Y si estimado maestro Roger... es así... pero como comenté hay algunos NIC
que cobran por la delegación de zonas a IP no definidas en un DNS externo.
O sea si yo adquiro el dominio:
miempresa.com.py
Y quiero ponerla a DNS propios con IP de mi proveedor de servicios en PY
ej: 201.129.128.98 (son
Estoy utilizando UltraVNC Viewer para acceder el escritorio pero no se porq
me dice autenticacion failed y luego dice algo de que me bloqueo por
seguridad, deje toda la noche sin usarlo para ver si me dejaba utilizarlo
pasadas unas horas y nada no me deja entrar.
El password es correcto porq con
Hola a todos,
El próximo 8 de octubre se celebrará en Madrid una nueva edición de CentOS
Dojo.
Los CentOS Dojo son eventos de un solo día, que se organizan en el mundo
entero, y que reúnen a las comunidades de CentOS para hablar de
administración de sistemas, mejores prácticas en el mundo linux,
Me gusto mejor usar freenx es más seguro a mi parecer y funciona perfecto
Raul Eduardo Arboleda Zapata
Ingeniero Sistemas
Universidad Innca
Teléfonos 3122889086.- 3006206613
El 24/10/2013, a las 8:22, metal box metalbox9...@gmail.com escribió:
Estoy utilizando UltraVNC Viewer para acceder
Una corrección, es el 8 de noviembre ;)
Saludos,
--
Yanis Guenane
2013/10/24 Jaime Melis jme...@opennebula.org
Hola a todos,
El próximo 8 de octubre se celebrará en Madrid una nueva edición de CentOS
Dojo.
Los CentOS Dojo son eventos de un solo día, que se organizan en el mundo
entero,
A mi parecer estas haciendo mal.
Usa las view... internal view, external view. De esa forma no tienes que
mezclar las direcciones ip no ruteables con Internet y las direcciones ip
publicas. Eso para mi es una implementación poco seria. Creo que deberías
chequear la documentación oficial de Bind9
En ese caso, con tan poca informacion puedes comprarte una cosa de estas
http://esoterismos.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/crystalball_468x317_thumb.jpg
y
preguntar :D...
El 24 de octubre de 2013 09:47, Raul Arboleda raularbol...@une.net.coescribió:
Me gusto mejor usar freenx es más seguro a
hola
asumiendo que tengo el siguiente escenario:
Red Interna (clientes): 172.16.11.0/24 (segmento de direcciones privadas)
Red Externa (Internet): 222.221.220.219/4 (segmento de direcciones públicas)
Nombre de Máquina Dirección IP interna Dirección IP publica
ns.midominio.cl
El resolv.conf de tu server debe apuntar a los DNSs de tu ISP, en caso de
tener un dedicado pues podria ser las IPs del DNS de Google (8.8.8.8) o las
DNSs que te asigne el proveedor del dedicado.
Saludos !
El 24 de octubre de 2013 12:11, David González Romero
dgrved...@gmail.comescribió:
A
ya lo resolvi gracias a todos.
El 24 de octubre de 2013 11:56, angel jauregui darkdiabl...@gmail.comescribió:
En ese caso, con tan poca informacion puedes comprarte una cosa de estas
http://esoterismos.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/crystalball_468x317_thumb.jpg
y
preguntar :D...
El 24
Yo no haria eso si tengo un servidor dns.
Un servidor dns debe de poder preguntar a los root severs y de ahi llegar hasta
el ultimo de los dns servers
Si no tengo un servidor dns entonces no tengo otro remedio que usar el del
proveedor que en buena lid debe ser el unico confiable que me va
From: Joseph Hesse joehe...@gmail.com
The problem is my wife's Win7 laptop which is running some sort of home
edition of Win7. I did everything I could in control panel to enable
file sharing but I still can't see the Samba share. I can ping the
computer running Samba? I tried to launch
Am 23.10.2013 um 17:18 schrieb Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Leon Fauster
leonfaus...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 23.10.2013 um 07:52 schrieb James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca:
| i have a new setup where the htdocs directory for the webserver
| is located on
On 10/23/2013 12:01 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Scott Robbins wrote:
To view the startup, when you boot, hit any key, then hit e as in edit (I
think--otherwise, just use the arrow key to get down to the line beginning
with Linux and when you highlight that line hit e to
Hi,
I am running CentOS 6.4 on a remote server. when i run the below command,
it prints out the headers too. is there a way to remove headers using the
below command line
*top -b -p 22657 topcpu.txt*
Regards,
Kaushal
___
CentOS mailing list
On 24/10/2013 12:20, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
Hi,
I am running CentOS 6.4 on a remote server. when i run the below command,
it prints out the headers too. is there a way to remove headers using the
below command line
*top -b -p 22657 topcpu.txt*
Perhaps the 'ps' command in a sleep 3 loop is
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
I find ddclient stops running after a time
on a remote CentOS-6.4 server.
Has anyone else found this?
I think it has been happening for a couple of months.
I notice because I get complaining messages in my logwatch.
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
School of Mathematics,
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote:
On 24/10/2013 12:20, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
Hi,
I am running CentOS 6.4 on a remote server. when i run the below command,
it prints out the headers too. is there a way to remove headers using the
below command line
On 24/10/2013 13:29, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote:
On 24/10/2013 12:20, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
Hi,
I am running CentOS 6.4 on a remote server. when i run the below command,
it prints out the headers too. is there a way to
I really love Centos.
I loaded Ubuntu last night on another drive and booted from that because
I want to develop an application to run on a tablet and GTK 3 seems like
a better route for a touch screen device.
However I really hated Ubuntu and I was so happy to get back to Centos
on my first
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Our next Dojo is going to be taking place at Madrid on the 8th Nov
2013. Details on the venue and registration are on the wiki page at
http://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/Madrid2013
As has now become tradition, the Dojo will start at 9:30am and
From: Kaushal Shriyan kaushalshri...@gmail.com
I am running CentOS 6.4 on a remote server. when i run the below command,
it prints out the headers too. is there a way to remove headers using the
below command line
*top -b -p 22657 topcpu.txt*
If you want to stick to top:
top -b -p 22657 |
Hi, folks. This is, in fact, off-topic: I'm fighting a user's FC19 box. I
updated him, rebooted... and his ATI video card seems to not be supported
any more (and it's *not* that old - an RV620).
The thing that drives me crazy is, when I reinstalled the whole system,
whatever video driver the
n Thu, 24 Oct 2013, Steve Clark wrote:
Have you looked at /var/log/Xorg.0.log file - it sounds like there is a
problem with X.
Not yet, but I will.
Also someone mentioned editing /etc/inittab and setting the run level to 3.
id:5:initdefault: - change the 5 to a 3.
If it boots
to a
On 10/24/2013 04:42 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hi, folks. This is, in fact, off-topic: I'm fighting a user's FC19 box. I
updated him, rebooted... and his ATI video card seems to not be supported
any more (and it's *not* that old - an RV620).
Google says it's from 2007 which make it ancient in
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Leon Fauster
leonfaus...@googlemail.com wrote:
What kind of throughput and latency are you talking about here? NFS
shouldn't add that much overhead to reads compared to disk head
latency and if you enable client caching might be considerably
faster. If
On 10/24/2013 11:17 AM, Patrick Lists wrote:
On 10/24/2013 04:42 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hi, folks. This is, in fact, off-topic: I'm fighting a user's FC19 box. I
updated him, rebooted... and his ATI video card seems to not be supported
any more (and it's *not* that old - an RV620).
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Patrick Lists
centos-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl wrote:
On 10/24/2013 04:42 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hi, folks. This is, in fact, off-topic: I'm fighting a user's FC19 box. I
updated him, rebooted... and his ATI video card seems to not be supported
any more
Btw, one more note: taking out all kernel lines, blacklist, and just a
*real* basic xorg.conf, in Xorg.0.log, the very first thing I see is
X.Org X Server 1.14.3
Release Date: 2013-09-12
[56.756] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
[56.756] Build Operating System: 3.10.9-200.fc19.x86_64
SilverTip257 wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Patrick Lists
centos-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl wrote:
On 10/24/2013 04:42 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hi, folks. This is, in fact, off-topic: I'm fighting a user's FC19
box. I updated him, rebooted... and his ATI video card seems to not
On 10/24/2013 07:03 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Btw, one more note: taking out all kernel lines, blacklist, and just a
*real* basic xorg.conf, in Xorg.0.log, the very first thing I see is
X.Org X Server 1.14.3
Release Date: 2013-09-12
[56.756] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
[
Patrick Lists wrote:
On 10/24/2013 07:03 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Btw, one more note: taking out all kernel lines, blacklist, and just a
*real* basic xorg.conf, in Xorg.0.log, the very first thing I see is
X.Org X Server 1.14.3
Release Date: 2013-09-12
[56.756] X Protocol Version 11,
I was trying to install CentOS 6.4 a workstation with an Abit AB9 motherboard
on a machine that had been running 5.9
Installation completed, but upon boot, it hangs hard after
acpiphp: ACPI Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version 0.5
ipmi message handler version 39.2
… then 3 attempts to
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Tony Schreiner
anthony.schrei...@bc.edu wrote:
I had used the the 6.3 net installer disk (and the 6.4 repo) which I noticed
had kernel 2.6.32-279, so I retrieved that kernel from the vault and it works.
The 279 and earlier kernels don't display any ipmi
On Oct 24, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Tony Schreiner
anthony.schrei...@bc.edumailto:anthony.schrei...@bc.edu wrote:
I had used the the 6.3 net installer disk (and the 6.4 repo) which I noticed
had kernel 2.6.32-279, so I retrieved that kernel from the
We are a CentOS shop, and have the lucky, fortunate problem of having
ever-increasing amounts of data to manage. EXT3/4 becomes tough to
manage when you start climbing, especially when you have to upgrade, so
we're contemplating switching to ZFS.
As of last spring, it appears that ZFS On Linux
On 10/24/2013 1:41 PM, Lists wrote:
Was wondering if anybody here could weigh in with real-life experience?
Performance/scalability?
I've only used ZFS on Solaris and FreeBSD.some general observations...
1) you need a LOT of ram for decent performance on large zpools. 1GB ram
above your
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Lists li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
We are a CentOS shop, and have the lucky, fortunate problem of having
ever-increasing amounts of data to manage. EXT3/4 becomes tough to
manage when you start climbing, especially when you have to upgrade, so
we're
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Tony Schreiner
anthony.schrei...@bc.edu wrote:
Try adding the following kernel parameters and see if the 6.4 kernel boots:
ipmi_si.tryacpi=0 ipmi_si.trydmi=0 ipmi_si.trydefaults=0
Akemi
Awesome, that did the trick.
I do not see those parameters in
On 10/24/2013 01:59 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
1) you need a LOT of ram for decent performance on large zpools. 1GB ram
above your basic system/application requirements per terabyte of zpool
is not unreasonable.
That seems quite reasonable to me. Our existing equipment has far more
than
On 2013-10-24, SilverTip257 silvertip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Lists li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
We are a CentOS shop, and have the lucky, fortunate problem of having
ever-increasing amounts of data to manage. EXT3/4 becomes tough to
manage when you start
On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 19:44 -0700, Keith Keller wrote:
Hi all,
I'm doing a very informal and unscientific poll: which kernel do you use
on your CentOS machines? Not which version of the CentOS kernel, but
which repository. Here are some examples I can think of off the top of
my head:
On 10/24/2013 2:59 PM, Lists wrote:
(*) ran into a guy who had 100s of zfs 'file systems' (mount points),
per user home directories, and was doing nightly snapshots going back
several years, and his zfs commands were taking a long long time to do
anything, and he couldn't figure out why. I
On 10/23/2013 10:30 AM, Morgan Cox wrote:
If you want SSD + MDRAID you need to use a 3.8+ kernel to have TRIM.
The speed difference between the stock 2.6.32 - 3.10 kernel with SSD +
MDRAID is insane.
has someone quantified what this 'insane' amounts to ?
--
Karanbir Singh
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013, Steve Clark wrote:
Have you looked at /var/log/Xorg.0.log file - it sounds like there is a
problem with X.
I have now, but I do not know what to do with the information.
I understand line 15 and 111.
Any ideas?
[root@localhost log]# grep -n EE Xorg.0.log
15: (WW)
On 10/24/2013 03:48 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 10/23/2013 10:30 AM, Morgan Cox wrote:
If you want SSD + MDRAID you need to use a 3.8+ kernel to have TRIM.
The speed difference between the stock 2.6.32 - 3.10 kernel with SSD +
MDRAID is insane.
has someone quantified what this 'insane'
On 10/24/2013 02:47 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
You didn't mention XFS.
Just curious if you considered it or not.
Most definitely. There are a few features that I'm looking for:
1) MOST IMPORTANT: STABLE!
2) The ability to make the partition bigger by adding drives with very
minimal/no
Am 25.10.2013 um 00:47 schrieb John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com:
On 10/24/2013 2:59 PM, Lists wrote:
(*) ran into a guy who had 100s of zfs 'file systems' (mount points),
per user home directories, and was doing nightly snapshots going back
several years, and his zfs commands were taking a
We tested ZFS on CentOS 6.4 a few months ago using a descend Supermicro
server with 16GB RAM and 11 drives on RaidZ3. Same specs as a middle range
storage server that we build mainly using FreeBSD.
Performance was not bad but eventually we run into a situation were we
could not import a pool
On 10/24/2013 4:12 PM, Lists wrote:
On 10/24/2013 02:47 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
You didn't mention XFS.
Just curious if you considered it or not.
Most definitely. There are a few features that I'm looking for:
1) MOST IMPORTANT: STABLE!
XFS is quite stable in CentOS 6.4 64bit.
there was a
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:44:44 -0700
Keith Keller kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:
Hi all,
I'm doing a very informal and unscientific poll: which kernel do you
use on your CentOS machines?
You just got the snip
I use kernel-ml from elrepo for my Desktop due to hardware support as
my
as i was trying to install in my laptop , it was stuck will an problem, the
graphics was not seen on the display, means display goes black, when i look
into display closely negative images were seen, thought might be a problem
in dispaly drivers , but other OS are installed properlly and working
On 10/24/2013 17:12, Lists wrote:
2) The ability to make the partition bigger by adding drives with very
minimal/no downtime.
Be careful: you may have been reading some ZFS hype that turns out not
as rosy in reality.
Ideally, ZFS would work like a Drobo with an infinite number of drive
On 10/24/2013 14:59, John R Pierce wrote:
On 10/24/2013 1:41 PM, Lists wrote:
1) you need a LOT of ram for decent performance on large zpools. 1GB ram
above your basic system/application requirements per terabyte of zpool
is not unreasonable.
To be fair, you want to treat XFS the same way.
On 10/24/2013 5:31 PM, Warren Young wrote:
To be fair, you want to treat XFS the same way.
And it, too is unstable on 32-bit systems with anything but smallish
filesystems, due to lack of RAM.
I thought it had stack requirements that 32 bit couldn't meet, and it
would simply crash, so it is
On 10/24/2013 5:29 PM, Warren Young wrote:
The least complicated*safe* way to add 1 TB to a pool is add*two* 1 TB
disks to the system, create a ZFS mirror out of them, and add*that*
vdev to the pool. That gets you 1 TB of redundant space, which is what
you actually wanted. Just realize,
On 2013-10-23, Keith Keller kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:
I'm doing a very informal and unscientific poll: which kernel do you use
on your CentOS machines?
Thanks to all for what was a surprisingly interesting thread! Here are
my very informal and unscientific tallies. This isn't
Hi all,
I'm doing a very informal and unscientific poll: which kernel do you
use on your CentOS machines?
You just got the snip
We're all stock, all the way. Figure 30 servers configured like this,
including dev/test and embedded servers. We'll soon have a true
Disaster Recovery setup
On 10/24/2013 05:29 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On 10/24/2013 17:12, Lists wrote:
2) The ability to make the partition bigger by adding drives with very
minimal/no downtime.
Be careful: you may have been reading some ZFS hype that turns out not
as rosy in realiIdeally, ZFS would work like a
60 matches
Mail list logo
