On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote:
Try this
http://www.howtoforge.com/creating_a_local_yum_repository_centos
What I was really looking for was a little more detail on exactly what
I *must* have from the mirror to successfully upgrade.
Would excluding
Good afternoon folks.
Earlier today, I started upgrading a few of our servers to 5.4 based
on input from the list. So far, all has gone well. I have about 6
servers (not very many, but still) that need to be upgraded. Instead
of taking precious bits from the mirrors for each upgrade, I was
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Daniel Bird db...@sgul.ac.uk wrote:
Lincoln Zuljewic Silva wrote:
List archive: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/
Thanks for not reading my post. See I can't find it in the archives or
via Google in the text below.
Spent a few minutes looking at the
Hi there folks. I've been watching the never ending CentOS 5.4 OMG
WHEN? threads for the last few days / weeks and had a question. I'm
pretty new to anything rpm based. I used Red Hat 9 back in college,
but that's about it. Currently, I do have a few Cent OS servers and
we're slowly migrating
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
You can, if you connect the iscsi block devices into one machine that can
combine them in one or more md raid devices, put a filesystem on them, and
export via nfs and/or smb to the systems that want shared space.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
But the latency over the net is much higher.
Who knows if the kernel can handle this in all situations?
I could see it taking longer to notice a failed disk then it normally
*should*. I wonder
what type of impact
Thanks for the input folks. I think I see now that it's going to be a
pretty easy going process, and I don't need to screw around with crazy
update processes. Very good to know.
-jonathan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
Just curious, why the move from Debian to CentOS?
There is very little in the way of technical reasoning for it. Mostly it
was a call by those in charge.
We still have several servers running Debian doing various network
related
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com wrote:
---8
I imagine the following scenario: someone walks into my office building with a
laptop (a colleague, a visitor, a guest, whoever), and hooks up onto the local
net (wired or wireless). The server detects an unknown
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 09/14/2009 05:35 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
A week or two ago someone mentioned something about using their own
home-grown RPMs for managing config info on their boxes.
this is a really really bad idea. I'd suggest you
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rick Barnes li...@sitevision.com wrote:
8
Since my switch *does* support 802.3ad, including layers 2,3 and 4
hashing, should I use mode=4? Or would one of the other modes be
better for providing fail-over and link-aggregation, specifically
balance-tlb or
11 matches
Mail list logo
