Re: [CentOS] ls and rm: argument list too long

2008-10-18 Thread Damian S
and get only argument list too long as feedback. Is there a way to go round this problem? I have CentOS 5.2. I'm not going to repeat some of the good advice given to you by others as to how to avoid this error, but will instead tell you this is related to the ARG_MAX variable. The

Re: [CentOS] ejabberd 2.0.2 vs SELinux vs CentOS 5

2008-10-05 Thread Damian S
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 03:02 +1100, Damian S wrote: Anyway, to cut a long story short, I have discovered that SELinux is preventing erlang from accessing its crypto libs. This message appears in the SELinux audit logs: type=AVC msg=audit(1223133076.770:102): avc: denied { execmod } for pid

[CentOS] ejabberd 2.0.2 vs SELinux vs CentOS 5

2008-10-04 Thread Damian S
Lordy, I've been having problems with this darn thing, so I hope someone can help me. :s My troubles started when I downloaded the latest erlang and ejabberd packages. I crashed and burned very quickly, trying two or three different versions of erlang along with several of ejabberd 2.0.x.

Re: [CentOS] ejabberd 2.0.2 vs SELinux vs CentOS 5

2008-10-04 Thread Damian S
To answer my question, I have found the allow_execmem boolean, and set it. So, should I file a bug with someone? Also, I'm thinking I might run into more problems with SELinux silently interfering with ejabberd later on, so maybe I should disable SELinux and be done with it. Does anyone here

Re: [CentOS] ejabberd 2.0.2 vs SELinux vs CentOS 5

2008-10-04 Thread Damian S
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 09:43 -0700, nate wrote: Damian S wrote: Also, I'm thinking I might run into more problems with SELinux silently interfering with ejabberd later on, so maybe I should disable SELinux and be done with it. That's what I'd suggest too. SELinux isn't even installed

Re: [CentOS] ejabberd 2.0.2 vs SELinux vs CentOS 5

2008-10-04 Thread Damian S
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 13:01 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Damian S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, I'm thinking I might run into more problems with SELinux silently interfering with ejabberd later on, so maybe I should disable SELinux and be done

Re: [CentOS] Lies wide open ...!

2008-08-23 Thread Damian S
Hi, that MS article is just marketing fluff. Here is a less biased viewpoint: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080425-study-70-percent-say-red-hat-more-secure-than-windows.html Its further interesting to note that at a CanSecWest conference earlier this year, researchers were given access