On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:11:55 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
Mike - email ignored wrote:
How do I format the prompt at level 3? One of my accounts has it
right, but not the other. I guessed that it was in .tcshrc which was
missing from the bad account so I copied it from the good account
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:25:48 -0700, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
[...]
Ah! Permission/ownership problem?
mark
Good suggestion. I found that for myUser .bashrc had the wrong
permissions and .bash_profile was missing! I am sure that this
happened because I copied /home/myUser
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:22:44 -0700, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:25:48 -0700, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw
wrote: [...]
Ah! Permission/ownership problem?
Good suggestion. I found that for myUser .bashrc had the wrong
permissions and .bash_profile was
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:48:58 +0100, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Mike - email ignored wrote:
[...]
I get:
TERM = linux
doing default
The mystery remains.
what do you get with these:
echo $PROMPT_COMMAND
echo $PS1
if $PROMPT_COMMAND has a value you could grep
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:50:54 -0700, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
[...]
No, we're getting closer. What you need to find out is what's setting
TERM to linux, which is further back than /etc/bashrc. Is the user
logging directly onto the Linux box, or are they from, say, a WinDoze
box via
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:00:25 +0100, Frank.Brodbeck-E4aVwrWTXLGELgA04lAiVw
wrote:
Hi,
I'd try this as a quickshot:
find /etc /root /home -type f -exec grep -l PS3 {} \;
than I'd take a closer look at the files that will show up. And I'd read
bash(1) closely to learn which files are
I installed an openvpn-2.0.9 server on my new CentOS 5.4 box from
using the same parameters I used on a Fedora box I retired.
Now I have a dual boot laptop that has WinXP and Fedora FC8. Both of
these partitions have openvpn clients installed that have worked well in
the past.
After adjusting
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:14:14 +, Mike - email ignored wrote:
[...]
PROBLEM SOLVED by shutting off eth0 on the laptop.
This was never necessary before.
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
How do I format the prompt at level 3? One of
my accounts has it right, but not the other.
I guessed that it was in .tcshrc which was
missing from the bad account so I copied it
from the good account, but it made no
difference.
Thanks,
Mike.
___
Where can I get openvpn for Centos 5.4?
yum list openvpn doesn't find it.
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:41:47 -0500, Ron Loftin wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 03:38 +, MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
Does anyone know if the pan news reader works on CentOS 5.4? I am
considering installing version 0.132 that I downloaded from
pan.rebelbase.com .
I'm using 0.133 from
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:00:28 -0500, B.J. McClure wrote:
This works fine for me on 5.4.
[bmccl...@house ~]$ rpm -q pan
pan-0.132-1.el5.rf
CentOS 5.4, Linux 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 athlon 04:58:11 up 8:30, 2 users,
load average: 0.06, 0.13, 0.09
It didn't work for me until I installed it
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:27:18 -0800, John Doe wrote:
From: MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED
m_d_berger_1...@yahoo.com
On CentOS 5.4 I just installed K3B to write some CDs. Now every time I
used a CD, I get a popup that asks me to Select a CDDB entry How
can I stop this popup?
Tried
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:22:02 -0800, John Doe wrote:
From: MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED
m_d_berger_1...@yahoo.com
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:27:18 -0800, John Doe wrote:
From: MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED
On CentOS 5.4 I just installed K3B to write some CDs. Now every
time I used a CD, I get a popup
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:29:10 -0600, Robert wrote:
MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:22:02 -0800, John Doe wrote:
From: MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED
m_d_berger_1...@yahoo.com
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:27:18 -0800, John Doe wrote:
From: MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED
Does anyone know if the pan news reader works
on CentOS 5.4? I am considering installing
version 0.132 that I downloaded from
pan.rebelbase.com .
Thanks for your advice.
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On CentOS 5.4 I just installed K3B to write some
CDs. Now every time I used a CD, I get a popup
that asks me to Select a CDDB entry
How can I stop this popup?
Thanks,
Mike,
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Has anyone put Centos 5.4 (or ant version on aHP Pavilion box?
I'm having some problems. For example, I can't get
my Dell E198WFPV 1440x900 monitor to work correctly.
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:33:08 -0500, mark wrote:
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
Has anyone put Centos 5.4 (or ant version on aHP Pavilion box? I'm
having some problems. For example, I can't get my Dell E198WFPV
1440x900 monitor to work correctly.
What's the video card?
mark
Video
As mentioned in my previous thread, I can't get my
Video card: NVIDIA C73 [GeForce: 7100/ nForce 630i]
to display 1440x900 on my CentOS 5.4 on my HP
Pavilion with monitor Dell E198WFPV.
Googing around, I see that others have had this problem
with the NVIDIA card. In one case, it was solved by
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:42:11 -0500, fred smith wrote:
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 09:31:20PM +, MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
As mentioned in my previous thread, I can't get my Video card: NVIDIA
C73 [GeForce: 7100/ nForce 630i] to display 1440x900 on my CentOS 5.4
on my HP Pavilion
My Centos 5.2 box shuts itself down during a
long tar -x. There is plenty of disk available.
This is new; it worked in the past.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:04:50 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
My Centos 5.2 box shuts itself down during a long tar -x. There is
plenty of disk available. This is new; it worked in the past.
Any suggestions?
Look in the logs, particularly dmesg
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:03:49 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
My Centos 5.2 box shuts itself down during a long tar -x. There is
plenty of disk available. This is new; it worked in the past.
Any suggestions?
Are you dropping things on top of running programs (like
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:51:35 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:04:50 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
My Centos 5.2 box shuts itself down during a long tar -x. There is
plenty of disk available. This is new; it worked
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:31:22 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:56:22 + (UTC):
Please refer to my thread excessive DNS slows httpd
Why don't you keep posting in there then?
Because the new title reflects a new focus, and I hoped
to attract
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:23:04 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:31:22 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
[...]
Until now, for a long time, mine wasn't doing it either.
Part of the problem was suggested by someone on the Apache group; there
are two
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:55:01 -0400, Matty wrote:
[...]
If you are uncertain where the DNS lookups are originating from, you
could always add an interposer between Apache and glibc. When the
culprit calls one of the get* routines, you could log a backtrace to a
file. Summarizing the
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:58:17 -0700, nate wrote:
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
Except that nscd was not set to run, it is probably not specifically a
CentOS problem. Perhaps I made a wrong choice in setup?
Something I like to do when troubleshooting apache related things is
turn
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:28:13 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
If I really want to know what is different between two boxes, I'll do
something like NFS mount one into the other or rsync their /etc trees
somewhere on a common host and let diff -r walk through them
My web server is a CentOS box thus:
[root ~]# uname -a
Linux mbrc21 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue
Dec 16 12:03:43 EST 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
root ~]# rpm -q httpd
httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2
My development and standby is on a Fedora box thus:
[root ~]# uname -a
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:11:09 -0400, Brian Mathis wrote:
What did you revise in your httpd.conf file? My guess is that you
enabled DNS lookups for the connecting clients.
HostnameLookups Off
The changes were largely the removal of a lot of common
code for Directorys and VirtualHosts to
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:23:18 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
[...]
Are you doing any proxy passthrough's or rewrites resulting in a proxy?
Or client access permissions based on hostnames. These things might be
specified in a .htaccess file. Also, remember that all the
/etc/httpd/conf.d/*.conf
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:14:25 -0500, Robert wrote:
[...]
Don't you just hate it when you know something and can't remember it!?!
Yes, and it happens more often as time passes.
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Could someone please remind me what
file controls automatic updates?
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:31:23 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:07:59 + (UTC):
If I try to access it on a WinXP box, ZoneAlarm blocks it as a spy
site. I wonder why it thinks so.
And I wonder why you use ZA at all.
Kai
It blocks all
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:41:26 +0100, Rainer Duffner wrote:
Kai Schaetzl schrieb:
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:07:59 + (UTC):
If I try to access it on a WinXP box, ZoneAlarm blocks it as a spy
site. I wonder why it thinks so.
And I wonder why you use ZA
On my Centos 2.5 web server, in /var/log/httpd/access_log,
I saw several occurrences of:
new.mydomain.net - - [11/Feb/2009:14:34:58 -0500] GET /
HTTP/1.0 403 - - Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS)
(internal dummy connection)
I have never seen anything like this before over many
years of
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:45:36 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
new.mydomain.net - - [11/Feb/2009:14:34:58 -0500] GET /
HTTP/1.0 403 - - Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS) (internal dummy
connection)
What is it? Why do I have it now, and not before?
http
I have an old 400mHz Dell with a 20G hard drive
and 125M ram. Can I install and run CentOS on it?
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:31:20 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
[...]
I installed a fresh Centos 5.2
that means exactly what?
Kai
I have a DVD image of CentOS 5.2 downloaded
a few months ago. It is installed on an ftp
server on a nearby machine. I booted the
netinstall disk and did a complete
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:18:37 +, Tony Mountifield wrote:
[...]
This suggests that yum is not flushing output, possibly because it
doesn't think it's stdio is on a tty.
1. Were you running yum update locally on the console, or remotely via a
network connection of some kind, e.g. ssh? If
I am redoing it with script, and it is
working well.
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
It gets as far as telling me:
Total download size: 207 M
It doesn't ask if its ok. But
if I type yenter it reports:
Is this ok [y/N]: Downloading Packages:
Then it does nothing. I can't kill it
with CRTL-C, but I killed the yum process
with kill -9 from another window.
I retried it several
This is a continuation of the thread:
yum update fails: CentOS 5.2.
I installed a fresh Centos 5.2 and ran yum update.
It ran correctly, except for these issues:
1. As previously mentioned, after deciding what it
is going to do, It doesn't ask if its ok. But
if I type yenter it
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:25:06 -0500, Jim Perrin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
m_d_berger_1...@yahoo.com wrote:
This is a continuation of the thread:
yum update fails: CentOS 5.2.
I installed a fresh Centos 5.2 and ran yum update.
It ran correctly, except
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:18:37 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
I have Capture NX 1. Is it worth spending money to get Capture NX 2?
Why?
Thanks,
Mike.
Sorry, wrong group. Please ignore.
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 02:25:17 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
Further examination shows numerous log lines that were detected on Dec
12 by swatch using tail on the secure file but do not presently appear
in the secure file. However, they do appear in the messages file.
Mike.
Here
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:33:06 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote:
On my Centos 5 server, the secure file has not updated since Dec 10.
This despite the fact that I run an sshd server that I access many
times per day. Most peculiar is the fact that a swatch monitor that
I run on the secure file catches
Further examination shows numerous log lines that were detected on
Dec 12 by swatch using tail on the secure file but do not presently
appear in the secure file. However, they do appear in the messages
file.
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
Since I put my new Centos box on the net, it frequently
tr1es to make ftp contact with IP address 64.90.181.77 .
Why is this, and does anyone recognize this IP address?
Is it spyware?
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:03:41 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
[...]
Or it's yum-updatesd in action.
Ralph
[...]
It looks like this is it; I shut it down.
I don't remember being offered a choice about
this on install; maybe I didn't recognize it.
I would think it should be made obvious.
Is
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:27:45 -0400, Toby Bluhm wrote:
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:03:41 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
[...]
Or it's yum-updatesd in action.
Ralph
[...]
It looks like this is it; I shut it down.
Is there a reason why you don't want your
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:01:24 +0930, admin wrote:
Have you run several Virtual Hosts with the same IP address?
Yes, I run multiple Virtual Hosts on my development server and they all
look like this:
NameVirtualHost *:80
VirtualHost *:80
DocumentRoot /var/www/html/site1
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:52:33 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:07, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes indeed! I do some complicated things, and I can do without the
wonderful surprises that updates sometimes deliver. I do updates, but
at times
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:59:35 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:27:45 -0400, Toby Bluhm wrote:
Is there a reason why you don't want your machine updated?
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:07, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
Yes indeed! [...]
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 14:42
On: Centos 5.2, with httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3
I tried to bring up a web server using an
httpd.con that runs well
on: Fedora 8, with httpd-2.2.8-1.fc8
as well as several earlier versions, going
back to Fedora 4.
On the Centos version, I cannot successfully:
run a NameVirtualHost;
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:51:54 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
[...]
Don't we all like puzzles? All those hundreds of pieces which look
similar? Is that blue one there sky or is it the water? The green one
over there - is it a tree? Is it a part of that house which has been
painted green?
If
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:14:54 -0700, Jerry Franz wrote:
[...]
What do you get in the error_log?
I found the CGI problem (mia culpa), and the CGI
is now working, but the NameVirtualHost still has
a problem.
NameVirtualHost 192.168.9.21:80
NameVirtualHost 127.0.0.1:80
...
VirtualHost
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:07:08 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
[...]
I have additional information that ServerName is not working.
My system requires two virtual hosts with different values of
ServerName. If they share an IP address, the system fails.
But if each virtual host has a unique IP
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:31:19 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
what's the purpose of that whole confusing configuration? If you want to
use IP-based virtualhosts *any* of them needs a servername. And why do
you enclose the Location statement in a virtualhost? Why don't you
simply specify the real
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:42:06 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
[...]
I still don't see the purpose of that virtual host. If it is for
catching IP only accesses there are several methods to do this. Look
for
default virtualhost in the apache documentation (and in the config
template coming with
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:03:13 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote:
Michael Peterson wrote on Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:09:54 -0500:
You need to remove the :80 in the VirtualHost declarations that
contains Servername entries.
No, that's perfectly ok and recommended. His problem was that he was
using a
I am thinking of trying centos (I am now using Fedora).
Does centos support libipq?
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
64 matches
Mail list logo
