-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/17/2014 08:33 PM, Nilton Morales wrote:
Gracias por la respuesta, pero aun no me dicen si hay diferencias
notables entre centos 5.5 (curso que pretendo tomar en una
universidad de mi ciudad) o 6.5 el que estuve practicando de manera
libre,
Tu esta haciendo la comparacion de centos 5.5 con centos 6.5
Siendo que Centos 5 hasta el dia de hoy esta en la version 5.10 (para fines
practicos da lo mismo, en terminos de seguridad no) y la ultima disto de
Centos es la 7.0..
si bien es cierto los comando siguen siendo los mismos, algunos
Si necesitas hacer el curso para curriculum o tener alguna certificación
esta bien, si es por aprender te recomiendo simplemente anexarte a las
lista de centos como plataforma y de los programas mas comunes en centos lo
que normalmente utilizarías para hosting, servidor de archivos, servidor de
Si hay diferencias. Una de ellas es SELinux, El sistema de particiones
ext4, y algunas otras que no recuerdo.
Te recomiendo lo siguiente, ni 5 ni 6, porque te comento esto; en mi caso
soy uno de los primeros certificados en latinoamerioca en Redhat version 6
y este mes caduca mi certificacion, por
2014-07-18 4:05 GMT+03:00 Benjamin Fernandis benjo11...@gmail.com:
keep-alive icp-echo-* at pptp-client end ?
means i need to add this option on my client pc in /etc/ppp/options.pptp ?
Read the docs. Options might be like lcp-echo-interval VALUE and
lcp-echo-failure VALUE
pptp protocol is
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
As far as I can see, the current advice is to leave filtering
to dovecot, using the dovecot-pigeonhole rpm.
I'm wondering if anyone else is doing this?
If so, what settings exactly did you use?
I haven't been able to find any clear documentation,
or rather I have
Frank Cox wrote:
I run spamassassin on my mailserver, pick up the mail from there with my
desktop machine using fetchmail, and filter it with procmail.
Thanks for your response.
I'm actually doing that on another server,
but I thought the dovecot sieve method would be simpler,
if I could sent
Mark Tinberg wrote:
But the only practical advantage of systemd that I've seen touted
is that it speeds up boot-time.
Even if this were true it does not seem to me worth worrying about,
If the only practical advantage of systemd that you have seen touted has
been boot time efficiency then
The amavisd-new rpm in epel fails with a number of missing dependencies,
in particular clamav* :
--
Error: Package: amavisd-new-2.9.1-1.el7.noarch (epel)
Requires: perl(Unix::Syslog)
Error: Package: amavisd-new-2.9.1-1.el7.noarch (epel)
Requires:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 06:07:08PM +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
What is the point of putting an rpm in the epel repo
if it cannot be installed?
Why don't you ask on the EPEL list where it is on-topic and not here,
where it is not.
--
rgds
Stephen
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 18:07:08 +0200
Timothy Murphy wrote:
The amavisd-new rpm in epel fails with a number of missing dependencies,
in particular clamav* :
You should file a bug on the Fedora epel bugzilla. (Lyx also fails to install
on C7 due to missing dependencies and I filed a bug there
Hi Folks,
Just wondering what Thunderbird users are doing on el7 now it's been
removed from the distro?
I note EPEL has a thunderbird package but it seems very out of date at
version 24.5.0. Version 24.6.0 was released 10 June, nearly 6 weeks ago,
and fixed 3 critical security issues. Is this
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 20:19:23 +0100
Ned Slider wrote:
Just wondering what Thunderbird users are doing on el7 now it's been
removed from the distro?
I don't use thunderbird but am wondering if you have tried compiling a Fedora
20 src.rpm?
I've installed a number of things on this C7 system
Ned Slider wrote:
The other alternative seems to be running the tarball from Mozilla, but
that is only available in 32-bit and I don't really want to install a
whole bunch of 32-bit libs just to run one program.
Mozilla do have 64 bit builds:
On 18/07/14 21:22, James Pearson wrote:
Ned Slider wrote:
The other alternative seems to be running the tarball from Mozilla, but
that is only available in 32-bit and I don't really want to install a
whole bunch of 32-bit libs just to run one program.
Mozilla do have 64 bit builds:
On Jul 18, 2014, at 7:14 AM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@alice.it wrote:
In principle this should simplify the algorithms involved.
But it seems to me that the way in which it has been implemented
has in fact increased the complication rather than the reverse.
From my perspective this is a
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Mark Tinberg mtinb...@wisc.edu wrote:
So simple things are trivial, more complicated things are possible and the
options are there in the config file if you want to use them but you aren’t
forced to.
But it does force people who should be focusing on
Is anyone using CentOS 6 on PC104 stacks?
I have tried a couple of different CPU cards with CentOS 6.5 [no updates]. I
can install with the Install DVD to the PATA hard drive just fine, but they
each hang up while the installed system is trying to get UDEV going. And by
hang up I mean a)
On 2014-07-18, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
But it does force people who should be focusing on improving an
application to instead spend their time reconfiguring the startup
configuration for a distribution just to keep it working the same way.
This seems (again) to be moving into
19 matches
Mail list logo
