On 21/04/11 5:26 AM, Olaf Mueller wrote:
Hello,
'yum update' runs into the following error message.
Package libuser-devel-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.i386.rpm is not signed
I got this too, there's two ways around it:
1) Wait until the package is signed and then update.
2) Run: yum update
On 17/04/11 2:47 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
But when I run ntpdate it returns the wrong time:
16 Apr 19:46:13 ntpdate[1968]: step time server 204.235.61.9 offset
14408.651330 sec
[root@VIRTCENT08:/etc] #date
Sat Apr 16 19:46:42 EST 2011
can someone hit me upside the head with the
On 17/04/11 2:47 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
[root@VIRTCENT08:/etc] #date
Sat Apr 16 19:46:42 EST 2011
can someone hit me upside the head with the cluehammer?
Well, depending on the system (and how old it might be) perhaps the
BIOS time?
Regards,
Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
On 28/03/11 2:33 PM, Todd Cary wrote:
It has been 6 years since I set up my Linux server and have
hardly had to touch it in all of those years other than running
yum update, so I ma rusty in some of the fine details (especially
at 72).
That's not old, I've been corresponding with a 78
Hello,
I've noticed that there haven't been any updates to
centos-announce (or in Yum) for CentOS 5 since January 6th (that might
be the 5th for a lot of you, I'm at +11:00 UTC). Since then, however,
Red Hat have released the following updates for RHEL 5:
Critical:
On 1/02/11 10:50 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
Work is currently ongoing on QA for 5.6 ... once that is out then
you'll start seeing the other updates that depend on that.
Ah, so that's what it is. I had kind of assumed everyone had been
distracted by work on CentOS 6, until I saw the recent
On 1/02/11 11:13 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
Centos6 is pretty much on hold until 5.6 is out the door due to the
number of systems it has an impact on (ie no existing C6 systems to
update and many many C5 ones).
Now that is excellent news; exactly what I wanted to hear.
Regards,
Ben
On 2/02/11 12:16 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 02/01/2011 11:43 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
Critical:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0169.html
This is irrelevant to CentOS, its an RHEL update; if there was to be
a critical or a remotely exploiteable issue that comes up we would
then do
On 28/12/10 1:30 AM, S Mathias wrote:
I can see, that theres a program that keeps sending packets on port 25:
Dec 27 14:11:46 a kernel: [ 6336.992320] O_D_LOG: IN= OUT=lo SRC=127.0.0.1
DST=127.0.0.1 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=61533 DF PROTO=TCP
SPT=37263 DPT=25 WINDOW=32792
On 22/12/10 11:52 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
It's the easiest way to do it. If you allow someone else to hold your
SSL keys, they can do interesting things to act as your front end to
Where in the original post did it mention using a system that's not
under their control? The question was
On 14/12/10 7:12 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I've been working with them (right, the engineer I'm working with is in
Chile, while I'm in DC). I *think* this is a Linux naming convention,
though. Anyway, after I posted, I mentioned the problem to my manager, and
he suggested I look in dmesg.
On 7/12/10 8:33 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Ah, I must pity you who have to live with what you've got in the United
States being under the rule of these tyrants. You guys probably can only
dream of getting a 100MB fibre connection for 13USD/mnth or a 1GB fibre
connection for 30 or so
On 8/12/10 4:12 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 07/12/10 16:49, Bob McConnell wrote:
No, it is not FUD, it is a real concern by people with much to lose.
Those of you evangelizing this new, and still unproven technology can't
seem to recognize this simple fact.
This is FUD.
Agreed, but
On 4/12/10 9:45 PM, Mathieu wrote:
Dear Manuel
First,thanks for your kindness...
I understand now better the Centos spirit of contribution.
For the wiki link I dont know how you got it, i sent you the table of
contents of my wiki page, not the content (yet)...
You composed your email in
On 30/11/10 10:54 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 02:12 -0800, John Doe wrote:
Because it comes from the NSA!
The backdoor experts... ;P
PS: joking of course, the NSA would never do anything bad...
This of course was a serious concern by any of the early
On 25/11/10 4:07 AM, tony.chamberl...@lemko.com wrote:
I am looking for the optimal VPN. Well it doens't have to be that elaborate.
Just the best VPN. We currently have some customers using PPTP, some using
openvpn, some using Cisco Any Connect and there are a few others.
Be careful with
On 1/12/10 2:32 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ben McGinnes wrote:
The reason for the second one is pretty obvious, though, they know
that SELinux would be (and is) used by non-Americans and they don't
want to protect foreign secrets, they want to discover them.
Um, not quite
On 22/11/10 2:54 PM, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
Pls add bdgiedjhea.po6e4ina.com mailto:j...@bdgiedjhea.po6e4ina.com to
/etc/hosts file
and , then add bdgiedjhea.po6e4ina.com
mailto:j...@bdgiedjhea.po6e4ina.com to mydestination parameter in
/etc/postfix/main.cf http://main.cf file
On 22/11/10 2:47 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Ben McGinnes wrote:
What is the complete output of postqueue -p? What is the From address
and, more to the point, is it MAILER-DAEMON?
Yes it is
Cool.
Where $MSGID is one of the messages in the queue. That will show
you the message and headers
On 17/11/10 7:26 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Examining the postfix queue with postqueue -p: I see many
(Host or domain name not found. Name service error for
name=bdgiedjhea.po6e4ina.com type=MX: Host not found, try again)
j...@bdgiedjhea.po6e4ina.com
My
On 20/11/10 8:16 AM, Michael D. Berger wrote:
On my intranet, I sometimes transfer large files, about 4G,
to an CentOS old box that I use for a web server. I transfer
with ftp or sftp.
Have you tried scp or rsync?
Regards,
Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
with either of these as I edit the config files
with a text editor.
Regards,
Ben
--
Ben McGinnes http://www.adversary.org/ Twitter: benmcginnes
Systems Administrator, Writer, ICT Consultant
Encrypted email preferred - primary OpenPGP/GPG key: 0xA04AE313
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op
at, this could be
a real problem, especially when the usernames might conflict between
different domains.
If I were in your position I'd be looking at either 1a or 1b.
Regards,
Ben
--
Ben McGinnes http://www.adversary.org/ Twitter: benmcginnes
Systems Administrator, Writer, ICT Consultant
On 5/11/10 9:39 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
As for the SSL part, you can monitor traffic over it in a couple of
ways. For internal services being served out you can have the SSL
connection terminate at the gateway and the gateway establish an
internal SSL connection to the service. For internal
On 5/11/10 11:29 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 11/5/10 4:27 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
I believe this is one of the methods that was looked at to enable
ISPs to filter/censor/log SSL connections should the government
policies become legislation here. Except for all outbound
connections. The rest
On 6/11/10 12:25 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
If we could start the whole certificate thing over I think it would
have been better to have a trust registrar rather then a bunch of
semi-trusted authorities. Then any corporation can create their own
CA and register that CA with a registrar with
Hello,
Has anyone managed a successful installation of Nagios using
the RPMForge packages on CentOS 5.5?
It looks like it should have worked, I followed the guides for Fedora
and CentOS here (with appropriate path adjustments):
On 6/11/10 3:04 AM, 韦加宁 wrote:
信已收到,谢谢!
有没有必要每个邮件到达通知我们。谢谢。
Regards,
Ben
P.S. 不，我看不懂中文。我用谷歌。
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 6/11/10 5:30 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
I've had trouble getting Nagios runtime files to work and play well
with SELinux. In particular, the pid file, /var/nagios/nagios.pid, is
created with a generic var_t type rather than the necessary
nagios_var_run_t type, so I've tweaked system
On 6/11/10 6:09 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Ben McGinnes wrote:
Now this is an excellent idea! It would be vastly superior to the
current situation, though a serious challenge to the price-gouging of
many CAs.
I used to use godaddy for my certs but now use the startssl folk - much
better
On 4/11/10 10:28 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I recently transferred the / partition on my CentOS server
from a small disk to a large disk, using rsync -auvz.
This works fine, except that I get dozens of selinux warnings
when I re-boot.
I'm running selinux in permissive mode.
Is there any
On 4/11/10 10:35 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Nov 3, 2010, at 7:01 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 11/03/10 3:46 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
I just think VPNs' time has come and gone.
VPN's have another use entirely, which is linking LAN segments over the
internet to create a
On 22/10/10 3:10 AM, David wrote:
I was hoping Dovecot could be not so RFC compliant in this matter. Anyway if
gets the DELE command the message arrived safely to the client.
Any other POP3 server not so RFC compliant?
Thanks for the answer.
Breaking RFCs to get the functions you want is
On 23/10/10 2:17 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Would someone @ mail dot centos dot org delete this email expung it
from public view???
uhm.. what's your problem, dude?
He's probably referring to the private RSA SSH key that has been posted
in that message. Actually, that would be *your* private
On 21/10/10 6:17 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
I thank you guys for your patience and help.
No problem.
I just spent a good few hours googling today and working my way
around blogs, documentation, howto articles, forum posts, mailing
list archives, and the like. I wouldn't have even known what to
On 20/10/10 5:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ian Murray wrote:
No the example above shows a telnet to port 25 connecting - which I can
reproduce too - but there is no 220 response as there should be from a
I am late to the thread (and I haven't a clue what we are talking about in
fact),
said in his response, the error indicates a networking
failure. Either the system's Internet connection is down, suffering
from high latency or the DNS resolution is timing out. You should check
all the suggestions that Manish made.
Regards,
Ben
--
Ben McGinnes http://www.adversary.org/ Twitter
--
Ben McGinnes http://www.adversary.org/ Twitter: benmcginnes
Systems Administrator, Writer, ICT Consultant
Encrypted email preferred - primary OpenPGP/GPG key: 0xA04AE313
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x371AC5BFA04AE313
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 13/10/10 1:44 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone have a sample SELinux policy for dkim-milter?
I'm using the configuration from this page:
http://www.howtoforge.com/set-up-dkim-for-multiple-domains-on-postfix-with-dkim-milter-2.8.x-centos-5.3
Along with the latest RPM
or later your stuff
will get stolen and the place will get trashed.
Regards,
Ben
--
Ben McGinnes http://www.adversary.org/ Twitter: benmcginnes
Systems Administrator, Writer, ICT Consultant
Encrypted email preferred - primary OpenPGP/GPG key: 0xA04AE313
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op
On 10/10/10 10:16 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Go OpenSolaris then. Also OpenOffice and maybe LibreOffice can open docx
files...not sure about those from MSO 2010 though...
Except OpenSolaris has already been killed by Oracle. There is a fork
called Illumos, though.
Regards,
Ben
On 10/10/10 11:31 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
/me shrugs. Yeah, maybe I better start saying Illumos and yelling use
OpenIndiana, a distro which uses Illumos.
It'll only be an option for x86/x86-64 and with the move to using
Fujitsu UltraSPARC chips that contain patented technology which can
clean]
If it doesn't work it will tell you.
Regards,
Ben
--
Ben McGinnes http://www.adversary.org/ Twitter: benmcginnes
Systems Administrator, Writer, ICT Consultant
Encrypted email preferred - primary OpenPGP/GPG key: 0xA04AE313
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch
On 9/10/10 9:06 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
Why is there only one Windows? :-D
(sorry, couldn't resist... ;-) )
There isn't. The original consumer edition (i.e. Win 95/98/ME) became
the XBox.
Regards,
Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 9/10/10 11:12 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
XBox is a gaming console, not an operating system. You cannot install it on a
generic PC hardware.
Besides, AFAIK XBox's OS was based on WinNT and WinXP, not the 95/98/ME.
It's been quite a few years since I looked at any of this so I might be
On 8/10/10 8:27 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
About 10% of the people at my workplace use Linux for the
desktop despite sizable pressure to the contrary from the CIO.
Is there a reason for the pressure or is it just a generic pro-M$ and
anti-*nix attitude?
Regards,
Ben
signature.asc
On 7/10/10 6:20 PM, Smith Erick Marume-Bahizire wrote:
Hello
Please I want help in centos server I can ping the gateway or
my eth1 ip address but i cant browse from my server could you help
me with the codes the codes that will enable network cause i've
already configure my iptables
On 7/10/10 10:23 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
My man page says: ~/.ssh/identity.pub...
argh ... sorry, i was logged into the wrong system when reading the
man page, i was connected to my ubuntu system. interesting that
different distros have different default files for the same command.
On 7/10/10 11:20 PM, Václav Strachoň wrote:
OpenBSD is not shipped with ssh-copy-id. But ssh-copy-id is only
script. So if you try this:
Ah, cool. The last time I needed to do this it was the old-fashioned way.
Regards,
Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2/10/10 4:27 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hello listmates,
I have discovered a very strange SFTP problem which I can not connect to
anything but NIS thus far. See here:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-server-73/sftp-seems-to-fail-for-nis-accounts-under-openssh-5-x-816020/
On 1/10/10 1:32 AM, adrian kok wrote:
Hi
ls the if top package availblale in Centos?
http://www.ex-parrot.com/~pdw/iftop/
It appears to be available in the RPMForge repository:
iftop.i386 0.17-1.el5.rf rpmforge
Regards,
Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 30/09/10 12:43 AM, Alexander Farber wrote:
Hello,
I'm using the latest CentOS with phpBB 3.0.x + postgreSQL + sendmail
(relayed through gmail.com) - all those programs working fine,
with no big modifications of the CentOS defaults (i.e. SELinux is on).
[SNIP
Does anybody know what is
On 30/09/10 3:21 AM, Simon Billis wrote:
You can use setenforce 0 without the quotes to disable selinux from the
command line till next reboot or until you issue setenforce 1 - this is
useful for testing as is looking at /var/log/audit/audit.log and also using
commands such as audit2why and
53 matches
Mail list logo
