John R Pierce wrote:
Anup Shukla wrote:
Jim Perrin wrote:
Thanks to all who responded.
But I repeat the question:
how to upgrade CentOS4 to PHP 5.2.5 correctly?
There is no correct method for this, there are only less wrong
ways to do it.
1. download form php.net + make ... etc
'make'd apps.
Suggestions?
--
Regards,
Anup Shukla
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
exiting normally) that another process can be run.
Thanks,
Jerry
Try monit.
http://tildeslash.com/monit/
The link seems to be down.
But the rpm is available on rpmforge and the manpage is excellent.
--
Regards,
Anup Shukla
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
set of rules protecting you,
its unnecessary to do all the hard work in impersonating another OS.
But its only me.
--
Regards,
Anup Shukla
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
, however
the card would take longer to connect to a network.
Dont know why that happened.. i simply reverted back to ndiswrapper.
As for Centos, i have never installed it on my laptop,
but only on our servers.
--
Regards,
Anup Shukla
___
CentOS mailing
connect at all to any of the web servers..
1. Are real servers accessible from lvs (ping/arp -n?)
2. Does telnet to port 80 (or the one to which http server is listening
to) on real server from lvs work?
if #1 == yes and #2 == no, it might be the firewall on the real servers.
--
Regards
Anup
Tim McGeary wrote:
Device BootStart EndBlocks Id System
/dev/sda1 1 91201 7325720017 HPFS/NTFS
This is definitely the drive. So when I try to use Webmin to mount and
partition device /dev/sda (and also tried /dev/sda2) as a New Linux
Native
Balaji wrote:
192.168.13.179 is eth0 ipv4 ipaddress and 192.168.13.83 is eth0 ipv6
ipaddress
192.168.13.83 does not look like an ipv6 address.
I would like to help, but i honestly did not understand the problem.
If possible, please elaborate.
--
Anup Shukla
of those consoles. Don't remember which one
is it.
I am not sure if you can do lspci or mount etc.
But there is a shell available nevertheless.
--
Anup Shukla
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
by default uses ssh as the remote shell.
It depends on how you are running rsync though.
Broadly, if you can ssh to the server, you sure can run rsync.
--
Anup Shukla
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Tom Brown wrote:
How about
# MOUNTER=`ssh $i mount | grep data | awk '{print \$1,\$2,\$3}'`
alas no
MOUNTER=`ssh $i 'mount | grep data | awk {print \$1, \$2, \$3}'`
results in
awk: {print , , }
awk:^ syntax error
awk: {print , , }
awk: ^ syntax error
awk: {print , , }
Tom Brown wrote:
# MOUNTER=`ssh $i 'mount | grep data | awk '{print$1,$2,$3}''`
How about
# MOUNTER=`ssh $i mount | grep data | awk '{print \$1,\$2,\$3}'`
Regards
A.S
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
Reconsider the multiple 500G part. Slicing a raid-set up typically has bad
performance effects (how bad depends on the controller). This results from
that linux now considers several parts of your one raidset as devices to be
scheduled independently.
Ok, looks
Morten Torstensen wrote:
Anup Shukla wrote:
Still, given the suggestion, i will surely try to reduce the number of
slices.
I would make one system LUN at say 20GB and one data LUN with the rest
of the RADI5 space.
On the system LUN I would make a /boot filesystem and a LVM partition
Anup Shukla wrote:
I created 500G slices. Partitioned and mounted them
Then did a simple
time dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/data1 bs=1k count=120
This gave me a speed of over 150MB/s
Then i deleted entire RAID thing.. recreate 2 LUNs
30G, and whatever is left.
Create a PV on the bigger drive
James A. Peltier wrote:
James A. Peltier wrote:
Anup Shukla wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry if this has been answered many times.
But i have been going through a lot of pages (via google search).
The more i search, the more its confusing me.
I have a server with 6 (750G each) SATA disks with H/W Raid 5
Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
On Tuesday 23 October 2007, Anup Shukla wrote:
...
I think its finally got into my head now. :)
From what i understand (after your replies and some more googling)
GRUB cannot boot from gpt labeled drives.
So no matter how i partition them, it just wont boot.
Correct
Sorry, the previous mail i sent was not correctly quoted.
Corrections below.
Anup Shukla wrote:
Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
On Tuesday 23 October 2007, Anup Shukla wrote:
...
I think its finally got into my head now. :)
From what i understand (after your replies and some more googling)
GRUB
Johnny Hughes wrote:
James A. Peltier wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
I know that XFS gets all the press about being a great performing file
system ... but if you want the best stability on CentOS, you should at
least consider ext3 instead.
I have worked very hard to get stable code for xfs in
Morten Torstensen wrote:
Anup Shukla wrote:
So finally, i am putting a 300G SATA to act as the system drive.
Then use the other 750G's to be the big RAID 5 Volume (XFS)
If you use a hardware RAID adapter, you can make two LUNs from the
disks. So make one big RAID5 array but two logical
Hi all,
While build a rpm from the httpd-2.2.6 sources (spec file included in
the source package), i had a situation where packaging would fail at the
step where several link are created for logs etc directories.
..snip from httpd.spec...
# symlinks for /etc/httpd
ln -s
21 matches
Mail list logo
