Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

On 9.12.2020 0.38, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:34:54AM -0600, Christopher Wensink wrote: Is it possible that more regressions will get through than have before? Well, sure, some. But let's not pretend that even RHEL is ever regression-free. It's software, after all, and

Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!

On 7.6.2017 23:40, Bruce Ferrell wrote: On 06/07/2017 01:27 PM, Warren Young wrote: On Jun 7, 2017, at 1:02 PM, John R Pierce wrote: every RPM that interacts with systemd will need to be 'fixed' to do it the old way, with init.d scripts. repositories like postgres, EPEL,

Re: [CentOS] Some thoughts on systemd

On 19.7.2014 1:23, Keith Keller wrote: On 2014-07-18, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: But it does force people who should be focusing on improving an application to instead spend their time reconfiguring the startup configuration for a distribution just to keep it working the same

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, not systemd questions

On 9.7.2014 20:35, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Question 1: has anyone used preupgrade (I used it with fc 17 - 19, and it pretty much appeared to work, but that was on a couple of worksttions)? Opinions? Question 2: is grub still supported, or is there something that *FORCES* you to use grub2?

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On 9.7.2014 22:00, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Lamar Owen wrote: On 07/09/2014 01:38 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: snip and (b) why you think an unpredictable daemon should be resurrected to continue its unpredictable behavior. I have had services that would reliably crash under certain reproduceable

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On 9.7.2014 22:46, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: On 9.7.2014 22:00, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Lamar Owen wrote: On 07/09/2014 01:38 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: snip On the other hand, restarting can be the *wrong* answer for some things. For example, a bunch of our sites use SiteMinder from CA*. I do

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, not systemd questions

On 9.7.2014 22:43, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: On 9.7.2014 20:35, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Question 1: has anyone used preupgrade (I used it with fc 17 - 19, and it pretty much appeared to work, but that was on a couple of worksttions)? Opinions? Question 2: is grub still supported, or is there

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On 8.7.2014 17:25, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: The problem firewalld tries to solve is that nowadays you often want to insert temporary rules that should only be active while a certain application is running. This collides a bit with the way iptables works. For

Re: [CentOS] Y2K not - Re: Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

On 8.7.2014 20:45, Les Mikesell wrote: On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Gilbert Sebenste seben...@weather.admin.niu.edu wrote: On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Robert Moskowitz wrote: and did the conversion for display to save another byte. Efficiency? We were desperate for every byte we could squeeze

Re: [CentOS-virt] CentOS 5.9 Xen DomU NFS Data Transfer to Dom0 kills network.

On 1.3.2013 16.40, Van wrote: 01.03.2013, 15:22, Van va...@yandex.ru: 26.02.2013, 20:01, Veli-Pekka Kestilä cen...@vpk.nu: Greetings, I have problem using Dom0 as NFS(v4)-server and DomU as client. When ever the client actually tries to copy data to nfs-server the virtual network (bridge

Re: [CentOS-virt] CentOS 5.9 Xen DomU NFS Data Transfer to Dom0 kills network.

On 1.3.2013 13.22, Van wrote: 26.02.2013, 20:01, Veli-Pekka Kestilä cen...@vpk.nu: I have problem using Dom0 as NFS(v4)-server and DomU as client. When ever the client actually tries to copy data to nfs-server the virtual network (bridge) between the two hosts completely freezes

[CentOS-virt] CentOS 5.9 Xen DomU NFS Data Transfer to Dom0 kills network.

Greetings, I have problem using Dom0 as NFS(v4)-server and DomU as client. When ever the client actually tries to copy data to nfs-server the virtual network (bridge) between the two hosts completely freezes and stops working. After this of course the client hangs waiting nfs-server to answer

Re: [CentOS] Python version fights.

On 24.6.2012 10:12, Gene Heskett wrote: On Sunday 24 June 2012 03:06:14 Chris Geldenhuis did opine: On 06/24/2012 02:47 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: Greets; This centos6.2 system seems to have python-2.6.6, but that is turning into a huge problem because I now have a backlog of about 40 packages

Re: [CentOS] openLDAP under CentOS-6

On 13.5.2012 4:18, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: I've been hard hit by the lack of CentOS-6 documentation mentioned in another thread. The openLDAP setup has been changed completely between CentOS 5 and 6, and I haven't been able to find any reasonably coherent instructions explaining how to

Re: [CentOS] boot-time NFS mount failures

On 20.4.2012 17:27, Tilman Schmidt wrote: Am 19.04.2012 19:30, schrieb Veli-Pekka Kestilä: On 19.4.2012 20:12, Tilman Schmidt wrote: backup:/home/backup/Oracle /backup_nfs nfs The last time this happened, I found a message on the console: mount: can't get address for backup So

Re: [CentOS] boot-time NFS mount failures

On 19.4.2012 20:12, Tilman Schmidt wrote: Hello List, backup:/home/backup/Oracle /backup_nfs nfs The last time this happened, I found a message on the console: mount: can't get address for backup So it seems that the failure was caused by the nameserver not being available yet.

Re: [CentOS] Problem with NFS4 and CentOs 5.8

On 10.4.2012 3:11, Rob Kampen wrote: On 04/10/2012 11:08 AM, Veli-Pekka Kestilä wrote: I hope someone could give me help with following problem on centos 5.8 kernel and nfs4. On server i have bind mounted directory shared to the client with following setup: mounted directory: /srv

[CentOS] Problem with NFS4 and CentOs 5.8

Hi, I hope someone could give me help with following problem on centos 5.8 kernel and nfs4. On server i have bind mounted directory shared to the client with following setup: mounted directory: /srv/nfs/imagetest on /exports/imagetest type none (rw,bind) /etc/exports file: /exports

[CentOS-virt] Strange problem with guest having more than 3 virtual interfaces.

-10-02 18:39:14 xend.XendDomainInfo 6728] INFO (XendDomainInfo:2528) Dev 51712 still active, looping... ---Error--- Greetings, Veli-Pekka Kestilä ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS] Xen guest not starting automatically

On 30.10.2010 15:46, Jussi Hirvi wrote: I have a xen system with four guest OS's, (see list below). When I reboot the host, other guests autostart normally, but mail2 does not. I have found no explanation for this. The host and all guests are CentOS 5.5. Have you checked relevant log files: -

Re: [CentOS] Xen guest not starting automatically

On 30.10.2010 19:58, Jussi Hirvi wrote: On 30.10.2010 19.29, Veli-Pekka Kestilä wrote: Have you checked relevant log files: - dmesg -/var/log/xen/* I tried to check them the last time this happened - there is a lot of stuff in the logs (which makes it harder to find what's relevant), and I

Re: [CentOS-virt] Xen domU default gateway missing/ARP table full

Ken Bass wrote: Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: Yes, the routing table is correct for my domUs. I have never noticed/seen GATEWAY getting ignored.. Maybe your netmask is wrong, so the GATEWAY IP is unreachable? Well, the netmask for the domU is 255.255.255.255 since the domU is

[CentOS-virt] Problem with CentOS 5.3 Xen and Windows Server 2008 HVM DomU

found that official XEN distribution (development version) has some fixes for it, but is there anything I could do on CentOS / windows quest to get the things working with more than one CPU. Greetings, Veli-Pekka Kestilä ___ CentOS-virt mailing list