On 09/13/15, Always Learning wrote:
- Quoted text ---
Where does one obtain the RPM for Centos 5 and 6, please ?
- End quote
See: vault.centos.org
___
CentOS mailing list
On 09/10/15, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
--- Quoted text --
SSh is not parsing the port the way http does, it seems:
$ rsync -ah --stats root@192.168.129.2:613:/etc/dhcp/
/home/rgm/data/htt/httnet/homebase/new/dhcp
ssh: connect to host 192.168.129.2 port 22: No route to
On 09/10/15, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Quoted text
I just tried the following:
rsync -ah --stats "ssh -p613 -l root" 192.168.192.2:/root/samba.PDC/
/home/rgm/data/htt/httnet/homebase/new/root/
And it failed with:
Unexpected remote arg:
On 09/10/15, C Linus Hicks wrote:
On 09/10/15, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Quoted text
Try this:
rsync -ah --stats 192.168.192.2:/root/samba.PDC/
/home/rgm/data/htt/httnet/homebase/new/root/
- End Quote
On 07/06/15, g wrote:
you might try verifying that system you are getting error message on
has a good cd/dvd drive.
burn another dvd at at least 4 speeds slower.
if runs ok, bad drive.
if still fails, bad drive.
another way you can check is to pull iso on system you are having
problem with
On 07/05/2015 09:17 AM, lin...@verizon.net wrote:
Someone please tell me what I did to screw this thing up so badly.
On 07/05/15, Gordon Messmergordon.mess...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you looked at the log files in /mnt/sysimage/root/?
- Quoting broken in this mailer
So
On 07/05/15, Gordon Messmer wrote:
anaconda will try to delete an rpm file if it gets an IOError. Your
media may be corrupt. Check that first.
- Above quoted -
No such luck. On the system where I'm doing the install, I used dd to read the
entire DVD and also copied every .rpm to
On 07/05/15, Gordon Messmer wrote:
That's not the same as checking the media for corruption. You may be
able to read all of the files, but if the data is corrupt, rpm may throw
and IOError.
So, the next thing to do is check your media. The DVD should offer to
do that first when you boot from
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 01:20 -0400, JohnS wrote:
I am just wondering if any of you guys with the udev hang problem have
tried:
rpm -e the new kernel? Then try to reinstall it via yum install. You
should delete the new kernel from /var/cache/yum first.
Just a point in why I say that is I
On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 12:27 +0100, Colin Coles wrote:
Hi,
I have updated 8 machines so far and 2 are refusing to boot on
2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 kernel, they just hang at: 'Starting udev:' but when I
revert to 2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 kernel they boot fine. Any pointers?
I just updated a machine and
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 07:02 -0500, Brent L. Bates wrote:
The first question is did you unmount the file system first before doing
both the xfs_check and xfs_repair? A file system should not be mounted while
doing either of these. xfs_check will give false failures if it is run while
the file
I run:
xfs_check /dev/sdc10
And it reports:
sb versionnum missing attr bit 10
Then I run:
xfs_repair /dev/sdc10
And it reports output from 7 phases and done.
Again I run:
xfs_check /dev/sdc10
And it reports:
sb versionnum missing attr bit 10
Is this how it's supposed to work?
Thanks for
On CentOS 5.3 x86_64, I'm trying to build
xfsprogs-2.9.4-1.el5.centos.x86_64 with -ggdb so I can use it with gdb
and examine the data structures when using xfs_db. I've installed the
src rpm as a non-root user and when I run rpmbuild -bc during
the ./configure I get the error:
.
.
.
checking
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 12:29 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:43 AM, C Linus Hicks lin...@verizon.net wrote:
On CentOS 5.3 x86_64, I'm trying to build
xfsprogs-2.9.4-1.el5.centos.x86_64 with -ggdb so I can use it with gdb
and examine the data structures when using xfs_db
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:14 -0400, C Linus Hicks wrote:
strace output:
--
- Cut a bunch of lines
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 6
socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW, 0) = 7
bind(7, {sa_family
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:14 -0400, C Linus Hicks wrote:
strace output:
--
--- a bunch of lines cut ---
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 6
socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW, 0) = 7
bind(7, {sa_family=AF_NETLINK
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 12:36 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
What does the ietd.conf, initiators.allow and targets.allow look like?
What is your network setup? Are you using a vif on the loopback?
There's no VIF on loopback. The machine running iet has two NICs, the
private interconnect should not
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 15:13 -0400, C Linus Hicks wrote:
There's no VIF on loopback. The machine running iet has two NICs, the
private interconnect should not be playing a role. It's IP address is
10.200.2.2/24 while the local subnet is 10.200.1.0/24 and the iet
machine is IP address 10.200.1.6
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:43 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
I'm a little confused now, you are running IET and open-iscsi on the
same host, buy using an external interface for the connection between
the two instead of the loopback? You would get much better throughput
on the loopback.
Sure,
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:51 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
I don't know much about open-iscsi, just IET and the best way to
diagnose iSCSI problems is via tcpdump and wireshark not strace.
Is the iscsi-target service running?
[r...@lh6 iscsi]# netstat -nlp | grep 3260
tcp0 0
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 23:26 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
Can you send a short tcpdump between initiator and target during
discovery/login?
Sure. Note that all this traffic is on the lo interface.
The discovery command and tcpdump output:
[r...@lh6 ~]# iscsiadm -m discovery -t st -p
I am trying to install Oracle RAC in a two node cluster for testing
purposes, so performance is not something that concerns me. I just want
to go through the process all the way to creating a database. I have all
the prerequisites except the shared storage and thought I'd give this a
try.
I'm
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 17:53 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 5:37 PM, C Linus Hicks lin...@verizon.net wrote:
I am trying to install Oracle RAC in a two node cluster for testing
purposes, so performance is not something that concerns me. I just want
to go through
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 21:42 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:14 PM, C Linus Hicks wrote:
So for iet, that means /etc/iet/ietd.conf should define the Lun like
this:
Lun 0 Path=/dev/sdb,Type=blockio,ScsiId=asmdg,ScsiSN=dg0
If that's all it takes to make it do blockio
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 22:22 -0400, C Linus Hicks wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 00:39 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
This seems it may be a bad memory issue. When star is running it is
causing a lot of io to be cached putting pressure on regions of memory
that might otherwise go unused
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 00:39 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
This seems it may be a bad memory issue. When star is running it is
causing a lot of io to be cached putting pressure on regions of memory
that might otherwise go unused.
Think about running a memtest first or just swap the memory
I have gotten a hard system lockup several times using star on my system
with a Quantum DLT-V4 SATA tape drive. I am including what got recorded
in /var/log/messages from the most recent event showing stack trace.
Output from uname -a:
Linux lh10 2.6.9-78.0.13.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jan 14 15:55:36
27 matches
Mail list logo
