Re: [CentOS] Current RHEL fragmentation landscape

2023-07-25 Thread Walter H. via CentOS
On 21.07.2023 09:30, Lee Thomas Stephen wrote: Because the general rule seems to be Oh! You are an individual, we will offer you affordable/free service What! You are a business, we will offer you extremely 'unaffordable' service. this is ok, but the worse thing is:  students and teachers get

Re: [CentOS] Current RHEL fragmentation landscape

2023-07-24 Thread Walter H. via CentOS
On 21.07.2023 09:30, Lee Thomas Stephen wrote: Because the general rule seems to be Oh! You are an individual, we will offer you affordable/free service What! You are a business, we will offer you extremely 'unaffordable' service. this is ok, but the worse thing is:  students and teachers get

[CentOS] CentOS 7 EPEL rpms

2023-06-16 Thread H
Running C7 and using geany 1.37 which is the latest version available for C7 in EPEL. geany-plugins in EPEL, however, are at 1.38 and there is a bug in one of the plugins that could conceivably be due to version mismatch. I have just spent two hours searching high and low to see if there might

[CentOS] PHP error message when running yum update on CentOS 7

2023-03-14 Thread H
Running yum update on a CentOS 7.9 server today I encountered the following error: PHP Warning:  PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'imap.so' (tried: /usr/lib64/php/modules/imap.so (/usr/lib64/php/modules/imap.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory),

Re: [CentOS] C7, removing zoom problem

2023-02-10 Thread H
On 02/10/2023 04:32 PM, Ian Mortimer wrote: > On Thu, 9 Feb 2023, H wrote: > >> Is it possible to use ansible, puppet or the like to do this on an existing >> system? > > It's possible but can be a lot of work if you're not familiar with the > software. > > A s

Re: [CentOS] C7, removing zoom problem

2023-02-09 Thread H
On February 8, 2023 3:51:52 PM EST, Ian Mortimer wrote: >On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, Fred wrote: > >> I'm trying to build up the courage to do a full system upgrade to >> Rocky.latest. I hate doing upgrades, it's such a pain in the rear to >get >> everything working again, and get all my tweaks back into

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading system from non-RAID to RAID1

2023-01-15 Thread H
On January 12, 2023 1:56:36 AM EST, Simon Matter wrote: >> On 01/11/2023 01:33 PM, H wrote: >>> On 01/11/2023 02:09 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >>>> What I usually do is this: "cut" the large disk into several pieces >of >>>> equal size and creat

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading system from non-RAID to RAID1

2023-01-15 Thread H
On January 12, 2023 2:43:26 AM EST, Michael Schumacher wrote: > >> Follow-up question: Is my proposed strategy below correct: >> - Make a copy of all existing directories and files on the current >disk using clonezilla. >> - Install the new M.2 SSDs. >> - Partitioning the new SSDs for RAID1

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading system from non-RAID to RAID1

2023-01-12 Thread H
On 01/12/2023 03:00 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >> Hallo Simon, >> >>> Anyway, the splitting of large disks has additional advantages. Think of >>> what happens in case of a failure (power loss, kernel crash...). With >>> the >>> disk as one large chunk, the whole disk has to be resynced on restart

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading system from non-RAID to RAID1

2023-01-11 Thread H
On 01/11/2023 01:33 PM, H wrote: > On 01/11/2023 02:09 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >> What I usually do is this: "cut" the large disk into several pieces of >> equal size and create individual RAID1 arrays. Then add them as LVM PVs to >> one large VG. The advantage is

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading system from non-RAID to RAID1

2023-01-11 Thread H
On 01/11/2023 08:34 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > Perhaps you have not dealt with Firefox?  :) > > On my Fedora 35 notebook, it slowly gobbles memory and I have to quit it > after some number of days and restart. > > Now I only have 16GB of memory, 16GB physical swap, and 8GB zram swap. > >

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading system from non-RAID to RAID1

2023-01-11 Thread H
On 01/11/2023 02:09 AM, Simon Matter wrote: > What I usually do is this: "cut" the large disk into several pieces of > equal size and create individual RAID1 arrays. Then add them as LVM PVs to > one large VG. The advantage is that with one error on one disk, you wont > lose redundancy on the

[CentOS] Upgrading system from non-RAID to RAID1

2023-01-10 Thread H
I plan to upgrade an existing C7 computer which currently has one 256 GB SSD to use mdadmin software RAID1 after adding two 4 TB M2. SSDs, the rest of the system remaining the same. The system also has one additional internal and one external harddisk but these should not be touched. The system

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice on CentOS 7

2022-11-03 Thread H
On 11/02/2022 03:53 PM, jefflp...@twc.com wrote: > 3.10.0-1160.76.1.el7.x86_64. I check for updates every day. > > Jeff > > -----From: "H" > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday November 2 2022 6

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice on CentOS 7

2022-11-02 Thread H
On November 1, 2022 5:13:49 PM EDT, Josh Boyer wrote: >On Tue, Nov 1, 2022, 5:05 PM H wrote: > >> I am running the default version of LibreOffice 5.3.6.1 on CentOS 7. >This >> is quite an old version and has a serious bug in Calc, possibly an >errant >> poi

[CentOS] LibreOffice on CentOS 7

2022-11-01 Thread H
I am running the default version of LibreOffice 5.3.6.1 on CentOS 7. This is quite an old version and has a serious bug in Calc, possibly an errant pointer, that frequently locks up spreadsheets. Has anyone installed a later version of LO on CentOS 7? I would prefer a version that is not

Re: [CentOS] Anyone using odpdown?

2022-10-22 Thread H
On 10/21/2022 12:45 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > Am 21.10.22 um 17:42 schrieb H: >> On 10/20/2022 02:52 PM, H wrote: >>> Is anyone using odpdown to convert markdown files to OpenOffice Impress >>> slide presentations under CentOS 7? >>> >>> It

Re: [CentOS] Anyone using odpdown?

2022-10-21 Thread H
On 10/20/2022 02:52 PM, H wrote: > Is anyone using odpdown to convert markdown files to OpenOffice Impress slide > presentations under CentOS 7? > > It is not available in the CentOS repositories I have searched. > > ___ > CentOS

[CentOS] Anyone using odpdown?

2022-10-20 Thread H
Is anyone using odpdown to convert markdown files to OpenOffice Impress slide presentations under CentOS 7? It is not available in the CentOS repositories I have searched. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Installing mdadm and C7 on new computer

2022-10-19 Thread H
On 04/24/2022 02:54 PM, H wrote: > On 04/23/2022 09:19 PM, H wrote: >> On 04/19/2022 09:57 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: >>> On 4/18/22 1:27 PM, H wrote: >>>> I have a new computer with 2 x 2TB SSDs where I wanted to install C7 and >>>> use mdadm for RA

Re: [CentOS] OT:: Multiple PHP versions

2022-08-21 Thread H
On 08/20/2022 10:58 AM, Steve Meier wrote: > Hello, > > Am 20.08.2022 02:10, schrieb H: > >> If any C7 user has an opinion on whether to use IUS or Remi's repository for >> php 7.4, I would love to hear it. As discussed earlier, I am used to SCL but >> it is not av

Re: [CentOS] OT:: Multiple PHP versions

2022-08-19 Thread H
On 08/15/2022 08:29 PM, H wrote: > On August 15, 2022 3:30:00 PM EDT, Kenneth Porter > wrote: >> --On Monday, August 15, 2022 1:03 PM -0400 H >> wrote: >> >>> While I would prefer to install php 7.4 from SCL, both IUS and Remi's >>> repositories do c

Re: [CentOS] OT:: Multiple PHP versions

2022-08-15 Thread H
On August 15, 2022 3:30:00 PM EDT, Kenneth Porter wrote: >--On Monday, August 15, 2022 1:03 PM -0400 H >wrote: > >> While I would prefer to install php 7.4 from SCL, both IUS and Remi's >> repositories do carry it. Do you see a reason to choose one over the >> o

Re: [CentOS] OT:: Multiple PHP versions

2022-08-15 Thread H
On 08/14/2022 04:22 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: > On 8/14/2022 12:36 PM, H wrote: >> I do not see SCL having php 7.4, only php 7.3, or did I miss it? > > I don't see it, either. I suggest getting the source for 7.2 or 7.3 and > updating it to 7.4. Your contribution to the communit

Re: [CentOS] OT:: Multiple PHP versions

2022-08-14 Thread H
On 12/14/2021 12:57 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: > On 12/14/2021 9:38 AM, TE Dukes wrote: >> Been trying to get multiple versions of PHP on a CentOS 7 machine, off and >> on for the past couple months. I have followed 5 or 6 different howtos but >> none work. They are very similar and they seems to

[CentOS] php 7.4 on C7

2022-08-12 Thread H
I have a C7 server running Apache and php 7.0 and 7.2 simultaneously serving websites, both installed from SCL if I remember correctly. I now have a need to install a webapp requiring php 7.4 which seems to be available only from Remi's repository and IUS. Bearing in mind I do need to continue

Re: [CentOS] Time-tracking software

2022-08-11 Thread H
On 08/11/2022 12:20 AM, Timotheus Pokorra wrote: >> I am in search of open-source software to track billable time for myself. A >> quick Google search did not find anything that is open-source but I am >> hoping that this group might know of such software? The platform is C7. > > I am using

Re: [CentOS] Time-tracking software

2022-08-10 Thread H
the Real World v7 version of the course, and the > v8 of the coruse covers hesk.  You can learn more at > https://courses.linuxtrainingacademy.com/?ref=7 (aff link) > > Chris > > On 8/10/2022 2:28 PM, H wrote: >> I am in search of open-source software to track billable time

Re: [CentOS] Installing mdadm and C7 on new computer

2022-08-10 Thread H
On 08/02/2022 02:07 PM, H wrote: > On 04/29/2022 07:30 AM, Joakim Dellrud wrote: >> Think he might have just missed the fact that you had EFI boot aswell. So >> then it would be: >> >> /boot md0 >> >> /boot/EFI md1 >> >> / md2 -> vg0 -&

[CentOS] Time-tracking software

2022-08-10 Thread H
I am in search of open-source software to track billable time for myself. A quick Google search did not find anything that is open-source but I am hoping that this group might know of such software? The platform is C7. ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Installing mdadm and C7 on new computer

2022-08-02 Thread H
device for each "partition" needed > that is a sound and solid plan. > > When it comes to encryption the point is that you might want to have more > then just /home protected. But this is very dependent on your threat model. > If you have a laptop encryption of all partitio

Re: [CentOS] Special characters in bash strings

2022-07-07 Thread H
On 07/07/2022 12:52 AM, Jon LaBadie wrote: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 09:41:14PM -0400, H wrote: >> I have run into a bash variable string problem that I think I have nailed >> down to the variable string containing a tilde (~). Not sure if my >> conclusion is correct an

Re: [CentOS] Special characters in bash strings

2022-07-07 Thread H
e/.bashrc > > > # no quotes = expansion at assignment > $ x=~/.bashrc > $ echo "$x" $x; ls -l $x > /home/schanzle/.bashrc /home/schanzle/.bashrc > -rw-r--r-- 1 schanzle mygroup 8720 Mar  4 15:46 /home/schanzle/.bashrc > > > Hope that helps, > Chris >

Re: [CentOS] Special characters in bash strings

2022-07-07 Thread H
On 07/06/2022 10:42 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 7/6/22 18:41, H wrote: >> To my consternation this worked fine in some places but not in others. > > > It might be easier to explain if you had an example of where it worked.  The > bash man page has a section titled &qu

[CentOS] Special characters in bash strings

2022-07-06 Thread H
I have run into a bash variable string problem that I think I have nailed down to the variable string containing a tilde (~). Not sure if my conclusion is correct and could use some help. To make a long(er) story short, an associative array variable was created: p[work_path]="~/projects/test/"

Re: [CentOS] Installing mdadm and C7 on new computer

2022-04-24 Thread H
On 04/23/2022 09:19 PM, H wrote: > On 04/19/2022 09:57 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: >> On 4/18/22 1:27 PM, H wrote: >>> I have a new computer with 2 x 2TB SSDs where I wanted to install C7 and >>> use mdadm for RAID1 configuration and encrypting the /home partiti

Re: [CentOS] Installing mdadm and C7 on new computer

2022-04-23 Thread H
On 04/19/2022 09:57 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > On 4/18/22 1:27 PM, H wrote: >> I have a new computer with 2 x 2TB SSDs where I wanted to install C7 and use >> mdadm for RAID1 configuration and encrypting the /home partition. On the net >> I found >> https://tuxfixe

[CentOS] Installing mdadm and C7 on new computer

2022-04-18 Thread H
I have a new computer with 2 x 2TB SSDs where I wanted to install C7 and use mdadm for RAID1 configuration and encrypting the /home partition. On the net I found https://tuxfixer.com/centos-7-installation-with-lvm-raid-1-mirroring/ which I adopted slightly with respect to partition sizes, using

Re: [CentOS] Assistance with perl

2022-02-03 Thread H
On 02/03/2022 08:39 AM, Joe Kline wrote: > I avoid using ' or " in one-liners or even programs. > > I use q() or qq(). > > These are quote-like operators for single quote and double quote. > > There are, of course, many more: > > https://perldoc.perl.org/perlop#Quote-and-Quote-like-Operators > >

Re: [CentOS] Assitance with perl

2022-02-03 Thread H
On 02/02/2022 11:34 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote: > On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 08:54:38PM -0500, H wrote: >>>>> I am writing a long bash script under CentOS 7 where perl is used for >>>>> manipulating some external files. So far I am using perl one-liners to do >>&g

Re: [CentOS] Assitance with perl

2022-02-02 Thread H
On 02/02/2022 08:54 PM, H wrote: > On 01/31/2022 09:59 PM, H wrote: >> On 01/30/2022 11:00 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >>> On 1/30/22 18:12, H wrote: >>>> I am writing a long bash script under CentOS 7 where perl is used for >>>> manipulating some externa

Re: [CentOS] Assitance with perl

2022-02-02 Thread H
On 01/31/2022 09:59 PM, H wrote: > On 01/30/2022 11:00 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> On 1/30/22 18:12, H wrote: >>> I am writing a long bash script under CentOS 7 where perl is used for >>> manipulating some external files. So far I am using perl one-liners to do &g

Re: [CentOS] Assitance with perl

2022-01-31 Thread H
On 01/30/2022 11:00 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 1/30/22 18:12, H wrote: >> I am writing a long bash script under CentOS 7 where perl is used for >> manipulating some external files. So far I am using perl one-liners to do so >> but ran into a problem when I need to appen

Re: [CentOS] Assitance with perl

2022-01-30 Thread H
On January 30, 2022 8:25:46 PM EST, mailist wrote: >On 2022-01-30 20:12, H wrote: >> I am writing a long bash script under CentOS 7 where perl is used for >> manipulating some external files. So far I am using perl one-liners >to >> do so but ran into a problem wh

[CentOS] Assitance with perl

2022-01-30 Thread H
which I built containing a longish text with multiple newlines: txt="a b$'\n'cd ef$'\n'g h$'\n'ij kl" A simplified perl one-liner to append the text in the variable above to some file in the bash script would be: perl -pe 'eof && do{print $_'"${txt}"'; exit}' some

Re: [CentOS] Echoing statements in bash script

2022-01-15 Thread H
On 01/14/2022 08:59 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 1/14/22 17:18, H wrote: >> Using a bash script I want to echo several strings to a file. The echo >> statement, however, is in a function and thus indented but I do /not/ want >> the strings echoed indented in the new

[CentOS] Echoing statements in bash script

2022-01-14 Thread H
Using a bash script I want to echo several strings to a file. The echo statement, however, is in a function and thus indented but I do /not/ want the strings echoed indented in the new file. Is this doable? Here is an example: f () {     echo "     # this is a test     a=123     b=456" >

[CentOS] RADVd and DHCPv6?

2021-11-14 Thread Walter H. via CentOS
Hello, these are my settings in radvd.conf interface br0 {     AdvSendAdvert on;         AdvManagedFlag on;     AdvOtherConfigFlag on;     MinRtrAdvInterval 5;     MaxRtrAdvInterval 15;     route fe80::1/64     {     AdvRouteLifetime infinity;    

Re: [CentOS] MATE 1.20 test build for CentOS 7 available

2021-10-13 Thread H
On 09/08/2021 08:13 PM, H wrote: > On 09/04/2021 02:34 PM, H wrote: >> On 09/02/2021 04:16 PM, Frank Cox wrote: >>> On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 16:07:08 -0400 >>> H wrote: >>> >>>> On another note, the version that is available for C7, Mate 1.16.2, does >

Re: [CentOS] MATE 1.20 test build for CentOS 7 available

2021-09-04 Thread H
On 09/04/2021 02:34 PM, H wrote: > On 09/02/2021 04:16 PM, Frank Cox wrote: >> On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 16:07:08 -0400 >> H wrote: >> >>> On another note, the version that is available for C7, Mate 1.16.2, does not >>> save all sessions when it crashes, nor does

Re: [CentOS] MATE 1.20 test build for CentOS 7 available

2021-09-04 Thread H
On 09/02/2021 04:16 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 16:07:08 -0400 > H wrote: > >> On another note, the version that is available for C7, Mate 1.16.2, does not >> save all sessions when it crashes, nor does it save positions or session >> order arrange

Re: [CentOS] MATE 1.20 test build for CentOS 7 available

2021-09-03 Thread H
On 09/03/2021 02:36 AM, Szabo Akos via CentOS wrote: > On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 16:07 -0400, H wrote: >> On 08/28/2021 07:51 PM, H wrote: >>> On August 28, 2021 7:27:13 PM EDT, isdtor wrote: >>>> H writes: >>>>>> Thanks for your quick response! I'

Re: [CentOS] MATE 1.20 test build for CentOS 7 available

2021-09-02 Thread H
On 08/28/2021 07:51 PM, H wrote: > On August 28, 2021 7:27:13 PM EDT, isdtor wrote: >> H writes: >>>> Thanks for your quick response! I'll try building from the sources >>>> while I'm stuck with C7 :-). >>>> >>>> >>>> Regar

Re: [CentOS] MATE 1.20 test build for CentOS 7 available

2021-08-28 Thread H
On August 28, 2021 7:27:13 PM EDT, isdtor wrote: >H writes: >> > >> >Thanks for your quick response! I'll try building from the sources >> >while I'm stuck with C7 :-). >> > >> > >> >Regards, >> >> I have an interest in the

Re: [CentOS] MATE 1.20 test build for CentOS 7 available

2021-08-28 Thread H
On August 27, 2021 7:29:35 PM EDT, wwp wrote: >Hello Greg, > > >On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 16:19:29 -0700 Greg Bailey >wrote: > >> On 8/27/21 1:50 PM, wwp wrote: >> > Hello Greg, >> > >> > >> > On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 09:06:23 -0700 Greg Bailey >wrote: >> > >> >> There's been discussions in the past

Re: [CentOS] Git 2.23 or later

2021-08-23 Thread H
On 08/23/2021 02:06 PM, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > On 23/08/2021 20:00, H wrote: > > Hi H, > >> The latest version of git for C7 is 1.8.3 and in SCL it's 2.18 >> although the repository claims 2.9 is also available. I am looking to >> upgrade to 2.23 since i need the

[CentOS] Git 2.23 or later

2021-08-23 Thread H
The latest version of git for C7 is 1.8.3 and in SCL it's 2.18 although the repository claims 2.9 is also available. I am looking to upgrade to 2.23 since i need the --no-overlay option. Is anyone running this version (or later)? If so, from which repository? Thanks.

Re: [CentOS] hosts.deny, fail2ban etc.

2021-08-04 Thread H
On 07/27/2021 05:17 PM, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Tue, 2021-07-27 at 16:43 -0400, H wrote: >>> Running CentOS 7. I was under the impression - seemingly mistaken - >>> that by adding a rule to /etc/hosts.deny such as ALL: aaa.bbb.ccc.* >>> would ban all attempts from t

Re: [CentOS] hosts.deny, fail2ban etc.

2021-08-04 Thread H
On 07/28/2021 10:01 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > On 28.07.21 14:44, Jonathan Billings wrote: >> On Jul 27, 2021, at 16:43, H wrote: >>> >>> |Running CentOS 7. I was under the impression - seemingly mistaken - that >>> by adding a rule to /etc/hosts.d

Re: [CentOS] hosts.deny, fail2ban etc.

2021-08-04 Thread H
On 07/28/2021 08:44 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Jul 27, 2021, at 16:43, H wrote: >> |Running CentOS 7. I was under the impression - seemingly mistaken - that >> by adding a rule to /etc/hosts.deny such as ALL: aaa.bbb.ccc.* would ban all >> attempts from that netwo

Re: [CentOS] hosts.deny, fail2ban etc.

2021-08-04 Thread H
On 07/28/2021 05:12 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 16:43, H wrote: >> |Running CentOS 7. I was under the impression - seemingly mistaken - that by >> adding a rule to /etc/hosts.deny such as ALL: aaa.bbb.ccc.* would ban all >> attempts from

[CentOS] hosts.deny, fail2ban etc.

2021-07-27 Thread H
|Running CentOS 7. I was under the impression - seemingly mistaken - that by adding a rule to /etc/hosts.deny such as ALL: aaa.bbb.ccc.* would ban all attempts from that network segment to connect to the server, ie before fail2ban would (eventually) ban connection attempts. This, however, does

[CentOS] Server monitoring

2021-07-10 Thread H
I want to install open-source software on my hosted CentOS 7 server to monitor the system in general, as well as logs, apache webserver, MySQL and PostgreSQL to begin with. I know there are a multitude of packages available and would be interested in hearing if others have a favorite package?

[CentOS] Sending mail from rkhunter

2021-07-07 Thread H
I am having problems getting rkhunter to send the daily report to an outside email account under CentOS 7. I have installed postfix and fail2ban now sends ban messages as expected. I have googled but so far failed to identify the error in my setup: - /etc/aliases contain the correct mail alias

Re: [CentOS] Tracking down application sending mail in CentOS 7

2021-06-24 Thread H
On 06/23/2021 10:15 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: > --On Wednesday, June 23, 2021 10:54 PM -0400 H wrote: > >> Viewing /var/log/maillog I get some information but cannot see which >> application generated that e-mail, nor the content of it which would >> likely allow me to

Re: [CentOS] Tracking down application sending mail in CentOS 7

2021-06-24 Thread H
On 06/23/2021 09:59 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 21:54:02 -0400 > H wrote: > >> Can anyone suggest how to track down the app so I can reconfigure the mail >> address? > And the relevant line(s) in /var/log/maillog are > Here is an example line: Jun

[CentOS] Tracking down application sending mail in CentOS 7

2021-06-23 Thread H
I am running CentOS 7 on a server where I have only recently installed postfix. Postfix is configured to only send outgoing mail via an external relay server and test mails created on my server are indeed delivered via this external server. However, I must have some other application on the

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread H
On 04/05/2021 05:55 PM, Albert McCann wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: CentOS On Behalf Of H >> Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 4:59 PM >> To: centos@centos.org >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82 >> >>> One thing

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread H
On 04/05/2021 03:42 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:32:04 -0400 > H wrote: > >> Is something at Google responsible for this problem? > In one of your (numerous) previous messages you said that Firefox wasn't > working properly either, so I'd say it's not a probl

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread H
On 04/05/2021 04:44 PM, H wrote: > On 04/05/2021 02:34 PM, Richard wrote: >>> Date: Monday, April 05, 2021 18:31:36 +0200 >>> From: Simon Matter >>> >>> Some of our users wanted Chrome instead of Firefox so we installed >>> Chromium from EPEL

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread H
On 04/05/2021 02:34 PM, Richard wrote: >> Date: Monday, April 05, 2021 18:31:36 +0200 >> From: Simon Matter >> >> Some of our users wanted Chrome instead of Firefox so we installed >> Chromium from EPEL for them. Over the time, we had several problems >> where a build didn't work and also updates

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread H
On 04/05/2021 01:38 PM, H wrote: > On 04/05/2021 12:49 PM, H wrote: >> On 04/05/2021 12:31 PM, Simon Matter wrote: >>>> On 04/05/2021 11:56 AM, H wrote: >>>>> On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -04

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread H
On 04/05/2021 12:49 PM, H wrote: > On 04/05/2021 12:31 PM, Simon Matter wrote: >>> On 04/05/2021 11:56 AM, H wrote: >>>> On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400 >>>>> H wrote: >>>>&g

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread H
On 04/05/2021 12:31 PM, Simon Matter wrote: >> On 04/05/2021 11:56 AM, H wrote: >>> On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote: >>>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400 >>>> H wrote: >>>> >>>>> Here are two typical examples: >

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread H
On 04/05/2021 11:56 AM, H wrote: > On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote: >> On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400 >> H wrote: >> >>> Here are two typical examples: >> Javascript is disabled? >> > No, just checked that Javascript is allowed in the browser

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread H
On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400 > H wrote: > >> Here are two typical examples: > Javascript is disabled? > No, just checked that Javascript is allowed in the browser settings. When I load the browser and try to access eg nytimes.co

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-04 Thread H
On 04/04/2021 02:46 PM, H wrote: > On 04/04/2021 12:35 PM, Jos Vos wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 12:29:48PM -0400, H wrote: >> >>Where can I find the older release, ie 88.0.4324.150 of chromium? It >>is no longer in EPEL. >> >> Look in koji:

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-04 Thread H
On 04/04/2021 12:35 PM, Jos Vos wrote: > On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 12:29:48PM -0400, H wrote: > >Where can I find the older release, ie 88.0.4324.150 of chromium? It >is no longer in EPEL. > > Look in koji: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packag

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-04 Thread H
On 04/04/2021 11:24 AM, Richard wrote: >> Date: Sunday, April 04, 2021 10:19:34 -0400 >> From: H >> >> I am running CentOS 7 and just updated chromium to version >> 89.0.4389.82 from EPEL. >> >> Although this version was released a few weeks ago, I h

[CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-04 Thread H
I am running CentOS 7 and just updated chromium to version 89.0.4389.82 from EPEL. Although this version was released a few weeks ago, I had had the previous version of chromium (88.0.4324.150) running for several weeks but it crashed and the new version was then loaded. The older version

Re: [CentOS] XML parsing in shell script

2021-03-19 Thread H
On 03/19/2021 12:40 PM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 18/03/2021 22:08, H wrote: >> On 03/18/2021 04:30 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: >>> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, H wrote: >>> >>>> I have a challenge I am interested in getting feedback on. >>>> >>>

Re: [CentOS] XML parsing in shell script

2021-03-19 Thread H
On 03/19/2021 03:25 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > Am 19.03.21 um 17:40 schrieb Fabian Arrotin: >> On 18/03/2021 22:08, H wrote: >>> On 03/18/2021 04:30 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: >>>> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, H wrote: >>>> >>>>&g

Re: [CentOS] XML parsing in shell script

2021-03-19 Thread H
On 03/18/2021 08:18 PM, H wrote: > On 03/18/2021 05:53 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: >> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, H wrote: >> >>> I just checked and I cannot see that the organization publishing these data >>> files offer any XSLT stylesheet. IOW, I am, perhaps incorrectly,

Re: [CentOS] XML parsing in shell script

2021-03-18 Thread H
On 03/18/2021 05:53 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, H wrote: > >> I just checked and I cannot see that the organization publishing these data >> files offer any XSLT stylesheet. IOW, I am, perhaps incorrectly, assuming >> that the publisher of the dat

Re: [CentOS] XML parsing in shell script

2021-03-18 Thread H
On 03/18/2021 04:30 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, H wrote: > >> I have a challenge I am interested in getting feedback on. >> >> I will on a regular basis download a series of data files from the web where >> the data is in XML-format.

[CentOS] XML parsing in shell script

2021-03-18 Thread H
I have a challenge I am interested in getting feedback on. I will on a regular basis download a series of data files from the web where the data is in XML-format. The format is known in advance but is different between the various data files. I then plan to extract the various data items

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-16 Thread H
On March 16, 2021 11:16:21 AM EDT, Michael Hennebry wrote: >On Sun, 14 Mar 2021, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: > >> We need to ask the developers to make a re-spin that's about 5MB >> smaller. And before someone suggests it, the 2010-vintage server I'm >> trying to install CentOS on

Re: [CentOS] Electron for CentOS 7

2021-03-07 Thread H
On March 7, 2021 8:22:54 AM EST, Anthony K wrote: >On 7/3/21 12:28 pm, H wrote: >> I am trying to find electron for CentOS 7 but "yum provides >electron\*" turns up nothing and pkgs.org does not find anything >(https://pkgs.org/search/?q=electron). >> >>

[CentOS] Electron for CentOS 7

2021-03-06 Thread H
I am trying to find electron for CentOS 7 but "yum provides electron\*" turns up nothing and pkgs.org does not find anything (https://pkgs.org/search/?q=electron). Does anyone have better information? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

[CentOS] mkdtemp on CentOS 7

2021-03-06 Thread H
I am trying to compile DeltaChat in a CentOS 7 docker container and at one stage have to run: npm install --global electron but the above fails, seemingly because CentOS 7 does not have 'mkdtemp', nor have I found it in a repository. I had previously used: npm install electron --save-dev

[CentOS] Delta Chat on CentOS 7

2021-02-14 Thread H
Has anyone compiled Delta Chat to run on CentOS 7? I know it is available as a Flatpak and as an AppImage (https://delta.chat/en/download) but I wonder if there might be benefits to compile and run natively on CentOS. ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Changing command line version of php for apache

2021-02-14 Thread H
On 02/14/2021 12:51 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: > --On Saturday, February 13, 2021 9:59 PM -0500 H > wrote: > >> But my question is also a more general one: short of ridding the system >> of the old, default php 5 binary, how should I configure a user without a >> shel

Re: [CentOS] Changing command line version of php for apache

2021-02-13 Thread H
On 02/13/2021 09:43 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Feb 13, 2021, at 17:43, H wrote: >> But apache does not have a shell where I issue that command? And, a change >> needs to survive a reboot. > Perhaps it might help if you explained how the Apache user is running the >

Re: [CentOS] Changing command line version of php for apache

2021-02-13 Thread H
On 02/13/2021 05:05 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > Am 13.02.21 um 21:59 schrieb H: >> I have updated php on a Centos 7 system to use php 7.2 from sclo. Apache >> running on the system is also using php 7.2 as shown by phpinfo(), however, >> apache continues to us

[CentOS] Changing command line version of php for apache

2021-02-13 Thread H
I have updated php on a Centos 7 system to use php 7.2 from sclo. Apache running on the system is also using php 7.2 as shown by phpinfo(), however, apache continues to use the default version of php, ie 5.4.16, when that user launches a process from the command line. All other users default to

[CentOS] CentOS 7, selinux and pop_port_t

2021-02-11 Thread H
I am muddling my way through learning selinux when installing a webapp with httpd as the webserver running CentOS 7. The app allows the user to send/receive mail etc but it seems that I have yet to allow access to imap port 993. So far it seems this is configured through pop_port_t but

[CentOS] SCLO php70 imap missing

2021-02-09 Thread H
I am installing php70 on a machine running CentOS 7 for a particular reason and needed sclo-php70-php-imap which I believe is the imap module for php70 from SCL. It, however, does not seem to be available even though https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24734 suggests it should be. Am

Re: [CentOS] Telegram on CentOS 7

2021-01-28 Thread H
On 01/28/2021 11:46 AM, j...@tssystems.net wrote: > El 28/1/21 a las 16:52, H escribió: >> Is anyone running Telegram on CentOS 7? I see that it seems to be available >> as a snap and also in the getpagespeed repository. I try to avoid snap apps >> but am not familiar with

[CentOS] Telegram on CentOS 7

2021-01-28 Thread H
Is anyone running Telegram on CentOS 7? I see that it seems to be available as a snap and also in the getpagespeed repository. I try to avoid snap apps but am not familiar with the latter repository. Does anyone have experience with either source for the program?

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 fix sudo CVE-2021-3156

2021-01-27 Thread Walter H.
is that what you expect to find? https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0227 On 27.01.2021 08:38, Gionatan Danti wrote: Hi all, do you know if a fix for sudo CVE-2021-3156 is available for CentOS 6? While CentOS 6 is now supported anymore, RedHat has it under its payedsupport agreement

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >