On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
Good ... if you don't like CentOS, then we do not want you to use it.
For people who do like it, we do want you to use it.
What we do not want is for people to think that they have a Service
Level Agreement with CentOS
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:05 PM, R P Herrold herr...@centos.org wrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Tom H wrote:
This is the kind of answer that CentOS as a project
shouldn't allow (KB's recent use-something-else email is
another example) because it makes the developers look like
rank amateurs
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
Tom H wrote:
It's the second time that I point out that the CentOS communication
policy (if you there is one) is completely unprofessional. You can let
off steam by saying we're volunteers, so we can tell you to use
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Hendrik hendrik.stew...@hotmail.com wrote:
Or is that the Indian mentality?
I hope that you're banned for this racist comment. (And as an added
bonus, we'll be rid of someone who's making a mess of message
threading and the mail archive.)
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Russell Jones rjo...@eggycrew.com wrote:
Thank you!
If forcing it to stop system-wide is not possible, is there any way of
forcing IPv4 lookups to occur first then?
You're welcome.
In the case of traceroute, there shouldn't be any DNS requests
when
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 07:46:32PM -0400, Tom H wrote:
In the case of traceroute, there shouldn't be any DNS requests
when specifying ipv4 transport (-4).
Umm, no. The transport protocol is irrelevant to the query
by an attempt every 30 seconds is something i can
live with in exchange for not locking myself out for too long.
how long you set your lockout for is a call you must make for your
server(s); i just wanted you to have more points of view about what people
are doing out there in the wild.
--
Tom
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Russell Jones rjo...@eggycrew.com wrote:
I am having a strange issue with CentOS 5.4 that I cannot seem to solve.
Every DNS lookup results in records being requested first before A
records. As a result, this causes a large amount of unnecessary DNS
-snip
Does anybody know how to set up KVM on a headless, unattended server to
run a virtual machine automatically on boot? I've only ever used it on
my desktop with pointy-clicky tools like virt-manager. Even still, I
usually use VirtualBox for virtual machines on my desktop.
-Alan
accept my apologies.
How about yum install php-mcrypt?
Regards,
--
Tom Diehl tdi...@rogueind.com Spamtrap address mtd...@rogueind.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
to
protocol version 2 only.
http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20080220110039 might be useful in
setting this up.
Of course I could be wrong since I have not tried this yet but it is on my
short list for this week.
Regards,
--
Tom Diehl tdi...@rogueind.com Spamtrap address
to make it useful.
Regards,
--
Tom Diehl tdi...@rogueind.com Spamtrap address mtd...@rogueind.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Sam Trenholme
strenholme.use...@gmail.com wrote:
As an open-source developer, I understand the frustration of working
hard and having a lot of freeloaders not appreciating my work. I feel
people posting here talking about how unprofessional CentOS is acting
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:34 AM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
RHEL and opensuse are different - defferent kernels, different config files
and slightly different locations for some config files.
It's not like one is a drop in replacement for the other, so it doesn't make
sense to me
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Simon Matter simon.mat...@invoca.ch wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:34 AM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
RHEL and opensuse are different - defferent kernels, different config
files
and slightly different locations for some config files.
It's not
Hi
I am wondering if this has made it into any updates?
http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2010-4645
thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Neil Viglieno n...@viglieno.net wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 16:34 +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
With all due respect, the release was announced to be ready last week,
and planned for the end of the week. One week later, I don't see
anything. I think having some
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Rainer Traut tr...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 15.03.2011 10:37, schrieb Luigi Rosa:
It's a matter of personal taste, but I find more useful the -X (or
- --exclude-from) option
Yes, personal taste, but in crontab confusing not seeing the excludes
and besides that it
%sourcedir /home/test/rpm/SOURCES
Just a guess but try creating the %sourcedir above. Most likely you
will need other directories as well. You could also use mock but that
will need to be setup as well.
Regards,
--
Tom Diehl tdi...@rogueind.com Spamtrap address mtd...@rogueind.com
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:51 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Peter Peltonen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Peter Peltonen wrote:
Based on that info I assume the board having a 8x SAS Ports via LSI
1068E Controller. We received the server with 3 drives + 1 spare
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
Do you think we are not trying or damnedest to get it done as fast as we
possibly can?
What, exactly, is the problem here?
You have my permission to use something else. Does that help?
Good answer!
:)
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's face it most auditors these days are just accountants with Infosys Mgmt
text books.
Or former sysadmins who didn't make it in the management track but
still wanted to be able to lord it over others...
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 09:02 PM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
Anyway, neither in windows nor in unix/linux you want to specify
permissions on a per user level. Always groups. If the user leaves the
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Rafa Grimán rafagri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 03 February 2011 20:42 Robert Heller wrote
At Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:12:17 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Hi :)
On Thursday 03 February 2011 14:59 Giles Coochey wrote
On 03/02/2011
Spot on KB, I like KVM but the management tools are just not quite there,
unless your a big installation and can run RHEV on a windoze server. I know
they are moving towards an open source RHEV implementation but it appears
that it will take awhile to get there. I still plan to use KVM but will
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Soo-Hyun Choi s.c...@terabit.org.uk wrote:
As you know, $HOME is generally located at /home/$username by default.
I would like to re-locate all users' $HOME directories to something like
am guessing I have either have too much or too little included in
the kernel. I tried to make sure everything I thought was needed
were not modules but included in the kernel.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
---
Tom Murphy
Platform Support
Convey Computer
1-866-338-1768
tmur
talk to the coprocessor via pci.
A more detailed description of our system is at www.conveycomputer.com.
Thanks a lot.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:36 PM, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:19 -0600, Tom G Murphy wrote:
Nothing hard about doing this I do it a lot.
My
Thanks, this is an great idea.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.orgwrote:
On 01/28/2011 09:19 PM, Tom G Murphy wrote:
I am guessing I have either have too much or too little included in the
kernel. I tried to make sure everything I thought was needed were
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
The key to *keeping* it off in RHEL 6, and I assume in CentOS 6
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
You clearly work in an insecure environment.
By who's definition? The fact that you're PC is connected to the
internet place you in the same environment
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote:
And in those nine years you claim to have had at least one major security
incident.
It beggars my belief
You now publicly declare that your company not just advocates the sharing of
passwords, but certainly
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 01/21/2011 07:41 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
NetworkManager is utterly useless for server grade work, such as pair
bonding and bridges. It
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
It probably depends on his environment. If it's an office where people
actually work for money and need to address client issues then I'm
sure your colleagues won't be please if you make them loose all their
work just to be
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Tom H
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 1:03 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
Sometimes you need to access a PC of a staff member who is busy with
something right now. And I'm not talking about administrative access.
Sure, I can access any PC via root login, and frankly for that matter
I can also
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:06 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Tom H wrote:
Yes but someone's posted a global gconftool-2 recipe.
Run gconf-editor as root and you can edit the global mandatory rules too.
Very true, as long as you can run a GUI app as root
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 06:38:12 pm Scott Robbins wrote:
Boot has to be huge in Fedora for the preupgrade to have a chance of
working--having given up on it several releases ago, I have no idea if
it's been improved or
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 9:23 AM, John Horne john.ho...@plymouth.ac.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 14:05 +1300, Smithies, Russell wrote:
I've just setup nic bonding on our server (DL585-G7 running Centos 5.5
x86_64) as detailed on the wiki:
I'm going to chime in here, First off I want to thank Simon for pitching in
and trying to help out.The problem I have is that while I would love to
run RHEV, at the moment having to have a windows server to install it on is
a bit much for mein fact it kind of runs opposite of what I am
So I need some opinions on which way to go, for my home network I am running
almost all linux, and I am starting to want to manage all of the users
accounts, uid/gids for all of the devices some of which are laptops...so
what is the best path going forward, on the server end I am running
Centos5.5
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Philix T A philixli...@gmail.com wrote:
2) Dont create RAID for swap and / root partition (Not Advisable)
Any rationale for this bad advice?
3) Swap Size size should be 2X the size of the Physical memory
For a desktop, maybe.
6) My experience had always
LOL...great analogy..I think the details will be lost on many non firearm
types...but I found it to be a great analogy...:)
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Monday, December 13, 2010 03:15:48 pm Nick wrote:
This is a bit like saying I have 12 years
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
I have a confusing problem. I have two centos 5,5 boxes. Both have
sudo.i386 1.7.2p1-9.el5_5
installed
I am using the same sudoers file, but the one on box A keeps trying to do
DNS
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 12/10/2010 10:40 AM, Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
I have a confusing problem. I have two centos 5,5 boxes. Both have
sudo.i386
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Brunner, Brian T.
bbrun...@gai-tronics.com wrote:
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Tom H
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 11:34 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 15:16 +, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I guess the reason it jars us here is because most people post properly.
Except the gmail lusers who haven't figured out how to turn off
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/8/2010 4:04 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
iptables is a de-facto standard on all Linux distributions nowadays. It
is not ratified by ISO, IETF or similar ... but how does that make the
real life scenario any
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Bob McConnell rmcco...@lightlink.com wrote:
Ryan Wagoner wrote:
IPv6 is not broken by design. NAT was implemented to extend the time
until IPv4 exhaustion. A side effect was hiding the internal IPv4
address, which complicates a number of protocols like FTP and
Rinaldo wrote:
On Dec 6, 2010, at 5:27 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 05/12/10 14:21, Tom H wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 AM, RedShift redsh...@pandora.be wrote:
On 12/05/10 12:50, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
(http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3915471/IPv4+Nearing+Final+Days.htm
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Mathieu Baudier mbaud...@argeo.org wrote:
b) Do I get charged by my ISP on a per-device basis?
This is no science fiction.
Some big providers in some countries limit the number of device that
can connect to internet. You have to register the MAC address
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Bob McConnell rmcco...@lightlink.com wrote:
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 18:28 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
IPv6 is not broken by design. NAT was implemented to extend the time
until IPv4 exhaustion. A side effect was hiding the internal IPv4
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Brunner, Brian T.
bbrun...@gai-tronics.com wrote:
Trim your quotes.
LOL
I was in a hurry... I think that this applies to all in this thread so
I hope that you've email everyone else...
Also, please keep your commands on-list; I only caught your email
because
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 10:32:32 am Tom H wrote:
Is 172.16.10.72 a private address of yours or of your ISP?
More to the point; do you have a route to his address?
I have a route to his dsl router, which, assuming
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:27 AM, David Sommerseth
d...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On 05/12/10 14:21, Tom H wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 AM, RedShift redsh...@pandora.be wrote:
On 12/05/10 12:50, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
(http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3915471/IPv4+Nearing
Well I'm sure there are a lot of folks eagerly waiting..this is the latest I
have seen which sums it up the best http://planet.centos.org/
e.g. it will be here when it is ready, I for one am hoping for an early
christmas present;)
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Boris Epstein
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 AM, RedShift redsh...@pandora.be wrote:
On 12/05/10 12:50, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
(http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3915471/IPv4+Nearing+Final+Days.htm),
Haven't switched yet, I have IPv6 at home using sixxs.
I can't even figure out what address ranges
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:17 PM, John Kennedy skeb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:59, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
Have a CentOS 4.x 32 bit server running on a single 500M SATA drive.
What is easiest way to convert too RAID 1 on it? Anyone have a link?
Would be open to
Hi
I am having real trouble with a new batch of Intel NIC's - We were
using another type of 10gig card and they were fine but got EOL'd from
Intel and are now using something subtly different.
I dont have all the details yet on the issue but basically there is a
major delay in when the link comes
The only time I have seen such a delay in the past was because of OSPF on
the Cisco switch it was connected to.
these are Arista DCS-7148SX's so i'll have to chat to the network
guys. On the kernel line can you state delay=x so that it waits for a
link ??
thanks
It depends on what hardware you have available and what all you would
like to play with...I run both tomato and pfsense and both are great
products but both serve a particular setting...I use tomato for AP's
primarily but also use it for a soho router much better than
linksys...but if you want
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:36 AM, David McGuffey
davidmcguf...@verizon.net wrote:
I'm doing some testing in a lab which is isolated from the rest of my
network (DMZ). I'm doing both inbound and outbound filtering at the
firewall (CentOS +iptables).
What protocols, ports and destination IP
Very Nice...Keep us up to date on future findings, very interesting
readThanks.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Alexey Vasyukov vasyu...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi folks.
We finally finished our work on benchmarking SPICE and would like to share
the results.
Detailed report in English:
So still coming up to speed with mdadm and I notice this morning one of my
servers acting sluggish...so when I looked at the mdadm raid device I see
this:
mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Version : 0.90
Creation Time : Mon Sep 27 22:47:44 2010
Raid Level : raid10
Array Size
NEVERMINDsomehow my fstab mount is not right.
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com wrote:
So still coming up to speed with mdadm and I notice this morning one of my
servers acting sluggish...so when I looked at the mdadm raid device I see
this:
mdadm
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote:
centos 5 had modprobe.conf entries for eth0 and if present eth1.
something like:
alias eth0 forcedeth
alias eth1 e1000e
For the new centos 6 (I have the rhel 6 client installed on my laptop)
the modprobe.conf file is
Yah...can't wait
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:02 PM, John Kennedy skeb...@gmail.com wrote:
When will CentOS 6 be released???
(Just kidding...Just wanted to let you all know that RHEL6 has been
released...And yes, I know that most of you all know...)
John
--
John Kennedy
Thanks Karanbir , I actually want to pony up and start helping so I am
looking forward to hearing more about that and how I can help...Sounds Great
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.orgwrote:
hi Guys,
On 11/10/2010 07:52 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
Last time there
So I have finally carved out some time and need to start converting my vm's
from Vmware server to KVM and I was wondering if anyone had the specfic
steps that need to be taken...I understand how to convert the disks
etc..what I am interested in is how to get them to use virtio ones which
means iw
Well it depends on what you want in your new board, workstation vs
serverI just built 2 machines based on this boardMSI 785G-E53 AM3
785G...with amd quad coresone is acting as a server and centos 5.5
loaded up just fine with no issues, running KVM with a couple of VM'sI
would look
Ok so I'd like to help, since most folks have Intel Chipsets, I have a AMD
4p(16 core)/32gig memory opteron server that I'm running that we can get
some numbers onbut it would be nice if we could run apples to apples...I
have iozone loaded and can run that but would be nice to run using the
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:59 PM, fred smith
fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote:
back in Aug several of you assisted me in solving a problem where one
of my drives had dropped out of (or been kicked out of) the raid1 array.
something vaguely similar appears to have happened just a few mins
+1 can't wait
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Timo Schoeler
timo.schoe...@riscworks.netwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There's progress...
http://press.redhat.com/2010/10/18/red-hat-enterprise-linux-6-release-candidate-available-to-partners/
Cheers,
Timo
I don't have any benchmarks per se just my recent testing of them
I think xen is still on top in terms of performance and featuresnow
having said that my experience in the past with kvm and my latest testing
with 5.5 and KVM I can say that KVM has made great strides with the virtio
AM, Tom Bishop wrote:
I think xen is still on top in terms of performance and featuresnow
that is indeed what it 'feels' like, but I'm quite keen on putting some
numbers on that.
having said that my experience in the past with kvm and my latest
testing with 5.5 and KVM I can say
I use freenx and install it very frequently, I don't modify the sshd config
but go here to get a copy of the .ssh key...
/var/lib/nxserver/home/.ssh/client.id_dsa.key
and copy that to your client machine
in fact if you want to generate a new key the comman is nxkeygen
see if that makes
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:35 PM, David Goldsmith dgoldsm...@sans.org wrote:
On 10/7/2010 9:59 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:48 PM, David Goldsmith dgoldsm...@sans.org wrote:
On 10/7/2010 9:25 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:20 PM, David Goldsmith dgoldsm...@sans.org
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:20 PM, David Goldsmith dgoldsm...@sans.org wrote:
Two servers, each have normal user umask values of 0077 and root umask
values on 0022.
On the first server (CentOS 5.4 i386) running sudo 1.6.9pl7-5 (from
base), here are the results of touching a file as a user, as
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:48 PM, David Goldsmith dgoldsm...@sans.org wrote:
On 10/7/2010 9:25 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:20 PM, David Goldsmith dgoldsm...@sans.org wrote:
Two servers, each have normal user umask values of 0077 and root umask
values on 0022.
On the first server
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions for me?
http://www.wowzamedia.com/index.html
-tgc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Is anyone using or played with wowza???looks interesting...
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Tom G. Christensen
t...@statsbiblioteket.dkwrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions for me?
http://www.wowzamedia.com/index.html
-tgc
and your budget. From a FREE Wowza Server Developer edition
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Tom G. Christensen
t...@statsbiblioteket.dk wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions for me?
http
, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com wrote:
Wowza development editiion is free for personal use and appears to have
all
of the beels and whisltes but is limited to 10 concurrent connections
Editions and Pricing
Wowza gives you the choice of licensing editions to fit your
Looking at switching over from vmware and need to stand up a kvm install, I
really would like to wait for rhel6 but not sure when it may show upbut
what I would like to know what is the latest KVM that I can run with 5.5 and
what are the best management tools to use, I looked at the wiki but
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:46 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:22:58PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
And I'd at *least* go to NIS+. openLDAP is an unbelievable pain, but
Nobody in their right mind uses NIS+. Even Sun have stopped it.
When I did
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Iain Morris iain.t.mor...@gmail.com wrote:
No one seems to like AD. I actually find it to be fairly manageable compared
to stock LDAP/Kerberos. The management tools blow OpenLDAP out of the
water. I laugh at myself saying it, but if you want simple management of
So I have been playing with a RAID 10 f2 ( 2 disks far layout)
setup...thanks for all of the advice..Now I am playing with the format and
want to make sure I have it setup the best that I can, my raid was built
using the raid 10 option with 2 disks with the layout=far, chunk size
512now I read
:
On Sep 28, 2010, at 12:40 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 09/27/10 7:49 PM, Tom Bishop wrote:
How do I figure out if it's a 4k sector drive, I've read about that
but never looked into it...is there any way to tell, and when you mean
start my partition, I only have one
So I'm in the process of building and testing a raid setup and it appeared
to take along time to build I came across some settings for setting the min
amount of time and that helped but it appears that one of the disks is
struggling (100 utilization) vs the other one...I was wondering if anyone
, Tom Bishop wrote:
So I'm in the process of building and testing a raid setup and it
appeared to take along time to build I came across some settings for
setting the min amount of time and that helped but it appears that one
of the disks is struggling (100 utilization) vs the other one...I
27, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks ROss, I poured through my dmesg logs and all looks well, things
appear fine but i don't think the samsung should be running at
100%...something is not right but it hasn't bit me yether are my dmesg
logs...
scsi0 : ahci
break it and change the partitions and if so do I do it on both
of the disks so they are the same??? Thanks in advance...going to do some
more reading...
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 27, 2010, at 8:16 PM, Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com wrote
limit...
# sysctl dev.raid.speed_limit_min
# sysctl dev.raid.speed_limit_max
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 25, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 25, 2010, at 9:11 AM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
Jacob Bresciani wrote:
RAID10 requires at least 4 drives does it not?
Since it's a strip set of mirrored disks, the smallest
for the n2 optionthis is on 2 1TB hdd
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 25, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sep 25, 2010, at 9:11 AM, Christopher
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 25, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 25, 2010, at 9:11 AM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote
+1 Just Awesome.ROFL.too funny :)
Thanks for the link
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Timo Schoeler
timo.schoe...@riscworks.netwrote:
May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/
Windows admins use a
I have been reading lots of stuff but trying to find out if a raid10 2drive
setup is any better/worse than a normal raid 1 setupI have to 1Tb drives
for my data and a seperate system drive, I am only interested in doing raid
on my data...
So i setup my initial test like this
mdadm -v
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Matthew Topper toppe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
I need to find some good reference on GRUB, which seems difficult
because most things I can find are about GRUB2, and CentOS has 0.97
The commands
+1 for bastille...
On 9/18/10, m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Roland RoLaNd wrote:
i Just finished setting up an apache service on a centos 5.2 VM machine.
i need to secure this machine as i'm soon to be setting a public IP over
it where i'd be opening up the following services:
301 - 400 of 846 matches
Mail list logo
