CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0103 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0103.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
Hola a todos:
Una de las tareas que mayormente realizo es copiar archivos de un servidor
a otro, de un directorio a otro..etc...
generarlmente son directorios que contienen muchos archivos, y en ocaciones
no quiero copiar x archivo... o mas de un archivo no los quiero copiar
existe alguna
Has probado rsync con la opción de exclude
El 29 de enero de 2014, 11:55, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin
rodrigo.pichin...@gmail.com escribió:
Hola a todos:
Una de las tareas que mayormente realizo es copiar archivos de un servidor
a otro, de un directorio a otro..etc...
generarlmente son
ok muchas gracias ...probare y te cuento
El 29 de enero de 2014, 14:02, Edwin Boza ebo...@gmail.com escribió:
Has probado rsync con la opción de exclude
El 29 de enero de 2014, 11:55, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin
rodrigo.pichin...@gmail.com escribió:
Hola a todos:
Una de las tareas que
Muchas gracias Edwin-...funciono perfecto...gracias mil
El 29 de enero de 2014, 14:03, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin
rodrigo.pichin...@gmail.com escribió:
ok muchas gracias ...probare y te cuento
El 29 de enero de 2014, 14:02, Edwin Boza ebo...@gmail.com escribió:
Has probado rsync con la
El día 28 de enero de 2014, 9:42, Ricardo rico...@gmail.com escribió:
Tengo un cyber y cada año escogo una distro para usar en dicho local, este
año le toco a CentOS, he podido instalar algunas cosas pero me falta la
instalación de juegos para niños (Gcompris, Childsplay...) , espero q la
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Hass
Sent: den 29 januari 2014 08:47
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Hi friend -
what is your end goal with this effort to obtain security with
On 1/28/2014 4:45 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Use IPA. It combines LDAP with Kerberos, a server-client environment is
easily setup and the documentation (RHEL deployment) is very helpful.
Thank you. I'll look it up.
LDAP and Kerberos though. That does sound a lot like Microsoft Active
Hello Sorin,
Good call - not sure how far your coding goes and with what/how
languages and scripts...
Make sure to have as much as possible on VM's related to your security
'servers' -- so
that you also get a virtual built in Disaster recovery as well.
KERBEROS is a very secure, albeit
On 01/29/2014 09:44 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 1/28/2014 4:45 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Use IPA. It combines LDAP with Kerberos, a server-client environment is
easily setup and the documentation (RHEL deployment) is very helpful.
Thank you. I'll look it up.
LDAP and Kerberos though. That does
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Hass
Sent: den 29 januari 2014 09:49
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Good call - not sure how far your coding goes and with what/how
languages and
Hey Sorin,
I'm getting ready to catch a plane to Dubai but wanted to answer you
real quick and short:
SSL for smaller networks in terms of authentication is fine and secure -
as long as your infrastructure is secure.
I'm glad to hear your using VM's more and more. It give you a lot more
Almost forgot, //Sorin:
SSL uses public key cryptography:
1. You (or your browser) has a public/private keypair
2. The server has a public/private key as well
3. You generate a symmetric session key
4. You encrypt with the server's public key and send this encrypted
session key to the
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Hass
Sent: den 29 januari 2014 11:11
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Almost forgot, //Sorin:
SSL uses public key cryptography:
1. You (or your
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On Wed, January 29, 2014 01:44, James A. Peltier wrote:
- Original Message -
| Does anyone here use a Samba4 setup for single sign-on for MS_Win
| workstations
| and CentOS-6 boxes? Does anyone here use it for imap and/or smtp
| authentication? We are experimenting with replacing
Based on input from everyone here I am thinking of an alternate setup.
Single small inexpensive 64GB SSD used as /boot, / and swap. Putting
/vz on software RAID1 array on the two 4TB drives. I can likely just
zip tie the SSD in the 1u case somewhere since I have no more drive
bays. Does
On 01/29/2014 06:51 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
I would have to ask why you're doing such a thing in the first place? You
have a perfectly good working Active Directory setup, that people are already
familiar with, I suspect with existing MS clients which integrate fully (and
properly) and you
I'm doing exactly this on a trial basis with production servers. So far,
it's working great. Some tips:
1) Flash drives are less reliable than HDDs. Software RAID1 is the way
to go.
A) Use two different makes of USB drives so that you have
different failure characteristics. If either
On 01/29/2014 08:15 AM, Matt wrote:
If I am putting both 4TB drives in a single RAID1 array for /vz would
there be any advantage to using LVM on it?
My (sometimes unpopular) advice is to set up the partitions on servers
into two categories:
1) OS
2) Data
OS partitions don't really grow much.
- Original Message -
|
| On Wed, January 29, 2014 01:44, James A. Peltier wrote:
| - Original Message -
| | Does anyone here use a Samba4 setup for single sign-on for MS_Win
| | workstations
| | and CentOS-6 boxes? Does anyone here use it for imap and/or
| | smtp
| |
On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 08:57 -0800, Lists wrote:
My (sometimes unpopular) advice is to set up the partitions on servers
into two categories:
1) OS
2) Data
Absolutely. I have been doing this, without problems, for 5 years.
Keeping the two distinct is best, in my opinion.
On 01/24/2014 11:09 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
However, note that there might be an issue with anaconda and big USB
storage. The boot partition anaconda creates will not boot past grub.
I needed to manually create the partition to start on sector 63 for
grub to see it. Happens on my 16GB
That's great advice.. I've *across the universe* also sectioned off
/home directory and /opt
Not to counter anything here, no sir eee, to add.. to the sane request
from the previous mention...
It can make the difference sometimes with fast restores and there is a
slight performance increase
Paul,
I forgot to mention with the 'unconventional' slicing of the Partitions,
it does become unpopular
in terms of 'vendor' support (if it applies.. ) and also expentencies on
Code installs, etc. where
environments are set based on 'known knowns' with Linux/UNIX layouts ..
and the likes..
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Jeffrey Hass xacc...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's something: I've done before and /after performance testing with
real time data and User requests
with just the 'basic' file partioning and then Partioning the partition
-- really does wonders..
How so, unless you
On 01/29/2014 01:10 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
How so, unless you are adding disk heads to the mix or localizing
activity during your test?
Just ran into this: did a grep on what seemed to be a lightly loaded
server, load average suddenly spiked unexpectedly. Turns out that it was
performing
How not so...say something important next time. People are worl I no here..
On Jan 29, 2014 1:11 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Jeffrey Hass xacc...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's something: I've done before and /after performance testing with
real
--On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 12:45:09 PM + Sorin Srbu
sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
LDAP and Kerberos though. That does sound a lot like Microsoft Active
Directory. 8-)
No, the other way around. Microsoft Active Directory sounds a lot
like LDAP and Kerberos. Credit where credit is
No, the other way around. Microsoft Active Directory sounds a lot
like LDAP and Kerberos. Credit where credit is due ...
No, the other way around. Microsoft Active Directory implements an
LDAP like directory accessible interface for its own directory.
Calling Active Directory LDAP is like
brilliant.
exactly.
On 1/29/2014 2:24 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
No, the other way around. Microsoft Active Directory sounds a lot
like LDAP and Kerberos. Credit where credit is due ...
No, the other way around. Microsoft Active Directory implements an
LDAP like directory accessible
On 1/29/2014 2:24 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
No, the other way around. Microsoft Active Directory implements an
LDAP like directory accessible interface for its own directory.
Calling Active Directory LDAP is like calling vim `echo xx yy`. If you
are unaware of all the moving parts under
AD *is* a modified/extended LDAP+Kerberos based system, it just adds a
ton more proprietary stuff around it to manage Windows workstations, the
whole Group Policy Object stuff etc etc. Thats all implemented via
LDAP extensions.
I'm sorry, with all due respect I disagree. There is an
On 1/29/2014 3:17 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I'm sorry, with all due respect I disagree. There is an unfathomable quantity
of
functionality not accessible via LDAP.
You can query some aspects made available through the LDAP interface, you
cannot set nor modify plenty.
indeed, as I said,
Pretty much rightand is not truly X.500 compliant...This AD.
It makes me nervous when one refers to it as LDAP...heh.
Do a low level trace when running: ldapsearch ..
Problem is AD has to be dealt with until Microsoft dies! Becomes Novell.
And it will someday
Anyway The LDAP with
Hi,
I am pretty new to Openmeeting, and tried to follow the documentation for
Openmeeting, and looks quite a challenge with bit and pieces of software to
be compiled to make it work, I do not mind to sweat it out, but in the
interim, just wanted to check if there is any YUM packages for it,
We have a load balancer/session server that manages sessions in small
files. I did a grep on the directory of session files and the server
load went from 0.50 to 10.x, for all intents and purposes we were down
until I canceled the grep.
According to this article on
37 matches
Mail list logo
