Re: [CentOS] Realtek 8111GR on C7

2016-06-03 Thread Mike McCarthy, W1NR
Realtek is "real" good about getting drivers for their chips into the kernels as soon as possible. They are one of the few vendors that I have never had a problem with built in support... Mike McCarthy On 06/03/2016 08:03 AM, Phil Manuel wrote: You can get the Linux driver from

Re: [CentOS-es] Ayuda Fedora 22 OT

2016-06-03 Thread César Martinez
Gracias, me olvide de comentar que inicialmente estaba funcionando bien, pero la verdad no recuerdo en que momento dejo de funcionar, debe haber sido en una actualización pero no se cuál fue. -- Saludos Cordiales |César Martínez M. | Ingeniero de Sistemas | SERVICOM |Tel: (593-2)554-271

Re: [CentOS] Realtek 8111GR on C7

2016-06-03 Thread Phil Manuel
You can get the Linux driver from http://www.realtek.com/downloads/downloadsView.aspx?Langid=1=5=5=5=4=3=false#RTL8111B/RTL8168B/RTL8111/RTL8168%3Cbr%3ERTL8111C/RTL8111CP/RTL8111D%28L%29%3Cbr%3ERTL8168C/RTL8111DP if you can't find it under C7 Regards On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Alessandro

[CentOS] pam_sss fails to close cache files

2016-06-03 Thread Anand Buddhdev
Dear folks, After updating some of our servers to CentOS 6.8, we've noticed that the ones using pam_sss.so for authentication, appear to be suffering from a leak of sorts. On these systems, the /var partition is running out of disk space, and we eventually noticed that it's because of deleted,

[CentOS] Realtek 8111GR on C7

2016-06-03 Thread Alessandro Baggi
Hi list, I'm planning to buy a mobo (z170-K) that has Realtek 8111GR (nic). I've tried to search on google about support on C7 but can't fine anything. There is a way to check if supported? Is the Realtek 8111GR supported or I must change mobo? Thanks in advance.

Re: [CentOS] HFSPlus Question

2016-06-03 Thread Ned Slider
On 03/06/16 04:45, Chris Murphy wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016, 7:59 PM Albert McCann wrote: In CentOS 7.2.1511 does the 3.10.0-327.18.2.el7.centos.plus.x86_64 (Plus) kernel read HFSPlus iMac drives? I don't see any hfsplus modules installed anywhere, so I suspect