Re: [CentOS] FirewallD issue

On 04/21/2016 03:28 PM, Marcin Trendota wrote: Also, you probably should specify tun+ instead of tun0, even if you >think there will only be one tunnel up at any given time. Specify where? firewall-cmd --zone=home --add-interface=tun+ Beyond that, I can't really tell what firewalld is doing

Re: [CentOS] [OT] disk utility showing message "the partition is misaligned by"

On 04/22/16 05:40, g wrote: <> > suggestions for correcting above boundaries also appreciated. > > help needed and greatly appreciated. > ===> thank you all for replies. most helpful. now to decide which way to format a new drive that i now have on order. after reading replies, i feel easiest

Re: [CentOS] cron

​If your script is failing, I would normally expect it to output some error messages. Cron will email this to root by default. Maybe check ​/var/spool/mail/root? Or set MAILTO="youremail address" at the top of your cron script. ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] cron

On 23 April 2016 at 10:25, Marcin Trendota wrote: > Anything interesting in the logs? > > > > sudo journalctl -xf _SYSTEMD_UNIT=crond.service > > Don't know. > > [root@kohrin cron.d]# sudo journalctl -xf _SYSTEMD_UNIT=crond.service > ​...​ > (/etc/cron.d/osticket-cron) >

Re: [CentOS] cron

On 4/22/2016 5:27 PM, Marcin Trendota wrote: On Friday 22 of April 2016 8:10:04 PM Steven Ford wrote: >Seemed strange is all. Can the nobody user read down into >/var/www/html/osticket/api? If it works in tmp, maybe permissions are >the issue. As i said. sudo works as a charm. Cron rebels...

Re: [CentOS] cron

On Friday 22 of April 2016 8:10:04 PM Steven Ford wrote: > Seemed strange is all. Can the nobody user read down into > /var/www/html/osticket/api? If it works in tmp, maybe permissions are > the issue. As i said. sudo works as a charm. Cron rebels... -- Over And Out MoonWolf

Re: [CentOS] cron

On Saturday 23 of April 2016 10:08:54 AM Kahlil Hodgson wrote: > Anything interesting in the logs? > > sudo journalctl -xf _SYSTEMD_UNIT=crond.service Don't know. [root@kohrin cron.d]# sudo journalctl -xf _SYSTEMD_UNIT=crond.service -- Logs begin at śro 2015-12-02 22:34:16 CET. -- kwi 22

Re: [CentOS] cron

Seemed strange is all. Can the nobody user read down into /var/www/html/osticket/api? If it works in tmp, maybe permissions are the issue. On Apr 22, 2016 7:57 PM, "Marcin Trendota" wrote: > On Friday 22 of April 2016 5:58:39 PM Steven Ford wrote: > > Why bother with */1?

Re: [CentOS] cron

Anything interesting in the logs? sudo journalctl -xf _SYSTEMD_UNIT=crond.service ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] cron

On Friday 22 of April 2016 5:58:39 PM Steven Ford wrote: > Why bother with */1? Wouldn't that be the same as just *? That's for debugging. It'll be */5 for production purposes. Anyway. It still doesn't work. Why? -- Over And Out MoonWolf ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] cron

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 05:58:39PM -0400, Steven Ford wrote: > Why bother with */1? Wouldn't that be the same as just *? > On Apr 22, 2016 5:48 PM, "Marcin Trendota" wrote: > I had the same question. Plus, the man page says "'/' specifies skips of the number's value

Re: [CentOS] Storage cluster advise, anybody?

On Fri, April 22, 2016 3:24 pm, Traiano Welcome wrote: > Hi Valeri > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Digimer wrote: >> On 22/04/16 03:18 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> Dear Experts, >>> >>> I would like to ask everybody: what would you advise to use as a >>> storage >>>

Re: [CentOS] Dual boot C7 with Window 10

Oh and I can't stress enough to check for firmware updates. There's metric tons of UEFI bugs. This little baby NUC has had 6 firmware updates in 9 months. Some updates don't fix things I care about, others do, and the changelogs aren't always really detailed when it comes to thinks like user

Re: [CentOS] Suddenly increased my hard disk

On 04/21/2016 07:49 PM, Chandran Manikandan wrote: Why it's happened like this environment and how to avoid it. Generally the way to avoid it would be for your backup application to fail if the destination does not exist, and alert the admin. For instance, rsnapshot has the "no_create_root"

Re: [CentOS] tune2fs: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) while trying to open

On 04/22/2016 01:33 AM, Rob Townley wrote: tune2fs against a LVM (albeit formatted with ext4) is not the same as tune2fs against ext4. tune2fs operates on the content of a block device. A logical volume containing an ext4 system is exactly the same as a partition containing an ext4

Re: [CentOS] Dual boot C7 with Window 10

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Chris Murphy wrote: > >> What you should revert back to UEFI only, with Secure Boot enabled, >> and reinstall CentOS, deleting the previous partition/mount points >> including the BIOS Boot partition that was created

Re: [CentOS] [OT] disk utility showing message "the partition is misaligned by"

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 4:40 AM, g wrote: > > =+=+= > $ sudo fdisk -l /dev/sdc > [sudo] password for geo: > > Disk /dev/sdc: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes > Sector size

Re: [CentOS] cron

Why bother with */1? Wouldn't that be the same as just *? On Apr 22, 2016 5:48 PM, "Marcin Trendota" wrote: > On Friday 22 of April 2016 11:40:33 PM Marcin Trendota wrote: > > What the heck is wrong with cron? > > > > */1 * * * * nobody /usr/bin/php

Re: [CentOS] Storage cluster advise, anybody?

On 04/22/2016 12:24 PM, Digimer wrote: My requirements are: This sounds like you want a cloud-type storage, like ceph or gluster. I agree. I think either would work. A cluster with striping and mirroring of volumes should fit all the requirements.

Re: [CentOS] cron

On Friday 22 of April 2016 11:40:33 PM Marcin Trendota wrote: > What the heck is wrong with cron? > > */1 * * * * nobody /usr/bin/php /var/www/html/osticket/api/cron.php > > in /etc/cron.d doesn't get executed at all (ran from console works of > course!). But the SAME file in /tmp runs

[CentOS] cron

What the heck is wrong with cron? */1 * * * * nobody /usr/bin/php /var/www/html/osticket/api/cron.php in /etc/cron.d doesn't get executed at all (ran from console works of course!). But the SAME file in /tmp runs flawlessly: */1 * * * * nobody /usr/bin/php /tmp/cron.php It's CentOS7 on VPS

Re: [CentOS] Storage cluster advise, anybody?

On 22/04/16 04:40 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Digimer wrote: > >> Then you would use pacemaker to manage the floating IP, fence >> (stonith) a lost node, and promote drbd->mount FS->start nfsd->start >> floating IP. > > My favorite acronym: stonith -- shoot the other node in

Re: [CentOS] Storage cluster advise, anybody?

On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Digimer wrote: Then you would use pacemaker to manage the floating IP, fence (stonith) a lost node, and promote drbd->mount FS->start nfsd->start floating IP. My favorite acronym: stonith -- shoot the other node in the head. -- Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com 45°38'

Re: [CentOS] Storage cluster advise, anybody?

Hi Valeri On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Digimer wrote: > On 22/04/16 03:18 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> Dear Experts, >> >> I would like to ask everybody: what would you advise to use as a storage >> cluster, or as a distributed filesystem. >> >> I made my own research of

Re: [CentOS] Storage cluster advise, anybody?

On 22/04/16 03:18 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Dear Experts, > > I would like to ask everybody: what would you advise to use as a storage > cluster, or as a distributed filesystem. > > I made my own research of what I can do, but I hit a snag with my > seemingly best choice, so I decided to stay

[CentOS] Storage cluster advise, anybody?

Dear Experts, I would like to ask everybody: what would you advise to use as a storage cluster, or as a distributed filesystem. I made my own research of what I can do, but I hit a snag with my seemingly best choice, so I decided to stay away from it finally, and ask clever people what they

Re: [CentOS-virt] oVirt 3.6.5 packages available for testing

Thanks for the good news Rafael.  There are some bug fixes in it.  Would you mind posting the repo/yum instructions for this package?  Thanks Jack  Original message From: Rafael Martins Date: 04/22/2016 6:33 AM (GMT-08:00) To: centos-virt@centos.org

[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2016:0683 CentOS 7 tzdata Enhancement Update

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2016:0683 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-0683.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2016:0683 CentOS 6 tzdata Enhancement Update

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2016:0683 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-0683.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2016:0683 CentOS 5 tzdata Enhancement Update

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2016:0683 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-0683.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2016:0682 CentOS 6 qla2xxx Enhancement Update

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2016:0682 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-0682.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS] Fwd: EPEL-ANNOUNCE Re: Upcoming OwnCloud changes in EPEL

In the event that there are CentOS users making use of the EPEL owncloud packages, but not following the EPEL mailing lists, please read the mail below with regards to your installations. Thanks James -- Forwarded message -- From: "James Hogarth" Date:

Re: [CentOS] output of "ls" (was: Re: Postgrey on CentOS 6)

On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 16:05:52 + Richard Mann wrote: > > What does the "." at the right side > > of the attributes list mean? > > > > Following the file mode bits is a single character that specifies > whether an alternate access method such as an access control

Re: [CentOS] output of "ls" (was: Re: Postgrey on CentOS 6)

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gabriele Pohl > Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 11:53 AM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] output of "ls" (was: Re: Postgrey on CentOS 6) > > On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 02:23:28 +1200

[CentOS] output of "ls" (was: Re: Postgrey on CentOS 6)

On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 02:23:28 +1200 Peter wrote: > On 23/04/16 02:13, Gabriele Pohl wrote: > > I administer a postfix mail server on CentOS 6. > > Now I want to setup another with similar configuration. > > > > But the postgrey package is no longer available in Epel > >

Re: [CentOS] [OT] disk utility showing message "the partition is misaligned by"

On 04/22/2016 09:43 AM, g wrote: ]$ sudo blockdev --getalignoff /dev/sdc1 0 ]$ sudo blockdev --getalignoff /dev/sdc2 0 ]$ sudo blockdev --getalignoff /dev/sdc5 2560 ]$ sudo blockdev --report /dev/sdc1 RORA SSZ BSZ StartSecSize Device rw 256 512 4096 2048

Re: [CentOS] [OT] disk utility showing message "the partition is misaligned by"

On 04/22/16 08:19, Leon Fauster wrote: <<>> > check it with: > > blockdev --getalignoff /dev/sd > > (if a '0' is returned, the partition is aligned) > ===> Leon, thank you for reply. ]$ sudo blockdev --getalignoff /dev/sdc1 0 ]$ sudo blockdev --getalignoff /dev/sdc2 0 ]$ sudo blockdev

Re: [CentOS] Postgrey on CentOS 6

On 23/04/16 02:13, Gabriele Pohl wrote: > I administer a postfix mail server on CentOS 6. > Now I want to setup another with similar configuration. > > But the postgrey package is no longer available in Epel > for this CentOS release as I have seen now: >

Re: [CentOS] [OT] disk utility showing message "the partition is misaligned by"

Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 22.04.2016 um 12:40 schrieb g : >> centos 6.7 [current] >> 'disk utility' has started showing message; >> >> WARNING: The partition is misaligned by 2560 bytes. This may >> result in very poor performance. Repartitioning is suggested. >> for sdc5 -

[CentOS] Postgrey on CentOS 6

Hi, I administer a postfix mail server on CentOS 6. Now I want to setup another with similar configuration. But the postgrey package is no longer available in Epel for this CentOS release as I have seen now: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/postgrey/ 1. Will I have to make an

[CentOS-virt] New Packages in Testing for CentOS-7-Xen-46, CentOS-6-Xen-46, CentOS-6-Xen-44

On 04/18/2016 02:19 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > New Packages in Testing for CentOS-7-Xen-46, CentOS-6-Xen-46, > CentOS-6-Xen-44. > > CentOS-7-Xen46: > - kernel-3.18.30-20.el7.src.rpm : XSA-174, upstream changelogs: > https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.18.26 >

Re: [CentOS] [OT] disk utility showing message "the partition is misaligned by"

Am 22.04.2016 um 12:40 schrieb g : > greetings. > > centos 6.7 [current] > > > 'disk utility' has started showing message; > > WARNING: The partition is misaligned by 2560 bytes. This may > result in very poor performance. Repartitioning is suggested. > > for sdc5 -

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 134, Issue 11

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

[CentOS] [OT] disk utility showing message "the partition is misaligned by"

greetings. centos 6.7 [current] 'disk utility' has started showing message; WARNING: The partition is misaligned by 2560 bytes. This may result in very poor performance. Repartitioning is suggested. for sdc5 - /home partition. /dev/sdc5 302243312 156348604 130534968 55% /home

Re: [CentOS] Dual boot C7 with Window 10

Chris Murphy wrote: > What you should revert back to UEFI only, with Secure Boot enabled, > and reinstall CentOS, deleting the previous partition/mount points > including the BIOS Boot partition that was created for CentOS's > bootloader. > The gotcha is that with Secure Boot enabled, the CentOS

Re: [CentOS] tune2fs: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) while trying to open

tune2fs against a LVM (albeit formatted with ext4) is not the same as tune2fs against ext4. Could this possibly be a machine where uptime has outlived its usefulness? On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Matt Garman