Re: [CentOS] VPN suggestions centos 6, 7

SoftEther VPN all-in-one solution and cross platform. On Monday, April 4, 2016, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/04/2016 12:11 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote: > >> This made me google around a little, and I found some good info here. >> They, too, kind of recommend openvpn. >> >>

Re: [CentOS] VPN suggestions centos 6, 7

On 04/04/2016 12:11 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote: This made me google around a little, and I found some good info here. They, too, kind of recommend openvpn. http://www.howtogeek.com/211329/which-is-the-best-vpn-protocol-pptp-vs.-openvpn-vs.-l2tpipsec-vs.-sstp/ This is not good information. In

Re: [CentOS] VPN suggestions centos 6, 7

Am 04.04.2016 um 19:57 schrieb david: Folks I would like to have my windows 7 laptop communicate with my home server via a VPN, in such a way that it appears to be "inside" my home network. It should not only let me appear to be at home for any external query, but also let me access my

Re: [CentOS] VPN suggestions centos 6, 7

On 04/04/2016 10:57 AM, david wrote: I have seen discussions of OpenVPN, OpenSwan, LibreVPN, StrongSwan (and probably others I haven't noted). I'd be interested in hearing from anyone who wishes to comment about which to use, with the following requirements: I recommend l2tp/ipsec. It's

Re: [CentOS] VPN suggestions centos 6, 7

On Mon, 4 Apr 2016, david wrote: I have seen discussions of OpenVPN, OpenSwan, LibreVPN, StrongSwan (and probably others I haven't noted). I'd be interested in hearing from anyone who wishes to comment about which to use, with the following requirements: 1) As noted, it should be secure

Re: [CentOS] VPN suggestions centos 6, 7

On 4.4.2016 22.01, Eero Volotinen wrote: And openvpn. Avoid ipsec as it's too complex and pptp is unsecure. This made me google around a little, and I found some good info here. They, too, kind of recommend openvpn.

Re: [CentOS] VPN suggestions centos 6, 7

My partner has been using Openvpn extensively. It looks very reasonable and has been quite trustworthy. It is configured via commandline. The server seems to work on Windows, too ("Vista and later"). There are good tutorials for CentOs, for example

Re: [CentOS] VPN suggestions centos 6, 7

And openvpn. Avoid ipsec as it's too complex and pptp is unsecure. Eero 4.4.2016 9.55 ip. "Richard Zimmerman" kirjoitti: > SoftEther VPN > > Once setup, it just works > > Regards, > > Richard > > > --- > Richard Zimmerman > Systems / Network Administrator >

Re: [CentOS] VPN suggestions centos 6, 7

SoftEther VPN Once setup, it just works Regards, Richard --- Richard Zimmerman Systems / Network Administrator River Bend Hose Specialty, Inc. S Main Street South Bend, IN 46601-3337 (574) 233-1133 (574) 280-7284 Fax -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

On 4/4/2016 7:22 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: Yes, this helps at least "single" developers and people that are training for rhce / rhcsa exam.. it also helps development groups in big corporate environments as they won't have to budget and pay annual subscription fees to maintain their

[CentOS] VPN suggestions centos 6, 7

Folks I would like to have my windows 7 laptop communicate with my home server via a VPN, in such a way that it appears to be "inside" my home network. It should not only let me appear to be at home for any external query, but also let me access my computers inside my home. I already have

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Mohammed Zeeshan wrote: > > Hi, > > As things stand, you can signup for a Red Hat Developer Subscription for > free to get full access > to all Red Hat products as a developer. Yes, you cannot deploy Red Hat > products in production >

[CentOS-announce] Infra - CentOS forums migration

Just to inform you that we'll move some services to a new node, and so there will be a small impact for the following services : - https://www.centos.org (no real downtime, as it will just be redirected automatically) - https://www.centos.org/forums (see below) During that migration we'll also

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

On Mon, April 4, 2016 9:25 am, Digimer wrote: > On 04/04/16 10:06 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Mon, April 4, 2016 8:53 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free, and downloaded the ISO, though I

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

And (big) commercial vendors/users always prefer RHEL as it commercially supported platform. -- Eero 2016-04-04 17:25 GMT+03:00 Digimer : > On 04/04/16 10:06 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > > > On Mon, April 4, 2016 8:53 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM,

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

On 04/04/16 10:06 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Mon, April 4, 2016 8:53 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >>> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free, >>> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it. >>> >>> What do CentOS users think of

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

On 4 April 2016 at 15:22, Eero Volotinen wrote: > Yes, this helps at least "single" developers and people that are training > for rhce / rhcsa exam.. > > Note that this also gives access to the Red Hat Knowledgebase and to beta downloads both of which can be useful for any

Re: [CentOS] EPEL - Clamav update?

On 4/4/2016 2:16 AM, Ned Slider wrote: On 03/04/16 22:10, Ireneusz Piasecki wrote: W dniu 03.04.2016 o 04:39, Rob Kampen pisze: EPEL maintainers? I note messages in the log about updated version 0.99.1 of CLAMAV being available since Mar 5th. for CentOS 6 no update is available yet. I used

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

Yes, this helps at least "single" developers and people that are training for rhce / rhcsa exam.. br, -- Eero 2016-04-04 17:16 GMT+03:00 Mohammed Zeeshan : > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Valeri Galtsev > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, April

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Mon, April 4, 2016 8:53 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > >> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free, > >> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it.

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

On Mon, April 4, 2016 8:53 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free, >> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it. >> >> What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer? >> >> The registration with Redhat

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

Yes, but this is not still (very) big change as redhat partner companies get rhel linsences for developer / internal use for free. -- Eero 2016-04-04 16:55 GMT+03:00 Johnny Hughes : > On 04/04/2016 08:53 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

On 04/04/2016 08:53 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free, >> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it. >> >> What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer? >> >> The registration with Redhat seemed very

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free, > and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it. > > What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer? > > The registration with Redhat seemed very bureaucratic to me, > and I'm not sure if I have

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

Hello Timothy, On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:39:54 +0100 Timothy Murphy wrote: > I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free, > and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it. > > What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer? > > The registration with Redhat seemed very

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

Yes, they are providing free version only for "developer use". -- Eero 2016-04-04 16:39 GMT+03:00 Timothy Murphy : > I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free, > and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it. > > What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer? > > The

Re: [CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

Hi, I think you miss understood or the authors of the article about 'Redhat offering their Linux free'. Can you please provide your source? First of all it's the distro that has been offered for 'free', but only for developers. Please read the original press release:

[CentOS] Free Redhat Linux (rhel) version 7.2

I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free, and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it. What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer? The registration with Redhat seemed very bureaucratic to me, and I'm not sure if I have carried it out properly. Also, I didn't see if it was possible

Re: [CentOS] EPEL - Clamav update?

On 03/04/16 22:10, Ireneusz Piasecki wrote: W dniu 03.04.2016 o 04:39, Rob Kampen pisze: EPEL maintainers? I note messages in the log about updated version 0.99.1 of CLAMAV being available since Mar 5th. for CentOS 6 no update is available yet. I used to use rpmforge for this package but that