CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1165
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1165.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
El 16/08/13, Mario Villela Larraza mario.villelalarr...@gmail.com escribió:
Hola amigos, yo se que esto no es un foro de programación ni nada por el
Entonces usa Off-Topic, en el asunto, así sabremos que noe sta
relacioando a CentOS
estilo pero recurro a ustedes como mi ultima opción, tengo
buenas a todos
tengo el siguiente problema
tengo un servidor centos 5 con (mailscanner corriendo con sendmail) y en el
archivo de Access pongo las ip la cuales pueden mandar correos , pero tengo
varios dispositivos miviles (black Berry ,nextel)) los cuales si reciben
perfectamente bien los
Victor, es mas adecuado configurar tu servidor para que acepte relay de
usuarios autentificados, tratar de agregar ips de tus proveedores moviles,
al fichero access no es lo mas adecuado, ...
El 17/08/2013 15:10, VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ victor...@hotmail.com
escribió:
buenas a todos
tengo
On 08/17/2013 06:57 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 08/16/2013 06:44 PM, Ahmed wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to Restore files deleted with rm rf from ext4 or
ext3 filesystem by mistake.
I posted this as a Document in official CentOS Facebook group. Feel free
to use it in a blog,
hello,
over the past year, I bought a lot of laptops and I insist on running
Centos on all of them.
* the best is Dell dell-vostro3450, wich is 95 % compatible. The other
5% being some fn function keys
but I think it's not for sale any more.
* At the moment I use an Acer Aspire E1-571.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:25:40PM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 08/16/2013 08:07 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
On 08/16/2013 10:53 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
SUSE does not release their enterprise sources and there
is no SLES clone because of it.
I can't believe I never thought about it (to
On 08/17/2013 08:40 PM, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
hello,
over the past year, I bought a lot of laptops and I insist on running
Centos on all of them.
snip
/snip
* the worst are Asus X55-A and Dell Vostro 3460 that have Atheros
network cards. * I never tried Ati Radeon on Centos because of bad
I have Asus U32U with 8GBs of RAM and 320GBs of HD and everything works
fine (also the HDMI out) except some keys like volume up/down but I think
it's just a issue about config.
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.comwrote:
On 08/17/2013 08:40 PM, Johan Vermeulen
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
Hey there,
CentOS is using what kernel? 2.x??
which was not designed to work with newer hardware but Fedora works fine
with it.
If you need specific functions like EMAIL WEB etc take a look at the
latest stable Fedora and go back one version and test it.
I am using Fedora(18) on a very old MSI (5
On 08/17/2013 02:03 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
Hey there,
CentOS is using what kernel? 2.x??
which was not designed to work with newer hardware but Fedora works fine
with it.
If you need specific functions like EMAIL WEB etc take a look at the
latest stable Fedora and go back one version
On 08/16/2013 06:06 PM, carlopmart wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, sorry for the OT. I need to buy a new laptop for my
work. My prerequisites are:
- RAM: 6/8 GiB (preferably 8 GiB)
- Processor: Core i7
- Disk: up to 500 GiB for SATA, 128 GiB for SSD.
- Graphics card: Intel HD (I really
On Fri, August 16, 2013 11:06, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Reindl Harald
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
So which section of the GPL is it that exempts binaries from being
considered derived works with the same requiremnets?
the GPL doe snot talk about binaries at
On 08/16/2013 07:06 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 08/16/2013 10:16 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
The bottom line ... Robert is correct, the relationship is certainly
symbiotic and not parasitic. Red Hat (the company) needs to
On 08/17/2013 04:08 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I recently bought Samsung NP350E5x-A04HR that is all Intel with with
traditional Fn function (some manufacturers reverse the Fn action so you
get F1-F12 WITH Fn, and play/pause/wireless/etc are used WITHOUT Fn key)
with current problem that
On Fri, August 16, 2013 12:07, Joseph Spenner wrote:
 Thanks for the tip!  xorg-x11-xauth got me closer! The xlogo
does show up!
However, when I run 'bat', I get the gui with a bunch of little
squares instead of fonts/text:
http://img835.imageshack.us/img835/7935/62gh.png
So,
On 08/17/2013 03:23 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
On 08/17/2013 04:08 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I recently bought Samsung NP350E5x-A04HR that is all Intel with with
traditional Fn function (some manufacturers reverse the Fn action so you
get F1-F12 WITH Fn, and play/pause/wireless/etc are
On 2013-08-16 19:06, carlopmart wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, sorry for the OT. I need to buy a new laptop for my
work. My prerequisites are:
- RAM: 6/8 GiB (preferably 8 GiB)
- Processor: Core i7
- Disk: up to 500 GiB for SATA, 128 GiB for SSD.
- Graphics card: Intel HD (I really hate
On 08/17/2013 05:14 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 08/17/2013 03:23 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
On 08/17/2013 04:08 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I recently bought Samsung NP350E5x-A04HR that is all Intel with with
traditional Fn function (some manufacturers reverse the Fn action so you
Hello Ljubomir,
On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 16:14:11 +0200 Ljubomir Ljubojevic cen...@plnet.rs wrote:
On 08/17/2013 03:23 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
On 08/17/2013 04:08 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I recently bought Samsung NP350E5x-A04HR that is all Intel with with
traditional Fn function
levono thinkpad w530
On Aug 16, 2013 7:07 PM, carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, sorry for the OT. I need to buy a new laptop for my
work. My prerequisites are:
- RAM: 6/8 GiB (preferably 8 GiB)
- Processor: Core i7
- Disk: up to 500 GiB for SATA, 128 GiB for
GPL == SOURCECODE
No. It applies to everything copied/derived from/translated from
(etc.) anything where any part is covered by GPL. Including binaries.
GPL == COPYRIGHT
Yes, and without it, nothing gives you the right to distribute
programs where any part is covered.
YOU FOOL RHEL
Does anyone have info if Red Hat Software Collections will be available
for CentOS to recompile them (src.rpms)?
http://developerblog.redhat.com/2013/06/05/red-hat-software-collections-1-0-beta-now-available/
--
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe
StarOS,
On 17/08/13 12:03, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
Hey there,
CentOS is using what kernel? 2.x??
which was not designed to work with newer hardware but Fedora works fine
with it.
If you need specific functions like EMAIL WEB etc take a look at the
latest stable Fedora and go back one version and
On 17/08/13 14:14, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 08/17/2013 03:23 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
On 08/17/2013 04:08 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I recently bought Samsung NP350E5x-A04HR that is all Intel with with
traditional Fn function (some manufacturers reverse the Fn action so you
get
On 17/08/13 15:38, wwp wrote:
Hello Ljubomir,
On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 16:14:11 +0200 Ljubomir Ljubojevic cen...@plnet.rs
wrote:
On 08/17/2013 03:23 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
On 08/17/2013 04:08 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I recently bought Samsung NP350E5x-A04HR that is all Intel with
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 11:37 AM, carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/08/13 12:03, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
Hey there,
CentOS is using what kernel? 2.x??
which was not designed to work with newer hardware but Fedora works fine
with it.
If you need specific functions like
On 08/17/2013 06:17 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Does anyone have info if Red Hat Software Collections will be available
for CentOS to recompile them (src.rpms)?
http://developerblog.redhat.com/2013/06/05/red-hat-software-collections-1-0-beta-now-available/
AFAIK Red Hat has not released
On 08/17/2013 06:42 PM, Andrew Wyatt wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 11:37 AM, carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/08/13 12:03, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
Hey there,
CentOS is using what kernel? 2.x??
which was not designed to work with newer hardware but Fedora works fine
with it.
Hello carlopmart,
On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 16:40:42 + carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/08/13 15:38, wwp wrote:
[snip]
* VMWare says it supports it:
where Canonical even deserves the right to re-use your code for
non-open development - are you kidding?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contributor_License_Agreement#Canonical
Thanks for the link.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Aug 16, 2013, at 9:53 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 08/16/2013 07:51 PM, Tony Schreiner wrote:
I am wondering if any one knows of a way to manage Xyratex disk shelves from
CentOS (in particular CentOS 4).
More details:
Some years ago I installed a NAS unit from Exanet which
On 8/16/2013 10:51 AM, Tony Schreiner wrote:
Some years ago I installed a NAS unit from Exanet which consists of 2
rebadged IBM x3650 head nodes and a couple of Xyratex disk shelves with a
total of 96 TB of raw disk, connected by fibre channel. The operating system
is based on CentOS 4.4,
Copying a CD with k3b is no problem, except I want to include on my copy
the cbbd data (from freedb.org). I've configured k3b's cddb section
according to instructions at http://www.freedb.org/en/faq.3.html#15
and read every article google could find about k3b cddb freedb.org
config, but still
ken geb...@mousecar.com wrote:
Copying a CD with k3b is no problem, except I want to include on my copy
the cbbd data (from freedb.org). I've configured k3b's cddb section
according to instructions at http://www.freedb.org/en/faq.3.html#15
and read every article google could find about
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 8:10 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
the GPL doe snot talk about binaries at all
Exactly my point. Everything is about derived works. So binaries
cannot be exempt from the requirement that the work as a whole can
only be distributed under a license
37 matches
Mail list logo