Re: [CentOS] Latest CentOS does not boot, Proliant ML330 G6

Jari Fredriksson wrote: > Hello all. > > I just upgraded to the latest and tried to reboot: kernel panic and dead > as a brick. > > Luckily GRUB still works and booting the to the next option in boot menu > succeeds. > > How can this be? This OS is assumed to be solid as a brick :) > Do you have

Re: [CentOS] Latest CentOS does not boot, Proliant ML330 G6

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 03:49:23PM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > It's hard to diagnose if the only thing you say is that it panicked. I'd loan you my magic mind reading cap but it's at the cleaners. John -- Don't mistake my

Re: [CentOS] Latest CentOS does not boot, Proliant ML330 G6

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:34:41PM +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > I just upgraded to the latest and tried to reboot: kernel panic and > dead as a brick. > > Luckily GRUB still works and booting the to the next option in boot > menu succeeds. > > How can this be? This OS is assumed to be

Re: [CentOS] Latest CentOS does not boot, Proliant ML330 G6

On 11 May 2018 at 15:34, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > Hello all. > > I just upgraded to the latest and tried to reboot: kernel panic and dead as a > brick. > > Luckily GRUB still works and booting the to the next option in boot menu > succeeds. > > How can this be? This OS is assumed

[CentOS] Latest CentOS does not boot, Proliant ML330 G6

Hello all. I just upgraded to the latest and tried to reboot: kernel panic and dead as a brick. Luckily GRUB still works and booting the to the next option in boot menu succeeds. How can this be? This OS is assumed to be solid as a brick :) br. jarif signature.asc Description: Message

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1804) on x86_64 aarch64 i386 ppc64 ppc64le

On 05/11/2018 12:08 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 05/10/2018 09:10 AM, Warren Young wrote: >> On May 10, 2018, at 1:33 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Akemi Yagi > Anssi Johansson > Manuel Wolfshant > Pablo Greco > John Dennison > Trevor Hemsley > Christoph Galuschka > James

Re: [CentOS] OT: hardware: sanitizing a dead SSD?

On Thu, May 10, 2018 12:00, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > > On the other hand... static, and unchanging, right, and how many > minutes of Amazon S3 will it take to break the encryption? None. If it is NSA certified there will be a backdoor. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1804) on x86_64 aarch64 i386 ppc64 ppc64le

On 05/10/2018 09:10 AM, Warren Young wrote: > On May 10, 2018, at 1:33 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> >> I am pleased to announce the general availability of CentOS Linux 7 >> (1804) for across all architectures. > > I’ve checked about a dozen of the mirrors, and see no

Re: [CentOS-virt] Difference between qemu-kvm-ev and qemu-kvm-ma?

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 2:19 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > > 2018-05-10 21:57 GMT+02:00 Lance Albertson : > >> I see with the introduction of CentOS 7.5 there's a new qemu-kvm-ma >> package on ppc64le (which is actually newer than qemu-kvm-ev currently).

Re: [CentOS] Yum-cron

On 11 May 2018 at 11:36, wrote: > Ok, I've just had issues this morning, and went and *looked*. I can see a > yum-cron running monthly, sure. Running weekly, I guess. Running daily? > Why? > > And there is *NO* reason whatever for a "yum-hourly*. None. This is > CentOS, not

Re: [CentOS] Yum-cron

John Hodrien wrote: > On Fri, 11 May 2018, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> And there is *NO* reason whatever for a "yum-hourly*. None. This is >> CentOS, not ubuntu-snapshot-of-the-moment. > > Did you have a look at what the hourly run does by default? > Ok, I just did, and I see in the configuration

Re: [CentOS] Yum-cron

On Fri, 11 May 2018, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: In a work environment? Or production? No way is there going to be an instant update. In most cases, you need to test whether that update is going to break things, and that will get you a ton more grief from users and management. Even if it's rated

Re: [CentOS] Yum-cron

Jon Pruente wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:36 AM, wrote: >> >> And there is *NO* reason whatever for a "yum-hourly*. None. This is >> CentOS, not ubuntu-snapshot-of-the-moment. >> >> I don't know if this is from upstream or not, but it's wrong. I mean, >> even Redmond only

Re: [CentOS] Yum-cron

On Fri, 11 May 2018, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: And there is *NO* reason whatever for a "yum-hourly*. None. This is CentOS, not ubuntu-snapshot-of-the-moment. Did you have a look at what the hourly run does by default? jh ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Yum-cron

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:36 AM, wrote: > > And there is *NO* reason whatever for a "yum-hourly*. None. This is > CentOS, not ubuntu-snapshot-of-the-moment. > > I don't know if this is from upstream or not, but it's wrong. I mean, even > Redmond only pushes out patches once or

[CentOS] Yum-cron

Ok, I've just had issues this morning, and went and *looked*. I can see a yum-cron running monthly, sure. Running weekly, I guess. Running daily? Why? And there is *NO* reason whatever for a "yum-hourly*. None. This is CentOS, not ubuntu-snapshot-of-the-moment. I don't know if this is from

Re: [CentOS] [Marketing Mail] Centos7 update: epel no route to host

Hi, there seem to be some problems with the epel. I'm not sure if your problem (have the same on my systems) relate to this, however see epel- devel Mailinglist [1] for more information on current epel problems. Best regards Markus [1]

[CentOS] Centos7 update: epel no route to host

Hello All, I' have a laptop who's not booting to graphical screen today. Actualy I had several the last few days, related to cr repo. This one won't update, EM: updates | 3.4 kB 00:00:00 epel/x86_64/updateinfo FAILED

Re: [CentOS-virt] Difference between qemu-kvm-ev and qemu-kvm-ma?

2018-05-10 21:57 GMT+02:00 Lance Albertson : > I see with the introduction of CentOS 7.5 there's a new qemu-kvm-ma > package on ppc64le (which is actually newer than qemu-kvm-ev currently). > Does anyone know what the difference is between these two packages? We > currently use