--On Tuesday, April 28, 2020 10:16 PM -0500 Chris Adams
wrote:
I didn't get that you have a static assignment (presumably a business
connection) - they may not do RAs on that (I don't at my ISP job).
Business connections (or at least, connections with static assignments)
tend to operate
Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter said:
> I'm using OpenWrt at home and it's working mostly fine there. Except
> with my Android phone. I'm not getting a DNS setting for V6, but I
> do have the setting in the router's config file. The Win10 clients
> work fine, though. Apparently Android has
On 4/28/2020 4:22 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
What's in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-? I wonder if you
have IPv6 disabled.
Pasted below. V6 definitely works. I have a second server and gave it a
WAN address and I can connect between them using their WAN addresses.
That's what told me
Folks
While trying to automate a download of the ISO files, I ran into
inconsistencies with the method of checksums. I was trying to use
the checksum values to validate my download.
At least in one mirror (mirrors.sonic.net):
Centos 7 uses a file called sha256sum.txt containing:
Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter said:
> On 4/28/2020 3:17 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> >- gateway sends a router solicitation and gets a router advertisement
> > with "stateful config" set, which tells gateway to do DHCPv6 (but
> > default route comes from RA)
>
> I'm not seeing any outbound
On 4/28/2020 3:17 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
- gateway sends a router solicitation and gets a router advertisement
with "stateful config" set, which tells gateway to do DHCPv6 (but
default route comes from RA)
I'm not seeing any outbound IPv6 traffic from my CentOS 7 box on the WAN
Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter said:
> I just got 50 Mbps symmetric fiber from AT and it includes a /56
> of IPv6 addresses, replacing a much slower ADSL line. I never tried
> to get IPv6 working on the old connection. I'm using CentOS 7 as a
> gateway and it's worked great for several versions
I struggled with this under CentOS 7. I think there is a bug.
You can run /usr/sbin/radvdump to print out RAs. Leave it running for
some minutes.
I had this in my /etc/sysctl.d/50-net6.conf (on C7):
#
# IPv6 Forwarding
#
net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding = 1
net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding = 1
On Tue, 28 Apr, 2020 at 11:44:20 +0200, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're running some web apps on CentOS 6 on Tomcat 6 shipped by the
> distribution.
>
> As time goes by we'd like to move on to CentOS 8 and Tomcat 9 or whatever
> is appropriate.
>
> My question is, what do others
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 7:35 PM Simon Matter via CentOS
wrote:
> If I don't find usable RPMs for CentOS 8 I'm going to build our own as I
> do for other things as well. But I just can't believe they don't already
> exist.
I've packaged tomcat8 and tomcat9 in my repo here:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 2:40 PM Jared Jacob wrote:
> I have two network interfaces configured on a server. I would like both of
> them to be configured to start on boot, but when I enable the second
> interface to start on boot I do not have access to the first network
> interface. The second
I just got 50 Mbps symmetric fiber from AT and it includes a /56 of IPv6
addresses, replacing a much slower ADSL line. I never tried to get IPv6
working on the old connection. I'm using CentOS 7 as a gateway and it's
worked great for several versions for IPv4.
I'm not seeing any IPv6 default
--On Tuesday, April 28, 2020 9:35 PM +0200 Simon Matter via CentOS
wrote:
If I don't find usable RPMs for CentOS 8 I'm going to build our own as I
do for other things as well. But I just can't believe they don't already
exist.
Some upstream providers have taken to providing their own
I have two network interfaces configured on a server. I would like both of
them to be configured to start on boot, but when I enable the second
interface to start on boot I do not have access to the first network
interface. The second interface is a private network and does not allow any
> Hi,
>
> We're running some web apps on CentOS 6 on Tomcat 6 shipped by the
> distribution.
>
> As time goes by we'd like to move on to CentOS 8 and Tomcat 9 or whatever
> is appropriate.
>
> My question is, what do others use now that Tomcat is not shipped anymore
> with CentOS?
>
> Do you run
Am 28.04.20 um 08:07 schrieb Simon Matter:
Am 27.04.20 um 17:31 schrieb Simon Matter via CentOS:
On 4/27/20 8:27 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
Hi,
I've read the Fedora modularity docs but am still missing the big
picture
somehow. Hope someone can clarify things for me.
What I'm most
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
rbowen pushed a change to branch master
in repository centos/centos.org.
from 6809212 fixing broken hlink syntax
add d1463fc syntax error in header due to typo
add 17d4944 linking to a new policy, which is
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
Hi,
We're running some web apps on CentOS 6 on Tomcat 6 shipped by the
distribution.
As time goes by we'd like to move on to CentOS 8 and Tomcat 9 or whatever
is appropriate.
My question is, what do others use now that Tomcat is not shipped anymore
with CentOS?
Do you run some JBoss/WildFly
Got RHEL 8.2 today.
https://www.redhat.com/en/about/press-releases/red-hat-delivers-force-multiplier-enterprise-it-enhanced-intelligent-monitoring-unveils-latest-version-red-hat-enterprise-linux-8
.
thanks
--
Lee
___
CentOS mailing list
> Am 27.04.20 um 17:31 schrieb Simon Matter via CentOS:
>>> On 4/27/20 8:27 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
Hi,
I've read the Fedora modularity docs but am still missing the big
picture
somehow. Hope someone can clarify things for me.
What I'm most wondering:
21 matches
Mail list logo
