Re: [CentOS] log4j cve

2021-12-14 Thread Stuart Barkley
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 07:42 -, Steve Clark via CentOS wrote: > I see on CentOS 7 it has log4j-1.2.17... > Is ok 2 use. I know the CVE was against 2.0 fwd but not knowing if something > was backported to 1.2 ? According to https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/RHSB-2021-009

Re: [CentOS] Upstream details at...

2017-07-05 Thread Stuart Barkley
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 at 18:45 -, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Stuart Barkley <stua...@4gh.net> wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 at 08:00 -, centos-announce-requ...@centos.org > > wrote: > > > >> Upstream details at : https://rhn.r

[CentOS] Upstream details at...

2017-07-03 Thread Stuart Barkley
ed will reach the end of its service life on July 31, 2017. Customers will be required to migrate existing systems to Red Hat Subscription Management prior to this date. Is there any plan to shift the CentOS announcements to refer to an alternative freely available service? Thanks, Stuart Bar

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

2017-01-18 Thread Stuart Barkley
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 at 03:44 -, Rob Kampen wrote: > On 16/01/17 17:12, James A. Peltier wrote: > > VLANs are your friend, otherwise DHCPD is not going to understand how to > > properly answer your request for different networks on the same interface. Be careful about expecting VLANs to

Re: [CentOS] Measuring memory bandwidth utilization

2016-02-02 Thread Stuart Barkley
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 at 20:34 -, Benjamin Smith wrote: > Any idea? Wild guessing...How old a system? ~5 year old Nehalem? If so try: echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/zone_reclaim_mode For some memory performance diagnosing try 'sar': sar -B 10 There are lots of other sar options which might

Re: [CentOS] rsyslog.conf

2015-07-25 Thread Stuart Barkley
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 at 20:37 -, Always Learning wrote: There is absolutely no need to include irrelevant text when replying to a posting. Trim and Cut were sensible skills acquired by some of us in the 1980's and 1990's. Every email sent to this list includes the following in the headers:

[CentOS] ssh -X versus -Y

2015-06-26 Thread Stuart Barkley
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 at 03:16 -, Alexandru Chiscan wrote: On 06/25/2015 11:51 PM, Stuart Barkley wrote: Then from your desktop (assuming Linux already running X) in a local xterm do something like: ssh -Y remote-system Do not use that because any user logged on the server can

Re: [CentOS] An odd X question

2015-06-25 Thread Stuart Barkley
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 at 15:55 -, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I've got a headless server running CentOS 7. I've got a user who wants to run some graphical software on it, and view using x forwarding. What I don't have clear is how to set this up. I've just installed xorg-x11-server-[Xorg,

Re: [CentOS] /boot on a separate partition?

2015-06-25 Thread Stuart Barkley
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 at 09:27 -, Robert Heller wrote: Another advantage of having /boot on its own partition is supporting multiple linux flavors that is, it is possible to 'share' /boot between CentOS, Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian, etc. if one wants to, although it is really easier to pick one

[CentOS] mirrors still catching up and -01.iso images?

2015-04-01 Thread Stuart Barkley
I'm watching a couple of mirrors catch up with the 7.1 release and am noticing some churn on the .iso images. It appears that new -01.iso versions are coming downstream while some of the mirrors apparently were getting different .iso images. The -01.iso versions look to be significantly larger

Re: [CentOS] mirrors still catching up and -01.iso images?

2015-04-01 Thread Stuart Barkley
I now see an announcement on the centos-announce list which explains most/all of what I was seeing last night. Stuart -- I've never been lost; I was once bewildered for three days, but never lost! -- Daniel Boone

Re: [CentOS] rsync output under CentOS 6

2014-12-16 Thread Stuart Barkley
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 at 11:41 -, Niamh Holding wrote: EP Sounds like it might be differences in precision of the timestamp. Could be, thoght the NAS box has the sending system as it's NTP server so their times should be in sync. EP Check out the `--modify-window` option. Doesn't seem

[CentOS] ShellShock and bash status

2014-10-03 Thread Stuart Barkley
For those of us still in shell shock, the following was sent several days ago under a misleading subject/thread mixed in with a bunch of other nonsense. (Message-ID: 54291071.7010...@centos.org) According to Johnny the second bash patch addressed all of the known issues. I had been waiting for

Re: [CentOS] abrt relevance?

2014-07-22 Thread Stuart Barkley
I just remove abrt it as useless. Stuart -- I've never been lost; I was once bewildered for three days, but never lost! -- Daniel Boone ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] On of mirrors doesn't work properly

2014-04-18 Thread Stuart Barkley
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 at 09:25 -, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I, for one, am not even going to try to help you - look at this version of what you wrote, since that's what *all* of us are seeing. Please try resending this email as PLAIN TEXT, not html email. We don't care how pretty it is, all

Re: [CentOS-virt] Loading a FreeBSD 10 VM on QEMU-KVM..

2014-01-21 Thread Stuart Barkley
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 at 05:22 -, Howard Leadmon wrote: The FreeBSD release I am trying to load on a guest VM is the production release of FreeBSD 10, the ISO grabbed from the master site is FreeBSD-10.0-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso, and the virt-install command I am using is: virt-install

Re: [CentOS] an rsync question

2013-02-27 Thread Stuart Barkley
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 at 11:34 -, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Is there any way to have rsync compare against a file with a *different* name? What I'd like to do is compare a vm - whatsit.img against a backup - whatsit.current, that's a symlink to whatsit.timestamp, and if different, *then*

Re: [CentOS] bind-chroot rpm only builds chroot tree?

2013-02-14 Thread Stuart Barkley
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 at 20:47 -, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I just downloaded the bind-chroot rpm and looked into it with Archive manager (so I am lazy), and no files, just the chroot tree. I am assuming there is some script that Archive manager does not show, or I am just missing it, because

Re: [CentOS] evaluating backup systems: rsync

2013-01-23 Thread Stuart Barkley
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 at 08:07 -, SilverTip257 wrote: If you change a directory name, rsync has no way of knowing that you moved it. And since the new directory doesn't exist on the rsync source that new directory is removed and those items are rsynced again. Bottom-line: Change things