Hello,
I believe all 7 updates are on hold til 7.1 releases, 'any day now’.
We’re having a bit of mess in here :D
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
kubernetes-0.13.2-0.6.git8a7a127.el7 [1] is now in virt7-testing repo,
please test and feedback.
[1] http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=907
--
Navid
IRC: nshaikh
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
Centos 5 is not affected by this bug, so fix is not available.
Eero
31.3.2015 9.48 ap. kirjoitti Venkateswara Rao Dokku dvrao@gmail.com:
Hi All,
I wanted to fix the openssl vulnerabilities (CVE-2014-3569, CVE-2014-3570,
CVE-2014-3571, CVE-2014-3572) in my CentOS 5.5 and found out that
Hi All,
I wanted to fix the openssl vulnerabilities (CVE-2014-3569, CVE-2014-3570,
CVE-2014-3571, CVE-2014-3572) in my CentOS 5.5 and found out that 0.9.8zd
has the fixes I am looking for (from the
https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html link).
But, When I tried to find the
On 03/31/2015 12:08 AM, Jegadeesh Kumar wrote:
Is there any way to decry pt the password and get it as plain text.
yes. but not inexpensive.
from this group;
http://www.openwall.com/
you will find;
http://www.openwall.com/john/pro/linux/
and a shell script for using;
On 03/31/2015 08:23 AM, Dulmandakh wrote:
Hello,
I believe all 7 updates are on hold til 7.1 releases, 'any day now’.
We’re having a bit of mess in here :D
it may be in the CR repo
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
just for my curiosity, How can we make sure that its not affected?
Is there any script to check whether its vulnerable or not (as in bash
shell shock vulnerability test)?
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi
wrote:
Centos 5 is not affected by this bug, so fix
Hi everyone,
I'm having some issue with a Qt application using D-Bus (Qt API) in a
threaded appllication on CentOS 6.
Searching for the cause has led me to the following issues in the dbus library:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=857
Well, read article from: https://access.redhat.com/articles/1384453
Anyway, If You are really running centos 5.5 then you are missing more
important security patches and you should immediately update to latest
version 5.11
--
Eero
2015-03-31 9:57 GMT+03:00 Venkateswara Rao Dokku
Server is a Lenovo RV-340 E2420 build 70AB001VUX 8go
Support for Sata-3 6gbps and Raid-5
Did someone can tell if it can handle 6tb hard drives?
--
Michel Donais
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
KB / Jonathan / Others,
One of our potential GSoC students, Guatam Malu, has proposed trying
to include xapi packages in the Xen in a Box project.
He's gotten packages of xapi building for CentOS 6.6 using XenServer's
buildroot (see below).
The only potential issue I see is about signing.
As I
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On 31.3.2015 14.43, donais wrote:
Server is a Lenovo RV-340 E2420 build 70AB001VUX 8go
Support for Sata-3 6gbps and Raid-5
Did someone can tell if it can handle 6tb hard drives?
See this. It depends on the operating system version and filesystem
(ext4, xfs etc.).
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:47:24PM -0400, Alfred von Campe wrote:
Forget I ever said I wanted to replace glibc. Assume it’s a different
library or application.
Except libc is not just like any other library. Unless you're going
to recompile the software, the location of the ld loader is
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:42:05 -0400, Stephen wrote:
16G/swap 500MB/boot 80G/home 50G/root
800G/sdb
will not install Grub bootloader Fatal error
Um, this is JBOD, and not RAID1.
Raid1 would be 2x drives (sda sdb) appearing as one single drive to the
OS. Data is byte for byte mirrored
2015-03-31 15:07 GMT+03:00 Jussi Hirvi listmem...@greenspot.fi:
On 31.3.2015 14.43, donais wrote:
Server is a Lenovo RV-340 E2420 build 70AB001VUX 8go
Support for Sata-3 6gbps and Raid-5
Did someone can tell if it can handle 6tb hard drives?
See this. It depends on the operating
On 03/31/2015 05:56 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 13:28 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/31/2015 12:31 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-DVD.iso
CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1503.iso
Please take a look at the Archived Versions, and the Release Announcement:
They
On 03/30/2015 07:28 PM, Paul R. Ganci wrote:
Can somebody tell me what this error means (server, domain etc.
changed to protect the innocent)?
ldapsearch -H ldap://ldapserv-1.example.com:389 -ZZ -W -D
cn=Boss,dc=example,dc=com -b dc=example,dc=com uid=testuser homeDirectory
ldap_start_tls:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0741
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0741.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0728 Moderte
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0728.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0625
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0625.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2015:0653
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0653.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
On 03/31/2015 04:24 PM, Alain Péan wrote:
Le 31/03/2015 20:30, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
I would have assumed that this release would be 7.1.1503, and the URL
on at least one mirror has:
http://mirror.fdcservers.net/centos/7.1.1503/
Guess if that's the new convention, I'll need to keep my
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2015:0746
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0746.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2015:0731
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0731.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0716 Moderte
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0716.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0747
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0747.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0739
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0739.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0750 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0750.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2015:0735
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0735.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0729 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0729.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
Muchas gracias por las respuestas, he estado tratando de instalar Centos en
un netbook samsung np n100, y lamentablemente no hay caso, probé con centos
6.6 en dvd, minimal y net install, aclaro que lo hice a través de usb
utilizando los software YUMI, unetbootin y liveusb-creator, ninguno de los
--- Important Update to CentOS Linux 7 1503 release ---
In order to better communicate the upstream code relationship, we
changed the way we handle /etc/centos-release and /etc/redhat-release in
CentOS Linux 7. However, a fallout of this change was that some config
management and automation tools
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0766 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0766.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0672 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0672.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2015:0732
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0732.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0734
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0734.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0736
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0736.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0742
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0742.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0733
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0733.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0749 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0749.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0728 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0728.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/01/2015 03:49 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
It is also my opinion that the name CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1503.iso
is rather confusing, it is not immediately evident that it is
release 7.1. I would have prefered the name
CentOS-7.1-1503-x86_64-DVD.iso,
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0626
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0626.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0743
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0743.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0737
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0737.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0745
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0745.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2015:0740
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0740.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0696 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0696.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0726 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0726.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0646
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0646.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
Si el ISP es el encargo de soportar la VPN, entonces tu no deberás
hacer nada. En todo caso poner dos tarjetas de red en tu servidor y
activar un DHCP para que puedan establecer la red.
Tu ISP deberá hacerse cargo de las rutas, salvo que tu debas hacerte
cargo ellas y entonces en cada uno de tus
Saludos amigo, yo he trabajado muy bien con open vpn según el ambiente que
indicas y para cualquier cliente que se conecte será transparente no saben
como es que llegan al otro lado sino que simplemte llegan
Espero que esto te ayude en algo
El 31/03/2015 08:46, César Martinez
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Ron E r...@questavolta.com wrote:
Dear List,
We have noticed a variety of reproducible conditions working with sparse
files on multiple servers under load with CentOS 6.4.
The
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0744
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0744.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0766 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0766.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
+1 for that!
On 1 April 2015 at 02:25, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Just wanted to say Thanks! to the CentOS team for their efforts to put
out a 7.1 release.
Upgraded several systems, so far smooth sailing. Good job!
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0767 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0767.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
On 3/31/2015 5:25 PM, Nux! wrote:
Just wanted to say Thanks! to the CentOS team for their efforts to put out a
7.1 release.
so I updated my c7 dev systems last night with CR... do I need to do
anything special to get it to clean update ? yum update isn't offering
me anything newer and
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0700 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0700.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0766 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0766.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2015:0141
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0141.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0642 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0642.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0718 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0718.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.com wrote:
Tell your vendor you want a centos 6 version of the library, it's really
not a huge ask, esp if you are paying them. If they say no, do a new
install of centos 7 and run it on a different box. It's the only
We would like to announce the general availability of CentOS Linux 7
(1503) for 64 bit x86 compatible machines.
This is the second major release for CentOS-7 and is tagged as 1503.
This build is derived from Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.1
As always, read through the Release Notes at :
On 03/31/2015 11:12 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.com
wrote:
Tell your vendor you want a centos 6 version of the library, it's really
not a huge ask, esp if you are paying them. If they say no, do a new
install of centos 7 and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We would like to announce the general availability of CentOS Linux 7
(1503) for 64 bit x86 compatible machines.
This is the second major release for CentOS-7 and is tagged as 1503.
This build is derived from Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.1
As always,
As a CentOs newbie, I'm not sure, will we still have CentOS 7.1 which derive
from RHEL 7.1?
or this is the new naming conversion for CentOS 7.
Thanks!
-Ryan
On Apr 1, 2015, at 12:30 AM, Karanbir Singh kbsi...@centos.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We would
I'm moving some server configurations from Ubuntu Server 12.04 to CentOS
6.6. Now I'm working on `/etc/init` script that should be handled by
`upstart` at both OS as far as I know. The files on both server are the
same and I mean the same at content level and also at path level and
permissions
Entonces OpenVPN es tu amigo.
Hay cientos de manuales en internet para este fin. Y hay algunos que
son muy instructivos y sencillos.
Saludos,
David
El día 31 de marzo de 2015, 9:55, César Martinez
cmarti...@servicomecuador.com escribió:
Hola David gracias, es correcto yo montaré la VPN, ya que
On 03/31/2015 01:28 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/31/2015 12:31 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
On 03/31/2015 09:53 AM, Ryan Qian wrote:
As a CentOs newbie, I'm not sure, will we still have CentOS 7.1 which
derive from RHEL 7.1?
or this is the new naming conversion for CentOS 7.
Thanks!
-Ryan
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:21 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Perhaps, but I’m running CentOS 6.6 i686 (i.e., 32-bit), and it appears
that Docker requires 64-bit. Oh well, I was getting my hopes up for a
while.
snip
I haven't really been following this thread closely, but would it be a
dumb
On 3/31/2015 4:43 AM, donais wrote:
Server is a Lenovo RV-340 E2420 build 70AB001VUX 8go
Support for Sata-3 6gbps and Raid-5
Did someone can tell if it can handle 6tb hard drives?
you sure of that model number? not finding that at lenovo to look up
the storage controller specs, I can
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.com
wrote:
On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:21, Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote:
Isn't this the problem that docker was invented to solve?
Yes, you could address this with docker quite easily, depending on the
I know this isn't CentOS-specific, but it is probably a common problem
- does anyone have a solution?
If you mail something that is plain text from linux a recipient using
outlook, it will remove line breaks more or less randomly. There is
a way to tell outook to put them back as you read each
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.com wrote:
On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:21, Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote:
Isn't this the problem that docker was invented to solve?
Yes, you could address this with docker quite easily, depending on the app.
Perhaps, but
On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:21, Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote:
Isn't this the problem that docker was invented to solve?
Yes, you could address this with docker quite easily, depending on the app.
Perhaps, but I’m running CentOS 6.6 i686 (i.e., 32-bit), and it appears that
Docker requires
On 03/31/2015 12:31 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
On 03/31/2015 09:53 AM, Ryan Qian wrote:
As a CentOs newbie, I'm not sure, will we still have CentOS 7.1 which
derive from RHEL 7.1?
or this is the new naming conversion for CentOS 7.
Thanks!
-Ryan
That was going to be my question as well.
On 03/31/2015 09:53 AM, Ryan Qian wrote:
As a CentOs newbie, I'm not sure, will we still have CentOS 7.1 which derive
from RHEL 7.1?
or this is the new naming conversion for CentOS 7.
Thanks!
-Ryan
That was going to be my question as well. According to
Outlook is the devil. It wants to get mail in html to make things look
right for everyone, since most people just leave the defaults on.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
wrote:
I know this isn't CentOS-specific, but it is probably a common problem
- does
El 31/03/2015 a las 03:18 p.m., Frank Cox escribió:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:11:38 -0400
James B. Byrne wrote:
Does anyone have any idea what has happened and why I might be getting
that message?
I don't use that but have you checked to see if you now have a rpmsave file
left after installing
Saludos amigos listeros, quiero que me ayuden despejando algunas dudas
con un tema:
Tengo que montar una VPN entre dos oficinas de forma transparente, en
cada oficina habrá un servidor Linux Centos 6.6 con 1 ip privada
entregada por el isp aquí necesitaría que me ayuden con estas preguntas:
Am 31.03.2015 um 22:11 schrieb James B. Byrne:
There was an update to opendkim 2.10.1 which I applied and now I am
seeing this:
warning: connect to Milter service inet:127.0.0.1:8891: Connection
refused
[ ... ]
Does anyone have any idea what has happened and why I might be getting
that
After a long time I found the following solution:
I use the traditional way by exporting an environment variable http_proxy. After
editing yum.conf by adding a line proxy=libproxy everything works fine.
Regards
Tim
Am 16.01.2015 um 22:52 schrieb Tim:
I read sth. about cntlm, but it is not
Buenas, estoy estudiando Ing. Inf. y tengo de tarea, instalar un servidor
CentOS, con los servicios necesarios para un servidor web.
No tengo problemas en la instalación de Linux en General, sin embargo me
surgió la duda de que es preferible instalar. Lamp o Xampp, hasta donde he
leído, no se
David,
El correo de salida de tu red ¿pasa por clamav y spamassasin?
Procura definir en dns un registro txt con la definicion spf de tu correo para
mejorar la confianza de tu server y evitar en parte suplantación.
Puede ser conveniente que analices los logs de tu servicio de correo y veas
Saludos Alexis,
Mi recomendación es que instales LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySql y PHP) en vez de
XAMMP. En el interner hay guias muy buenas de como hacer esto, aquí te dejo un
par de links :
http://hostingdiario.com/instalacion-de-lamp-en-centos-6-x/
en ingles pero bastante decente esta guía:
Lo mejor es instalar cada paquete desde los repos oficiales, así aprenderás
mas, con instalaciones limpias, es decir
- Apache.
- Php.
- MySQL/MariaDb.
- Phpadmin.
- Proftpd.
Saludos,
Wilmer.
El 31 de marzo de 2015, 19:29, Julio Villarreal juliov...@gmail.com
escribió:
Saludos Alexis,
Mi
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0760
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0760.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0767 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0767.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
Le 31/03/2015 20:30, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
I would have assumed that this release would be 7.1.1503, and the URL
on at least one mirror has:
http://mirror.fdcservers.net/centos/7.1.1503/
Guess if that's the new convention, I'll need to keep my ISO files
sorted out somehow, as this
There was an update to opendkim 2.10.1 which I applied and now I am
seeing this:
warning: connect to Milter service inet:127.0.0.1:8891: Connection
refused
I tried to yum history rollback to 2.9.1 but that package has
disappeared so I am evidently constrained to resolve this.
Does anyone have
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:11:38 -0400
James B. Byrne wrote:
Does anyone have any idea what has happened and why I might be getting
that message?
I don't use that but have you checked to see if you now have a rpmsave file
left after installing the update? If so, that's your old configuration and
Just updated to release 7 1503. CentOS team is awesome!
I thought I read sometime back that the release was going to
rebase to a newer gnome?
Did that not happen? Is there a way to get release 7 to a later gnome
version?
Thanks! Looking forward to playing.
Jerry
On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 13:28 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/31/2015 12:31 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-DVD.iso
CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1503.iso
Please take a look at the Archived Versions, and the Release Announcement:
They both tell you that 7 (1503) is derived from Red
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0766 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0766.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
From what I've read there will be a newer Gnome in 7.2.
HTH
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Wednesday, 1 April, 2015 00:04:11
Subject:
Just wanted to say Thanks! to the CentOS team for their efforts to put out a
7.1 release.
Upgraded several systems, so far smooth sailing. Good job!
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
___
CentOS mailing list
99 matches
Mail list logo
