On 2019-07-03 23:36, Phil Perry wrote:
On 04/07/2019 03:12, Florin Andrei wrote:
I've installed an RH8 IAM in AWS and I'm trying to build packages on
it. I've noticed there are many *-devel packages that I cannot
install:
You want to enable the codeready-builder repository to install
On 2019-07-03 19:12, Florin Andrei wrote:
I've installed an RH8 IAM in AWS and I'm trying to build packages on
I meant an RH8 AMI.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman
.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
BTW, chef-client
is running as a service via /etc/init.d/chef-client
Adding SYS_UID_MAX to /etc/login.defs doesn't help.
Any clue what's going on? Why useradd has different behaviors depending
on how it's launched?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
On 2015-04-14 11:44, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2015-04-14 21:40 GMT+03:00 Florin Andrei flo...@andrei.myip.org:
http://serverfault.com/a/655752/24406
If that is accurate, the documentation, and the clustering / load
balancing might tilt the balance in the direction of strongSwan.
Well, both
, whatever) on CentOS 7, that will do site-to-site
connections with Cisco hardware at the other end? Is any of the *swan
apps still considered the best option for that?
Any guidelines w.r.t. IPSec VPN in general on this platform?
Thanks.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
On 2015-04-14 11:25, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 04/14/2015 11:07 AM, Florin Andrei wrote:
I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there
are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps -
Openswan, strongSwan, etc. I'm pretty sure CentOS 6 had Openswan
, but that obviously doesn't work,
because the login prompt overwrites everything I do.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
know what happened to it?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 2014-01-20 12:32, Florin Andrei wrote:
to install the glusterfs-package as if it was available directly in the
I meant the glusterfs-server package. Sorry.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
On 2014-01-20 14:24, Nux! wrote:
Yes, it was not built/distributed. You can either rebuild the SRPM and
enable the build of the server package or even better - get the RPMs
from gluster.org.
So, what is the reason for not distributing it?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
that setup (just mediatomb instead of ps3mediaserver)
and there's no avahi on my network. Yet the PS3 is perfectly capable of
discovering and using the DLNA server.
It might be useful for *something* but it doesn't appear to be required
in this case.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 01/09/2012 04:51 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/09/12 4:34 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
OpenVPN normally uses UDP.
it does? I thought OpenVPN used ssl/tls as the transport, which is most
decidedly TCP. I'll admit I haven't used it in quite a long time
openssl is used for encryption
don't control the routers in between. I must use a proxy.
Fortunately, OpenVPN seems to work well with dante-server. Too bad
dante-server is not in EPEL, but RPM packages are available online.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing
-announce/2011-August/017689.html
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Anyone packaging the new kernel for RH / CentOS?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
.
It's not terribly bad, since there are few systems nowadays with only
512 MB of RAM (that you would want to run C6 on). Just a bit annoying.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
. The system boots up with networking and all
the niceties enabled.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
displayed to match my own, so as to make more sense of the timestamps on
the various posts in there, that would be perfect. :)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 07/08/2011 01:59 PM, Steven Crothers wrote:
How is the site excellent if it changes nearly every other day, displays
zero useful information on the development cycle, and discourages people
Take a break, breathe deeply.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
is much better. The Linux server
becomes the router.
The third network card goes into a switch that connects all the local LAN.
The Linux box does NAT for all the networks behind it. Also runs a local
DNS cache and stuff like that.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:46:38 -0500
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you tried upgrading to a current release?
I'm running the same version like you: Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 (except
it's on Linux)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
, not the Composer or whatnot).
Maybe that's what Thunderbird does - re-scans the IMAP folders, but in a more
sneaky way, and it's dumb enough to put a Big Lock on the whole interface. Hmm.
I opened a bug report with them:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=650400
--
Florin Andrei
http
the updates or whatever in the
background, instead of blocking the UI until it's done. Ironically, it
blocked when I was done with this paragraph and I hit Enter. Sticking it
to the man one last time, I guess.
Any suggestions? Thanks.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
to sending emails.
The IMAP and SMTP servers are defined by IP address, not hostname. But
even if that was the case, a software that blocks the UI completely
while waiting for something in the background? Sounds like 1999 all over
again.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
on this computer
It's unchecked already.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
of hoping it's a software issue, but chances are slim.
OTOH, I can't imagine any hardware problem that would exhibit these
symptoms.
Any idea what to test?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
On 04/13/2011 01:55 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
1) Are you untarring from *and* to the SAN volume or is the source on
the local volume?
Source on SAN, destination on SAN. Still slow.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
case, the explanation would have to account for the fact that
network transfers, *and* local disk activity, are both slow.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 06/18/2010 05:49 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 18/06/2010 22:28, Florin Andrei wrote:
Fun fact: Postfix-2.3.3 has been released in August 2006. Think about that.
While you are doing that - also think about this : Red Hat have a
policy, and they stick with it. Its something that works well
(e.g. if you deliver
thousands of emails to Yahoo). With config changes, the improvement
might be even bigger.
Fun fact: Postfix-2.3.3 has been released in August 2006. Think about that.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
-by-case basis.
Just rpm -U the 2.7 package and that's it. For a mail relay, the rest
is good.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 06/18/2010 03:19 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
(reading the EL6 beta 1 release notes) EL6 will be based on 2.6.32, use
EXT4 by default, have XFS support (in 64bit builds), Apache 2.2.14, gcc
4.4, samba 3.0, postgres 8.4, mysql 5.1
and Postfix 2.6.5. Not bad. I could live with that.
--
Florin
:
http://ftp.wl0.org/official/
Anybody using it? Good things, bad things?...
Anybody using Postfix 2.7 on CentOS by the way? Do you have any
observations?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
options in dhclient.conf or something like that?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
So, my favorite RPM repository (EPEL) only has the ancient nagios-2.12
or so.
What's the repo you use for Nagios 3?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 12/9/2009 3:51 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
So, my favorite RPM repository (EPEL) only has the ancient nagios-2.12
or so.
What's the repo you use for Nagios 3?
I asked too soon. rpmbuild -tb works pretty well on the source tarball. :)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
when XFS for Linux was released, and I probably was
among its first users. It was great back then, but now it's over-rated.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
for network-based dumps (the remote end may be
unavailable due to a number of reasons).
The local storage is a couple SATA drives with hardware-based mirror
RAID. The chassis is a Dell PowerEdge.
Also, what it the recommended size for a dedicated raw partition for kdump?
--
Florin Andrei
. :-)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
to be out for
another few weeks
http://twitter.com/CentOS/status/4831596086
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Meenoo Shivdasani wrote:
One option would be to comment out the make_resolv_conf() function in
/sbin/dhclient-script.
That's the last-ditch solution. Never use it, unless everything else fails.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
-scripts/ifcfg-*
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Clint Dilks wrote:
Try adding PEERDNS=no to /etc/sysconfig/network :)
aw, man :)
This is not fixing the leaking faucet. It's hammering the water pipe
shut instead.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
: \
| grep -v /ifdown-eth:
# to see if it's called from somewhere else than the regular places
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
finding
the cause, which is what the OP requested. It will just make the problem
go away.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
and stuff like that, if you really need it).
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
easy to
hide the problem, either do what you suggest, or edit away
make_resolv_conf(). But the underlying cause will remain, and may
resurface if these changes are undone.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
on the network. Most distributions
provide some sort of plug-and-play recursive resolver, you just need to
install it and turn it on.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
with proprietary drivers? Any problems those drivers may cause
with bonding?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
nate wrote:
Florin Andrei wrote:
Any luck with proprietary drivers? Any problems those drivers may cause
with bonding?
I don't think there are proprietary drivers for broadcom NICs,
about 5 years ago there was proprietary fault tolerance drivers
but I don't see them now.
Right, I
service is enabled:
chkconfig --list iptables
Tip: if the FORWARD chain doesn't seem to work, check
net.ipv4.ip_forward in /etc/sysctl.conf, it's probably set to 0.
That's it, you're good to go.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS
Ryan Pugatch wrote:
I recognize that in most cases du and df are not going to report the
same but I am concerned about having a 12GB disparity. Does anyone have
any thoughts about this or reason as to why there is a big difference?
Sparse files?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
Ryan Pugatch wrote:
Oh, and no sparse files either :)
Last time I saw this issue, no sparse files, nothing legit, it was a
corrupted FS. :(
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
, and yes, it can be done on CentOS or just about any
Linux distro. But with Ubuntu everything is just there, so the
install/admin effort is greatly reduced.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
. In the end, Linux is the same, just different flavors for
different tastes.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
fast
and it's using the best strategy (that worked before for the likes of
Intel, Microsoft and, yes, Linux in general): they're co-opting the
low-end first. Things are going to get pretty interesting a few years
down the road.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
Max Hetrick wrote:
the zealots
Nah, it's just the way the human mind works, according to its current
blueprint. It can be pretty awesome in what it can do sometimes, but it
does have obvious fundamental flaws too.
You and I have biases too, but nobody is aware of their own. :)
--
Florin
booting Vista a lot more often
on my home PC - it's a long story and yes I am aware of all the
wonderful Linux video apps)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
to stay
with the crowd.
What I'm saying is, they will be able to figure out more things by
themselves on Ubuntu, if they can use a browser. Maybe even become
totally independent after a while.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing
. :) It works fine for the most
part, but once in a while it can do silly things. That's fine for me,
cause I can fix it, but it's not fine for the non-tech user.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
of the transcode package, but the idea
is the same. Here's the actual command:
n=14
for i in `seq -w 1 ${n}`; do
echo ${i} out of ${n}
tccat -i /dev/dvd -T 1,${i} ch${i}.mpeg
done
sync
ls -lh
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
Good suggestions, thanks.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
absolute paths with
cron every time. :-)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
others.
+1 for TouchTerm.
+2
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On one mirror that I tried, at least.
So, is it live yet? :-)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
, and I can power any one of those machines up, and so far Cent
OS has never failed me. Cent OS just works. That's what matters to me.
Just my 2 cents
That's very much the mindset of many CentOS users.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
%3Aredhat.com
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
is ease of installation. I will compile from source if
I have no other choice, but I'd rather avoid wasting time with that, as
I'm quite busy with non-tech things nowadays. If the application is in a
repo somewhere, that would be perfect.
Thanks!
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
Hywel Richards wrote:
Florin Andrei wrote:
The options are: L2TP, PPTP and IPSec. If you were to install a VPN
endpoint on CentOS, which protocol would you prefer?
I know this doesn't answer your question as put, but it may be worth
taking a different tack and supplying whatever
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Florin Andrei wrote:
So far, OpenVPN has been working very well for me. Unfortunately, the
iPhone doesn't have (yet?) an OpenVPN client, so I'm forced to work with
what's available.
The options are: L2TP, PPTP and IPSec. If you were to install a VPN
endpoint
is whether the Linux
IPSec server supports UDP encapsulation (and whether the iPhone client
does too).
The machine has a public interface exposed directly to the Internet, so
that simplifies things a bit.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
Les Mikesell wrote:
Florin Andrei wrote:
Maybe I don't trust the IMAP server enough to expose it. Maybe I should.
Anything that can survive in a university environment should be safe
enough for the rest of us.
That's a good point.
Okay, I have a few things to try now.
--
Florin Andrei
and combined with various other measures. We
should put this slogan to rest by now, it's 2009 already. Sheesh.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
much automation
is involved.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Marko A. Jennings wrote:
You might want to try munin: http://munin.projects.linpro.no/
It is available through the rpmforge repo and is easy to set up.
It's also on EPEL, and that's a repository that tends to create fewer
issues.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#howtouse
--
Florin
there the
situation is changing. Maybe this year I'll use 64 bit on my desktop(s)
for the first time, as it seems most of the lingering problems are being
solved, finally.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
already use a couple
different load balancing technologies.
I was just curious about performance comparisons between different types
of load balancers in general.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
new.mydomain.net - - [11/Feb/2009:14:34:58 -0500] GET /
HTTP/1.0 403 - - Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS)
(internal dummy connection)
What is it? Why do I have it now, and not before?
http://tinyurl.com/cnzaf6
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
to the critical
components.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ones are faster (provide more in terms of raw speed and max load). I
could be wrong.
Can anybody provide a performance comparison between, say, nginx and
LVS? (max connections, max new connections rate, max bandwidth, max
packets per second, etc.)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
more holes in it than a metric ton of Swiss
cheese. But then Postfix came along, and I had no reason to stick with
qmail anymore.
Such is the computer industry - licentious and forgetful. :-)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing
even more so.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Scott Silva wrote:
on 1-23-2009 1:19 PM Ashley M. Kirchner spake the following:
Quoting Florin Andrei flo...@andrei.myip.org:
I like the stability of Ext3, but in terms of speed it's not the
sharpest lightbulb in the toolshed.
Isn't that supposed to be not the fastest lawnmower
for
this.
Exactly. There are differences between file systems even when using very
large files sequentially. I did benchmarks on various controllers and my
experience was the same: the file system does matter.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS
.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
is fastest nowadays, but I guess you can do
a quick test and find out.
There might be some security implications for using a different crypto
protocol, but you need to figure that out yourself.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
MHR wrote:
I think you meant nspluginwrapper - ndiswrapper is for Window$ drivers
to run in Linux.
d'oh! brain segfault :)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
like a last-resort fallback solution, in those
rare cases when 64 bit really won't work (and even then it's due to a
bug, or lazy vendors, or something like that).
For 64 bit on the desktop, see my comments on point #3 above.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
on the desktop is OK.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Les Mikesell wrote:
I can't see anything to indicate why it doesn't show the disk, but I've
used dynamic disks for installation before.
I exclusively use dynamic allocation and it works for me with CentOS 5.2
as a guest.
Host is Ubuntu 8.10
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org
conversations
moving to the centos-tech list.
Nah. It will be too fragmented and people will never figure out the
difference between the lists.
Just my $0.02
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
--- linux-2.6.23.1.orig/scripts/package/mkspec 2007-10-19 02:07:58.0
-0700
+++ linux-2.6.23.1/scripts/package/mkspec 2007-10-19 05:42:47.0
-0700
@@ -81,6 +81,11 @@ echo 'cp $KBUILD_IMAGE $RPM_BUILD_ROOT'
echo %endif
echo %endif
Florin Andrei wrote:
Get the vanilla kernel tarball.
Apply the mkspec patch. (*)
Now do this:
export RPM_RH5_STYLE=1
Otherwise the patch is pointless.
Or hack the patch and remove the if $RPM_RH5_STYLE; then conditionals
so it's always generated RH5 style.
Get the .config file from
?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Florin Andrei wrote:
Maybe it does reply, just on a different interface? Is this a
multi-homed system? Bonded interfaces?
There's only one interface with an IP address, and only one route back
to the office.
If you were running tcpdump in promiscuous mode, re-run
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Florin Andrei wrote:
If you were running tcpdump in promiscuous mode, re-run the tests with
it non-promiscuous. Just to make sure the SYN is actually received by
that system.
I ran the test again with tcpdump -i eth0 -p and then thinking better
of it, with tcpdump -i
a relatively minimal system. If you want to install
anything after that, just do a yum install.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
