Re: [CentOS] Chromium on CentOS 6

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of H > Sent: den 27 november 2017 19:45 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Chromium on CentOS 6 > > >> I have chromium installed on CentOS 7 and it works fine, I now need > >> to install it on a

[CentOS-es] Servidor Web Centos7

Buenas noches se que la lista es de Centos, pero quiero consultar lo siguiente tengo un VPS KVM de 4GBRAM y 100GBSSD voy alojar un cms de aplicaciones móviles en ionic, angular y requiero un servidor web rápido he visto LNAMP que es Apache con servidor NINGX proxy en su experiencia cual seria mi

Re: [CentOS] Failed attempts

On Mon, November 27, 2017 1:22 pm, Mark Haney wrote: > On 11/27/2017 12:10 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: >> hi All, >> >> I happened to login to one of my servers today and saw 96000 failed >> login >> attempts. shown below is the address its coming from. I added it to my >> firewall to drop. >> >>

Re: [CentOS] Failed attempts

On Mon, November 27, 2017 1:02 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Pete Biggs wrote: >> On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 12:10 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: >>> hi All, >>> >>> I happened to login to one of my servers today and saw 96000 failed >>> login attempts. shown below is the address its coming from. I added it

Re: [CentOS] Chromium on CentOS 6

On 11/27/2017 07:35 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 11/25/2017 11:55 AM, H wrote: >> I have chromium installed on CentOS 7 and it works fine, I now need to >> install it on a CentOS 6 workstation. However, it is not available in EPEL >> as it is for C 7. From what I understand, this is because it

Re: [CentOS] Devilspie or wmctrl for CentOS 6

On November 27, 2017 2:06:30 PM EST, Nux! wrote: >It's in my repo, gdevilspie as well. > >http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/dextop/el7/x86_64/devilspie-0.22-13.el7.nux.x86_64.rpm > >-- >Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > >Nux! >www.nux.ro > >- Original Message

Re: [CentOS] Chromium on CentOS 6

On November 27, 2017 2:09:34 PM EST, Richard wrote: > > >> Date: Monday, November 27, 2017 19:45:28 +0100 >> From: H >> >> On 11/25/2017 10:52 PM, Richard wrote: >>> Date: Saturday, November 25, 2017 18:55:18 +0100 From: H

Re: [CentOS] Failed attempts

On 11/27/2017 12:10 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: hi All, I happened to login to one of my servers today and saw 96000 failed login attempts. shown below is the address its coming from. I added it to my firewall to drop. Failed password for root from 123.183.209.135 port 14299 ssh2 FYI - others might

Re: [CentOS] Failed attempts

Pete Biggs wrote: > On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 12:10 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: >> hi All, >> >> I happened to login to one of my servers today and saw 96000 failed >> login attempts. shown below is the address its coming from. I added it to my >> firewall to drop. >> >> Failed password for root from

Re: [CentOS] Chromium on CentOS 6

> Date: Monday, November 27, 2017 19:45:28 +0100 > From: H > > On 11/25/2017 10:52 PM, Richard wrote: >> >>> Date: Saturday, November 25, 2017 18:55:18 +0100 >>> From: H >>> >>> I have chromium installed on CentOS 7 and it works fine, I now >>>

Re: [CentOS] Devilspie or wmctrl for CentOS 6

It's in my repo, gdevilspie as well. http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/dextop/el7/x86_64/devilspie-0.22-13.el7.nux.x86_64.rpm -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "H" > To: "CentOS mailing list"

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:3260 Important CentOS 7 samba Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:3260 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3260 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:3263 Moderate CentOS 7 curl Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:3263 Moderate Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3263 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

Re: [CentOS] Chromium on CentOS 6

On 11/25/2017 10:52 PM, Richard wrote: > >> Date: Saturday, November 25, 2017 18:55:18 +0100 >> From: H >> >> I have chromium installed on CentOS 7 and it works fine, I now need >> to install it on a CentOS 6 workstation. However, it is not >> available in EPEL as it is for

Re: [CentOS] Devilspie or wmctrl for CentOS 6

On 11/26/2017 09:55 AM, wwp wrote: > Hello H, > > > On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 18:59:23 +0100 H wrote: > >> Anyone running one of the above on C 6? Recommendations for which one to >> install appreciated. > I do run devilspie on several CentOS 6 (and 7) boxes w/o any issue. I >

Re: [CentOS] Devilspie or wmctrl for CentOS 6

On 11/26/2017 09:21 PM, Nux! wrote: > I am not sure they provide the same features. > I do use wmctrl with some key shortcuts to move windows between my 2 monitors. > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message - >> From: "H"

Re: [CentOS] Chromium on CentOS 6

On 11/25/2017 11:55 AM, H wrote: > I have chromium installed on CentOS 7 and it works fine, I now need to > install it on a CentOS 6 workstation. However, it is not available in EPEL as > it is for C 7. From what I understand, this is because it is already > available in a supplementary channel

Re: [CentOS] Failed attempts

On Mon, November 27, 2017 12:13 pm, Leroy Tennison wrote: > And if you're really security conscious consider using port knocking > (knock server - amazingly easy to set up. Or use fwknop, a little more > difficult to set up but not much. Finally, for the hard core who really > like pain - write

Re: [CentOS] Failed attempts

And if you're really security conscious consider using port knocking (knock server - amazingly easy to set up. Or use fwknop, a little more difficult to set up but not much. Finally, for the hard core who really like pain - write the iptables rules yourself). - Original Message -

Re: [CentOS] Failed attempts

On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 12:10 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: > hi All, > > I happened to login to one of my servers today and saw 96000 failed login > attempts. shown below is the address its coming from. I added it to my > firewall to drop. > > Failed password for root from 123.183.209.135 port 14299

Re: [CentOS] Failed attempts

On Mon, November 27, 2017 11:10 am, Jerry Geis wrote: > hi All, > > I happened to login to one of my servers today and saw 96000 failed login > attempts. shown below is the address its coming from. I added it to my > firewall to drop. > > Failed password for root from 123.183.209.135 port 14299

Re: [CentOS] Failed attempts

I can confirm that this IP had been actively and repeatedly hitting honeypots in the community honeypot network I'm a part of. On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: > hi All, > > I happened to login to one of my servers today and saw 96000 failed login >

[CentOS] Failed attempts

hi All, I happened to login to one of my servers today and saw 96000 failed login attempts. shown below is the address its coming from. I added it to my firewall to drop. Failed password for root from 123.183.209.135 port 14299 ssh2 FYI - others might be seeing it also. Jerry

Re: [CentOS] Kickstart and nvme0n1

Volker wrote: > > In recent hardware the first disk has device name nvme0n1 rather then sda > > How do you tell kickstart to use the first available disk? No matter if > it is called sda or nvme0n1? > > e.g. part /boot --fstype="xfs" --ondisk=sda --size=1000 I've never tried it, but the

Re: [CentOS] File access in Apache 2.4

Hi Gordon, > Or you could just run "systemctl edit httpd.service" like I suggested two > days ago. :) ... which is a nice way of doing it quickly, indeed. Thanks for the hint, I didn't know that command. However there is one disadvantage: All changes go into a file named 'override.conf',

[CentOS] Kickstart and nvme0n1

Hi all. In recent hardware the first disk has device name nvme0n1 rather then sda How do you tell kickstart to use the first available disk? No matter if it is called sda or nvme0n1? e.g. part /boot --fstype="xfs" --ondisk=sda --size=1000 Regards Volker