[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:1845 CentOS 6 yum Update

2013-12-17 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1845 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1845.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:1848 CentOS 6 pcs Update

2013-12-17 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1848 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1848.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:1850 Important CentOS 6 openjpeg Update

2013-12-17 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1850 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1850.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

Re: [CentOS] thunderbird-24.2.0-2.el5 is borked

2013-12-17 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 12/16/2013 10:21 AM, Lars Hecking wrote: Try to export your calendars and import them on a fresh install, see if the problem persists. Don't think I can do that with Exchange calendars. Anyway, the CentOS6 version works fine, even coming from a 17.x profile, so there definitely is a

Re: [CentOS] LVM recovery after pvcreate

2013-12-17 Thread Robert Nichols
On 12/16/2013 09:22 AM, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote: Hi all, I had centos 5.9 installed with one of its volumes (non-root) on LVM: ... /dev/vgapps/lvapps /opt/apps ext3defaults1 2 ... Then installed centos 6.4 on this servers but without exporting this volume

Re: [CentOS] thunderbird-24.2.0-2.el5 is borked

2013-12-17 Thread Lars Hecking
Thanks for the update, Johnny. 1. The mozilla compiled lightning uses a newer glibc than is available in EL5 ... therefore it will not work with the EL5 Thunderbird. There is a thunderbird-lightning package in EPEL testing for EL5 (thunderbird-lightning-2.6.4-1.el5.x86_64.rpm) that should

Re: [CentOS] thunderbird-24.2.0-2.el5 is borked

2013-12-17 Thread m . roth
Lars Hecking wrote: Thanks for the update, Johnny. snip 2. External http, https, and ftp Links may not work from thunderbird: [...] This works, although I didn't try if it works without. Yeah. That's been broken for a couple of years. Ever t-bird update I do (I'm still on 5.x at home,

Re: [CentOS] thunderbird-24.2.0-2.el5 is borked

2013-12-17 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 12/17/2013 09:15 AM, Lars Hecking wrote: Thanks for the update, Johnny. 1. The mozilla compiled lightning uses a newer glibc than is available in EL5 ... therefore it will not work with the EL5 Thunderbird. There is a thunderbird-lightning package in EPEL testing for EL5

Re: [CentOS] thunderbird-24.2.0-2.el5 is borked

2013-12-17 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 12/17/2013 09:38 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Lars Hecking wrote: Thanks for the update, Johnny. snip 2. External http, https, and ftp Links may not work from thunderbird: [...] This works, although I didn't try if it works without. Yeah. That's been broken for a couple of years. Ever

[CentOS] Headless system

2013-12-17 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
So I'm in a bit of a pickle ... I have a machine that needs to be repurposed from WinXP to CentOS. I downloaded the CentOS DVD and all then realized ... I don't have a keyboard/mouse for the machine. It only has USB ports on it, and I don't have a single available USB keyboard that I can plug

Re: [CentOS] Headless system

2013-12-17 Thread m . roth
Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: So I'm in a bit of a pickle ... I have a machine that needs to be repurposed from WinXP to CentOS. I downloaded the CentOS DVD and all then realized ... I don't have a keyboard/mouse for the machine. It only has USB ports on it, and I don't have a single available

Re: [CentOS] Headless system

2013-12-17 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Suggestion: check the closets, and people's desks. Certainly, we have a *lot* of crap (i.e., IDE drives, old, OLD SCSI drives) laying around. I have a strict rule at the office: if no one's using it, throw it out. MY actual office is

Re: [CentOS] Headless system

2013-12-17 Thread John R Pierce
On 12/17/2013 9:52 AM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: I don't have a keyboard/mouse for the machine. It only has USB ports on it, and I don't have a single available USB keyboard that I can plug in. you can't even borrow a USB key/mouse off another system for the 5 minutes it would take to get

Re: [CentOS] Headless system

2013-12-17 Thread Chris Stone
Have a look at this: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/VncHeadlessInstall Chris On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Ashley M. Kirchner ash...@pcraft.comwrote: So I'm in a bit of a pickle ... I have a machine that needs to be repurposed from WinXP to CentOS. I downloaded the CentOS DVD

Re: [CentOS] Virtual Machine converted from physical : Kernel Panic at boot .

2013-12-17 Thread Gregory Machin
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Barry Brimer li...@brimer.org wrote: On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Gregory Machin wrote: Hi. I used VMware Standalone converter 5.5 to convert a CentOS 5.3 machine from a Physical server to a Virtaul Machine on ESXi 5.1 . Thus far with every attempt to

Re: [CentOS] Headless system

2013-12-17 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
Yeah, that didn't work as expected ... The system was setup to always boot from the HD first ... in order to change that I had to go in the BIOS and flip the order around so it would boot from the CD. So, I ended up stealing a coworker's keyboard when they went to lunch. Returned it before they

Re: [CentOS] ldapsearch w. SSL refuses to connect to server with openssl 1.0.1 (worked with openssl 1.0.0)

2013-12-17 Thread m . roth
Frank Thommen wrote: Hi, ldapsearch with an ldaps-URL stopped working recently, probably with the update from openssl 1.0.0 to openssl 1.0.1. snip Question #0: is selinux enforcing? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-17 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Karanbir Singh wrote: I wonder if its time to start considering a social list again; very little of the conversation in this thread is really CentOS specific now. On Fri, 13 Dec 2013, Michael Hennebry wrote: I noticed the the grub stanza for my F14 contains the line

[CentOS] ldapsearch w. SSL refuses to connect to server with openssl 1.0.1 (worked with openssl 1.0.0)

2013-12-17 Thread Frank Thommen
Hi, ldapsearch with an ldaps-URL stopped working recently, probably with the update from openssl 1.0.0 to openssl 1.0.1. On a server with up-to-date packages (openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.x86_64, openldap-clients-2.4.23-32.el6_4.1.x86_64) I get the following errors when issuing an ldapsearch (some

Re: [CentOS] ldapsearch w. SSL refuses to connect to server with openssl 1.0.1 (worked with openssl 1.0.0)

2013-12-17 Thread Frank Thommen
On 17.12.13 20:42, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Frank Thommen wrote: Hi, ldapsearch with an ldaps-URL stopped working recently, probably with the update from openssl 1.0.0 to openssl 1.0.1. snip Question #0: is selinux enforcing? SELinux is disabled. frank

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-17 Thread SilverTip257
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Michael Hennebry henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu wrote: On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Karanbir Singh wrote: I wonder if its time to start considering a social list again; very little of the conversation in this thread is really CentOS specific now. +1 Maybe ... :)

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 7 Beta is now public

2013-12-17 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 12/16/2013 01:27 PM, Andrew Wyatt wrote: I meant the actual implementation, I knew it would be GNOME Classic. This beta release is awful. I lost count of how many devel packages were missing now, I think I had to rebuild over 20 of their source rpms to get them while I was toying with

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 7 Beta is now public

2013-12-17 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 12/15/2013 10:29 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Alain Péan alain.p...@lpn.cnrs.fr wrote: so stay on RHEL6/CentOS6 until this old hardware dies where is the problem? Google Chrome, etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux

[CentOS] Why the huge shmmax default setting?

2013-12-17 Thread Lists
Fresh load of Centos6/64 from new ISO (downloaded 2 weeks ago?) and getting set up with PostgreSQL, one of the typical steps is to increase shmmax from its normal, conservative value (eg: 32 MB or something) to something far more aggressive. But in recent installs of CentOS 6, this value is

Re: [CentOS] Virtual Machine converted from physical : Kernel Panic at boot .

2013-12-17 Thread Eric Michaelis
On 12/17/2013 2:06 PM, Gregory Machin wrote: I deleted the directories and recreated as above but no luck. In similar conversions I've done in the past, I've found that the server I've converted from is using a different SCSI driver that isn't compatible with the VMware virtual SCSI devices. I

Re: [CentOS] Why the huge shmmax default setting?

2013-12-17 Thread John R Pierce
On 12/17/2013 4:33 PM, Lists wrote: This large value doesn't really make sense to me - can somebody explain why the change to such a large value? its just a limit, it has no impact unless someone claims too much shared memory. the only place it makes sense to set it small is on a shared

Re: [CentOS] Virtual Machine converted from physical : Kernel Panic at boot .

2013-12-17 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Eric Michaelis combin...@gmail.com wrote: 5. Create a new initrd: mkinitrd /boot/initrd-KERNELVERSION.img KERNELVERSION 6. Exit out of the rescue environment, reboot, and hope for the best.. I'd do a grub-install /dev/sda while your are there... In similar

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 7 Beta is now public

2013-12-17 Thread Andrew Wyatt
Yes, there are many missing -devel packages. It's possible that they didn't fit on the media though, I haven't connected the system to RedHat's repositories. On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.orgwrote: On 12/16/2013 01:27 PM, Andrew Wyatt wrote: I meant the

Re: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux testing

2013-12-17 Thread Lists
On 12/14/2013 08:50 AM, Chuck Munro wrote: Hi Ben, Yes, the initial replication of a large filesystem is *very* time consuming! But it makes sleeping at night much easier. I did have to crank up the inotify kernel parameters by a significant amount. I did the initial replication using

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 7 Beta is now public

2013-12-17 Thread Scott Robbins
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 07:57:01PM -0600, Andrew Wyatt wrote: Yes, there are many missing -devel packages. It's possible that they didn't fit on the media though, I haven't connected the system to RedHat's repositories. You can just run yum update (though I think you have to manually change