running in 512M that I recall.
It depends on the amount of packages you select. A minimal install
should work with 5.3 and 512 MB of RAM.
The reason is that yum needs a lot of memory when doing dependency checking etc.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven...@gmail.com - 0479 / 88 11 83
in the mailing list or on IRC (or somewhere else). But the
conclusion was that you are better of using 64 bit and XFS for such
large filesystems, and that you need a 64 bit system anyway for ext3/4
to go over 8TB. Well, that is what I remember the conclusion to be :-)
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven
in the past and yes I have 2 of these as
well at my current job.
--
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven...@gmail.com - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven...@gmail.com - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming
.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven...@gmail.com - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
. He had multiple chances to rectify the
situation.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven...@gmail.com - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds
at this point?
I don't have any experience for how to debug this. But I have CentOS 5
running fine on the same kind of Blades. I have about 25 of them and
have seen no crashes. What kernel are you running ? Did you upgrade
the firmware on the Blades to the latest version ?
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim
in the volume group and you can increase the LV's and the filesystems
inside them.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven...@gmail.com - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds
you actually need to install.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven...@gmail.com - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds
that uses md5sum snapshots to do a
quick before and after test, showing anything that's changed on a
particular file system?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven
the people
that helped in testing to make this release possible.
--
Tim Verhoeven - t...@centos.org
The CentOS Project - http://www.centos.org/
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
to explain things the
way I've understood them. It is quite likely for a few mistakes to be in
there.
No problem, I will go over it when you are ready.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven...@gmail.com - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft
is welcome, including the Cluster Suite. I don't
think there is a section about right now. But feel free to start that.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven...@gmail.com - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven...@gmail.com - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
be migrated
between your 2 servers. You can use heartbeat to automate that or do
that manually as you are doing now. But moving a service IP is much
simpler and faster. Stay away from using DNS to manage the failover.
As you said is can take a while.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven
that happens, so you know a
drive is gone.
For recovery, just replace the disk, repartition it and re-add the
partitions to the raid arrays and your are done. The disks will resync
and then everything is back to how it was.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven...@gmail.com - 0479 / 88 11 83
. : Dag, your keepalived package is a bit outdated. Could you update it ?
--
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven...@gmail.com - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds
? Ned?
Yep,
But I'm wondering where we need to put it ? I was thinking in either
the general CentOS FAQ or in the CentOS 5 FAQ ? Anyone can think of a
better place ?
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven...@gmail.com - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring
.
The standaard boot scripts should activate all LVM volume groups and
logical volumes at boot. And the automatic mounting should be done
using /etc/fstab. If this does not happen this is a bug and it should
be investigated.
Are you experiences this problem yourself ?
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven
IBM ServeRAID cards.
I've run a lot of machines with these type of ServeRAIDs and they all
worked fine.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never
packages. I don't know if he can still do
that or not. Else I'll have a got at them.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds
)
IIRC the EDAC i5000 is the memory controller of the server, and it
looks like something went wrong with a DIMM and that is probably why
it crashed. So it looks like you may have a (intermittent) hardware
issue.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping
/twa0 -H -m root -d 3ware,1 -s S/../../7/04
/dev/twa0 -H -m root -d 3ware,2 -s S/../../7/04
Also, tw_cli just works for me. Maybe you should do a firmware upgrade
of your 3ware controller.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away
are interested, we really might try for a booth there.
If a couple of people want to help out, it should be good for us to get
a booth there. You want to go ahead and fill out the request form ?
I'm also willing to help out on CeBit. It isn't as far as Berlin :-)
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim
know
if the ones in rpmforge/kbs repo are up to date.
The NSA has security guides online, including for RHEL. It seems only
RHEL 5 it seems, but I presume a lot of stuff from it can be used for
RHEL/C 4.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem
primary=eth0
I've got setup running like this in mode 1 (failover) and in mode 4
(LACP). Unfortunately I don't have any systems with more then 1 bond
and I don't have anything spare to set this up. But you can try your
setup using this way to configure it, maybe that helps.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim
First, are you running 5.2 or a older version ? If it is a older
version, first upgrade to 5.2.
Then read
http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/release-notes/as-amd64/RELEASE-NOTES-U2-x86_64-en.html#id2914967
and the section about SHA passwords.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Grzesiek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/3828/kernelpaniczm7.jpg
Another victim of : http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2912.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes
incorporated...
Or use this kernel
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.bz_pre53.x86_64.rpm
in the meantime.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach
.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3
conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2
This probably means that there is some other none-CentOS package that
has a dependency on the old perl package. Do you have any special perl
packages installed ?
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven
...snip...
You are definitalty not alone on this. See
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2912. Maybe add a note there that
you have the same issue and report your system config. It looks likes
it only happens on older PII and PIII machines.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED
:-(
I have the CentOS-Base repo enabled (base, updates, addons, extras
centosplus) and CentOS-Media --- but no others.
...snip...
Could you post the output of the command /bin/rpm -qa --qf
'%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}.rpm\n' ?
Thanks,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479
seems to be that upstream has
decided to make that module part of the kernel itself and not as a
seperate module. This means that it is always loaded and that is
probably the reason why ther are issues on none-AMD hardware.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
. This will only remote entries inside the RPM database
and not on the filesytem itself. If you remove the newest version of
the duplicate packages you can run the yum update again and it will
reinstall the newer versions and all should be good.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11
/CentOS-5.2-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso;
or example.
And what do you mean by fake ?
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds
on that
box, I will follow on in this thread. TIA, Lanny
Could it be that you are also having this issue :
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2912
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach
in the updates repository to make sure the
our and upstreams install media are as identical as possible.
And no, the updates repo only contains updates for the running minor
release. So currently it contains updates for 5.2.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping
5.2. The
iso you have is faulty. This was discovered yesterday and updates
images are being distributed. So please wait for the official
announcement before starting to download.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring
patience please. It will be
released really soon know (famous last words :-) )
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds
Linux distro
also works like this
sorry for the studid question but do we use yum upgrade or yum update
and what is the difference between the 2
Run man yum for the answer :-)
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away
with kernel 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 or is there a workaround?
Could you create a bug report on bugs.centos.org ? Also could you test
if a 2.6.18-53.* kernel still work and also report that in the repot ?
Thank you,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically
are available for i586.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)
___
CentOS mailing list
://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/WikiDesign/modern-CentOS?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=Screenshot-scrolling_text_inside_tables.png
Just a question, is it possible to make the text just wrap instead of
displaying a scrollbar ? I prefer that, but it should be possible of
course.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven
from scratch?
A reinstall is the only option you have. The differences are to great
to be able to go back to C4.x online.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should
dom
and virt doms
As far as my experience goes you can use the 8GB completely for all
the domU's. I think you are still limited to 4GB per domU.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach
, it works. How is
the failing?
Could you post your complete named.conf file so that we can have a look at it ?
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never
): 4
CPU frequency: 2333 MHz
CPU socket(s): 2
Core(s) per socket: 2
Thread(s) per core: 1
NUMA cell(s):1
Memory size: 10484736 kB
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring
that was used by VM's is not automatically
returned to the dom0 and therefore won't show when running free and
top.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never
install
CD and you are ready. The rest works the same as virtualizing Linux.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds
and quad core Intle CPU's and I don't have
any issues with them since CentOS 5.1. I'm only using Xen and it's
been fine for me.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming
issues
with their Linux support (all issues encountered they fixed :) ). They
go even as far that for servers Linux is on the same level as Windows,
meaning that Linux is supported at the release of new hardware (not a
couple of months later).
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED
in fedora. You can check the fedora reasoning here -
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureRsyslog
As a sneak preview I can already tell you that CentOS 5.2 already will
have rsyslog instead of the old plain syslog.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping
to be updated
for 5.2, but this can only be done with the actual install media has
been created. So that info will be added somewhere next week.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming
support RHEL 4U6 and higher and SuSe.
Well, if RHEL 4U6 is supported, then just use CentOS 4.6 instead of
4.5 and the install will work.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach
pretty sure the 5.2 will have that driver. So if you can wait a bit
longer...
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds
not subscribe to
centos-docs mail to it ?
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Verhoeven wrote:
For me people don't need to be subscribe (as in must), but they are
encouraged to do so (as in may). Can people not subscribe to
centos-docs mail to it ?
Not at the moment (and I don't want
).
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs
I've created a blog entry about the upcoming 5.2 release and when it
well be ready.
You can find it at http://planet.centos.org/.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming
,
I think you probably need to rebuild the ramdisk (initrd) used for
booting your kernel. It will also contains references to the root
device. So boot back into rescue mode and do a mkinitrd.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes
new specfile
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)
___
CentOS mailing list
decimal GB is is actually 698 binary GB. And 8 disks in 2 RAID
5 arrays is (6 * 698)/1024 = 4,09 TB (binary).
So it is ok, you did not loose any storage.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft
and do a online update to
5.1. Or download the 5.1 cd's and use those.
If you already have the 5.0 cdroms then it is probably best to do a
minimal install with 5.0 then upgrade to 5.1 and then use yum to
install the actual stuff you need.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479
(http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories).
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds
on a 64 bit dom0 is currently not really stable. This is suppose to
improve with 5.2
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds
.
Is anyone here is aware of another way to get a fixed version of perl
for CentOS 5?
You need to get upstream to fix it. Report this bug in our and theirs
bug reportingtools (bugs.centos.org and bugzilla.redhat.com)
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping
what 32 bit libraries are needed and install them
together with the application.
So if you use the tools provided by CentOS there is nothing special
that needs to be done. The system will sort it out itself.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem
:
# lsscsi
[0:0:0:0]diskATA ST910021AS 4.06 /dev/sda
[4:0:0:0]cd/dvd HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-4083N 1.08 /dev/sr0
So that should help you indentify your devices.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring
on python. So replace the base python package with a newer one could
very well break your complete system. As Eric suggests find a way to
install python 2.4 besides the core python in a seperate place so you
don't start mixing them.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88
a standard
UNIX vi, vim gets you the enhanced vi with colors etc.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds
, just realize
what you are doing then. But we do like that people are polite and
respect each other.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed
For the sed people, this should also work :
ifconfig | grep eth0 | sed -e s/^.*HWaddr \(.*\)$/\1/
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus
probably
will have things like console redirection, BMC/IPMI, remote console,
... but they are platform specific so look at the manual for that
server and see what is available. They usualy do provde a way to
redirect almost all output to a serial port.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL
the dom0's
are not doing anything so why do they need the memory in the first
place ? That is why I've limited my dom0's like this by default, I
consider this a good practice for these kinds of setups
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically
. You can provide the
version number with yum install. Or just use the latest kernel. In the
past I've run the RDAC modules on so called not-supported kernels.
Usually newer kernels then the one mentioned. I never had any issues
with it.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479
experience it is ok.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)
___
CentOS mailing list
at spec files from the different
repositories you can find online (CentOS, DAG/RPMForge, Atrpms, ...)
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed
to the volume group. A
vgdisplay should then show that you have again free space in the
volume group. Then you can do a lvextend and resize2fs as normal.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach
-1.7-29.tar.gz
What do you think now, does it could be a candidate for installation ?
It's a go for me. This can be put in the production wiki.
Nice work !
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring
the squares on
the current design a bit, but to much. To much contrast hampers good
reading. The point of the background is only to guide the eyes to stay
where the text is (a.k.a. the indicate the borders where the text
end).
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
assume there's some checksum in it, so
that I can't just make one up?
In my experience, at least with Xen, is that you can generate the UUID
yourself. It suppose to be a unique number that identifies a VM.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http
has been correctly
generated. Cannot open/read repomd.xml file for repository:
anaconda-base-200704101950.i386.
any clue what to do.
Try with /centos/5.0/os/i386 instead of /centos/5.0/os/i386/CentOS
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem
.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs
through
sdc: sdc1
Attached scsi disk sdc at scsi3, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
# ls -l /dev/sdc*
brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 33 Nov 7 14:45 /dev/sdc1
Really weird. Anyway you can use mknod to create the missing device.
In your case mknod sdc b 8 32 should do the trick.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven
?
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
.
The argumentment can also come immediately after -a. e.g.
-ap.
Am I doing something wrong, or is there no way to get mdadm to automatically
create a specific device file.
I've done it like this :
mdadm --create /dev/md12 --auto=yes --level=1 --run --raid-devices=2 /dev/...
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim
arcconf) that allows you monitor and
configure the controller inside Linux.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds
to it? ;)
Nothing that I can think of. Only that using PAE mode incurs a small
performance penalty because of extra address translations. But
functionally it's identical to a normal kernel.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring
of the
chipset itself. If that is the case, nothing can be done about it.
Another option is that you try to boot with the PAE kernel. That
kernel is made to go over the 4GB boundary on 32bit.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away
need tools
for the RAID controller itself, those should be able to get the info
you need.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus
91 matches
Mail list logo