I've got a three Centos 5.5 KVM severs, but only one of them is presenting
guests with the kvm-clock source.
The two servers I'm not seeing kvm-clock on have Athlon x2 64bit
processors.
The other server with kvm-clock has a Phenom II X6 1090T Processor.
I've checked the system
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:03:33 +1300, Steven Ellis
mail_li...@stevencherie.net wrote:
I've got a three Centos 5.5 KVM severs, but only one of them is
presenting
guests with the kvm-clock source.
The two servers I'm not seeing kvm-clock on have Athlon x2 64bit
processors.
The other
again, but it will be a couple of
days before I can bring the server down again.
Steve
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:37:17 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 01:56:33PM +1300, Steven Ellis wrote:
I've recently upgraded a Centos 5.3 machine to Centos 5.5. The
hardware
I've recently upgraded a Centos 5.3 machine to Centos 5.5. The
hardware isn't HVM capabile so I'm only running para-virt guests.
Using a vanilla i386 kernel boots without, but the newer kernel-xen
locks up the Dom0 after a couple of minute. I'm only booting into
single user mode for these
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 23:47:09 +0200, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org
wrote:
Am 24.10.2010 23:03, schrieb Drew Kollasch:
Is there any known issues when trying to run CentOS (x86 or x64) on a
fresh
install of vmware 4.1?
Details as to why I am asking are here in the CentOS forums:
the host/which one?
(I'm using almost-latest, ie last week, kernel on host and guest
(pygrub) on hardware raid, haven't had any issues to date.)
Eric
Sent from my iPhone. Pardon the top-posting!
On Oct 27, 2010, at 5:56 PM, Steven Ellis wrote:
I've recently upgraded a Centos 5.3
appear to
be a difference, Any where else to look?
Steve
--
Steven Ellis - Bulletin.Net Inc - http://www.bulletin.net
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables = 0
net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables = 0
# Virtual machines special kernel params
vm.swappiness = 0
Care to explain some of your choices.
In particular why
vm.swappiness = 0
and why elevator=deadline over noop.
Steve
--
Steven Ellis - Director
/linux-virtual-machine-tuning-guide/
This suggests avoiding running scheduled jobs simultaneously across
guests, and suggests using a random sleep.
Does anyone else have suggestions on reducing the impact of cron/logrotate.
--
*Steven Ellis - Director of Worldwide Engineering,*
*Bulletin.Net Inc
Tait Clarridge wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 14:02 +1300, Steven Ellis wrote:
Running Centos 5.4 with KVM on a Dell R610 server and I'd like to
control which of the four ethernet interfaces are used for specific
tasks
My ideal configuration would be
eth0 - Host traffic only, no virtual
with no
local IP.
Any ideas?
Steve
--
*Steven Ellis - Director of Worldwide Engineering,*
*Bulletin.Net Inc* - http://www.bulletin.net/
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
11 matches
Mail list logo