for CentOS
to provide any updates?
2. What are the bug numbers filed for CentOS 5 so that the updates
could be pushed out?
3. Given that last months updates were a month late, where are
the bug numbers filed against those, because the updates eventually
made it.
Regards,
Vandaman
be offered by the CentOS community.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
. Many would offer to help were any offers
for help made.
Can you show me where offers for assistance have been made
and the community declined?
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
.
Members of the CentOS community should, in a free world be able
to ask valid questions aand offer to volunteer if that is needed.
Off course some don't live in the free world so its
unfortunate.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
David Mackintosh wrote:
From: david.mackint...@xdroop.com david.mackint...@xdroop.com
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:14:22AM +, Vandaman wrote:
Its not the time to be nannying people
over how to behave on mailing list.
/irony
What is your contribution to the topic? Or are you one
,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
David Mackintosh wrote:
irrelevant banter
Would you like the joke explained to you in more detail?
What time will your mummy come home. You should not be playing
on a mailing list like this. :-)
We have the serious business of CentOS to talk about.
Regards,
Vandaman
not to top-post. Its not the time to be nannying people
over how to behave on mailing list.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
name and shame this comapany it will make good reading
on teh web.
2. Consider paying for RHEL so that you can actually get
official support and can raise support tickets.
3. You probably don't understand what CentOS is or who is supposed
to use it.
Regards,
Vandaman
it come from?
2. Which fix is this that CentOS released before upstream?
Regards,
Vandaman.
---
Report another spam?
Your average reporting time is: 3 hours; Great!
noob detector - 15 noobs top-posting
here
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-January/070168.html
applies here as well?
Regards,
Vandaman.
---
Report another spam?
Your average reporting time is: 3 hours; Great!
noob detector - 15 noobs top
sig in
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-January/070282.html
Wink :-)
Regards,
Vandaman.
---
Report another spam?
Your average reporting time is: 3 hours; Great!
noob detector - 4 noobs top-posting
then it is best to just use
the upstream ones to fix any immediate issues and avoid repackaging
issues.
Perhaps the OP David Hrbáč's talents can be utilised elsewhere
in CentOS such as php which people ask for and they are told it
is in testing for 5 years?
Regards,
Vandaman
it is likely to have been met by someone upstream.
It would also be worth giving the Fedora/Mandriva lists a look
to see if the problem has been reported there. If the problem has
not been reported upstream or in those distros then it is likely
to be something you have done.
Regards,
Vandaman
.
It goes without saying that the kernels are unsupported
by both CentOS and upstream.
Regards,
Vandaman.
---
Your average reporting time for spam is: 5 hours; Great!
noob detector - 3 noobs top posting
Anne Wilson wrote:
blank
Hi,
Welcome to CentOS. What can we do you for?
Regards,
Vandaman.
---
Your average reporting time for spam is: 5 hours; Great!
noob detector - 3 noobs top posting
Thomas Dukes tdu...@sc.rr.com wrote:
Got cocky and decided to upgrade from from 4.7 to 5.2.
Have a couple
problems I can't figure out.
Was that upgrade using anaconda or yum? Hadn't you thought
of backing up and doing a clean install of 5.2?
Regards,
Vandaman
MHR wrote:
PS (yeah, yeah, I know) especially to Mr. Vandaman:
I've noticed that
a lot of your postings are fairly concise, or one might say
clipped.
I gather that this is how you post, and this is not a
criticism, just
an observation: most people, especially us annoying
colonists
.html
You may also wish to read up on why top-posting is not
allowed on many mailing lists this one included.
Regarads,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
it into the main
CentOS-Base.repo file and then ship with it disabled. For now people could
just download the text file.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
yourself?
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
fasttrack is more important in this regard than contrib.
Upsteam ships with the main channels as well as fasttrack.
As CentOS includes the repos in one repo file rather than having
separate files, this tradition should be considered for fasttrack
as well.
Regards,
Vandaman
/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
#baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/fasttrack/$basearch/
gpgcheck=1
enabled=1
gpgkey=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-centos4
priority=1
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
.
There is some more info here
https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2008-October/msg0.html
Betas are not meant for production machines BTW or for upgrades
to the final version.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
but 5.3 beta is unable
to solve them automagically for you.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
other squid versions in CentOS plus?
Any other repos/sources you know of with EL4/EL5 squid rpms?
Is there a CentOS dev with any experimental packages?
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
and then do yum install wine.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
/RPMS/
Even yum search foo will yield results from a default CentOS
4 install (assuming CentOS Plus is enabled in the default install).
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
work out of the box?
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
in (none)
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Dirk H. Schulz wrote:
This does not look like httpd errors. These are missing
MIBs, presumably
you have installed and (mis)configured NetSNMP.
Dirk
That is from /var/log/httpd/error_log I have not installed and
misconfigured NetSNMP
Regards,
Vandaman
Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vandaman wrote on Sun, 7 Dec 2008 22:22:03 + (GMT):
The CentOS 4 grub is not the same as the CentOS 5
grub.
Right, I was on the wrong machine for checking the version.
But this is
not the point of my posting, it's irrelevant. ;-)
Suggest
using slackware or gentoo? The logs are located in /var/log/
unless you are using some other non-redhat distro.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Fabian Arrotin wrote:
No problem .. in fact i believe you wanted to post it to
the centos-fr
lists :D
I thought Ralph's invitation to spammers was accepted and
they had taken his challenge. :-)
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing
)
If you have rpmforge, kbs, epel all set up at 10 then wouldn't
those also potentially overwrite each other if the same package
exists in all of them?
Who has got several 3rd party repos and what are your yum priority
for those?
Regards,
Vandaman
://www.centos.org/docs/ has yum docs.
So if you for just install CentOS 4.7 from the ServerCD and do
# yum check-update
it will give you a list of packages to be updated, which you can
do by
# yum update
and then say yes or no. Welcome to CentOS BTW.
Regards,
Vandaman
, then one would not need exclude
as the yum priority should take care of versions shouldn't it?
If you have say webmin from webmin.com and there is webmin
in all those repos then it might be good to use exclude but shouldn't
the plugin handle versions between repos?
Regards,
Vandaman
Ross Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's most obvious you have no idea what you are talking
about, so if
you prefer Ubuntu over CentOS then please move along, we
need no
trolls here.
Agreed. The guy seems to be a poorly informed loudmouth.
Regards,
Vandaman
work
with what's available in CentOS.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
How does #yum list name not work *if* the repo is
added to your list?
Is that how rpmfind works? http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/
What packages are available for CentOS and third party repos
without having the .repo files installed?
Regards,
Vandaman
/XenPvopsDom0
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
.el5
I was replying to Peter Kjellstrom
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-November/068300.html
as the original thread was about yum --downloadonly not present
in centos 4.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
find a
valuable solution: which is (or which are) the best
repository I should add to have a satisfying list of bioinfo
rpm?
These look like BioRpms to me BioRPMS :-
Bioinformatics RPMs Repository http://informatics.umdnj.edu/BioRPMs/
Regards,
Vandaman
research on your problem particularly
when http://www.centos.org/docs has tons of stuff. There seems
to be an influx of Slackware refugees joining the list.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
integration work
between the Xen hypervisor and the Linux kernel.
/snip
As far as CentOS is concerned saying Xen is deprecated is
jumping the gun. CentOS ships with Xen and as long as upstream
supports it, CentOS by extension supports it.
Regards,
Vandaman
-headers-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm
kernel-xen-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm
kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Bo Lynch wrote:
On Wed, November 19, 2008 4:52 pm, Vandaman wrote:
This might be a little aside, but why build rpms as
root?
Are you rolling out your own patches for Samba? If so
can
you share them with the list?
Regards,
Vandaman.
Not rolling out patches just trying out
, or point me to a
place where it's use is described in lay terms? I'm
very comfortable with CentOS, but this is a whole
'nother ball game !
For such a general enquiry, try google
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=xenbtnG=Searchmeta=
Regards,
Vandaman
the question ?
Well said. You are very zippy too after rolling out those kernel
updates what brand of coffee do you take? :-)
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
rawhide at least
even if the changes are backported int RHEL.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Steve Huff wrote:
On Nov 19, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Vandaman wrote:
What is the bug? It does not appear in the site you
linked to.
It would be surprising if Red Hat are unaware of
upstream changes
as one would expect it to be rolled out into Fedora
rawhide at least
even if the changes
own patches for Samba? If so can
you share them with the list?
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
have run out? Or what business is it of yours if someone is
running RHEL as opposed to a RHEL-derivative?
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
have run out? Or what business is it of yours if someone is
running RHEL as opposed to a RHEL-derivative?
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Indeed. Look in a mirror and say it again.
You remind me of a Nazi Guard.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
to see why
it locks
up?
Are those the only logs you've got. Normally linux is very chatty,
and you get WARNING, PANIC etc messages. What kernel are you using?
Does a previous kernel or CentOS plus kernel stop the problem?
Regards,
Vandaman
://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/065922.html
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
and others complaining
about Fedora being bleeding edge should have a CentOS server.
Best of both?
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
of package hwinfo in sid
hwinfo is the hardware detection tool used in SuSE Linux.
In Debian Edu ( Skolelinux) hwinfo has shown better results
than discover when detecting mouse, ..
The Mandriva spec file lists :-
Add debian patch to get it build in non-suse distro
Regards,
Vandaman
to get it to build on none-suse systems
if its made for debian systems?
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-November/067613.html
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Miguel Medalha wrote:
Vandaman wrote
I may need a strong shot of coffee but I though
putting hide files = /~*/ as follows in
the samba config file would hide files with a tilde.
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browseable = no
writable = yes
hide files
command. I don't have Centos 5
but you can look at the CentOS docs or a quick Fedora example below.
http://dailypackage.fedorabook.com/index.php?/archives/158-System-Recovery-Week-Rescue-Mode-and-Reinstalling-Grub.html
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS
/404 566 GET
http://mirror.centos.org/favicon.ico - DIRECT/84.22.180.89 text/html
1226225785.707 2 10.0.0.3 TCP_NEGATIVE_HIT/404 572 GET
http://mirror.centos.org/favicon.ico - NONE/- text/html
Are you Ned Slider from the CentOS forum and have changed the faq links?
Regards,
Vandaman
been moved presumably without notice/announcement.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-grub-installing.html
Not everyone uses IRC/Forum/Developers mailing list so
for the benefit of others, what happened to
the docs?
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Directories
browseable = no
writable = yes
hide files = /~*/
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Anne Wilson wrote:
Vandaman wrote:
I may need a strong shot of coffee but I though
putting hide files = /~*/ as follows in
the
samba config file would hide files with a tilde.
You mean files starting with a tilde?
I expanded the selection to hide all files with a tilde.
I will also
are still visible.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Milton Calnek wrote:
Sorry, I missed the question. I'm severely confused
and I don't know what I'm talking about.
My friend, stop misquoting me. See
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-November/067393.html
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS
appreciated.
I would guess you have doctored your CentOS yum repo
files to point to 4.6 What are the contents of your
CentOS-Base.repo file?
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
contributed to
Fedora or to CentOS? This is open source after all, you have
access to the source.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
from 3rd/4th party repos you get to keep the pieces.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/24/tuttle_centos/
so he knows much more than you think.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
mailing list and are conducting
conversations with yourself saying basically nothing.
Dell have forums for users too.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
is unique and he has not told us the whole story.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
way to go ... I'm willing to bet that the
eircom.net spammer has spammed many on this list but due to no-one
taking action he was still in business.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
with the guidelines.
You can tell I'm already lightened up - basic google searches on find
on Linux has about 4.8 million replies but I didn't mention this to the
dozen or so responses to that topic. Sorin Srbu contacted me offlist and
you can bet what was said remains offlist.
Regards,
Vandaman
another?
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
list as your first port of call instead
of a basic google search you may need brain surgery.
It's not a waste of bandwidth to post ontopic stuff
that is easily solved by simple google searches or
reading the docs?
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS
threads with
interesting subjects that I might not see otherwise.
It will be interesting if things went like so :-
- a CentOS Ivory Tower List for those on top of Ivory Towers.
- a CentOS OT list full of 419 scammers, salesmen/affiliates posts
- a CentOS n00b list for n00bs
Regards,
Vandaman
are spending an awful amount of time on
this issue.Without hard evidence from Lutz its going
nowhere. All of this because someone quoted Seth on
probably what is the latest release of yum?
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
then the ISP will be forced to take action.
When reporting spam to hotmail, they do come and say some headers are
forged but others are legit. In this instance it looks as if a legit
eircom customer is abusing the service.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS
another free email account.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
some guy named Cole running a similar scam from
a residential account in Glasgow. Once his ISP is on him and the local
police notified, his days are numbered.
Bottomline - report the MOFOS.
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
86 matches
Mail list logo
