Dne 10.1.2011 00:35, derleader __ napsal(a):
Red hat yum downloads packages from RHN
Centos yum downloads packages from the fastest mirror?
There is difference in configuration.
yum can use plugins and in this case RHEL yum uses rhnplugin for
communicating with RHN/Satellite. Yum itself
Dne 14.12.2010 00:20, Warren Young napsal(a):
Nothing is truly intuitive
in computing. (The only intuitive interface is the nipple.)
As a father of two kids, I can testify that even the nipple is hardly
intuitive. Every kid (and mom) needs to learn how to use it. Just to
clear one myth.
On 2008-12-30, 15:32 GMT, Tony Placilla wrote:
The root answer is that if he wants to use ZFS (which is
a *good* choice) he should use some flavor of Solaris
I would just add that RHEL 5.3 (and thus CentOS 5.3) when it
happens, will have ext4fs as a technology preview, which may
fulfill OT
On 2008-12-24, 14:00 GMT, Alain PORTAL wrote:
More info in the updated bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D477708#c5
Thanks Alain, this looks really pretty bad. Bug updated and
maintainer asked to take a look at it.
Matěj
___
CentOS
On 2008-12-24, 01:22 GMT, MHR wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 2008-12-23, 12:15 GMT, James Bensley wrote:
find . -exec grep -q $1 '{}' \; -print ./found_files
I think you can have only one action (either -exec or -print),
but not sure about it. Anyway, my first
On 2008-12-22, 23:49 GMT, William L. Maltby wrote:
I presume this completes the triage process? Now, who reports
I hope this bug is publicly visible
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471193
otherwise just yes, IMHO (and it is not official statement by RH
Gecko developers) whole
On 2008-12-23, 12:15 GMT, James Bensley wrote:
find . -exec grep -q $1 '{}' \; -print ./found_files
I think you can have only one action (either -exec or -print),
but not sure about it. Anyway, my first instinct when things are
getting to be more complicated is to use while cycle, like this:
On 2008-12-23, 18:05 GMT, Vandaman wrote:
If you are having problems with 5.2 then address these problems
immediately without waiting for 5.3. How do you address them? File bugs
or ask questions relating to your existing problem but 5.3 beta is unable
to solve them automagically for you.
I
On 2008-12-22, 00:11 GMT, William L. Maltby wrote:
He had tried vesa in a parameter to system-config-display, as
suggested by Alan, and it hadn't worked. So I figured try
something that _ought_ to work on stuff even 10 years old (or
older) and go from there.
OK, if *that* didn't work, then
On 2008-12-22, 17:38 GMT, William L. Maltby wrote:
Well, having faith that things really _are_ working, one of his
messages in the log file about insufficient memory reminded me
that many laptops and less-expensive desktops have shared
memory. I've suggested that he check BIOS for various
On 2008-12-22, 17:58 GMT, William L. Maltby wrote:
Other folks chimed in at various points, so you might want to
take a gander at those too.
I think I saw couple of these in our bugzilla now and I wonder
whether it is the same. Try to run
gnome-default-applications-properties and take a look
On 2008-12-21, 22:38 GMT, William L. Maltby wrote:
Note that I changed vesa to vga since the card mentions
only vga.
Forget about VGA, it is really obsolete now -- all graphic cards
you are likely to encounter in the wild are VESA-compatible,
which is what you want.
Matěj
On 2008-12-17, 08:37 GMT, NiftyClusters T Mitchell wrote:
It is possible that dedicated Cisco hardware solutions will
scale better.
Your mileage may vary, but I have terrible experience with Linux
Cisco VPN clients, so I would strongly suggest OpenVPN. Of
course, I don't know anything about
On 2008-12-05, 23:48 GMT, William L. Maltby wrote:
I was able to _start_ a comparison process, not completed yet.
What is the output of the command
mozilla-plugin-config -l
? And if you have flash-plugin in ~/.mozilla then many bad things
will happen to you. Remove it and install the one
On 2008-12-04, 17:50 GMT, R P Herrold wrote:
Almost all (I cannot think of any exceptions, but there may be)
of the core centos team do not run off-topic threads on either
the fedora or RHEL lists; May we have the same courtesy?
sorry, I will do better next time,
On 2008-12-05, 13:22 GMT, William L. Maltby wrote:
Got second cup of coffee downed and went to see if the bug was
known here
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific\
order=relevance+descbug_status=__open__content=plugin
Didn't see a match. If someone can confirm, I'll
On 2008-12-03, 00:41 GMT, Christopher Chan wrote:
This is not a matter of preferring Ubuntu. It is one of NO
CHOICE. I know next to nothing about Debian/Ubuntu
configuration files nor am I familiar with dpkg or apt as I am
with rpm and yum. You think I want to move over for fun?
I am
On 2008-11-29, 02:18 GMT, MHR wrote:
Does anyone here have a good working knowledge of the command line
interface to Bugzilla?
If so, please contact me off-list as this is OT here, but my inquiry
on the bugzilla list met with silence
It is OT, but I cannot resist to make a small plug to
On 2008-11-29, 20:23 GMT, Vandaman wrote:
yumlist or yumex are not as good as rpmfind, as i don't run
yumex/GUI on any server.
He, didn't say yumlist, but yum list (and you can add yum search
to the mix).
Matěj
___
CentOS mailing list
19 matches
Mail list logo
