CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0588
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0588.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0587
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0587.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Firstly, Register URL :
http://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/centos-dojo-cincinnati-oh-4-june-2014-university-of-cincinnati-tickets-11484677981
(its free to register and attend on the day, but you do need to
register, and registrations close in ~ 40 hrs
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Lars Kurth lars.ku...@xen.org wrote:
On 28/05/2014 16:16, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Perhaps I am missing something obvious here? Could you please
enlighten me?
Konrad,
you are absolutely correct. The discussion on XenServer / XenCenter is
off-topic really.
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 8:45 PM, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Hi,
what is the proposed way to create domU guests on centos 6.5? At first
I tried to follow the documentation on the xen project website which
recommends using xl. I created a config file and ended up with getting
a message
Lee,
I managed to get this working, but I'm not in front of my computer at the
moment. I used KOAN and Cobbler with a few caveats...I'll try to follow up to
tomorrow.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
Original message
From: lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de
Hi,
all the descriptions of networking setups with VMs I`m seeing involve
bridges. The only use I see for bridges is when I actually want to be
able to send network traffic to multiple arbitrary interfaces connected
to the bridge. I do neither need, nor want bridges when I want to keep
the VMs
Saludos:
Estoy presentando un problema con el controlador de dominio luego del bajon
de voltage de ayer, la mayoria de los usuarios no se pueden loguear en el
dominio, da el error que el dominio no se encuentra disponible.
Tengo Samba 3.0 como Controldador de Dominio
esto es lo que muestra el
tenes el servicio (net)rpc habilitado?
2014-06-02 11:17 GMT-03:00 Dayron Fabars Maura day...@fco.uo.edu.cu:
Saludos:
Estoy presentando un problema con el controlador de dominio luego del bajon
de voltage de ayer, la mayoria de los usuarios no se pueden loguear en el
dominio, da el error
Hi,
No, source IP address differ in packets.Even I change source port also
in packets.
Regards
Varun
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
marcelo.leit...@gmail.com wrote:
Em 25-05-2014 07:35, Varun Sharma escreveu:
Hi,
I am experimenting with libnetfilter_queue.
Hi, All
The vm can't start when using numa based on centos 6.5(kernel:
kernel-2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64,
qemu-kvm: qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.8.x86_64). My numa setting in vm
xml is the following:
numatune
memory mode='strict' nodeset='1'/
/numatune
On 05/30/2014 12:50 PM, Eugene Vilensky wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote:
EPEL is self-reliant. Nothing in EPEL will depend on another other than
Base/Updates. You need to check which repo you're installing the package
from, and be careful with the
On 05/30/2014 01:58 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote:
With SCL and epel repositories enabled, some dependencies for the package
name 'nodejs' get satisfied with libs from SCL which are placed in paths
that are not part of my user's
On 05/30/2014 12:50 PM, Eugene Vilensky wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote:
EPEL is self-reliant. Nothing in EPEL will depend on another other than
Base/Updates. You need to check which repo you're installing the package
from, and be careful with the
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 05/30/2014 01:58 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Is yum supposed to track the dependencies separately? That is, if an
EPEL package requires some other package (expected with the stock
paths), can an SCL package fulfill that
On 06/02/2014 07:47 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 05/30/2014 01:58 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Is yum supposed to track the dependencies separately? That is, if an
EPEL package requires some other package (expected with the
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote:
That seems pretty dangerous if the packages replace standard or EPEL
libraries/components. I'd have expected them to have some sort of
namespace concept for dependencies to keep the sets of packages
completely
On 06/02/2014 10:06 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote:
That seems pretty dangerous if the packages replace standard or EPEL
libraries/components. I'd have expected them to have some sort of
namespace concept for dependencies to keep
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
I consider this a bug, as the SCL's should be self-contained. We'd need
to see if this occurs upstream as well, and then file a bug there if so.
There's really a bigger issue of how EPEL is supposed to fit in the
world
On 06/02/2014 10:06 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
There's really a bigger issue of how EPEL is supposed to fit in the
world of 'other' repositories. What should happen when
centosplus/extras has a same-named package? Other 3rd parties?
Top posting:
Seems someone's already filed this as a bug. You can keep an eye on the
progress via - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1042879
Similar bug impacting SSSD -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089090
On 05/30/2014 10:18 AM, Eugene Vilensky wrote:
Hello,
Hello everyone,
Thanks for thoughtful and thorough advice. No luck so far, though.
I have two VLAN's now - 0003 and 0004, named vlan3 and vlan4
respectively - and still for some reason the CentOS fails to recognize them
as one would expect. So I am puzzled as to what is still missing from the
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
Thanks for thoughtful and thorough advice. No luck so far, though.
I have two VLAN's now - 0003 and 0004, named vlan3 and vlan4
respectively - and still for some reason the CentOS fails to recognize
On 05/30/2014 02:59 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Emmett Culley
lst_man...@webengineer.com wrote:
So I removed it all again and reinstalled from RPMforge. Now it all works
as expected. I never should have switch from RPMforge to EPEL for these
programs.
On 05/30/2014 04:41 PM, S.Tindall wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 14:14 -0700, Emmett Culley wrote:
On 05/30/2014 10:46 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 5/30/2014 8:27 AM, Emmett Culley wrote:
So I removed it all again and reinstalled from RPMforge. Now it all works
as expected. I never should
25 matches
Mail list logo
