On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 5:53 PM, George Dunlap dunl...@umich.edu wrote:
As promised, in preparation for next week's SIG meeting, here's a
kick-off discussion about the Virtualization SIG roadmap.
I'm mainly tossing out ideas here -- see this is an invitation to
discussion.
Key things I
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Dusty Mabe dustym...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Dusty Mabe dustym...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 11, 2014 1:37 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
I've been working with the epel guys to bring that through - in the
coming
Hola
El 12/04/2014 7:47, William Romero escribió:
hola lista.
quisiera hacerles una consulta , tengo 2 servidores de firewal en centos cada
uno tiene diferente proveedor de internet, todo funciona bien, pero tengo una
problema con 3 servidor que es de correos electronicos tambien en
Hola a tod@s,
¿al final has podido implementarlo?
¿que parámetros has indicado en el fichero pure-ftpd.conf?
Estoy en tu mismo tesitura, quiero implementar Pure-Ftpd con Geotrust pero
no encuentro la manera.
Gracias por cualquier información
Saludos,
Sergio.
El 10 de abril de 2014, 17:04,
:: Si, compre un certificado para cada servidor, yo trabajo con
GlobeSSL
Yo segui estas guias:
http://www.howtoforge.com/forums/showthread.php?t=41883
http://wiki.ggis.biz/index.php/Pure-FTPd_on_Ubuntu
Y para el pureftp.pem :
cat certificado.key pureftp.pem
On 18 Apr 2014 16:49, Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.com wrote:
As I read more and more about this beast, I keep finding pages that
indicate the samba4 rpms supplied with the Centos/RH distribution are
not the full version and that I should get them from either samba.org or
certain other
Hello!
We have central ldap for users, idmapd.conf configured on every machine
and users' home folders on nfs, mounted by automount on several machines.
After the last OS upgrade we notice that permissions on some files (not
for all users) are corrupted:
For example:
-rw-r--r--1
Restarting rpcidmapd and clearing the cache helped to solve the problem.
Barbara
On 04/22/2014 10:15 AM, Barbara Krasovec wrote:
Hello!
We have central ldap for users, idmapd.conf configured on every machine
and users' home folders on nfs, mounted by automount on several machines.
After
Thanks very much. The SerNet stuff was what I was seeing using Google,
but as I mentioned, the postings were rather old.
Thanks James for the reply.
steve
On 4/22/2014 3:20 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
On 18 Apr 2014 16:49, Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.com wrote:
As I read more and more about
I have used the informations available at samba4:
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Main_Page
wget ftp://ftp.samba.org/pub/samba/samba-4.1.6.tar.gz
and compiled samba4.
CentOS Version is 6.5
best regards
Helmut
Viele Grüße
Helmut Drodofsky
Internet XS Service GmbH
Heßbrühlstraße 15
70565
And, would you care strongly if it went away (or would you just
migrate to something else)?
I would care strongly as I use it at home to limit inbound ssh to just the
IP addresses of my work machine. Setting up IPtables is more complicated
which can be read as easier to get it wrong.
Am 18.04.2014 17:49, schrieb Steve Campbell:
I'm a little new to Samba when used as more than just a simple place to
mount a single user to a single share, but we're now getting ready to
replace our Netware servers with Samba, and I guess that means Active
Directory DC.
As I read more and
I'm not sure why I need that. As I stated, I'm a little new to Samba and
AD. For some reason, my research suggests that to get AD, I need Samba 4.
The person who manages our Netware, and who will be assuming the
responsibility of managing all of this once installed wants to keep as
much of the
Please don't top post.
Steve Campbell wrote:
On 4/22/2014 9:59 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Am 18.04.2014 17:49, schrieb Steve Campbell:
I'm a little new to Samba when used as more than just a simple place to
mount a single user to a single share, but we're now getting ready to
replace our
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
James B. Byrne
Sent: Monday, 21 April, 2014 17:28
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Yum cannot download from local repository
... snip
in /root/RPMS/repos/Packages I have this:
ll
The person who manages our Netware, and who will be assuming the
responsibility of managing all of this once installed wants to keep as
much of the similarities between Samba and Netware as he/she can.
Is that his/her same forward thinking that managed to keep you guys on
netware for so
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.com wrote:
I'm not sure why I need that. As I stated, I'm a little new to Samba and
AD. For some reason, my research suggests that to get AD, I need Samba 4.
Do you want to replace AD or just interoperate with a Microsoft AD?
On 4/22/2014 2:13 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.com wrote:
I'm not sure why I need that. As I stated, I'm a little new to Samba and
AD. For some reason, my research suggests that to get AD, I need Samba 4.
Do you want to replace AD
Steve Campbell wrote:
On 4/22/2014 2:13 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.com
wrote:
I'm not sure why I need that. As I stated, I'm a little new to Samba
and AD. For some reason, my research suggests that to get AD, I need
Samba
4.
On 4/22/2014 2:40 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Campbell wrote:
On 4/22/2014 2:13 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.com
wrote:
I'm not sure why I need that. As I stated, I'm a little new to Samba
and AD. For some reason, my
On 4/22/2014 11:52 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
But do the workgroups have their own login scripts on the server? That's
sort of been the difference between using workgroups and domains, at
least from any readings I've done so far. We actually break the
workgroups/domains down into departmental
On 4/22/2014 3:02 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 4/22/2014 11:52 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
But do the workgroups have their own login scripts on the server? That's
sort of been the difference between using workgroups and domains, at
least from any readings I've done so far. We actually break the
Le 22/04/2014 21:21, Steve Campbell a écrit :
Another samba 4 advantage, I think:
You can load and use Windows Remote Server Administration Tools (RSAT)
to manage the domains. How completely? Time will tell.
I think you should wait for RHEL 7 (and then CentOS 7), which will be
released soon
On 4/22/2014 12:21 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
Another samba 4 advantage, I think:
You can load and use Windows Remote Server Administration Tools (RSAT)
to manage the domains. How completely? Time will tell.
I'd read the EULA on those tools carefully. I would not be at all
surprised that
Le 22/04/2014 21:54, Reindl Harald a écrit :
I think you should wait for RHEL 7 (and then CentOS 7), which will be
released soon (June ?). Perhaps, it well include samba4 without anything
to build from source
not perhaps, for sure
samba-4.1.0-3.el7.x86_64
samba-client-4.1.0-3.el7.x86_64
I've got an MSI K9N Platinum MS 7250 VER 1.1
motherboard with a dead battery.
The battery mounts vertically:
http://www.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu/~hennebry/computer/battery.png
To me, the tab on the right would seem to need moving.
It does not want to move.
I am reluctant to apply any more force than I
On 2014-04-22 16:08, Michael Hennebry wrote:
I've got an MSI K9N Platinum MS 7250 VER 1.1
motherboard with a dead battery.
The battery mounts vertically:
http://www.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu/~hennebry/computer/battery.png
To me, the tab on the right would seem to need moving.
It does not want to
Yup, looks like that tab needs moved out of the way and the battery
removed. Down seems to be the shortest path to my eyes. However, I could
see why one might also try right.
--Blake
Michael Hennebry wrote the following on 4/22/2014 3:08 PM:
I've got an MSI K9N Platinum MS 7250 VER 1.1
Le 22/04/2014 22:14, Reindl Harald a écrit :
not perhaps, for sure
samba-4.1.0-3.el7.x86_64
samba-client-4.1.0-3.el7.x86_64
samba-common-4.1.0-3.el7.x86_64
samba-libs-4.1.0-3.el7.x86_64
I notice it is samba-common-4, so samba 4 will be the default in RHEL
7, not samba 3.6.x?
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:02 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 4/22/2014 11:52 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
But do the workgroups have their own login scripts on the server? That's
sort of been the difference between using workgroups and domains, at
least from any readings I've done
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 04:17:30PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
Pliers?
I would suggest a 22oz claw hammer and a more appropriate venue.
John
--
Be always at war with your vices, at peace with your neighbors, and let
each new year
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Blake Hudson bl...@ispn.net wrote:
Yup, looks like that tab needs moved out of the way and the battery
removed. Down seems to be the shortest path to my eyes. However, I could
see why one might also try right.
How does it look from the backside?
--Blake
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Alain Péan alain.p...@lpn.cnrs.fr wrote:
Thanks for the information. Samba 4 domains are a very different beast
than samba 3.x ones (NT4 style). A samba 4 (AD style) includes its own
DNS, its own LDAP etc...
A lot of which is irrelevant if you just have one
Michael Hennebry wrote:
I've got an MSI K9N Platinum MS 7250 VER 1.1
motherboard with a dead battery.
The battery mounts vertically:
http://www.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu/~hennebry/computer/battery.png
To me, the tab on the right would seem to need moving.
It does not want to move.
I am reluctant to
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 03:08:29PM -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
I've got an MSI K9N Platinum MS 7250 VER 1.1
motherboard with a dead battery.
The battery mounts vertically:
http://www.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu/~hennebry/computer/battery.png
To me, the tab on the right would seem to need moving.
On 4/22/2014 1:31 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Alain Péanalain.p...@lpn.cnrs.fr wrote:
Thanks for the information. Samba 4 domains are a very different beast
than samba 3.x ones (NT4 style). A samba 4 (AD style) includes its own
DNS, its own LDAP etc...
A lot of
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:10 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
A lot of which is irrelevant if you just have one server, serving file
shares.
active directory is relevant if you have more than a couple users,
logging into desktop Windows machines, who want to connect to your
On 4/22/2014 2:25 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
I never actually used it that way, but I thought that you were
supposed to be able to change your password from windows when using
samba as a domain (not AD) controller. And there was some support for
making that change your linux password to match.
Do somebody had this situation where an Email is sent every minutes to a
specific user named michel.
These emails are
incoming from:Root
with an header like: Cron michel@donais ~/.h5siP /dev/null
2/dev/null;
and a text message as: /bin/sh: no: command not found
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Michel Donais don...@telupton.com wrote:
Do somebody had this situation where an Email is sent every minutes to a
specific user named michel.
These emails are
incoming from:Root
with an header like: Cron michel@donais ~/.h5siP
On 04/23/14 02:08, Michael Hennebry wrote:
I've got an MSI K9N Platinum MS 7250 VER 1.1
motherboard with a dead battery.
The battery mounts vertically:
http://www.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu/~hennebry/computer/battery.png
To me, the tab on the right would seem to need moving.
It does not want to
Did this user intentionally set up something that automatically recreates
cronjobs?
No, he cannot do such a task.
Yesterday, our business was closed; so no body there.
This morning we found at 7:30 am we found 826 emails in his mailbox.
For one a minute this process was started around 13.76
Looking at the picture, does the tab toggle to the right. There is a
slot that leads me to believe that if you pushed the tab to the righ, it
might release the battery.
john
On 4/22/2014 9:32 PM, g wrote:
On 04/23/14 02:08, Michael Hennebry wrote:
I've got an MSI K9N Platinum MS 7250 VER
In order to get Beats Audio (2.1 channel sound) working on my HP
k025dx laptop running CentOS 6.5, I need to re-assign some of the pins
on the Intel HDA soundcard - model 92HD91BXX. This is trivial in newer
distros for two reasons:
1. the 'hda-jack-retask' application compiles and runs on
44 matches
Mail list logo
