CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1307 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1307.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1309
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1309.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1308
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1308.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1307 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1307.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
Perl/CPAN
http://search.cpan.org/~jforget/Astro-Sunrise-0.92/Sunrise.pm
Ruby
https://rubygems.org/gems/RubySunrise
Bash /Usando Api de Yahoo
http://www.commandlinefu.com/commands/view/6882/get-sunrise-and-sunset-times
El día 26 de septiembre de 2014, 2:56, New Route Inc
newro...@gmail.com
*:: Muchas gracias a todos, me habeis abrumado con tanta respuesta
y cada vez mas ajustada.
La opcion de PERL es la que usare, ahora estoy bastante liado
cambiando la pagina de la empresa, y en cuanto termine, me pongo con
esto.
*
*** Fin del mensaje ***
On 25 Sep 2014 19:39, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote:
I used to use rc.local and just need a script to run AFTER everything else
has ran.
no special start/stop/reload is needed... just a simple script.
1) you can still use /etc/rc.d/rc.local
2) read the systemd.service man page and
On 26 Sep 2014 05:46, Cliff Pratt enkiduonthe...@gmail.com wrote:
Take the case of an Apache Bash CGI. This will have been loaded when
Apache
started, so Apache will have to be restarted to get the new one. There may
be other similar cases. So the best thing is to reboot.
This is false and a
On 26 September 2014 07:24, James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 Sep 2014 19:39, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote:
I used to use rc.local and just need a script to run AFTER everything
else
has ran.
no special start/stop/reload is needed... just a simple script.
Hello. Previously debian, ubuntu, opensuse, I've used. But I'm new to CentOS
too. I do not install desktop environment. Servers want to learn. I can not
update the system. I could not so I researched. I give the following command
. yum update. I get the error. I'm working on a virtual machine. (I
On 26/09/14 09:44, Gökhan Öztürk wrote:
Hello. Previously debian, ubuntu, opensuse, I've used. But I'm new to CentOS
too. I do not install desktop environment. Servers want to learn. I can not
update the system. I could not so I researched. I give the following command
. yum update. I get the
On 09/25/2014 01:49 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
On 24 Sep 2014 17:12, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
For informational purposes:
https://access.redhat.com/articles/1200223
As a by heads up that advisory has been updated since the updated packages
were released.
The fix in the
It is listed how one can check whether his system is vulnerable to
shellshock or not how to verify after the upgrade of bash rpm.
https://garage.godaddy.com/webpro/security/shellshock-vulnerability-need-know/
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On
Better one -
https://support.godaddy.com/help/article/12120/patching-bash-on-your-server-shellshock-patch
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Ankush Grover ankushcen...@gmail.com
wrote:
It is listed how one can check whether his system is vulnerable to
shellshock or not how to verify after the
On 26/09/14 11:54, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 09/25/2014 01:49 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
snip
If you absolutely must run an EL4 workload, please do not do it on
CentOS-4 and instead pay for and upgrade to RHEL-4 ELS as described in
the above link from February 2012. CentOS-4 is unsafe .. don't
Jake Shipton wrote:
On 26/09/14 11:54, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 09/25/2014 01:49 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
snip
If you absolutely must run an EL4 workload, please do not do it on
CentOS-4 and instead pay for and upgrade to RHEL-4 ELS as described in
the above link from February 2012. CentOS-4
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
If you absolutely must run an EL4 workload, please do not do it on
CentOS-4 and instead pay for and upgrade to RHEL-4 ELS as described in
the above link from February 2012. CentOS-4 is unsafe .. don't use it
.. don't do it .. please.
Or, use the source, Luke. There are official patches for
I'm working with some people using apple laptops. When we share text
files (latex files), I reach in an encoding problem on our CentOS
laptops and desktops. In my favorite editor, é is 8e, à is
88 etc...
Of course, I can change the encoding with iconv:
iconv -f MACINTOSH -t ISO8859-15
Hi folks,
just curious about the requirement having a nonpae kernel for i686 hw (el6).
Are there any one outside that have the need for such a kernel?
It would be great having such kernels in the plus channel (yum).
--
Thanks,
LF
___
CentOS mailing
On 09/25/2014 09:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Lindemann wrote:
On 9/25/2014 8:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
From: Johan Vermeulen jvermeu...@cawdekempen.be
op 25-09-14 13:46, mark schreef:
Yup, forgot that:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:09 AM, Jake Shipton jak...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On 26/09/14 09:44, Gökhan Öztürk wrote:
Hello. Previously debian, ubuntu, opensuse, I've used. But I'm new to
CentOS
too. I do not install desktop environment. Servers want to learn. I can
not
update the
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Leon Fauster
leonfaus...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
just curious about the requirement having a nonpae kernel for i686 hw (el6).
Are there any one outside that have the need for such a kernel?
It would be great having such kernels in the plus channel
On Fri, September 26, 2014 8:21 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 09/25/2014 09:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Lindemann wrote:
On 9/25/2014 8:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 8:59 am, John Doe wrote:
From: Johan Vermeulen
Ok I created my script this morning
[Unit]
Description=Connections
After=network.target
[Service]
Type=notify
ExecStart=/home/silentm/bin/mystart
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
I put it in the correct directory, I rebooted and I see that
my mystart script runs- programs start up but then
Am 26.09.2014 um 15:48 schrieb Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com
wrote:
just curious about the requirement having a nonpae kernel for i686 hw (el6).
Are there any one outside that have the need for such a kernel?
It would
Hi Patrick,
iconv -f MACINTOSH -t ISO8859-15 file.bib.mac file.bib
iconv -f ISO8859-15 -t MACINTOSH file.bib file.bib.mac
But it is a little tedious to work like this...
Runing pdflatex (in CentOS) on these files written on apple laptops works
fine with
Am 26.09.2014 um 15:13 schrieb Patrick Bégou
patrick.be...@legi.grenoble-inp.fr:
I'm working with some people using apple laptops. When we share text files
(latex files), I reach in an encoding problem on our CentOS laptops and
desktops. In my favorite editor, é is 8e, à is 88 etc...
Of
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:16:49AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
Ok I created my script this morning
[Unit]
Description=Connections
After=network.target
[Service]
Type=notify
ExecStart=/home/silentm/bin/mystart
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
I put it in the correct directory, I
On Thu, September 25, 2014 10:27, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:09:15AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
developers to follow this:
Don't change anything unless it is absolutely necessary.
(it was excellent attitude to programming I was doing once: this way you
diminish the
On Thu, September 25, 2014 12:42, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Thanks, I sit (and type) corrected. There was something nagging at me,
saying Russia was wrong for Nux. However, I don't foresee aforesaid
manager being happy with an eastern European individual's repo.
You, and your boss, should
On 26 Sep 2014 15:17, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote:
Is there something else that allows them to continue to run?
the mystart runs the needed programs then it does exit.
I presume that mystart exit is killing the children.
Did you see the template I made for you in your other thread
James B. Byrne wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 12:42, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Thanks, I sit (and type) corrected. There was something nagging at me,
saying Russia was wrong for Nux. However, I don't foresee aforesaid
manager being happy with an eastern European individual's repo.
You,
On Fri, September 26, 2014 11:56 am, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 12:42, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Thanks, I sit (and type) corrected. There was something nagging at me,
saying Russia was wrong for Nux. However, I don't foresee aforesaid
manager being happy with an eastern
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, September 26, 2014 11:56 am, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Thu, September 25, 2014 12:42, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Thanks, I sit (and type) corrected. There was something nagging at me,
saying Russia was wrong for Nux. However, I don't foresee aforesaid
manager
I hope, my government doesn't go into alliance with Russia behind my
back ;-) (I'm perfectly OK about Romania, no matter how much more
careful
I'll be about repositories hosted there compared to the ones hosted,
say,
in Finland, just based on statistics of compromised machines...)
These guys
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
So, because you have to check a box to get the menu, you want to look
for a new browser, which could just stop working at the whims of the
upstream guys (like chromium did) when they move on to the latest and
greatest
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Valeri Galtsev
galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
No, it is not because of that. At least in my case. I started looking for
decent open source browser that to an extent possible follows the rule
don't change anything unless it is absolutely necessary as far as
On Fri, September 26, 2014 1:27 pm, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Valeri Galtsev
galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
No, it is not because of that. At least in my case. I started looking
for
decent open source browser that to an extent possible follows the rule
don't
Good afternoon!
After applying the latest bash RPM listed at
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-September/020594.html :
The fixed RPM (bash-3.2-33.el5_10.4.x86_64.rpm) DOES work just fine on
CentOS 5.10. However, it DOES NOT work on CentOS 5.4. That is, bash runs
fine, but
Never mind; false alarm. Apparently, we both had a previous 'echo' file
sitting around from before.
Best,
Jessica
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014, Jessica Blank wrote:
Good afternoon!
After applying the latest bash RPM listed at
Jessica Blank wrote:
Good afternoon!
After applying the latest bash RPM listed at
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-September/020594.html
:
The fixed RPM (bash-3.2-33.el5_10.4.x86_64.rpm) DOES work just fine on
CentOS 5.10. However, it DOES NOT work on CentOS 5.4. That
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:24 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Jessica Blank wrote:
Good afternoon!
After applying the latest bash RPM listed at
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-September/020594.html
:
The fixed RPM (bash-3.2-33.el5_10.4.x86_64.rpm) DOES work just fine on
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 15:02 -0500, Jessica Blank wrote:
Scary screenie at: http://i.imgur.com/yR7sBjV.png
Never mind the scary screen why are you deliberately using an insecure
and out-of-date 5.4 version of Centos ?
Common sense says that if you are genuinely interested in security then
you
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 12:22 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
. just based on statistics of compromised machines...)
Probably all Windoze :-)
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 9/26/2014 2:51 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Probably all Windoze
linux apache web servers with the bash exploit are getting owned en
masse today. my (patched) internet web server has logged 100s and
100s of attempts like...
66.186.2.172 - - [26/Sep/2014:00:49:29 -0700] GET
2014-09-27 0:42 GMT+03:00 Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net:
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 15:02 -0500, Jessica Blank wrote:
Scary screenie at: http://i.imgur.com/yR7sBjV.png
Never mind the scary screen why are you deliberately using an insecure
and out-of-date 5.4 version of Centos ?
Common
On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
On 9/26/2014 2:51 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Probably all Windoze
linux apache web servers with the bash exploit are getting owned en
masse today. my (patched) internet web server has logged 100s and
100s of attempts like...
On 9/26/2014 3:36 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
On 9/26/2014 2:51 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Probably all Windoze
linux apache web servers with the bash exploit are getting owned en
masse today. my (patched) internet web server has
On 2014-09-26, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
linux apache web servers with the bash exploit are getting owned en
masse today. my (patched) internet web server has logged 100s and
100s of attempts like...
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Keith Keller
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:
On 2014-09-26, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
linux apache web servers with the bash exploit are getting owned en
masse
It may be that you have a bad bash RPM from somewhere. I believe that the
cpio command works directly on the package so you could try with cpio on
the command line to see if it will open the RPM. I suspect that it won't be
able to.
Cheers,
Cliff
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Tony Molloy
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 01:29:44AM +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2014-09-27 0:42 GMT+03:00 Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net:
Scary screenie at: http://i.imgur.com/yR7sBjV.png
Never mind the scary screen why are you deliberately using an insecure
and out-of-date 5.4 version of Centos ?
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 6:28 PM, James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 26 Sep 2014 05:46, Cliff Pratt enkiduonthe...@gmail.com wrote:
Take the case of an Apache Bash CGI. This will have been loaded when
Apache
started, so Apache will have to be restarted to get the new one.
On Fri, September 26, 2014 6:05 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
On 9/26/2014 3:36 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
On 9/26/2014 2:51 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Probably all Windoze
linux apache web servers with the bash exploit are getting owned
On 2014-09-26, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
66.186.2.172 - - [26/Sep/2014:00:49:29 -0700] GET /cgi-bin/test.sh
no. mod_cgi launches /bin/sh and passes it the command, even if the
file doesn't exist. and /bin/sh is
On Fri, September 26, 2014 6:05 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
On 9/26/2014 3:36 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, September 26, 2014 5:13 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
On 9/26/2014 2:51 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Probably all Windoze
linux apache web servers with the bash exploit are getting owned
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 16:05 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
no. mod_cgi launches /bin/sh and passes it the command, even if the
file doesn't exist. and /bin/sh is linked to bash
Don't use cgi. Have no /cgi directory. Don't load mod_cgi
Bash is patched (updated to new version).
On Fri, September 26, 2014 8:32 pm, Always Learning wrote:
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 16:05 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
no. mod_cgi launches /bin/sh and passes it the command, even if the
file doesn't exist. and /bin/sh is linked to bash
Don't use cgi. Have no /cgi directory. Don't load
Hi Valeri,
On Fri, September 26, 2014 8:32 pm, Always Learning wrote:
Don't use cgi. Have no /cgi directory. Don't load mod_cgi
Bash is patched (updated to new version). Automatically bloke IPs of
anyone trying to hack Apache. Am I safe ?
You are. But if you run the server you do
V,
Sorry that should be ...
I understand your hotel analogy.
P.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
61 matches
Mail list logo
