Hi All,
In my Windows 7 Pro 64 bit KVM virtual machine, I have
a hidden device driver called vport0p1.
What driver goes with this?
Many thanks,
-T
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
On 09/12/2014 07:36 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Hi All,
In my Windows 7 Pro 64 bit KVM virtual machine, I have
a hidden device driver called vport0p1.
What driver goes with this?
Many thanks,
-T
Found it!
It is called VirtIO-Serial Port RawPDO and is found over on
C:\Program Files
Hi All,
How do you enable copy and paste from a Windows VM to
the host Linux machine?
Many thanks,
-T
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Saludos amigos, tengo un servidor centos 6.5 el cuál hace proxy con
restricciones encontré un artículo que Epe habla para bloqueo de
facebook donde aplca esta regla iptables -I FORWARD -p tcp --dport 443
-m string --string 'facebook' --algo bm -j DROP lo he probado y funciona
al 100%, ahora
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/12/2014 08:10 PM, César Martinez wrote:
Saludos amigos, tengo un servidor centos 6.5 el cuál hace proxy
con restricciones encontré un artículo que Epe habla para bloqueo
de facebook donde aplca esta regla iptables -I FORWARD -p tcp
Perdon por el top-posting pero este cliente no lo se usar bien.
Pregunto porque no bloquear via dns?
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Ernesto Pérez Estévezmailto:ernesto.pe...@cedia.org.ec
Sent: 9/12/2014 9:16 PM
To:
Gracias por responder, he logrado bloquear por ip pero como google usa
muchas ips de youtube se bloquea google, por el tema de dns no se como
hacerlo creo que lo más seguro y rápido es bloquear por nombre, Epe
perdona como puedo verificar lo que tu dices de las cadenas hay alguna
forma corta
El vie 12-sep-14, William Alexander Brito Vinas wilian05...@hotmail.com
escribió:
Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] Bloqueo https
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Fecha: viernes, 12 de septiembre de 2014, 22:19
Perdon por el top-posting pero este
cliente no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/12/2014 08:25 PM, César Martinez wrote:
Gracias por responder, he logrado bloquear por ip pero como google
usa muchas ips de youtube se bloquea google, por el tema de dns no
se como hacerlo creo que lo más seguro y rápido es bloquear por
Sigo con mi top posting...
A grandes rasgos consiste en desviar (DNAT) las peticiones DNS (udp 53) hacia
nuestro propio servidor bind que resolvera la url a bloquer hacia otro lado que
puede ser una pagina propia con un mensaje informativo o lo que deseemos.
Sent from my Windows Phone
Saludos,
Tal vez este documento te pueda ayudar: Configuración automática de proxy a
través de WPAD http://www.alcancelibre.org/staticpages/index.php/como-wpad
El 12 de septiembre de 2014, 22:35, William Alexander Brito Vinas
wilian05...@hotmail.com escribió:
Sigo con mi top posting...
A
On 09/10/2014 05:00 PM, Bill Gee wrote:
On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 10:10:19 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
James B. Byrne wrote:
On Tue, September 9, 2014 13:03, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Tue, September 9, 2014 11:56 am, John R Pierce wrote:
On 9/9/2014 9:42 AM, a. wrote:
its imho cheaper
On 09/12/2014 07:00 AM, Chris wrote:
On 09/09/2014 01:06 AM, ken wrote:
I've also read horror stories about the how often new ink cartridges are
required, that basically you pay for the printer a second and third time
buying cartridges (not to mention how often a print job is interrupted
by a
On 09/12/2014 07:00 AM, Chris wrote:
On 09/09/2014 01:06 AM, ken wrote:
I've also read horror stories about the how often new ink cartridges are
required, that basically you pay for the printer a second and third time
buying cartridges (not to mention how often a print job is interrupted
by a
Am 11.09.2014 um 21:05 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 11.09.2014 um 17:05 schrieb Mingfei Hua mf...@aerohive.com:
This issue happened again, who can help on this? system load up to 72,
but /proc/stat only show that 2 processes were running and no process
blocked. could it be
Mingfei Hua wrote on Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:05:33 +:
This issue happened again, who can help on this? system load up to
72, but /proc/stat only show that 2 processes were running and no
process blocked
As others have already said, you are not giving and you are not looking at
relevant
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
Hi List
Is there going to CentOS 7 for i686 architecture ? If yes , when will it
be released ?
Thanks
Jatin
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
I am running 64 bit CentOS 6.5, and have an intermittent problem where the
desktop crashes with the following error
nouveau E[Xorg 6062]] failed to idle channel 0xccc
The only route I have out of it is to power down then restart. It is
intermittent, where some days it does not happen,
On 09/12/2014 09:20 AM, Jan Taylor wrote:
Hi,
I am running 64 bit CentOS 6.5, and have an intermittent problem where the
desktop crashes with the following error
nouveau E[Xorg 6062]] failed to idle channel 0xccc
The only route I have out of it is to power down then restart. It is
From my experience, if you are using NVidia graphics cards you should probably
change over to the proprietary NVidia drivers. They have fewer issues and
better performance.
Here are a couple of links on how to do this. We've had people who have had
success with each of these 2 different
On Fri, September 12, 2014 12:00 am, Chris wrote:
On 09/09/2014 01:06 AM, ken wrote:
I've also read horror stories about the how often new ink cartridges are
required, that basically you pay for the printer a second and third time
buying cartridges (not to mention how often a print job is
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 09:41:31AM -0400, zep wrote:
On 09/12/2014 09:20 AM, Jan Taylor wrote:
Hi,
I am running 64 bit CentOS 6.5, and have an intermittent problem where the
desktop crashes with the following error
nouveau E[Xorg 6062]] failed to idle channel 0xccc
The only
On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 18:23 +0530, Jatin Davey wrote:
Hi List
Is there going to CentOS 7 for i686 architecture ? If yes , when will it
be released ?
Upstream says: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/509373 , I'd expect
CentOS to follow suit.
On Fri, September 12, 2014 9:23 am, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 09:41:31AM -0400, zep wrote:
On 09/12/2014 09:20 AM, Jan Taylor wrote:
Hi,
I am running 64 bit CentOS 6.5, and have an intermittent problem where
the
desktop crashes with the following error
nouveau
Le 12/09/2014 14:53, Jatin Davey a écrit :
Is there going to CentOS 7 for i686 architecture ? If yes , when will
it be released ?
As already explained on this list, Red Hat (The Upstream Vendor, TUV)
did not release a 32 bit version, CentOS project, which follows RHEL,
did not provide a 32
I've installed centos 7 64 bit and would like to install xfce and yumex.
I've had no success doing either despite installing the EPEL repo. I
keep getting no package yumex available.
Are they available and if so what am I doing wrong?
Bob
--
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10
Am 12.09.2014 um 17:03 schrieb Alain Péan alain.p...@lpn.cnrs.fr:
Le 12/09/2014 14:53, Jatin Davey a écrit :
Is there going to CentOS 7 for i686 architecture ? If yes , when will it be
released ?
As already explained on this list, Red Hat (The Upstream Vendor, TUV)
did not release a 32
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Valeri Galtsev
galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
On Fri, September 12, 2014 12:00 am, Chris wrote:
On 09/09/2014 01:06 AM, ken wrote:
I've also read horror stories about the how often new ink cartridges are
required, that basically you pay for the printer a
On 09/12/14 12:00, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
I've installed centos 7 64 bit and would like to install xfce and
yumex. I've had no success doing either despite installing the EPEL
repo. I keep getting no package yumex available.
Are they available and if so what am I doing
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:52:53 -0400
Mauricio Tavares wrote:
If it makes you feel any better, I found out a new cartridge for
my home laser printer is $45 while the new version of my printer is
$10 more.
It's my understanding that the cartridges that come with new printers usually
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:53:54 -0400
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
This
It looks like there are no repositories installed for Centos 7?
contradicts this
despite installing the EPEL
However, yumex for Centos 7 appears to be available from the nux repo. I just
checked.
--
Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:52:53 -0400
Mauricio Tavares wrote:
If it makes you feel any better, I found out a new cartridge for
my home laser printer is $45 while the new version of my printer is
$10 more.
It's my understanding that the cartridges that come with new
On 09/12/14 13:04, Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:53:54 -0400
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
This
It looks like there are no repositories installed for Centos 7?
contradicts this
despite installing the EPEL
Yes I realized that after I wrote it. I went through the
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
bobgood...@wildblue.net wrote:
On 09/12/14 13:04, Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:53:54 -0400
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
This
It looks like there are no repositories installed for Centos 7?
On 09/12/14 13:20, SilverTip257 wrote:
I haven't taken the plunge on EL7 (but I can say from Fedora installs) that
the repo files are usually in /etc/yum.repos.d/
Yes, you are correct, I see them there including epel.repo.
So that should work. I should have read my own notes! Yum usually
On Fri, September 12, 2014 12:08 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:52:53 -0400
Mauricio Tavares wrote:
If it makes you feel any better, I found out a new cartridge for
my home laser printer is $45 while the new version of my printer is
$10 more.
37 matches
Mail list logo
