Hi All,
It's very helpful that CentOS release official AMIs in AWS EC2 marketplace.
However, compare to official RedHat Linux and Amazon Linux AMIs in EC2,
current official CentOS AMIs in marketplace does not support cloud-init or
user-data scripts.
which means that these AMIs doesn't support
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, gregg anderson wrote:
We've been using CentOS 5 with Xen on our machines for a while now and have
really grown to appreciate it. The lack of Xen for Centos 6 is the
reason we haven't upgraded yet, but with Xen4CentOS6 we have all the tools we
need. The concern some of
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Robert Dinse wrote:
I am getting to where we want to offer virtual servers
for lease but to do so we need some method of measuring
and/or limiting traffic to individual guests.
I am wondering what others are using for this purpose?
I know that you can look
buenos dias!!
Quizas no me supe explicar bien, pero me estoy guiando de lo siguiente:
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_%26_Windows_Profiles#Creating_a_profiles_share_and_setting_permissions
Y estoy detenido en la siguiente parte:
Log on to a Windows machine as Domain Administrator
Go to
Yo hace mucho con Samba 2.x hice un Controlador de Dominio Primario (PDC)
con PC Windows XP, seguí el tutorial oficial de Samba. En aquel entonces yo
debía crear una cuenta de confianza para la PC y otra cuenta común para el
usuario. Estoy hablando de Centos 3.x. Ya después no continué en la
Buenas, necesitaria que me guien si alguien sabe por donde viene el
siguiente error en mi squid:
# tail -f /var/log/squid/cache.log
2013/08/16 14:04:44 kid1| ERROR: No forward-proxy ports configured.
Mi configuracion es la siguiente:
# squid -k parse
2013/08/16 13:58:48| Startup: Initializing
Hola amigos, yo se que esto no es un foro de programación ni nada por el
estilo pero recurro a ustedes como mi ultima opción, tengo unos combobox en
php que necesito que actualicen una base de datos pero no lo hacen creo que
solo me falta una linea donde lo indique, me podrian ayudar??? gracias y
Mario Villela Larraza mario.villelalarr...@gmail.com escribió:
Hola amigos, yo se que esto no es un foro de programación ni nada por
el
estilo pero recurro a ustedes como mi ultima opción, tengo unos
combobox en
php que necesito que actualicen una base de datos pero no lo hacen creo
que
solo me
buenas tardes
cuando envías el formulario lo recibes con post o get ?
El 16 de agosto de 2013 15:14, Mario Villela Larraza
mario.villelalarr...@gmail.com escribió:
Hola amigos, yo se que esto no es un foro de programación ni nada por el
estilo pero recurro a ustedes como mi ultima opción,
Al parecer te hace falta en tus option definir un name=var que php tomara como
variable de data para guardar en la db.
Estas usando el tag form? post o get?
Slds.
FYI
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:14:41 -0500
From: mario.villelalarr...@gmail.com
To: centos-es@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-es]
Entondo que esto $row_Recordset1 es un mysql_fetch_assoc o array. Lo que
implica que ese sea el dato que estas cogiendo de la BD y mostrandolo en el
formulario.
Hasle un echo al variable de sentencia sql para que te muestre como hace el
la misma y asi puedas definir el error. Por otro lado, te
El día 16 de agosto de 2013 13:14, Mario Villela Larraza
mario.villelalarr...@gmail.com escribió:
Hola amigos, yo se que esto no es un foro de programación ni nada por el
estilo pero recurro a ustedes como mi ultima opción, tengo unos combobox en
php que necesito que actualicen una base de
Ya lo verifique y asi lo tengo con metodo $_POST [tipobach] en el archivo
update.php (que es el que recibe) y mi combobox esta estructurado de igual
foma pero aun asi no graba en la base
El 16 de agosto de 2013 16:01, cheperobert jrobertoa...@gmail.comescribió:
El día 16 de agosto de 2013
In article 520d158f.9080...@plnet.rs,
Ljubomir Ljubojevic cen...@plnet.rs wrote:
On 08/14/2013 07:14 PM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
I have two CentOS6 boxes, both running Bind as a local resolver, with
what appears to me to be the same configuration as each other. I have
a problem on one but
On 15/08/2013 23:58, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
So, what about redistribution of copies?
learn the difference between trademarks and software licences
So, if you have a license that says the distribution of the whole
must
Some weeks ago, I asked if anyone had set up a backup scheme for a remote
server.
By backup here, I mean an alternative arrangement that can be called upon
if eg the DSL connection to the remote machine fails.
I received one interesting reply:
==
At home, besides my fixed
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote:
On 15/08/2013 23:58, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
So, what about redistribution of copies?
learn the difference between trademarks and software
Have you trying with a power supply over lan?
(I don't know how is named in english, but maybe this can help you;
http://http://www.google.com/images?client=ms-rimhl=esq=zapatilla+ipoe=UTF-8channel=browsersa=Xoi=image_result_groupei=4A4OUqS6EIioyAHAn4Awved=0CAcQsAQ
)
Then some kind of magic (
On 16/08/2013 12:34, Andrew Wyatt wrote:
RedHat -- Production Systems, with paid-for support, something goes wrong
then I have some commercial comeback to get it fixed. High change control
environment.
CentOS -- QA, Development and Test Systems, and sometimes, non-critical
infrastructure,
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote:
On 16/08/2013 12:34, Andrew Wyatt wrote:
RedHat -- Production Systems, with paid-for support, something goes wrong
then I have some commercial comeback to get it fixed. High change control
environment.
CentOS -- QA,
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
Am 16.08.2013 14:07, schrieb Andrew Wyatt:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net
wrote:
While I agree that CentOS will always have support while it is
community
driven, and has an
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 01:33:01PM +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Some weeks ago, I asked if anyone had set up a backup scheme for a remote
server.
By backup here, I mean an alternative arrangement that can be called upon
if eg the DSL connection to the remote machine fails.
I received one
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
learn the difference between trademarks and software licences
So, if you have a license that says the distribution of the whole
must be on the terms of this License, and You may not impose any
further restrictions
On 08/15/2013 03:12 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
http://www.businessinsider.com/red-hat-ceo-go-ahead-copy-our-software-2013-8
Title says is all. Nice to know RH understands and accepts the
relationship between CentOS and RHEL.C
Although it is complex. After all, if too many choose CentOS,
Snip...
The bottom line ... Robert is correct, the relationship is certainly
symbiotic and not parasitic. Red Hat (the company) needs to make money,
and software that is built on the same code base is available for free
as well. It is a win-win ... which is exactly what the GPL provides
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:28 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 8/15/2013 2:22 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
And RedHat really DOESN'T own any of the source code it sells!
redhat doesn't sell the source code. they sell their support services
and infrastructure.
I agree
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
So which section of the GPL is it that exempts binaries from being
considered derived works with the same requiremnets?
OK you are really that stupid
the GPL doe snot talk about binaries at all
Exactly my point.
If anyone's got old RocketRAID cards, I just had to deal with one. They
are years behind in updating their drivers - googling, I find the last
time some were supported was CentOS 5.2.
At any rate, I have just managed to build 1.8 of rr232x successfully, and
am building filesystems on the drive as
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
The bottom line ... Robert is correct, the relationship is certainly
symbiotic and not parasitic. Red Hat (the company) needs to make money,
and software that is built on the same code base is available for free
as
I'm running a piece of network backup software called 'bacula', on a minimal
CentOS 6.4 install.
I got everything working pretty well, but there's one piece giving me some
problem-- a component which gives status info via a GUI.
In the past, on previous installations, I could ssh to the bacula
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Joseph Spenner joseph85...@yahoo.com wrote:
In the past, on previous installations, I could ssh to the bacula server with
the -X option, and run the application (called 'bat'), and it would display
back. I'd have to make sure the sshd_config permits
Joseph Spenner wrote:
I'm running a piece of network backup software called 'bacula', on a
minimal CentOS 6.4 install.
I got everything working pretty well, but there's one piece giving me
some problem-- a component which gives status info via a GUI.
In the past, on previous installations, I
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Joseph Spenner joseph85...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm running a piece of network backup software called 'bacula', on a minimal
CentOS 6.4 install.
I got everything working pretty well, but there's one piece giving me some
problem-- a component which gives status
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Joseph Spenner joseph85...@yahoo.comwrote:
I'm running a piece of network backup software called 'bacula', on a
minimal CentOS 6.4 install.
I got everything working pretty well, but there's one piece giving me some
problem-- a component which gives status
Hi all,
First of all, sorry for the OT. I need to buy a new laptop for my
work. My prerequisites are:
- RAM: 6/8 GiB (preferably 8 GiB)
- Processor: Core i7
- Disk: up to 500 GiB for SATA, 128 GiB for SSD.
- Graphics card: Intel HD (I really hate to use Nvidia or ATI Radeon
graphics cards).
From: Joseph Spenner joseph85...@yahoo.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] minimal X applications needed to export to remote
server?
Les:
Thanks for the tip! xorg-x11-xauth got me closer! The xlogo does show
From: Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 8:30 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] minimal X applications needed to export to remote
server?
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Joseph Spenner joseph85...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to Restore files deleted with rm rf from ext4 or
ext3 filesystem by mistake.
Regards
Ahmad
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 08/15/2013 03:12 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
http://www.businessinsider.com/red-hat-ceo-go-ahead-copy-our-software-2013-8
Title says is all. Nice to know RH understands and accepts the
relationship between
Timothy Murphy wrote:
The problem in both places is that the ADSL modem sometimes goes off,
and the only way to turn it back on seems to be
to disconnect and re-connect the power supply.
I had a similar problem with a cable modem. My relatively
inexpensive solution was to buy an X-10
On 08/16/2013 10:06 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
So which section of the GPL is it that exempts binaries from being
considered derived works with the same requiremnets?
OK you are really that stupid
the GPL doe snot talk
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 21:44:11 +0500
Ahmed wrote:
is it possible to Restore files deleted with rm rf from ext4 or
ext3 filesystem by mistake.
There are several programs and procedures that show up on a google search for
undelete ext4 and undelete ext3. Have you looked at and/or tried
On 08/16/2013 11:06 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Exactly my point. Everything is about derived works. So binaries
cannot be exempt from the requirement that the work as a whole can
only be distributed under a license that permits free redistribution
and that additional restrictions cannot be
On 08/16/2013 10:16 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
The bottom line ... Robert is correct, the relationship is certainly
symbiotic and not parasitic. Red Hat (the company) needs to make money,
and software that is built on the
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
OK you are really that stupid
the GPL doe snot talk about binaries at all
Exactly my point. Everything is about derived works. So binaries
cannot be exempt from the requirement that the work as a whole can
only be
Johnny Hughes wrote:
If you are asking for an opinion, I actually agree that they (Red Hat)
should also give it away for free. However, nothing requires them to do
so. Since they didn't, CentOS was created and fills that niche.
Hmm. In my opinion, Red Hat is doing the right thing. I
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.comwrote:
snip
Really? Are none of the trademark-restricted additions packaged into
GPLed items? Or is redistributing the trademark OK as long as nothing
is changed? If you could obtain a copy and didn't care about RNH,
From: Ahmed ahmed.daud...@gmail.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 9:44 AM
Subject: [CentOS] Restoring deleted files.
Hi,
is it possible to Restore files deleted with rm rf from ext4 or
ext3 filesystem by mistake.
There is something called
On 2013-08-16 @11:25 UTC, Giles Coochey wrote:
For me Redhat and CentOS have their place, together in the same
environment:
RedHat -- Production Systems, with paid-for support, something goes
wrong then I have some commercial comeback to get it fixed. High
change control environment.
On 08/16/2013 12:18 PM, Carl T. Miller wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
If you are asking for an opinion, I actually agree that they (Red Hat)
should also give it away for free. However, nothing requires them to do
so. Since they didn't, CentOS was created and fills that niche.
Hmm. In my
On 08/16/2013 12:12 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
OK you are really that stupid
the GPL doe snot talk about binaries at all
Exactly my point. Everything is about derived works. So binaries
cannot be exempt from the
On 08/16/2013 01:12 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Really? Are none of the trademark-restricted additions packaged into
GPLed items? Or is redistributing the trademark OK as long as nothing
is changed? If you could obtain a copy and didn't care about RNH,
could you ship straight RH binaries
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
Nothing in the GPL says that if you distribute the source to the public
you must distribute binaries to the public;
What about permitting redistribution? And if losing your RHN support
as a consequence isn't a restriction that
I am wondering if any one knows of a way to manage Xyratex disk shelves from
CentOS (in particular CentOS 4).
More details:
Some years ago I installed a NAS unit from Exanet which consists of 2 rebadged
IBM x3650 head nodes and a couple of Xyratex disk shelves with a total of 96 TB
of raw
On 08/16/2013 01:45 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
What about permitting redistribution? And if losing your RHN support
as a consequence isn't a restriction that the You may not impose any
further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted
herein. covers, then what kind of
On 8/16/2013 10:45 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Lamar Owenlo...@pari.edu wrote:
Nothing in the GPL says that if you distribute the source to the public
you must distribute binaries to the public;
What about permitting redistribution?
redistribution of SOURCE.
On 08/16/2013 12:45 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
What about permitting redistribution? And if losing your RHN support
as a consequence isn't a restriction that the You may not impose any
further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted
herein. covers, then what kind of
There's also PhotoRec included in the testdisk package.
Clive
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Joseph Spenner joseph85...@yahoo.comwrote:
From: Ahmed ahmed.daud...@gmail.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 9:44 AM
Subject: [CentOS] Restoring
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:01 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Nothing in the GPL says that if you distribute the source to the public
you must distribute binaries to the public;
What about permitting redistribution?
redistribution of SOURCE.have you READ the GPL ?
Please
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/16/2013 12:45 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
What about permitting redistribution? And if losing your RHN support
as a consequence isn't a restriction that the You may not impose any
further restrictions on the
On 08/16/2013 01:27 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/16/2013 12:45 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
What about permitting redistribution? And if losing your RHN support
as a consequence isn't a restriction that the You may not
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Exactly my point. Everything is about derived works. So binaries
cannot be exempt from the requirement that the work as a whole can
only be distributed under a license that permits free redistribution
and that
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
redistribution of SOURCE.have you READ the GPL ?
Please quote the section that you think exempts binaries
*THE WHOLE GPL TALKS ABOUT SOURCE CODE DAMNED*
*THE WHOLE GPL TALKS ABOUT SOURCE CODE DAMNED*
*THE
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Exactly my point. Everything is about derived works. So binaries
cannot be exempt from the requirement that the work as a whole can
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
redistribution of SOURCE.have you READ the GPL ?
Please quote the section that you think exempts binaries
*THE WHOLE GPL TALKS
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Sorry, but that quote does not appear in any copy of the GPL that I
can find. And it's not true, either. Everything it says is about
'works as a whole' and anything that can be considered a copy or
derivative work
Hello,
I think the commandline filemanager can reunite you with deleted files.
Greetings, j.
Clive Hills discordia...@gmail.comschreef:
There's also PhotoRec included in the testdisk package.
Clive
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Joseph Spenner joseph85...@yahoo.comwrote:
From: Ahmed
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
wow - everybody but you understands the GPL
Apparently not...
GPL == SOURCECODE
No. It applies to everything copied/derived from/translated from
(etc.) anything where any part is covered by GPL. Including binaries.
On 08/16/2013 03:12 PM, Andrew Wyatt wrote:
RedHat's trademarks are the only reason why you can't take the RedHat ISO
and distribute it to whomever you want.
Not exactly. The aggregate collection, just because it contains
GPL-licensed software, is not necessarily under the GPL as a whole, and
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On 08/16/2013 03:12 PM, Andrew Wyatt wrote:
RedHat's trademarks are the only reason why you can't take the RedHat ISO
and distribute it to whomever you want.
Not exactly. The aggregate collection, just because it contains
oracle is the bad!!
On Aug 15, 2013 11:12 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.businessinsider.com/red-hat-ceo-go-ahead-copy-our-software-2013-8
Title says is all. Nice to know RH understands and accepts the
relationship between CentOS and RHEL.
Although it is complex.
Mihai T. Lazarescu wrote:
In case the web/CLI interface of DSL modem/router is still
responsive, you can script a reboot from the server on the
LAN when fails the ping to a set of well-know always-up hosts.
Thanks very much for the suggestion,
which I shall study with interest.
I'm actually
On 8/16/2013 4:33 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Some weeks ago, I asked if anyone had set up a backup scheme for a remote
server.
By backup here, I mean an alternative arrangement that can be called upon
if eg the DSL connection to the remote machine fails.
Not sure if this is what you are
On 08/16/2013 10:53 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
SUSE does not release their enterprise sources and there
is no SLES clone because of it.
I can't believe I never thought about it (to wonder why there wasn't any
SLES clone)...
Shouldn't they release the source for the GPL packages? I thought there
On 8/16/2013 6:07 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
On 08/16/2013 10:53 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
SUSE does not release their enterprise sources and there
is no SLES clone because of it.
I can't believe I never thought about it (to wonder why there wasn't any
SLES clone)...
Shouldn't they release
On 08/16/2013 07:51 PM, Tony Schreiner wrote:
I am wondering if any one knows of a way to manage Xyratex disk shelves from
CentOS (in particular CentOS 4).
More details:
Some years ago I installed a NAS unit from Exanet which consists of 2
rebadged IBM x3650 head nodes and a couple of
On 08/16/2013 06:44 PM, Ahmed wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to Restore files deleted with rm rf from ext4 or
ext3 filesystem by mistake.
I posted this as a Document in official CentOS Facebook group. Feel free
to use it in a blog, just mention my name:
Recover files from ext3/ext4
On 08/16/2013 01:33 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Some weeks ago, I asked if anyone had set up a backup scheme for a remote
server.
By backup here, I mean an alternative arrangement that can be called upon
if eg the DSL connection to the remote machine fails.
I received one interesting reply:
On 08/16/2013 08:07 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
On 08/16/2013 10:53 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
SUSE does not release their enterprise sources and there
is no SLES clone because of it.
I can't believe I never thought about it (to wonder why there wasn't any
SLES clone)...
Shouldn't they release
79 matches
Mail list logo
