CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0046 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0046.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0046 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0046.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
Lucian,
So far here is the best we could find out:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084747
Testing to see if this is the solution; so far it seems to be.
Cheers,
Boris.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Use BIND. How the times have changed. :-)
PS:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0046 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0046.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/14/2015 02:11 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0048
Upstream details at :
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0048.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0048
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0048.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
I tried both ways. But some reasons I don't know it didn't work.
How to define the username when it is a active directory user?
Tim
Am 14. Januar 2015 22:01:07 MEZ, schrieb John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com:
On 1/14/2015 12:53 PM, Tim wrote:
how can I get CentOS 7 to authenticate against a
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0046 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0046.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
Hello list,
how can I get CentOS 7 to authenticate against a Microsoft ISA server for
package installations after the OS is installed.
In Debian/Ubuntu apt.conf just needs to be edited and it works. How to do so in
CentOS?
Regards
Tim
___
CentOS
On 1/14/2015 12:53 PM, Tim wrote:
how can I get CentOS 7 to authenticate against a Microsoft ISA server for
package installations after the OS is installed.
In Debian/Ubuntu apt.conf just needs to be edited and it works. How to do so in
CentOS?
thats a proxy service?
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0047 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0047.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0037
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0037.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:05:47PM +0100, Tim wrote:
I tried both ways. But some reasons I don't know it didn't work.
How to define the username when it is a active directory user?
You probably need to URL escape the @. See:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0050
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0050.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 14/01/15 23:38, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
Please help us (me, especially) understand what we may be doing to the
detriment of your use of CentOS and thereby avoid that negative
result.
Lets flip this around - just
On 01/14/2015 03:04 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 01/14/2015 02:11 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0048
Upstream details at :
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0048.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Trevor Hemsley
trevor.hems...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 14/01/15 23:38, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:26 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:09:01PM -0800, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
Proposal:
The Third Party
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:09:01PM -0800, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
Proposal:
The Third Party Repositories section should not list any other repositories,
but should only note there are difficulties in making several independent
repositories safely usable and give a thorough explaination of
On 14/01/15 23:38, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
Please help us (me, especially) understand what we may be doing to the
detriment of your use of CentOS and thereby avoid that negative
result.
Lets flip this around - just going by your comments in the last few
days, it seems to me that you dont
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 01/09/2015 11:49 PM, Tom Sorensen wrote:
KB -- I made those changes several months ago (Sep/Oct I believe), with
discussion in IRC. This was after a spate of people in the main channel
having issues with Atomic
On 14/01/15 23:51, Trevor Hemsley wrote:
Now as far as the term Community Approved goes: I think it's fairly
accurate and I'm not sure what the objection to it was. We have to have
a way to say These repos are ok and these suck and these suck worse
than that. The way the page reads at the
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:26 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:09:01PM -0800, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
Proposal:
The Third Party Repositories section should not list any other repositories,
but should only note there are difficulties in making several
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0048
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0048.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
http://www.stainlesssteelfabricator.co.uk/szo/wrlibhwczdqvztunskbldj.xobrbewcuuqszoczctbped
newaddictionsumit
1/15/2015 3:31:38 AM___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
The rules I went by weren't so cut and dried. EPEL was recommended because
it is recommended -- the epel-release package is in centos-extras, packages
from it are built to Fedora guidelines, are from Fedora packagers, it
endeavors to not overlap upstream, and -- perhaps most importantly -- it is
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Manuel Wolfshant
wo...@nobugconsulting.ro wrote:
On 01/15/2015 03:44 AM, Mark Hahn wrote:
CentOS repos. There are others that do. Some of the repos that overwrite
core packages do so with little packages like sqlite (yum uses sqlite so
changing the version of
On 01/15/2015 01:09 AM, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 01/09/2015 11:49 PM, Tom Sorensen wrote:
KB -- I made those changes several months ago (Sep/Oct I believe), with
discussion in IRC. This was after a spate of people in
Hello,
I have two identical servers in hardware. I installed both with CentOS.
I did LVM snapshots before updating to test LVM merging.
On one server I merged all filesystem's during boot because they where mounted
when I merged.
The other server I did the snapshots, made my installations and
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Manuel Wolfshant
wo...@nobugconsulting.ro wrote:
On 01/15/2015 02:56 AM, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
I want to use CentOS to explore the aspects of operating systems that
I was not allowed to explore with a proprietary system. I had a couple
of 32-bit machines I
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Manuel Wolfshant
wo...@nobugconsulting.ro wrote:
On 01/15/2015 01:09 AM, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org
wrote:
On 01/09/2015 11:49 PM, Tom Sorensen wrote:
KB -- I made those changes several
On 01/13/2015 05:09 AM, Patrick Bervoets wrote:
Hi,
does anyone know if aide should have access to this socket?
SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/aide from write access on the
sock_file /var/run/winbindd/pipe.
Thanks
Patrick
Looks like it is doing some call to getpw* which is using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/14/2015 09:05 AM, César Martinez wrote:
Gracias Epe si lo vi el link pero a lo que me refería es que no
encuentro información para configurar e instalar anku.
hay un anku-release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
Hello Dave,
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:01:02 -0700 Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:28 AM, wwp subscr...@free.fr wrote:
Hello Dave,
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:18:18 -0700 Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
Unfortunately, this is only for
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:28 AM, wwp subscr...@free.fr wrote:
Hello Dave,
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:18:18 -0700 Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
Unfortunately, this is only for RHEL/CentOS 7
Really? It installs and works fine on my CentOS6, more over, on the
Cern pages, it says
Hello Dave,
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:18:18 -0700 Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, this is only for RHEL/CentOS 7
Really? It installs and works fine on my CentOS6, more over, on the
Cern pages, it says for Scientific Linux CERN 6 (note the '6');
repodata says '6' too.
Le 05/01/2015 16:14, Philippe BOURDEU d'AGUERRE a écrit :
We have a SuperMicro server with a LSI MegaRAID 9260-4i controller.
Since Centos 6.6 update (kernel 2.6.32-504), the controller doesn't
initialize at boot. Reverting to kernel 2.6.32-431 allows server to boot
fine.
The server can't
Gracias amigos revisare la información que mencionan y les comento, Epe
buscando en al red no encuentro nada sobre anku que mencionas de pronto
tienes por ahí algún link de su instalación
Gracias nuevamente
--
Saludos Cordiales
|César Martínez | Ingeniero de Sistemas | SERVICOM
|Tel:
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 17:01 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
For the love of Pete! If you use RHEL or CentOS, you'll have a stable,
reliable operating system with bug and security fixes for upward of 10
years! For free (in the case of CentOS)!
Not all updates are currently being supplied for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/14/2015 08:20 AM, César Martinez wrote:
Gracias amigos revisare la información que mencionan y les comento,
Epe buscando en al red no encuentro nada sobre anku que mencionas
de pronto tienes por ahí algún link de su instalación
claro, es
Le 14/01/2015 14:43, Nux! a écrit :
You should open perhaps a bugzilla issue with redhat about this.
Is it possible to post in Redhat bugzilla without a Redhat support
contract ? Even when using Centos ?
--
Philippe BOURDEU d'AGUERRE
AIME - Campus de l'INSA
hello,
With CentOS 6.6, I try to configure two bonding interfaces via kickstart, but
it works only with bond0, I don't understand why I can't configure bond1 the
same way.
I found this old post:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2013-March/133439.html I have exactly
the same problem.
estimados
junto con saludar, les sugiero que utilicen SCROLLOUT para el control de
SPAM, esta disponible una ISO para su instalacion
atte
Rodrigo Alfaro
El 14 de enero de 2015, 9:00, centos-es-requ...@centos.org escribió:
Envíe los mensajes para la lista CentOS-es a
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Philippe BOURDEU d'AGUERRE
Sent: den 14 januari 2015 14:16
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Hardware raid LSI Megaraid not working since Centos
6.6
Le 05/01/2015 16:14,
That's weird, because starting with 6.6 we could finally ditch inserting kmods
at installation time, the new kernel in 6.6 supported everything.
I believe the model we have (among others) is 9341-4i; I would imagine it's
pretty similar with what you have.
You should open perhaps a bugzilla issue
I think the problem is on the max_bonds parameter, the default value is 1 so
On 14/01/2015 11:17, Benninger Frédéric wrote:
hello,
With CentOS 6.6, I try to configure two bonding interfaces via kickstart, but
it works only with bond0, I don't understand why I can't configure bond1 the
same
On 14/01/2015 03:56, Emmett Culley wrote:
On 01/13/2015 12:10 PM, Mateusz Guz wrote:
Have you found a solution?
Did u allow master dns server to update the slave in /etc/named.conf ?
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Gracias Epe si lo vi el link pero a lo que me refería es que no
encuentro información para configurar e instalar anku.
--
Saludos Cordiales
|César Martínez | Ingeniero de Sistemas | SERVICOM
|Tel: (593-2)554-271 2221-386 | Ext 4501
|Celular: 0999374317 |Skype servicomecuador
|Web
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0049
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0049.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
48 matches
Mail list logo
