On 1/28/19 4:23 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
IMHO - as Kern (Bacula lead developer) is pushing Bacula forward I dont
understand this too. It must be
a misinformation about the current status of the project itself and competitors
interests (Bareos).
There's probably going to be a lot
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 02:49, jinho kong wrote:
>
> I got a permission, thanks~
>
> But, I can't edit my wiki page. (
> https://wiki.centos.org/KongJinho?action=edittemplate=HomepageTemplate )
>
> Can you help me again?
>
>
I have initialised a wiki home page for you as --
On 1/28/19 6:23 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
Am 28.01.2019 um 10:50 schrieb Peter Eckel :
Hi Alessandro,
Why many users skip bacula? It is powerfull and very stable. It is very
difficult to setup but if you know how it works it is simple.
IMHO - as Kern (Bacula lead developer)
Hi Leon,
> IMHO - as Kern (Bacula lead developer) is pushing Bacula forward I dont
> understand this too. It must be
> a misinformation about the current status of the project itself and
> competitors interests (Bareos).
the fork of Bacula happened in 2013, IIRC. Things may have changed since
On 1/28/2019 4:23 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
I used Bacula before I switched to Bareos.
There was a point, however, when the open source release of Bacula became, to
put it mildly, a bit too inactive for my taste.
Inactive? Every 2 months a release (average):
BackupPC suffered from
On 1/27/19 06:56, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
Hey there,
what type of backup solution do you use on C7?
Thanks in advance
AMANDA - one config to encrypted LTO that are sent offsite and intended
primarily for DR purposes, another config dumps a differently curated
DLE list to virtual tapes
On Monday 28 January 2019 12:23:25 Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
> > Am 28.01.2019 um 10:50 schrieb Peter Eckel :
> > I used Bacula before I switched to Bareos.
> >
> > There was a point, however, when the open source release of Bacula
> > became, to put it mildly, a bit too inactive for my
> Am 28.01.2019 um 10:50 schrieb Peter Eckel :
>
> Hi Alessandro,
>
>> Why many users skip bacula? It is powerfull and very stable. It is very
>> difficult to setup but if you know how it works it is simple.
IMHO - as Kern (Bacula lead developer) is pushing Bacula forward I dont
Am 25.01.19 um 13:13 schrieb Alessandro Baggi:
Hi list,
I created my rpm for Bacula 9.4.1 reading centos srpm spec files. I
made a single package and not split in several packages because this
is my first rpm so I created my spec file taking a cue from bacula-5.3
spec file.
All works as
On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 00:04 -0500, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
> On 1/25/19 10:27 AM, mark wrote:
> > Ok, folks,
> >
> > I brought this up some time ago, and got no replies. We have a good
> > number of systems - > 100 - and we use sssd. On the C 7 boxen, which is
> > most of them, gssproxy
Hi Alessandro,
> Why many users skip bacula? It is powerfull and very stable. It is very
> difficult to setup but if you know how it works it is simple.
I used Bacula before I switched to Bareos.
There was a point, however, when the open source release of Bacula became, to
put it mildly, a
11 matches
Mail list logo