Re: [CentOS] [OT] VOIP

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of TE Dukes > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 2:03 PM > To: 'CentOS mailing list' > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] VOIP > > > > -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On

[CentOS] amanda and selinux

Anyone familiar with the selinux policy for the amanda backup software package? I'm getting lots of data not being backed up. For example, under /home there are 2 directory trees owned by root. Those get backed up, user home dirs do not. No AVC denials nor messages in /var/log/messages or

[CentOS] SELinux upgrade

Well, got hit by this too. Ironically, I don't use docker, I think I had it installed being pulled in for something else. So, tried the yum remove docker* but no go. When I do semanage port -a -t ssh_port_t -p tcp I get an error Bad type declaration at

Re: [CentOS] Restricting mirrors off a repo

On 1/19/2017 1:57 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote: What is the best way to specify which mirrors off a repository you want to use? Have a host with rather restricted egress rules and want to allow it to reach a couple of mirrors for each repo it needs. And, yes, I am not ready to mirror them locally.

[CentOS] Restricting mirrors off a repo

What is the best way to specify which mirrors off a repository you want to use? Have a host with rather restricted egress rules and want to allow it to reach a couple of mirrors for each repo it needs. And, yes, I am not ready to mirror them locally. ___

Re: [CentOS] [OT] VOIP

-Original Message- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 1:01 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] VOIP On 1/19/2017 4:41 AM, TE Dukes wrote: > I lost > the ability to use the DSL as a FAX line. Analog

Re: [CentOS] [OT] VOIP

On 1/19/2017 4:41 AM, TE Dukes wrote: I lost the ability to use the DSL as a FAX line. Analog traditional FAX may not work very well over VOIP.Just sayin'. So, I bought an OOMA. Turns out it uses a number of ports, three of which are reserved, 53 TCP/UDP, 110 TCP and 443 TCP. These ports

Re: [CentOS] Increase CPU usage on HV after upgrade (7.2 -> 7.3)

Hello m, Thursday, January 19, 2017, 5:17:48 PM, you wrote: >>> In the mean time, if you have not disabled it, you should find some >>> collected statistics from sysstat/sar. >>> Look at the sarXX files under /var/log/sa. They should be kept for 30 >>> day >>> by default in CentOS 7. >> >>

Re: [CentOS] Increase CPU usage on HV after upgrade (7.2 -> 7.3)

Hello Gordon, Thursday, January 19, 2017, 4:57:48 PM, you wrote: > On 01/19/2017 06:29 AM, Subscriber wrote: >>> and what kind of IO patterns do those VMs >>> have? >> Do not quite understand. What do you mean? >> > What at the VMs doing? Its gateway from local network to Internet > Are they

Re: [CentOS] SELinux upgrade

On 01/19/2017 08:57 AM, Marcin Trendota wrote: > W dniu 19.01.2017 o 14:54, Johnny Hughes pisze: > >>> So, it looks like something with docker-selinux and container-selinux... >> Right, I wanted to mention that docker-selinux was replaced with >> container-selinux in the lasest version. >

Re: [CentOS] Increase CPU usage on HV after upgrade (7.2 -> 7.3)

Subscriber wrote: > Hello Gianluca, > > Wednesday, January 18, 2017, 3:54:15 PM, you wrote: > >> In the mean time, if you have not disabled it, you should find some >> collected statistics from sysstat/sar. >> Look at the sarXX files under /var/log/sa. They should be kept for 30 >> day >> by

Re: [CentOS] Increase CPU usage on HV after upgrade (7.2 -> 7.3)

Hello Gordon, Thursday, January 19, 2017, 5:09:29 PM, you wrote: > On 01/19/2017 06:54 AM, Subscriber wrote: >> But I collect such statistics in Zabbix. And the numbers and graphs >> indicate an increase in the load on the CPU (ie System time). > "load" has another meaning in the context of

Re: [CentOS] Increase CPU usage on HV after upgrade (7.2 -> 7.3)

On 01/19/2017 06:54 AM, Subscriber wrote: But I collect such statistics in Zabbix. And the numbers and graphs indicate an increase in the load on the CPU (ie System time). "load" has another meaning in the context of POSIX system performance counters. I'm pretty sure you're talking about

Re: [CentOS] Increase CPU usage on HV after upgrade (7.2 -> 7.3)

Hello Subscriber, Thursday, January 19, 2017, 4:44:04 PM, you wrote: > Hello Gianluca, > Wednesday, January 18, 2017, 3:54:15 PM, you wrote: >> In the mean time, if you have not disabled it, you should find some >> collected statistics from sysstat/sar. >> Look at the sarXX files under

Re: [CentOS] Increase CPU usage on HV after upgrade (7.2 -> 7.3)

On 01/19/2017 06:29 AM, Subscriber wrote: and what kind of IO patterns do those VMs have? Do not quite understand. What do you mean? What at the VMs doing? Are they entirely idle? Are they doing light work, mostly reading from disks? If they're not generating disk IO, then that's not

Re: [CentOS] SELinux upgrade

On 01/19/2017 12:43 AM, Marcin Trendota wrote: After recent system upgrade (this night) i lost access to two servers through SSH, because of change in SELinux policy - i have ssh there on different port and now it's gone. Which release? I also run ssh on an alternate port on one host, and

Re: [CentOS] Increase CPU usage on HV after upgrade (7.2 -> 7.3)

Hello Gianluca, Wednesday, January 18, 2017, 3:54:15 PM, you wrote: > In the mean time, if you have not disabled it, you should find some > collected statistics from sysstat/sar. > Look at the sarXX files under /var/log/sa. They should be kept for 30 day > by default in CentOS 7. Unfortunately,

Re: [CentOS] Reliable way of having both LAN and WIFI on headless box

On Wednesday 18 January 2017 15:09:49 Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Wed, January 18, 2017 4:24 am, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > > You could say the same thing about computers in general: > > I hate them, they automated many tasks in life and took many jobs out of > > the > > market!. > > And they

Re: [CentOS] Increase CPU usage on HV after upgrade (7.2 -> 7.3)

Hello Gordon, Wednesday, January 18, 2017, 11:52:35 PM, you wrote: > On 01/18/2017 05:34 AM, Subscriber wrote: >> Someone noticed something similar? > How is your storage arranged, It is software RAID1 + LVM > and what kind of IO patterns do those VMs > have? Do not quite understand. What do

Re: [CentOS] SELinux upgrade

W dniu 19.01.2017 o 14:54, Johnny Hughes pisze: >> So, it looks like something with docker-selinux and container-selinux... > Right, I wanted to mention that docker-selinux was replaced with > container-selinux in the lasest version. Shouldn't be docker-selinux automatically removed then? --

Re: [CentOS] SELinux upgrade

On 01/19/2017 04:47 AM, Marcin Trendota wrote: > W dniu 19.01.2017 o 10:17, Hal Wigoda pisze: >> I have experienced this myself. It is very upsetting. > > > It happened on servers with docker installed. I got error message there: > # semanage port -a -t ssh_port_t -p tcp > Re-declaration of

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:0086 Important CentOS 7 kernel Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:0086 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0086.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

Re: [CentOS] [OT] VOIP

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of TE Dukes > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 7:41 AM > To: 'CentOS mailing list' > Subject: [CentOS] [OT] VOIP > > So, I bought an OOMA. Turns out it uses a number of ports, three of

[CentOS] [OT] VOIP

Hello, I changed ISPs a few weeks ago and now I'm on cable. In doing so, I lost the ability to use the DSL as a FAX line. So, I bought an OOMA. Turns out it uses a number of ports, three of which are reserved, 53 TCP/UDP, 110 TCP and 443 TCP. These ports have already been port forwarded from my

Re: [CentOS] SELinux upgrade

W dniu 19.01.2017 o 10:17, Hal Wigoda pisze: > I have experienced this myself. It is very upsetting. It happened on servers with docker installed. I got error message there: # semanage port -a -t ssh_port_t -p tcp Re-declaration of type docker_t Failed to create node Bad type declaration at

Re: [CentOS-virt] Increase CPU usage on HV after upgrade (7.2 -> 7.3)

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Subscriber wrote: > Hello , > > After upgrading the system from CentOS 7.2.1511 to CenOS 7.3.1611 I > see that the average processing time has increased from 5-7% to 12-15% > (doubled). Not critical but it is not pleasant. Server as KVM

Re: [CentOS] SELinux upgrade

I have experienced this myself. It is very upsetting. (Sent from iPhone, so please accept my apologies in advance for any spelling or grammatical errors.) > On Jan 19, 2017, at 2:57 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > > log ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] SELinux upgrade

On 19/01/17 09:43, Marcin Trendota wrote: > Hello All > > After recent system upgrade (this night) i lost access to two servers > through SSH, because of change in SELinux policy - i have ssh there on > different port and now it's gone. > > Thanks to puppet i was able to change SSH port back to

[CentOS] SELinux upgrade

Hello All After recent system upgrade (this night) i lost access to two servers through SSH, because of change in SELinux policy - i have ssh there on different port and now it's gone. Thanks to puppet i was able to change SSH port back to default and log in, but is this expected behavior? I