Re: [CentOS] using autofs on C-7

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:02:05PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: Kenneth: thanks for the heads-up. I was stuck on looking for autofs tutorials, having forgotten (if I ever knew) that systemd had subsumed that feature. thanks again! Fred > On 6/8/2017 11:03 AM, Fred Smith wrote: > >I'm trying to

Re: [CentOS] using autofs on C-7

On 6/8/2017 11:03 AM, Fred Smith wrote: I'm trying to set up autofs on my C7 netbook so I can automount a cifs share (actually two) from my NAS box, and because when I'm not at home I don't want it attempting to mount it. Automounting is now done through systemd. You just have to create two

[CentOS] using autofs on C-7

Hi all! I'm trying to set up autofs on my C7 netbook so I can automount a cifs share (actually two) from my NAS box, and because when I'm not at home I don't want it attempting to mount it. so I've read several howtos on it, including the one on the CentOS Wiki. but what I've got isn't working

[CentOS-es] Aveces se pierde conexión a internet

Buenos días estimados listeros, esperando que todos se encuentren de lo mejor quiero dirigirme a ustedes por un problema que he tenido en un caso en particular, desde hace unas pocas semanas he vistoque en un servidor de frontera en una red se pierde de repente el acceso al internet en ciertos

Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!

I was sorely tempted to post saying I would initiate an empty email to the list in a week with subject systemd and see what the response would be - I'll refrain... - Original Message - From: "m roth" To: "centos" Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2017

Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!

Mark Haney wrote: > On 06/08/2017 09:12 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: >> I think we had enough of Systemd flaming last month. Please stop >> polluting my inbox and find an operating system compatible with your >> worldview. It is really tiresome to keep on hearing about it. >> > Huh. Okay, though I'm

Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 09:15:23AM -0400, Mark Haney wrote: > Huh. Okay, though I'm not sure when you became arbiter of this list. If you > don't like 'our worldview' discussions, maybe you need to find a different > OS that suits your childish attitude. Like Windows 95. > > Mailing lists now

Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!

On 06/08/2017 09:12 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: I think we had enough of Systemd flaming last month. Please stop polluting my inbox and find an operating system compatible with your worldview. It is really tiresome to keep on hearing about it. Huh. Okay, though I'm not sure when you became arbiter

Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!

I think we had enough of Systemd flaming last month. Please stop polluting my inbox and find an operating system compatible with your worldview. It is really tiresome to keep on hearing about it. On 8 June 2017 at 14:51, John Hodrien wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017,

Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Jonathan Billings wrote: Upstream 6 uses systemd? jh yes, 6.6 and above RHEL6 has used Upstart since RHEL 6.0, and continues to use it in RHEL 6.9. I have no idea where you'd get this kind of information. If you really thought Redhat would switch from upstart of

Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 05:02:38AM -0700, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > > > > > Yes, 7 does track upstream. upstream 6 uses systemd also and Scientific > > > Linux 6 does not. I would say that indicates a solution. > > > > Upstream 6 uses systemd? > > > >

Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!

On 8 June 2017 at 13:02, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > On 06/08/2017 04:59 AM, John Hodrien wrote: >> >> On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Bruce Ferrell wrote: >> >>> Yes, 7 does track upstream. upstream 6 uses systemd also and Scientific >>> Linux 6 does not. I would say that indicates a

Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!

On 06/08/2017 04:59 AM, John Hodrien wrote: On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Bruce Ferrell wrote: Yes, 7 does track upstream. upstream 6 uses systemd also and Scientific Linux 6 does not. I would say that indicates a solution. Upstream 6 uses systemd? jh ___

Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Bruce Ferrell wrote: Yes, 7 does track upstream. upstream 6 uses systemd also and Scientific Linux 6 does not. I would say that indicates a solution. Upstream 6 uses systemd? jh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!

On 6/8/17 1:15 AM, Veli-Pekka Kestilä wrote: On 7.6.2017 23:40, Bruce Ferrell wrote: On 06/07/2017 01:27 PM, Warren Young wrote: On Jun 7, 2017, at 1:02 PM, John R Pierce wrote: every RPM that interacts with systemd will need to be 'fixed' to do it the old way, with

Re: [CentOS] kvm/qemu and CPU load

Gordon Messmer wrote: On 06/02/2017 04:32 AM, hw wrote: What may cause the high CPU load? Offhand, it's hard to say. I don't see similar behavior. Can you post the libvirt XML definitions for those VMs somewhere? pastebin maybe? What's the output of "rpm -qa qemu\*"?

Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!

On 7.6.2017 23:40, Bruce Ferrell wrote: On 06/07/2017 01:27 PM, Warren Young wrote: On Jun 7, 2017, at 1:02 PM, John R Pierce wrote: every RPM that interacts with systemd will need to be 'fixed' to do it the old way, with init.d scripts. repositories like postgres, EPEL,

Re: [CentOS] C6 or C7 for an old netbook

On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I might add that NOT using GNOME on a notebook is a big processor/battery win. I switched to Xfce some years ago. I get far more hours out of this old NC10 with C6 and Gnome than I can cope with the cramped keyboard, so I don't need to tweak

Re: [CentOS] C6 or C7 for an old netbook

On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 06/06/2017 02:53 AM, John Hodrien wrote: On Mon, 5 Jun 2017, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Mmmm... looks like I may go for C6, then, since unlike that Ubuntu, I will want to do updates at least every time I get ready for a trip (other times, it sits in