-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Sorin Srbu
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 12:23 AM
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
Subject: Re: [CentOS] How fast?
If I may suggest Smoothwall for a firewall appliance...? This is a
Jerry Geis wrote:
I can do a yum update in my post kickstart (which is what I am doing
now actually).
However, I want to save network time at installations.
If I copy down the files from centos/5.3/updates/x86_64/RPMS and place
them in a directory local on my network, can I just rpm -U
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:17 PM
To: CentOS@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] 5.2 x86_64 DVD
Paul Fontenot said:
I've pulled this down with
Fabian posted:
apprecite if someone can help me of any site with examples on how to
mirror 2 centos servers so i one fails the other works perfect
Can you describe what services these servers will be providing?
Eucke
___
CentOS mailing list
I appreciate the input on this question from those who have made
suggestions. As the unofficial fix for %post does not change the
target build (as the anaconda rpms are untouched) I will move in that
direction. Those of you speculating will have to accept that there is
much I cannot share and
Is there a process for finding status updates to open bugs within
Centos? The particular bug I am talking about is 0002329
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2329. This was assigned on
01-20-2008 and, as far as I can tell, there's been no action other than
it being acknowledged. I've also
Lanny Marcus Wrote:
Does that mean that your Legal Department does not permit you to
upgrade your box, to get the latest packages,
issued for Security Stability reasons? 5.1, as you are well aware,
is not the latest and greatest.
That is correct. What they approve is based on the contents
Scott Silva wrote:
You might want to hint to your legal department that unpatched servers
sitting on the internet are just waiting to be hacked and exploited.
The fact that they make you sit with an older version without any
patches says that
they have no idea how much damage can be done, or
On 2008-12-22, 17:38 GMT, William L. Maltby wrote:
Well, having faith that things really _are_ working, one of his
messages in the log file about insufficient memory reminded me that
many laptops and less-expensive desktops have shared memory. I've
suggested that he check BIOS for various
9 matches
Mail list logo
