CONFIG_XEN_BALLOON_MEMORY_HOTPLUG is not set
I see that you have recommended:
On 7/23/2013 10:37 PM, Rock wrote:
Maybe I got the numbers wrong?
http://site.microcom.us/nbm2_datasheet
Shouldn't that Nanobridge m2 be powerful enough to reach the 300 feet
or so to go from my BBQ to my home broadband router open guest
access point?
that thing has a pretty narrow beam,
Hi! Does anyone know where i can find an rrdtool rpm which contains
rrdcached? it seems that there is no rrdcached rpm and rrdtool rpms from
all known repos (base,epel,rpmforge) dont have rrdcached ...
Thanks!
Adrian
___
CentOS mailing list
On 7/23/2013 10:15 PM, Rock wrote:
Netgear N600. ... it's far too anemic to make it outside by the BBQ where I
want to set up the computer.
really? my N600 has great range. mine is a wndr3700v3, I'm using it
as a bridge/access point rather than as a router. put it up high, on
edge, with
@ Indunil Jayasooriya
IIRC, in one of your follow up post, you mention that you have the
Zimbra suite installed and running on *this* machine (which is why you
might have had to remove the distro's default postfix in the first
place).
If above is true then you should try to figure out how to
From: Adrian Sevcenco adrian.sevce...@cern.ch
Hi! Does anyone know where i can find an rrdtool rpm which contains
rrdcached? it seems that there is no rrdcached rpm and rrdtool rpms from
all known repos (base,epel,rpmforge) dont have rrdcached ...
Google says to check DAG rpms...
JD
On Wednesday 03 July 2013 08:03:51 Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
make sure you have rpmdevtools
yum install rpmdevtools
then run
rpmdev-setuptree
to setup the ~/rpmbuild tree structure
Hope this helps
K
Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289
Head of
From: John Doe jd...@yahoo.com
From: Adrian Sevcenco adrian.sevce...@cern.ch
Hi! Does anyone know where i can find an rrdtool rpm which contains
rrdcached? it seems that there is no rrdcached rpm and rrdtool rpms from
all known repos (base,epel,rpmforge) dont have rrdcached ...
Google
Hi All,
I am using RHEL 6.4 on a Dell Server with 32 cores.
But in the Cpus_allowed_list only 30 cores are available. Why is that?
See the snippet from cat /proc/self/status:
Cpus_allowed: 7fff7fff
Cpus_allowed_list: 0-14,16-30
The allowed list is same for the init process as well
Read up on CPU sets
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/proc.5.html
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/cpuset.7.html
Tony.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Miraj Mohamed
Sent: 24 July 2013 11:57
To:
Hello,
just a little question:
Exists a way to update the Gnome 2.28.1 out of box at Centos 6.4 to a
Gnome 3?
And if yes...how does this work?
thanks a lot.
--
thanks + bye ajh
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 07/24/2013 07:44 AM, AJH wrote:
Hello,
just a little question:
Exists a way to update the Gnome 2.28.1 out of box at Centos 6.4 to a
Gnome 3?
And if yes...how does this work?
thanks a lot.
--
thanks + bye ajh
___
CentOS mailing list
Just to give more informations...
Like to test that in my virtual enviroment...and if i am compatible with
Gnome 3...and everything works fine...update my workstation...
cheers ajh
[ Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. eoconno...@gmail.com - 24.07.2013 07:47:31 ]:
On 07/24/2013 07:44 AM, AJH wrote:
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On 07/24/2013 06:44 AM, AJH wrote:
Hello,
just a little question:
Exists a way to update the Gnome 2.28.1 out of box at Centos 6.4 to a
Gnome 3?
And if yes...how does this work?
thanks a lot.
There is no supported way to do this. This would not be easy to
accomplish, but it would be
On 07/24/2013 12:51 AM, Rock wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 01:09:29 -0400, Darr247 wrote:
I inferred you wanted to make the laptop talk to the ubiquiti
nano through the RJ45 port in order to configure it.
Well, that is a necessary evil, so, yes, that is the first step,
to configure it.
But,
In addition to building GTK3, they would also have to update glib2, glibc,
atk, and roughly a dozen or more additional packages to support just
building base GNOME 3.
It would be a monumental change leaving them with a distribution that was
no longer CentOS.
Just adding my $.02 in-case it helps.
Thanks a lot...
I think that Gnome 2 is already the best for my desktop, because I like
the Centos OS..therefore I could life with Gnome 2 :-)
Thanks a lot!
cheers
[ Andrew Wyatt and...@fuduntu.org - 24.07.2013 08:36:40 ]:
In addition to building GTK3, they would also have to update
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 23:07:30 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
my N600 has great range. mine is a wndr3700v3
Mine is the WNDR3400.
It's in the center of the house and barely makes it to the
front steps.
In contrast, the Nanobridge M2 can go for five miles,
at least according to what I've read.
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 23:03:00 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
you should be able to get 300 feet of mostly open space with a simple
panel antenna
Understood. The Nanobridge M2 may be far more than I need.
But, it should work as it's advertised to go five miles.
All I need is a few hundred feet.
Rock wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 23:03:00 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
snip
I think my original problem was what you guys sensed from
the start.
It was supremely frustrating having my manually typed eth0
IP address being wiped out - but - apparently that was what
Network Manager was supposed
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:04:40 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
In any network subnet, a default gateway is required to talk to any
other subnet ... this is not a CentOS thing, it is a TCP/IP thing.
I saved your wonderful explanation (so that I may re-read it whenever
I need to make a gateway
On 07/24/2013 09:01 AM, Rock wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 23:03:00 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
you should be able to get 300 feet of mostly open space with a simple
panel antenna
Understood. The Nanobridge M2 may be far more than I need.
But, it should work as it's advertised to go five
On 07/24/2013 10:07 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
on the router, see if it will accept a fixed IP, rather than one
assigned by DHCP; if so, you can set it on the laptop. I'd also check
to see if you need to deal with NetworkManager to do that. I don't
know - I *loathe* NM, and am majorly
On 7/24/2013 7:01 AM, Rock wrote:
Understood. The Nanobridge M2 may be far more than I need.
But, it should work as it's advertised to go five miles.
All I need is a few hundred feet.
note thats 5 miles in open space.
you said the router is in the middle of the house, what all is between
it
26 matches
Mail list logo