Re: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoD CAC

2014-12-04 Thread Cal Webster
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 08:08 -0500, mark wrote: On 12/03/14 17:34, Cal Webster wrote: Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email and .mil web sites. I recently had to get a new DoD CAC (Smart Card

Re: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoD CAC

2014-12-04 Thread Cal Webster
On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 18:20 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Cal Webster Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 17:35 To: CentOS List Subject: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil

Re: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoD CAC

2014-12-04 Thread Cal Webster
a search in DADMS. We do use CentOS for local general purpose servers and workstations. On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Cal Webster cwebs...@ec.rr.com wrote: Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email

Re: [CentOS] DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC

2014-12-04 Thread Cal Webster
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote: Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license. I would recommend RHEL for critical

Re: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoD CAC

2014-12-04 Thread Cal Webster
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:30 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Cal Webster wrote: On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 08:08 -0500, mark wrote: On 12/03/14 17:34, Cal Webster wrote: Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only

Re: [CentOS] DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC

2014-12-04 Thread Cal Webster
something then get it integrated into RHEL before filtering down to CentOS. If this is acceptable then CentOS is an option. On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Cal Webster cwebs...@ec.rr.com wrote: On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote: Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems

[CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoD CAC

2014-12-03 Thread Cal Webster
. More relevant information below... I'd be grateful for any ideas or advice on this. I desperately need to retrieve vulnerability reports, patches, and other DoD resources. Thanks! Cal Webster Smart Card Reader: SCM Microsystems Inc. SCR3310 USB Smart Card Reader (21120628202509) 00 00-0 Old

[CentOS] Workaround for (EL6.4) rdesktop-1.6.0-10 Woe

2013-11-07 Thread Cal Webster
Up an RPM Build Environment under CentOS http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SetupRpmBuildEnvironment Note: Watch for line-wrap below. Best Regards, --Cal Webster =[Rdesktop Workaround]= ## Retrieve and install the CentOS source RPM: rpm -iv http://vault.centos.org/6.4/os

Re: [CentOS] Workaround for (EL6.4) rdesktop-1.6.0-10 Woe

2013-11-07 Thread Cal Webster
On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 19:17 +, James Pearson wrote: Cal Webster wrote: In short, rdesktop 1.6.0-10 is buggy and unstable. See this upstream bug report for more: There are more recent versions of rdesktop available via 3rd party repos e.g. http://pkgs.repoforge.org/rdesktop

Re: [CentOS] Workaround for (EL6.4) rdesktop-1.6.0-10 Woe

2013-11-07 Thread Cal Webster
On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 13:50 -0500, Fred Smith wrote: On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:51:48AM -0500, Cal Webster wrote: rdesktop has been spewing error messages since the update to CentOS 6.4. Aside from the continuous stream of errors in the terminal window from which it was launched

Re: [CentOS] Cannot get Centrino N 6200 wireless NIC to work Cento 6.4

2013-05-16 Thread Cal Webster
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 16:16 -0400, Selwyn Schultz Sr wrote: I am very new to installing Linux on laptops. I got it working on another Toshiba I owned without to much trouble, and then decided I wanted to experiment with KVM so I bought this laptop with an I5 chip. Anyway I tried modprobe

Re: [CentOS] How to configure display on CentOS 6?

2013-01-25 Thread Cal Webster
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 09:33 -0500, Scot P. Floess wrote: I think you can also use X --config That should build an /etc/X11/xorg.conf file for you... That's a good start (the command is actually Xorg -configure) but it may leave open questions to the OP and others who may consult this

Re: [CentOS] KVM as a desktop

2012-08-28 Thread Cal Webster
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 10:23 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: I am nearing the end of a project that moved our disparate services and hosts onto kvm virtualized servers. What I am now contemplating is setting up my desktop as a virtual host and using one of the guests as my primary workstation.

Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update

2012-08-24 Thread Cal Webster
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 19:46 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Cal Webster wrote: On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote: On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster

Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update

2012-08-23 Thread Cal Webster
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 19:46 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Cal Webster wrote: On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote: On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster

Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update

2012-08-23 Thread Cal Webster
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 19:46 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Cal Webster wrote: On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote: On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster

Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update

2012-08-17 Thread Cal Webster
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote: On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote: On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster

Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update

2012-08-16 Thread Cal Webster
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote: On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote: We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on servers that have

Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update

2012-08-16 Thread Cal Webster
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote: On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote: On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster

Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update

2012-08-15 Thread Cal Webster
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote: We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have occurred on similar connections to EL 6.2 servers

[CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update

2012-08-14 Thread Cal Webster
We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have occurred on similar connections to EL 6.2 servers. On the client machine a normal vncviewer display appears with the expected graphical login until the mouse

[CentOS] Update to EL 6.3 breaks TCP NFS automounts

2012-08-08 Thread Cal Webster
See Red Hat Bugzilla bug #846852 for details. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846852 FYI: We discovered that after updating to EL 6.3 on our x86_64 server, autofs 5.0.5-54 broke our nightly backups that rely on automounting an NFS share hosted on another EL 6 machine on our local

Re: [CentOS] Update to EL 6.3 breaks TCP NFS automounts

2012-08-08 Thread Cal Webster
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 18:37 -0400, Cal Webster wrote: See Red Hat Bugzilla bug #846852 for details. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846852 FYI: We discovered that after updating to EL 6.3 on our x86_64 server, autofs 5.0.5-54 broke our nightly backups that rely on automounting

Re: [CentOS] xorg.conf disappear

2012-03-29 Thread Cal Webster
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 09:57 +0100, Lars Hecking wrote: brick writes: Hi My system is CentOS 6. I need to edit xorg.conf. But it can't be find in /etc/X11. Where is it? How can I get the default setting? /var/log/Xorg.0.log will tell you which configuration Xorg is currently using,

Re: [CentOS] Missing nss dependency nss-softokn

2011-12-15 Thread Cal Webster
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 02:14 -0800, John Doe wrote: From: Cal Webster cwebs...@ec.rr.com Error: Package: nss-3.12.10-2.el6_1.x86_64 (updates) Requires: nss-softokn(x86-64) = 3.12.9 Installed: nss-softokn-3.12.7-1.1.el6.x86_64 (@anaconda-CentOS-201106060106.x86_64/6.0

[CentOS] Missing nss dependency nss-softokn

2011-12-14 Thread Cal Webster
I'm getting yum update errors when attempting to update nss: -- Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: nss-3.12.10-2.el6_1.x86_64 (updates) Requires: nss-softokn(x86-64) = 3.12.9 Installed: nss-softokn-3.12.7-1.1.el6.x86_64

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 chkconfig strange behavior

2011-07-22 Thread Cal Webster
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 13:00 -0600, Devin Reade wrote: --On Friday, July 22, 2011 11:10:29 AM -0700 Jerry Moore tec...@mcn.org wrote: It appears that chkconfig is re sequencing or re ordering the start priority of various services when turning on a service using chkconfig. [...] The only

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 chkconfig strange behavior

2011-07-22 Thread Cal Webster
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 12:47 -0700, Jerry Moore wrote: On Jul 22, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Cal Webster wrote: System V init has been replaced by upstart Upstream Deployment Guide: http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Technical_Notes/deployment.html Fedora

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync

2011-04-15 Thread Cal Webster
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 13:28 +0200, Simon Matter wrote: On 4/14/2011 6:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: Is it really true that the time is working perfectly with one of the other kernels (the older ones)? Johnny, Yes, As long as I run the older 5.5 kernel my time is

Re: [CentOS] Two cleanly installed CentOS 5.6 servers but with different Xen kernel versions

2011-04-15 Thread Cal Webster
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 16:37 +0200, Hans Vos wrote: Hello Cal, Thank you for your reply. It's possible that your #2 server has not rebooted or had problems with the latest kernel or just has the default set to something other than 0 in grub.conf. I did a reboot and checked the

Re: [CentOS] Two cleanly installed CentOS 5.6 servers but with different Xen kernel versions

2011-04-15 Thread Cal Webster
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 17:00 +0200, Hans Vos wrote: Hello, Ryan is right. The mirrors need to sync up. That's most likely the cause. Still, it's curious why you have two kernels listed in grub.conf and only one listed from yum. You should also see the 2.6.18-238.el5xen kernel listed.

Re: [CentOS] Two cleanly installed CentOS 5.6 servers but with different Xen kernel versions

2011-04-15 Thread Cal Webster
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 11:07 -0400, Ryan Wagoner wrote: On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Hans Vos h...@laissezfaire.nl wrote: Well, I copied the /var/cache/yum/timedhosts.txt file from server 1 to server 2. Then run yum update and all kinds of errors came flying at me. So I just SCP'ed the

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync

2011-04-13 Thread Cal Webster
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 13:08 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote: Mailing List wrote: On 4/13/2011 7:35 AM, Mailing List wrote: Hi, I have upgraded my Dell C151 to the latest 5.6. I have always used ntp to sync this machine and then the rest of the machines in the network would sync from it.

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync

2011-04-13 Thread Cal Webster
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 14:42 -0400, Mailing List wrote: On 4/13/2011 1:08 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: there are two other 238 kernels - do they show the same behavior? I will install kernel-2.6.18-238.5.1.el5.centos.plus and let the list know how it goes. I totally forgot that there was a

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync

2011-04-13 Thread Cal Webster
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 15:10 -0400, Mailing List wrote: On 4/13/2011 2:50 PM, Cal Webster wrote: [snip] The ntp server does connect to the internet fine. the version of ntp is as follows. ntp-4.2.2p1-9.el5.centos.2.1 The time is not off by a matter of minutes or I would

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync

2011-04-13 Thread Cal Webster
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 16:00 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: [snip] The avc messages are in /var/log/audit/audit.log ausearch -m avc -ts recent Will also show you recent AVC messages. audit2allow -la will search for any avc message in /var/log/audit/audit.log or /var/log/messages since

Re: [CentOS] bizarre system slowness

2011-04-13 Thread Cal Webster
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 13:06 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote: Running v5 64bit on a Dell 1950. A cluster of 3 DB machines, identical hardware. One of them suddenly became slower 2 weeks ago. tar -zxf with a large file on this machine takes 1.5 minutes, but takes only 10 seconds on any of its

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync

2011-04-13 Thread Cal Webster
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 16:22 -0400, Mailing List wrote: On 4/13/2011 3:35 PM, Cal Webster wrote: I'm running the same kernel and ntp versions and I'm having no problems at all on ntp servers or clients. If my previous suggestions didn't help maybe you could share contents

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync

2011-04-13 Thread Cal Webster
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 17:42 -0400, Mailing List wrote: On 4/13/2011 5:24 PM, Cal Webster wrote: ntpq -c pe -c as root ~# ntpq -c pe -c as remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter

[CentOS] [Thank you!] IMHO only RHEL is better than CentOS...

2011-04-12 Thread Cal Webster
, well at least we'll all benefit. :-) Very Gratefully Yours, Cal Webster ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] [Thank you!] IMHO only RHEL is better than CentOS...

2011-04-12 Thread Cal Webster
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 14:08 -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: On Apr 12, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Cal Webster wrote: ...based on my experience, for use in all non-certified enterprise operations (large and small) on general-purpose computers. Wow, what a great post. Thanks Carl, very cool

[CentOS] CentOS 5 Security Updates

2011-02-24 Thread Cal Webster
think many of us would like to see at least the security updates to cover potential vulnerabilities. Many thanks to the development team for all their hard work! :-) Respectfully, Cal Webster ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 Security Updates

2011-02-24 Thread Cal Webster
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 14:28 -0500, R P Herrold wrote: On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Cal Webster wrote: java-1.6.0-sun non FOSS, non-source provided, no? This is in an addon channel in RHEL, and so far as I know we have never shipped such You're right - shouldn't have listed that one. I manage

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 Security Updates

2011-02-24 Thread Cal Webster
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 11:30 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Cal Webster cwebs...@ec.rr.com wrote: I know the development team is furiously working to get 5.6 out the door so I understand that there will be delays. However, it was my understanding that Critical

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 Security Updates

2011-02-24 Thread Cal Webster
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 22:00 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: I wish people would read the list archives instead of posting the same kind of questione time and again. Kai Thank you for your thoughts Kai. I have invested quite a bit of time reading the CentOS and CentOS-Devel archives, including